Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

By failing to find a pass for Woods, PGA Tour has sabotaged its final event


Note: This thread is 5637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Didn't the USGA just recently change a rule to inhibit the bomb and gouge brigade?

That would be a strategic decision of this august regulatory body with respect to a particular type or class of player, NOT an action designed to target a particular individual - as our joke-of-a-journalist has suggested in the OP.

Chalk and cheese ..... apples and oranges ...... birdies and bogies

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Didn't the USGA just recently change a rule to inhibit the bomb and gouge brigade?

Yep... and all they were doing there is trying to finish what they were prevented from doing 20 years earlier by Solheim. The bomb and gouge would never have come into being were it not for that suit. Blame Ping for that, not the USGA.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No, I certainly don't agree. That's possibly the most pathetic, idiotic article I've read (almost) anywhere in the sporting Press this year.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
That wasn't preventing any particular player from having an edge. It affected the entire field equally. It amounted to nothing more than making a pointed suggestion that they play the course as designed. Had they truly been as evil as you mistakenly portray them to be, they would have made the short cut OB instead and guaranteed that it wouldn't be played that way.

Let me see........ Mr Dey was furious at Hinkle because and was red in the face from the press attention from Hinkle being able to reach a par 5 that almost nobody in the field could. A tree gets planted overnight? Nahhhhh....... your right........ The USGA was making it fair for everyone.


Posted
Of course it makes it less interesting for the casual fan & for the tv networks.

Whatever. Let the casual fan change channels to something else. I'm sure they can find a thrilling 13-9 football game somewhere.

Posted
Yep... and all they were doing there is trying to finish what they were prevented from doing 20 years earlier by Solheim. The bomb and gouge would never have come into being were it not for that suit. Blame Ping for that, not the USGA.

So, were PING's wedges considered conforming when they were originally introduced?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
So, were PING's wedges considered conforming when they were originally introduced?

Of course they were, because nobody had known or realized that such a change would have such a dramatic effect on the way the game was played. As soon as it was apparent, the USGA tried to cut it off before it got out of hand, but Solheim would have none of it, sought legal relief, and it did get out of hand. Now most of the manufacturers must have reailze that a mistake was made which dimished the skill requirement for players at the top of the game, or they would have fought harder to block the USGA's action again this time.

The only people I really see crying about it are a few forum dwelling amateurs who act like their civil rights have been revoked. Most of them couldn't tell what sort of grooves their wedges have just by playing them, but they've still decided that they are personally targeted for abuse. And since the rule doesn't affect them for a few more years anyway, I have never been able to figure out why these discussions begin in the first place.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Of course they were, because nobody had known or realized that such a change would have such a dramatic effect on the way the game was played. As soon as it was apparent, the USGA tried to cut it off before it got out of hand, but Solheim would have none of it, sought legal relief, and it did get out of hand. Now most of the manufacturers must have reailze that a mistake was made which dimished the skill requirement for players at the top of the game, or they would have fought harder to block the USGA's action again this time.

I've never played square grooves, and don't play in tournaments anyway, so the issue didn't resonate with me. Then again, I've never played with a mid-capper who could spin the ball like an internet mid-capper either.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

It's not even like Woods has an inspirational story and he struggled all year long to do his best. Rather, he displayed the ethical standards of a prostitute and showed up for about a dozen tournaments all year. He deserves to be let in... why?

Professional golf stands apart because you earn what you get, there are no free rides. The playoffs are all about a playoff of the best performers at the moment, not of the moment and last year.
Writing something controversial (or stupid) media folk famous. It's their job to make Joe Average talk about their articles... Seems to be working once again.

I think this hits the nail on the head. I've seen it happen with other articles in other fields: something borderline controversial occurs so inflamitory articles are written to plant thoughts and generate heated discussion.

The opening paragraph of the article is likely wrong. I sincerely doubt any of the PGA official were trying to think of a way to let Woods in. I bet that anyone who even brought it up would have gotten blank stares. Making an unpresidented excemption shouldn't even be considered.
I've never played square grooves, and don't play in tournaments anyway, so the issue didn't resonate with me. Then again, I've never played with a mid-capper who could spin the ball like an internet mid-capper either.

I'm surprised that you haven't figured out that only the really, really good mid-cappers post on Internet bulletin boards. If only their collective course management was better.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted
That's the whole beauty of a true playoff. Play well and you advance. Mess up and you go home. Tiger didn't make the cut and his year ended early. To suggest that the rules be changed to allow him into the playoff is beyond foolishness and undermines the playoff process. Personally I found the championship exciting and compelling - not knowing until the final hole who would win the tournament and the big bonus. And as others have suggested - golf's demographics aren't geared toward a casual viewer. So no, I don't think the PGA has screwed themselves at all.

Posted
I'm not a big fan of the playoffs, but I do have to admit that it was a nail biter for the last 45 minutes. Good show!

Note: This thread is 5637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Are these course getting easier? are the players getting better? should we not worry about tournaments that used to produce single digit winners are now producing course records year after year.  I am not talking roll back I am just curious why scores are so much lower than five to ten years ago. 
    • I've posted plenty of positive things about Tiger over the years. I just like to play fair.  But if you want to see me praise TW some more here you go: 12 wins by 7 shots or more - Jack had 4 3 separate win streaks of 5 or more in a row - Jack won 3 in a row once It took Jack 172 more events and 9 extra years to reach Tiger's 71 wins by 2009 TW is the only player since 1900 to win a major by double digits and he did it twice 30% peak win rate is even higher than the previous record holder Ben Hogan (25%) 11 time PGA Tour Player of the year - Jack had 5 12 times lead the Tour in wins - Jack 6 10 times money list leader - Jack 8 Jack officially has 73 wins, but 2 of them are team wins with Arnie. You could argue he should be listed with 71 and I wouldn't disagree. 
    • I mean that's clearly an opinion.  The funny thing is I never even attacked Tiger, I just pointed out that the other poster had a point when he mentioned that Jack had a longer career. Tiger basically had 5 years when he could have been winning more tournaments if not for his injuries. 2010-2011 and then again 2015-2017. Hard to make the argument after his final win because not many players win a ton after age 43.  If those numbers support the fact that Jack had a longer career so be it. Don't take that as an affront to Tiger. 
    • Even injured Tiger had a more impressive career than Jack against much stiffer competition. This was confirmed by Jack quite a few times. You want to ignore that, but it’s fact.
    • Day 201 3-5 Wider backswing and higher. Practiced consisted of mostly backswing today. Wrist arching through downswing still a focus on full shots with a pause.  Will probably have a 2nd practice tonight blending wider backswing into more of full swing without pause at the top. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.