Jump to content
IGNORED

Trip to San Francisco: Half Moon Bay or Harding Park?


Note: This thread is 4132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I've been browsing thru the past threads mentioning Bay Area courses as I approach a trip to SF next month. My wife has a conference there so I'll be in town with little to do during at least 3 of the 6 days I'm in town. I'll be staying in the area of the Moscone Convention center downtown and will be without a car. One of my golf buddies has mentioned Half Moon Bay and I've read about Harding Park (as well as hearing about it during the President's Cup).

Harding Park is approx. $135 during the week for a nonresident and Half Moon Bay is $160. Half Moon Bay is further being out of the City so that may play a factor ... does anyone have any other suggestions for what will likely end up being one round of golf (two at best) while there? Thanks a lot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


i've played both, and would pick Half Moon Bay easily. Even if you're having a cr*ppy day, you've still got stunning views of the ocean. And even the drive there and back from downtown on I-280 is spectacular. Harding is nice, but agree with pace of play...took me nearly 6 hours on a weekday a few years ago--bring a book, you may have lots of waiting. One other local course is Presidio -- i remember liking the layout, but again a near 6-hour round; i'm guessing that's the norm for SF public courses.

I'd recommend renting a car though (no matter which course(s) you play), as it will be cheaper probably than cab fare (and my cabbie to Harding Park didn't even know where it was...). There's a Thrifty on O'Farrell St near Union Square where i always rent from. If you're playing the day before departure, it may save you money to rent the car, park in a garage overnight (even though they're $$), and then drive to the airport & return it there as opposed to taking a taxi.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
If you decide to play an extra round, there's an additional course at Half Moon Bay - the Old Course. Never played it though - looks like more of an inland course.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
It's been awhile since I played HMB, but the last 2 holes, with the ocean views to the left I think and in front of you? A big hotel, a big prosaic, banal hotel building.

Argh! Nothing to do with the course layout, but spoils the whole effect.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's been awhile since I played HMB, but the last 2 holes, with the ocean views to the left I think and in front of you? A big hotel, a big prosaic, banal hotel building. Argh! Nothing to do with the course layout, but spoils the whole effect.

The Old Course at HMB mostly is surrounded by residential areas. I've also read some like it better than the Ocean (i've not played it), but as a tourist playing vacation golf i'd still recommend the Ocean. You don't get views like that at your home course unless you live at Pebble Beach. And I don't find the hotel banal at all -- it's the Ritz Carlton, not an Econolodge, and i think it looks quite nice as a backdrop to 18 green. I think they've filmed some movies there, the last i recall being the 3rd installment of the American Pie series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The nicest hole of both courses is the 18th of the old course(view wise).Standing on an elevated tee box,ocean to your right and looking towards the hotel.Beautiful.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just drive the extra 120 miles and play at Pebble, Spyglass, Spanish Bay . . .

But Half Moon Bay for sure - of the two.

Eat at the Slanted Door in SF. Best Vietnamese/Asian fusion restaurant EVER.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Harding Park is worth playing at least once, check ahead of the condition of the greens and fairways. #7 was recently shortened because the fairways was too wet and did not drain properly. Lincoln golf course has the best views of the Golden Gate Bridge on holes 16 & 17, but the course is not always in great shape but relatively inexpense to play.

My pick would be to try to get on the Olympic Club and play the Lake course, where they will play the US Open in 2012. Its private so you need connection to get on, so you need to make arrangements ahead of time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

Fellas. Thx so much for the input. I was genuinely on the fence as to whether I should even bring my clubs at all on this trip. I have to purchase a travel bag and then worry about whether a couple rotten apple baggage employees will lose, break or steal my clubs to or from SFO, then I have to lug the extra bag to & from the hotel and also get transportation to the course.

After thinking about it all, I'll prolly just pay for a rental car for two days of my trip and play Half Moon Bay one day and then one of the San Francisco courses on the 2nd day although I read a review about Harding Park and the Presidio courses being so logjammed that rounds take SIX HOURS! If that's the case, I'll look for one other coastal course. Overall, I'm hyped to be playing golf while on vacation (a 1st for me) so nothing will ruin it for me. One final x-factor will be that I'll be making my tee times as an individual so hopefully I get paired with some cool people to play with
Just drive the extra 120 miles and play at Pebble, Spyglass, Spanish Bay . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you want to play Half Moon Bay, you should join the e-club. They send out emails with sizable discounts. I just played on the weekend for $100 with the benefit of the e-club. I think you can sign up on their website. If you plan to play there I strongly suggest you join. I really think you can't go wrong with any of the 3 courses you are choosing from. Harding is a great course. The shooting range can be annoying, but it is wonderfully designed golf course and usually in excellent shape. At HMB, Ocean is a fun track that is very open and more of a links style, and the Old course has one of the best finishing holes in the Bay Area. I would play any of the 3 and I think you will be happy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Eat at the Slanted Door in SF. Best Vietnamese/Asian fusion restaurant EVER.

