Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5596 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I don't see much chatter about these clubs on the board so figured I'd put up this little review for anyone in the used driver market.

Had a little cash to burn so I took a long lunch today and hit the local shops. I wasn't looking for anything in particular. Second shop is attached to a driving range so I like to shop there as I'm able to do "research" on clubs, and back to back comparisons. It's also slightly downhill, so I can verify carry distances when hitting driver.

They had a MX 700 in the rack, only the second one I've seen in used racks. I was interested due to the review on this site so I grabbed my 9015D as a "control", and took it for a spin. First of all, it's a huge headed driver, similar in shape to the '07 Burner. The shaft feels a bit week to flex, but not bad. Took a bit to get accustomed to the club, as it's a higher swingweight then my 9015/Saga combo. Once I got it figured out I was very surprised by the distance I was getting. There is a low barb wire type fence at the end of the range, somewhere behind the 250 signs. Whether or not it's an accurate distance doesn't matter, it's my frame of reference. Well struck shots will fall 10yds short of the fence for me, if I hammer one I will get it within 5yds. Today, I flew it three times with the MX 700, I can't recall every flying it before and I've hit every driver available at that range.

Ball flight is mid/high but never ballooned for me. The shaft is a bit weak, as stated, so a smoother swing is needed I found. Otherwise, it's point and shoot. As expected, it's quite forgiving. It has the aluminum bat sound that is similar to a Hibore XL, and it does not have particularly good feel between well struck and mediocre shots. But, I will accept those drawbacks for the straight ball flight and huge carry I was seeing.

Driver: i15 8* UST Axivcore Red 69S
3w: CB1 15* Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum 75s
5w: G10 18.5* UST V2 HL
3h: HiFli CLK 20* UST V2 Hybrid
4h: 3DX 23* UST V2 Hybrid5i-pw: MX-23 TT Dynalite Gold S300GW/SW: RAC 52*and 56*Putter: SabertoothBag: KingPin


Posted
hope it doesnt honey moon out on you.

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted
I'm definitely interested in one of these. Having used an R5 for the past 5+ years, I'm looking for an upgrade. It's between the MX700 and the Burner 2009 at this point. Gotta hit em both I suppose.

Posted
The MX-700 is a great driver. If I hadnt won an R9 last year, Id probably be gaming an MX-700 right now.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
  TitleistWI said:
The MX-700 is a great driver. If I hadnt won an R9 last year, Id probably be gaming an MX-700 right now.

Can i ask why ur name is TitleistWI when you mostly have mizuno clubs


Posted
Went and hit both the MX700 and the Burner 09 and ultimately went with the Burner. There just was something weird about the MX that I can't put my finger on. It was almost too muted when it came to feel compared to the Burner. I'm a TM guy anyway, so it could be a mental bias, but I was definitely hitting a little further with the Burner as well. The MX was nice, don't get me wrong, but all things being equal (price), the Burner seemed like a better fit for me.

And ET---maybe TitleistWI had titleist clubs previously...you can't change your username every time you get a new set of clubs, can you? :)

Posted
I tried the MX-700 and did not like it at all. I tried the stock stiff and it did not work for me. Maybe another shaft would have been better? But was not impressed. My favorite was the R9.

Posted
sorry, but I'm not impressed, in fact "The Hammer" boasts of the same distance and straighter flight as this driver and we all know what a piece of

I'm down with the Hammer. I want a lefty one so I can practice my left handed recoveries in the trees!


Posted
I have the MX-700 hybrid an 3-wood. I absolutely love the 3-wood, especially the shaft. There is something about it that just feels awesome when swinging. Might be the fact that the shaft his thicker than my driver and 5-wood, but all of them are stiff. The 3-wood is my favourite club in the bag, but I haven't tried the driver.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I have the 2 hybrid MX 700. It is alright, but I would like to replace it.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  J_Bone said:
I tried the MX-700 and did not like it at all. I tried the stock stiff and it did not work for me. Maybe another shaft would have been better? But was not impressed. My favorite was the R9.

Could be. The shaft has a lot to do with the feel and performance of a club. Ive talked to a lot of people who werent impressed with the R9, they claimed its a steam backwards for TM in terms of distance.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted
Hit the course with the MX 700 today, with mixed results. My swing sucked, so I hit 4/14 FWY. That said, three were very close to being on and I had easy shots to the green. Also, two of them were actually hit "too" well, and blew through the fairway on doglegs. I can't say it's a magic combo as it won't fix my over the top move, but it does hammer the ball when I put a decent swing together. It will definitely stay in the rotation.

Driver: i15 8* UST Axivcore Red 69S
3w: CB1 15* Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum 75s
5w: G10 18.5* UST V2 HL
3h: HiFli CLK 20* UST V2 Hybrid
4h: 3DX 23* UST V2 Hybrid5i-pw: MX-23 TT Dynalite Gold S300GW/SW: RAC 52*and 56*Putter: SabertoothBag: KingPin


Note: This thread is 5596 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Short gym set at lunch;  bench press, four sets of five, 180 lbs.   Did a few of the medicine ball / driver drill too while I was at it. 
    • I took a look at a 6,300 yard fairly easy course and it was 99% distance and then a 6,800 yard more challenging course and it was 97% distance. Do you have an example of one less that 95% or 90%? Maybe I am misunderstanding something. (6,310/220) + 40.9 = 69.6. Course rating is 70.0 with a 120 slope. Less than 1% other factors? (6,804/220) + 40.9 = 71.8. Course rating is 74.0 with a 140 slope. About 3% other factors? These are more extreme: (4,698/220) + 40.9 = 62.3. Course rating is 62.7 with a slope of 101.  (7,569/220) + 40.9 = 75.3. Course rating is 77.4 with a slope of 155. So long hard courses are 97% length and short easy courses are 99% length in these examples. I am new to this so maybe I am all wet.  
    • I think in fairness what he means is Tommy's chances to win PGA Tour events are fairly similar in number to Rory's chances to win the Masters. I don't think he's remotely saying that Tommy and Rory are in the same league. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I took the comment as meaning if he keeps giving himself chances to win then eventually he will win one. Rory had a thing in his head about the Masters and won anyway. Tommy has a thing in his head about PGA Tour events. They do seem fairly analogous to me.
    • Don't get me wrong, I like TF from a nice-guy-next-door perspective but I was surprised at the nerves he showed on the 2nd putt on 17th. That was unmistakably a stroke of a player who had already submitted to the writing on the wall. Honestly I would not expect that out of a veteran tour player. I would have liked to continue rooting for him but gotta see a bit more fight from him. Rory could be reasonably accused of being a head case but he is a fighter. Big difference.
    • Um no. Rory Wins PGA Tour 29, EU 19, Majors 5, FedEx Cup 3 Tommy PGA Tour 0, EU 7, Majors 0, FedEx 0 He may win eventually, but he’s not in the same league as Rory.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...