Jump to content
IGNORED

Gap between low pros and good + handicap amaterus?


luckyluke699
Note: This thread is 5187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

So just how big is the gap between lower level pros? In terms of golfing ability?

What got me thinking of this was seeing a +4 handicap on this board (MiniMo).

Please try to aim the answer at your general mid handicap hack like myself. I can't begin to pretend to know, but I will be slightly more specific for those of you who might be better placed to answer, or simply give your opinions. For example...

Pro: Jim Herman recently won a hundred and twenty six thousand dollars in the PGA Nationwide tour (link below).
http://www.pgatour.com/2010/tourname...cap/index.html

Amateur: Minimo (handicap +4)
http://thesandtrap.com/forum/members/13917-MiniMoe

From my limited research, in the UK the national amateur golfing team all maintain handicaps from +3 to +5, which smacks Minimo firmly in the middle of that sort of range. How big is the difference between MiniMo and over a hundred thousand dollars for winning a tourny? :P

Cobra - Speed Pro 8.5º X-Flex, Speed Pro 13º S-Flex | Mizuno - MP CLK 20º Hybrid, MP-67 DG S300 4-PW | Cleveland - CG10 52º,56º, 60º | Rife - Antigua Island 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


How big is the difference between MiniMo and over a hundred thousand dollars for winning a tourny? :P

I think the physical golf ability is probably similar. The differences between the average 100K winners and the good 'plus' handicap amateurs are mostly mental. Everyone hits a bad shot at times - Pros react better to bad shots.

Plus handicap amateurs play with their friends and in small tournaments for prizes. Tour pros play golf to feed their families in front of hundreds or thousands of strangers.

driver: FT-i tlcg 9.5˚ (Matrix Ozik XCONN Stiff)
4 wood: G10 (ProLaunch Red FW stiff)
3 -PW: :Titleist: 695 mb (Rifle flighted 6.0)
wedges:, 52˚, 56˚, 60˚
putter: Studio Select Newport 1.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What got me thinking about this was seeing the classic Tiger vs Average Jo comparison. Of course Tiger's better!

I mean I'm sure there'd be very few people here who wouldn't want to earn a hundred grand a year playing golf for a living instead of doing their day job!

Cobra - Speed Pro 8.5º X-Flex, Speed Pro 13º S-Flex | Mizuno - MP CLK 20º Hybrid, MP-67 DG S300 4-PW | Cleveland - CG10 52º,56º, 60º | Rife - Antigua Island 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would guess the guy that just barley keeps his card on tour played to a +3 or 4 for that season. The difference between the tour guy and a ametuer plus player is probably mental endurance and putting. They are probably similar ball strikers in terms of skill.
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball
Link to comment
Share on other sites


MiniMoe? No proof he's a +4. He's said he hits 17/18 greens in regulation on average . Heh.

PGA Tour players who just keep their card are about a +5, but remember the "reward for excellence" starts to kick in, too. The gap between a +2 and a 2 is bigger than the one between a 2 and a 6. And, in terms of skill, it's about 100x bigger.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

MiniMoe? No proof he's a +4. He's said he hits 17/18 greens in regulation

Oh I agree entirely, there's no proof at all that he actually is a +4. That's the beautiful anonymity of the internet. The point is that there's +4s and +5s out there who aren't pro.

If I were that good I'd certainly be wanting to consider trying to close the gap down and at least think about playing full time! A man can dream though haha!

Cobra - Speed Pro 8.5º X-Flex, Speed Pro 13º S-Flex | Mizuno - MP CLK 20º Hybrid, MP-67 DG S300 4-PW | Cleveland - CG10 52º,56º, 60º | Rife - Antigua Island 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


MiniMoe? No proof he's a +4. He's said he hits 17/18 greens in regulation

How do we know your the real Butch Harmon? lol

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would also think playing to a +4 at your local course with friends is a whole lot different than playing to a +4 on a pro tour. Constant pressure can do funny things to people. Not to mention the distance and conditions the pro courses are played at.

Kevin

-------
In the Bag
Driver: G15 9.0*3 & 5 Wood: BurnerHybrid: Pro Gold 20*; 23*Irons: MP-58 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey Spin Milled 52*8; 56*14Putter: Newport 2.0 33"Balls: NXT

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think Tiger was estimated to have a +8 handicap a few years back.That should give you a rough idea.

Although, as mentioned, the courses the pro's play are a far cry from what most amateurs would be used to.If Tiger was playing the same courses as those guys you could probably add a few onto that handicap.
A great shot is when you go for it and pull it off. A smart shot is when you don't have the guts to try it. ~ Phil Mickelson.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites


. . . there's +4s and +5s out there who aren't pro. . .

