Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5652 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am getting frustrated.

I am 2-3° upright, and every modern fairway wood has a flat sole, and a flat lie. All I can hope to do is hit them on the toe, or thin them. No one will bend a fairway wood, and they never quite feel right. I can feel the toe hit the ground, and I don't like it. At this point, it may be mental.

I'm desperate to find a solution. I have heard some hybrids can be bent upright. I also have an Adams Insight XTD A3 15° Hybrid Fairway wood, which is OK, but still a little toe down. The ball marks on the face have a slight diagonal pitch (low on the toe, high on the center), just like my irons and wedges before they were fit. When I changed to fitted irons and wedges, the marks appeared on the center of the face, no longer at a diagonal, and the dirt lines made after each swing were parallel to the grooves.

What can I do? What do people who are upright do for their woods? I'm already weak with fairway woods, so not having them fitted is really killing me. Which hybrids can be bent, and which ones can't?

Posted
I've never been fitted for fairway woods, but there are touring pros who have insanely upright lie angles. I read somewhere that Stewart Cink has irons that are like 4° upright or something. So there's got to be a way to get fairway woods.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am a 3* upright and have no problem hitting a fairway wood...sometimes it's not the tool but the....

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted
You can bend fairway woods that have a longer hosel, I know one particular manufacturer that makes woods for this exact purpose, bendable 8 degrees.

Posted
Genberally, there should be no problem, even if your Irons are more upright. Mine 2.25* more upright, and my woods are fine. I've never heard of having woods fitted for anything but shaft flex.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted
  Gioguy21 said:
I am a 3* upright and have no problem hitting a fairway wood...sometimes it's not the tool but the....

Good for you.

  dkglf said:
You can bend fairway woods that have a longer hosel, I know one particular manufacturer that makes woods for this exact purpose, bendable 8 degrees.

I looked it up, and it's KZG and Sonartec who both offer bendable hosels. Sounds interesting. I'm seeing more and more customization these days, and now it seems several manufacturers are making bendable hybrids.

I'll have to check them out. I've always had problems with fairway woods. I usually try to carry a 2 iron, and I also had a 1 iron, but it broke. I can hit fairway woods ok most days, but on bad days, it just feels hopeless. Also, it's really bad from uneven lies.

Posted
I am getting frustrated.

I looked online at some of the mfgrs, and couldn't find a solution for you. Several companies all had 57* lie angle and 43" shaft for 3W | 58* and 42.4" for 4W - spooky!

You might look at Nike VR fairway woods. Had 58* and 43" 3W, and the sole looked a bit more rounded than some. Titleist has lower lie angle, BUT has multirelief sole , which means sole angles upward going back from bottom of clubface, lessening chance of clubhead drag on ground. Have no idea if this would help you or not. Years ago, Ping may have had variable lie angles in its second-wave I3 drivers and FW woods. But, I can't remember for sure. You might e-mail a couple of the manufacturers, tell them your situation, and see what they say. I have gotten excellent, thorough responses from the big guys on a couple of different questions I sent them.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  WUTiger said:
I looked online at some of the mfgrs, and couldn't find a solution for you. Several companies all had 57* lie angle and 43" shaft for 3W | 58* and 42.4" for 4W - spooky!

Yes, this is another situation where the big golf companies feel that one size fits all. It's made worse because I play shorter woods than most people. My driver is 44", and my FWs are cut down an inch. This makes them play even flatter. I hate how modern clubs are being made so damn long. For most people, adding 1" to their woods gives them about 2-4 yards more distance, but about 10 yards more side to side. That's crazy. If Tiger Woods can barely keep his 44.5" driver in play, what hope do I have of keeping a 46.5" driver in play?


Posted
For most people, adding 1" to their woods gives them about 2-4 yards more distance, but about 10 yards more side to side. ?

Out of curiosity, where did you get those numbers from?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  jamo said:
Out of curiosity, where did you get those numbers from?

Tom Wishon published the specs of different driver shaft lengths. Several others have replicated the tests. The 10 yards side to side is my own addition, it's at least true for me.


Posted
Yes, this is another situation where the big golf companies feel that one size fits all. ...

