Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5388 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
  ghalfaire said:
It isn't needed for handicaps, they are calculated using the course rating and slope.

But you need some number to use as the course rating and it's generally in the neighborhood of (perhaps even defined by, if I understand correctly) "par for a scratch golfer".

What's the point? Without Par, golf is no longer a game, but rather an "activity" that people do around a field to eventually put the ball in the hole.

Not really - without par it would still be a game, you'd still count strokes, and the winner would still be determined by who played the hole/course with the least number of strokes. You'd just lose the ability to say I shot "x over par" or "x under par"...

  None said:
Par is the measure, the measure that every single golfer on the planet fights for and that fight, is what makes Par and the game of golf wonderful.

...and that I agree with. (As well as all the other reasons in this thread supporting the notion of par.)

Bill


Posted
The USGA states "A male scratch golfer, for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 250 yards and can reach a 470-yard hole in two shots at sea level. A female scratch golfer, for rating purposes, can hit tee shots an average of 210 yards and can reach a 400-yard hole in two shots at sea level.". Due to this logic of distance, the current guidelines exist...

Thanks, that's interesting. I've wondered what these numbers might be (officially). Now I know. To me right now, any par 4 > 400 yds is a bit of a stretch as a GIR opportunity. It's not the distance, it's the accuracy.

Are there any par 6 holes anywhere by the way?

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Posted
  Bryan SD2 said:
I want 8-12 per round. You'll get there. 1 per 9 now, then 2, then 3, then 4.... We all measure ourselves against par as soon as we 1. Know what par is and 2. Get our first one.

Been actually doing a bit better lately at my home course, its a pretty basic easy course, and I can shoot in the low 40's pretty consistently there, usually pars and bogeys and an occasional double on the front 9, the back is a bit more difficult. If i go someplace more difficult, im struggling to keep it in the mid to upper 40's for 9 holes.

Driver-Taylormade Burner Ti 420 cc 10.5 deg reg flex
3 wood-orlimar rcx 14 deg
Hybrids-warrior golf 20 deg, 23 deg and 26 deg
6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 irons steel shafts, reg flex, 56 deg tour series wedge
Putter-Rife 2 Bar Hybrid Mallet...


Posted
  Chas said:
Thanks, that's interesting. I've wondered what these numbers might be (officially). Now I know. To me right now, any par 4 > 400 yds is a bit of a stretch as a GIR opportunity. It's not the distance, it's the accuracy.

Only place ive seen a par 6 is on a video game.

Driver-Taylormade Burner Ti 420 cc 10.5 deg reg flex
3 wood-orlimar rcx 14 deg
Hybrids-warrior golf 20 deg, 23 deg and 26 deg
6-pw-AFFINITY / ORLIMAR HT2 irons steel shafts, reg flex, 56 deg tour series wedge
Putter-Rife 2 Bar Hybrid Mallet...


Posted
Par 6 actually kind of sounds fun. 700+ Yards would be a cool hole.
 Driver:callaway.gifBig Bertha 460cc 10* Hybrids: adams.gif A7 3-4H  Irons: adams.gif A7 5i-PW
Wedges: cleveland.gifCG 12 50*, CG 14 56*, CG12 60* Putt Putt:odyssey.gif White ICE Tour Bronze 1 Putter

Posted
smails: Ty, what'd you shoot today?
Ty: Oh, I don't keep score, Judge.
Smails: Oh, well, how do you measure yourself with other golfers?
Ty: By height.

I like par.

Ping G2 Driver; Titleist 906F2 5W; TM Rescue Mid 3H; Adams Idea Pro 4H; Titleist DTR 3-SW; Callaway Bobby Jones Putter; Ping Hoofer lite

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  BostonSully said:
Par 6 actually kind of sounds fun. 700+ Yards would be a cool hole.

I personally haven't played any and I can't see them becomming commonplace for 2 reasons...