In every professional sport there are lot of guys who don't quite make the final cuts. There are guys a step or two below that who will never make it. It doesn't matter whether it's a slight lack of talent, work ethic, commitment, or even just plain good fortune (no lucky breaks), they'll never quite make it to the show. And when we play against them on the weekend, we'll get our asses to us, making us realize how much we truly suck.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think Tiger was estimated to have a +8 handicap a few years back.That should give you a rough idea.

I think that Tiger's Isleworth handicap is closer to +12.

Someone did an analysis years back of what a good touring pro's handicap might be after a year of tournament play and it was hovering around the +8 mark. As for the idea that $100,000 seemed to be a wonderful thing, I would think that after entry fees and travel expenses, that player might not be in the balck, finacially. If you really want to know how good these guys are, go to a tournament and watch them on the practice tee for five minutes. You will work out the difference between them and the average low marker immediately.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


One difference that I have seen brought up before is that the pro's game transfers anywhere. It is easier to maintain a handicap playing at the same few courses (not a knock on anyone, just how it is) than it is to play new courses each and every week under the toughest of conditions and pressure.

I played in a pro am once with a pro who is now top 25 in the world. He walked the course on Monday when he got into town, played a practice round on Tuesday, then the pro-am on Wednesday. He shot 67 in the pro-am having played the course only once. He was pretty much goofing off and having fun with us. I know a couple guys who are + handicaps at the course and they only shoot 67 on their best days. Another time I saw in the paper that lower level tour pro shot a 65 at a pro-am at a course that wasnt' even the tournament course. He had never played there before, and shot a 65.

I guess my point is, the tour pros know how to play anywhere.

I will judge my rounds much more by the quality of my best shots than the acceptability of my worse ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
I think that Tiger's Isleworth handicap is closer to +12.

I heard the same thing, except that's a course handicap, not an index.

Someone did an analysis years back of what a good touring pro's handicap might be after a year of tournament play and it was hovering around the +8 mark.

Nah.

http://thesandtrap.com/the_numbers_g...es_of_the_pros

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One difference that I have seen brought up before is that the pro's game transfers anywhere. It is easier to maintain a handicap playing at the same few courses (not a knock on anyone, just how it is) than it is to play new courses each and every week under the toughest of conditions and pressure.

I think you nailed it, the ability to adjust quickly, mental toughness to shrug off mistakes or bad breaks, the personality to enjoy or at least the comptetiveness to really have to, not want to do something like this. I know myself that even with their level of ability, and I know I would have been willing to do the work, but I know I would not have had the frustration tolerance to keep after it year after year. Except for the cream most of the PGA players struggle week to week and make all their money in a 4 to six week period when the get hot. Twenty-twenty five weeks and you struggle twenty of them, plus the travel. I know the perks are great but compared to a Wall street CEO PGA golfers are the more deserving of what they earn.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Biggest difference between a guy that makes it on the tour and a guy watching the tour on TV is putting. Knocking it close mean nothing if you can't make the putt.... UNDER PRESSURE . If you look at tour stats, the guy that makes the most putts from inside 12 feet usually wins. Course management is plays a huge roll, but that seems a bit obvious.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think that the difference between low pros and + handicap amateurs is like 5 or 6 meters, haha, what I really meant is that the difference is in putting. You can have a good day hit a lot of GIR's but if you don't 1-putt you will not lower your score or doing up-and-downs, IMHO that's the difference, they sink putts from everywhere.

About the courses they play, yes they are tough, but I have a question, since I haven't met a touring pro... at some time they were amateurs not used to that type of courses, so they have to take the skills to play on them... they didn't born being pros, so if you practice 7-8 hours a day on your game with a coach you would be able to play almost everywhere and that's what they do, right?

Cheers!

Driver: 905R 9.5° (UST Proforce V2 Stiff) | Fairway: 906F2 15° (UST Proforce V2 Stiff) | Hybrid: 585.H 21° (S300) | Irons: AP2 4-PW (Project X 6.0) | Wedges: Vokey Design 52.08, 56.11 & 60.11  | Putter: Studio Select Newport 2 

www.flickr.com/avm_photo

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think the difference is in their bad days and consistency. When pros don't have their swing, they can still grind out a 72-74 (mostly credited to short game skill). There is a player on our local am-tour that played professionally for awhile. He shoots in the 60's pretty much evertime he steps on the course, but he will still have a bad day of 75-78 every 3 tournaments or so. You can still go low and recover from a 2 over round, but 6 over is pretty much out of it no matter where you are playing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...