That just sounds wrong...bad choice of words for an Asian restaurant...IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...
**Update** I just returned from my trip to SF. I played the Ocean Course at Half Moon Bay on Wednesday and it was a beautiful day. 64 degrees and NO wind. I usually play from the whites where I live but I was paired with 2 guys who were about 7 and 9 handicaps respectively and they played from the blues. Playing these tees proved to be of no consequence as the blues are only 300-400 yards longer.

As others have said, this course is an aesthetic marvel, but it isn't particularly long - 6400 from the blues - though there were a couple 430 yd par 4's and I bogeyed one of them. The greens were very very fast and many of them require you to play a lot of break which threw my playing partners off. The course will punish you a little for inaccurate tee shots but only a little. The rough wasn't long at all and the fairway bunkers still allowed you to shoot for the green if you were in them. The only difficult areas I can remember is that there are several smallish greens and the larger ones were very undulating. There was no wind so I know my round would've been alot more difficult had there at least been a few gusts here and there.

The end result was that I tied my best career round ever: 95. I didn't hit more than a couple fairways and only had 2 or 3 GIR so I was very proud of myself with that score. I began this year working on 3 things in particular: driving off the tee so I didn't take as many penalties for OB/lost balls, putting and chipping. With only a couple GIR/s my chipping really saved me as I only had 2 or 3 three-putts and a couple one-putts. Lastly, I one-putted the 18th with a 20 footer to end my round on a high note. Thanks for the recommendations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Let us know how it goes. 
    • Cost and time.   THanks..have to give it a try..just trying to get back into my set without investing $$ for the time being..TY!
    • From yesterday's round. Approach to the green was a little long, and my ball was sitting on the back fringe. Large pile of coyote shit between the hole and my ball. The putt was right to left breaking so luckily my line was maybe 2-3 feet to the right of the turd, and there wasn't much chance of rolling into it, unless I hit a terribly offline putt, or got unlucky with a deflection off a bump in the fringe (which is quite beat up where my ball came to rest).
    • You're not supposed to change your vote. 😛 The problem with that is that the "shotgun pattern" doesn't account for the putts that go in. Yes, the distributions of both get larger. Bobby should have studied probability more. A putt going toward the hole, if mis-directed, can go left or right. Both result in a miss. A putt that is missing the hole, if mis-directed, can go left or right. One may result in a make, the other is still a miss. Bumps (if large enough to deflect the ball a little over an inch or so, and if close enough to the hole for a miss to become a make) have a negative outcome 100% of the time when the ball is going in, and a positive outcome 50% of the time when the ball is going to miss. Or to put it in absolute terms, every bump on a ball that would be going in the middle has a negative outcome - it steers the ball farther away from the center of the hole, and every bump that steers the ball on a putt that's missing has a 50% chance of "helping" by steering it in the right direction. Nope. You can join Bobby Jones in the statistics/probability class. 🙂 These bumps aren't knocking the ball feet farther away. They're not tees randomly stuck in the ground. They're just bumps on a putting green. That's the kind of road you can lead yourself down when you don't just look at it logically. 😄 To the majority of you getting this one wrong… Let's make an extreme example. You have one putter that makes 80% of his putts, and another that makes 50%. The gap is 30% or 0.3 strokes (1.2 versus 1.5). You introduce enough randomness that 25% of the putts that were going to go in miss and 5% of the putts that were going to miss go in. The gap is now: 0.8 * .75 + 0.2 * .05 = 61%. 0.5 * .75 + 0.5 * .05 = 40% What was a 30% gap is now a 19% gap. The gap narrows. The good putter is punished, even though he's punished at the same "rates" as the bad putter, at a higher "value" because he hits more putts that would have gone in, while the bad putter hits more putts that could potentially only be directed in. To put it another way, there's a larger possible "negative" adjustment or change for the good putter and a larger possible "positive" adjustment or change for the bad putter. This is true in pretty much* all cases: the more luck plays a role, the less skill plays a role. * I'm a "never say never or always" kinda guy. I can't think of a time when an increase in randomness or luck also increases or at least doesn't reduce skill, but again… see the first sentence here in this asterisk.
    • Why? On 40 foot putts, they both don’t have much of a chance.  It’s the putts inside 15 feet that have the highest Separation Value.  So if a great putter makes 5 of 10 putts at 8 feet (tour average) on tour greens and he missed 1 or 2 more on crappy greens, his percentage changes more. The bad putter is missing more of those anyway, even on good greens.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AmirReza
      AmirReza
      (34 years old)
    2. BushwoodCC
      BushwoodCC
      (55 years old)
    3. cozelos
      cozelos
      (36 years old)
    4. RollingStoppie
      RollingStoppie
      (52 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...