Check out these guys. They have a custom club design company, and have a blog where golfers can recommend specs for the "next generation" of clubs. (Don't know if they will listen or not, but might be worth a look. Maybe a custom hosel angle for you?)

http://www.hirekogolf.com/ Check out H's Dynacraft ICT FW with adjustable lie angles in hosel:
  None said:
Now with the interchangeable Prophet ICT 8-position adapter each hosel insertion provides differing lie angles ranging from 2º upright to 2º flat...

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't agree that 1 inch of length adds 10 yards of left/right (at least not for everyone), but I definitely agree that manufacturers should make woods with adjustable lie angles. I wish my woods could be set about 1-1.5 degrees more upright.

As far as length goes, when I choke up on my r9 460 TP an inch, I lose about 10 yards, so I don't think 2-4 yards is right either, at least for everyone. And my driver is 46-ish inches and I know I'm more accurate with that than I am with some other shorter drivers I've played. It's more of an individual thing, and it's easier for people to cut off length if they can't control it than it is to add it if they want to hit it farther.

What's in my Sun Mountain C-130 bag:

Driver - Taylormade Superfast 2.0 TP 10.5
3 Wood - Taylormade Burner 15* REAX
Hybrid - Adams Idea Pro 18* GD YSQ-HL

Irons - Callaway X-18 4-PW

GW - Cleveland 588 51*

SW - Cleveland CG 12 56*

LW - Cleveland CG15 60*

Putter - Cameron Studio Style Newport 2

Bushnell Medalist rangefinder


Posted
  WUTiger said:
Check out these guys. They have a custom club design company, and have a blog where golfers can recommend specs for the "next generation" of clubs. (Don't know if they will listen or not, but might be worth a look. Maybe a custom hosel angle for you?)

Thanks. I think those are the ones. I have a couple Dynacraft clubs, and I love them. I have two wedges that I use to hit tennis balls for my dogs, and a very, very nice Dynacraft milled putter. I'm very, very interested, and the price is right too.


Note: This thread is 5652 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • All great info. Thanks for the reply. 
    • Yea, it's more complicated than your high school projectile motion equations.  I am thinking it could increase under certain conditions. A gust of wind blowing in the same direction as the spin, causing more high and low pressure on the ball in a certain way that it increases the spin?  It has zero vertical velocity at its apex. So, it is all velocity caused by gravity for the vertical component.  Yea, landing angle is a big thing.  It is parabolic. Your apex is 90 yards in the air. A 30-yard elevated green is 1/3rd that height. At the apex, your vertical descent angle is zero, it should be horizontal. So, you are going from zero theta to let's say 45 degrees. Even if it was linear, let's say you're landing angle is close to 30 degrees. That is less than a driver and probably is significant.  Yea, it depends on how you hit it. Especially for downhill shots. If you hit a flighted shot, it might react more like a normal shot because of the lower launch and lower apex relative to your position. Versus a normal shot might come in at like 70 degrees, instead of 45 degrees.       
    • Wordle 1,553 3/6 ⬜🟨🟨🟨🟨 ⬜🟨🟩🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Spin will decay slightly over time, but not by a lot. The horizontal portion of the velocity will also decay due to air resistance. The vertical component will be increasing since the ball is accelerating due to gravity (albeit that the spin is creating lift, which will counteract that some). Neither of those has much of an impact of how the ball will react. The biggest difference is the vertical land angle. The angle theta prime (not sure how to show that on here) will be shallower than theta. That means the ball will stop faster at theta than at theta prime. The other thing is because there is still a horizontal component to the velocity, it will carry less far at theta prime than at theta.  The effects of those two things work in opposite directions. Which one "wins" will depend on ground conditions, ball flight, spin, any necessary carry distances, etc. Fortunately the margins are fairly small so you can wing it with enough experience. The calculation of the carry distance change is what your range finder estimates when you have slope turned on.
    • So, I was looking at this image and wondered what the best way is to play your approach to an elevated green versus a lowered green. Is the spin and velocity profile at θ' much different than at θ? I don't know the physics of it but to my wee brain, it would seem that at θ' the spin would be higher but velocity lower. At θ the spin would seem to be lower but velocity higher since it has more time to fall from its peak where it would be zero. Even the image below is off visually since we know the arc of the ball flight isn't consistent throughout.    It's okay if you tell me I'm overthinking this. 😂  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.