1) It's really just a par 5 with another long fairway shot thrown in on top, dosn't add anything extra. 2) People who own the golf course will have more land to look after! :P would be good to play one from a novelty point of view though

Cobra - Speed Pro 8.5º X-Flex, Speed Pro 13º S-Flex | Mizuno - MP CLK 20º Hybrid, MP-67 DG S300 4-PW | Cleveland - CG10 52º,56º, 60º | Rife - Antigua Island 34"


Posted
I personally haven't played any and I can't see them becomming commonplace for 2 reasons...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21116556...-active_travel 777 Yards and an absolutely beautiful hole. Want to play right now!
 Driver:callaway.gifBig Bertha 460cc 10* Hybrids: adams.gif A7 3-4H  Irons: adams.gif A7 5i-PW
Wedges: cleveland.gifCG 12 50*, CG 14 56*, CG12 60* Putt Putt:odyssey.gif White ICE Tour Bronze 1 Putter

Posted
Knowing what Par is simply makes it easier to keep score. It's much easier for me to remember than im "3 over" after 14 holes than it is for me to remember I've hit it "56 times".

Posted
In addition to the length guidelines, par can also give you a hint as to the course design, if it's designed properly.

The last hole on my course is an example of one that i think breaks this. The hole was originally a moderate length (480 yards or so, I think) slightly uphill par 5 with a gentle dogleg left. Over the years, houses were built up on the left side, just outside the fence, so after complaints, they shortened the hole by 50 yards or so by moving the tee box up along the fence. The result was that the tee shot is now directed more into the course rather than along the fence, and the dogleg is quite a bit sharper. There are two problems with the hole now. First, unless you are able to accurately shape your tee shot around the dogleg, you can't go much beyond about 200 yards off the tee (counting effective distance, you can go maybe 240 but you're along the right-edge of the fairway so not all that extra distance moves you closer to the green). Thus, you're quite likely looking at a 220ish approach into the green. This isn't so bad, except the green is small and elevated, so if you actually hit it with a club long enough to go 220, you're pretty unlikely to hold it; if you come up short, it's pretty unlikely you'll find your way up the hill. Neither of these would be a problem if it's a par 5, but as a par 4, it becomes extremely difficult to find a GIR. (Even if you don't consider the required draw on the tee a problem, it's still going to be hard to hold the green on your second shot).

So IMO a par 4 isn't just shorter than a par 5, it should also give a golfer a good chance to hit the green in 2, whereas a par 5 can fairly present other challenges to that goal.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
  ghalfaire said:
I like having a yard stick but after reading this thread I wonder where "par" came from. It isn't needed for handicaps, they are calculated using the course rating and slope. Are there limits on how long a par 4 can be? I've seen some that are longer than some Par 5 holes. So who decides on what a given hole's par is? I like having a par as it is a good way to measure your performance on any given hole.

My understanding is that par, at one point, stood for "professional average result," indicating that a very good player would expect to hit this score. Whether or not it actually came from that, I don't know.

  Chas said:
Are there any par 6 holes anywhere by the way?

There are a few. I know of one in Idaho that I read about in Golf Digest a while back.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5388 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • That's part of why faster greens reward better putters. Given time to acclimate, golfers of any level (not talking about utter beginners or people who can't break 100 often) putt better on faster greens.
    • Smoother greens rewards better putters. The faster the green, the bigger the error in distance control. But, if you make the greens too slow good players are not used to hit the ball that hard so it can make them struggle a bit.
    • Day 11 (August 21).  Practice session this morning;  chipping for a while (focusing chips that aren't "on the number" for me --- I'm very comfortable with 20 and 25 yard chips, less so with 15 and 10).  Then full swing work, shared a small bucket.  For my share, I was focusing on setup and where I'm aiming.  It dawned on me that I've been hitting some really nice drivers and woods lately, as far as contact, flight, and distance, but not getting them where I want them to go, and the conversation from yesterday's Spin Axis podcast (nice to finally be caught up!) made me realize I wonder if I'm adjusting my aim for the difference in swing path.  I definitely put my woods closer to my intended target line today;  not sure if that means I'm adjusting for a pull or aiming correctly though. 😕 
    • Tied my season low with a 79 at an away course.  Nothing spectacular on the front (3 pars, 6 bogeys), but on the back I had 3 birdies (should have been 4 as I missed a putt from 5').   This round almost dropped one full shot from my index....from a 13.4 to a 12.6   Also....just a on side note, I have a consecutive 72 hole streak currently on playing the same ball.
    • Wordle 1,524 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟨⬜🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...