Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Golf Channel Could be Removed from DIrecTV?


Note: This thread is 5491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

According to SportsBusinessJournal :

"DirecTV could drop Golf Channel at the end of the year, potentially taking away about 15 million subscribers from the Comcast-owned channel. Golf Channel’s affiliate deal with the satellite distributor expires Dec. 31..." and parties are apparently still far apart on quoting an appropriate price.

I will say that I don't think Golf Channel will be lost, and DirecTV will figure out a way to get the deal done, but I will also say that if they can't get it done, I may very well use this as grounds to ditch my DirecTV subscription altogether, and I've been a subscriber for 10 years and love their newest DVRs with Whole-Home setup.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm with you.  If Direct TV lost Golf Channel they will lose me too.  In this area we have a cable company that carries Golf Channel and there is also Dish TV. I don't care much for the cable guys however so probably would give Dish TV a try.  I've been a Direct TV customer for 15 years now.  A good company with good services so I'm pretty sure they will get it worked out.

Butch


Posted

I'd be surprised if things didn't get worked out... I have Time Warner and they were in a similar situation with ESPN... at the end of the day the deal got done; I'm pretty sure that's how it'll play out with the Golf Channel and DirecTV.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

I'd be surprised if things didn't get worked out... I have Time Warner and they were in a similar situation with ESPN... at the end of the day the deal got done; I'm pretty sure that's how it'll play out with the Golf Channel and DirecTV.


It doesn't help that Comcast - a competitor - owns GC. ESPN is kinda off on its own.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

A better link that actually has information.

I'd quote parts of it, but the whole article is worth reading if you're a DirecTV subscriber.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It would be a pity, as DIRECTV and The Golf Channel had a special relationship going back to TGC's original launch when DTV was one of the first to carry the channel.    As a former DTV exec, I fondly recall the early days when TGC treated us to a day at Industry Hills, and I also enjoyed a dinner with Arnold Palmer as part of the companies' relationship.     I'm a very long time DTV subscriber (my account number is triple digits!) but I would switch if they don't close the deal.

BTW, this isn't the first feud between Comcast and DIRECTV.      Comcast previously tried to prevent some of its content from being carried on DIRECTV, and the FCC ruled against Comcast, a ruling that was appealed and ultimately backed up by federal court of appeals.    Comcast then resorted to increasing its programming rates significantly (not a little, but a lot) to satellite carriers.    After much negotiation, DTV closed a new deal for Versus but dropped G4.

At risk with all of this is a major impact of the business models for the multichannel TV industry.    The complaint from DTV and DISH are that Comcast uses unfair market power to drive programming costs much higher by either not allowing content on satellite (struck down by the FCC) or made egregiously expensive.   Comcast counters that DIRECTV has exclusivity to the NFL Sunday Ticket, denying them the right to programming.    One major difference, however, is that the NFL programming is a business deal done between DIRECTV and the NFL, who owns the programming (and DIRECTV pays heavily for that exclusivity).     But Comcast is both a distributor AND an owner of content, and they're using their ownership to wield un-consumer friendly market power.     Many years ago the government broke up the film industry for the same type of problem - the studios could no longer own both the content and the distribution (i.e. the theaters).

Overall, I would expect that the two parties will close a deal just like they previously did with Versus.    DTV's 18+ million subscribers are just too large of audience for Comcast to ignore, and The Golf Channel is enjoyed by a passionate and generally higher income customer demographic at DIRECTV.     A high stakes game of TV industry chicken!


Posted

" But Golf Channel’s viewership, particularly out of season, has been low. In November, the channel ranked 78th of 90 cable networks in total-day viewership, averaging 55,000 viewers on a 24-hour basis. Of sports channels, only Fox Soccer, MLB Network and NBA TV ranked lower. "

WOW, that quote is pretty telling. TGC is out of their gord asking for more money when DTV is already in the process of eliminating channels that don't have the eyeballs.

When a company makes a club in the USA I will proudly display their brand here. All of mine were made in china by somebody making $2 a day. Shame on you Mr club manufacture.


Posted

I don't subscribe to TV of any sort at the moment, but I probably will when I finish school.  The thing is, there aren't that many channels that are on my wish list -- Golf Channel is one of the few.  And a big deal for me is how much I'd have to pay for the channels I want.

Any carrier without Golf Channel won't even be on my radar screen.  And any that move it to one of those tiers where you have to buy a ton of channels I don't care about to get it probably won't be on the list, or would be very low.

Even with TGC ranking low, I wonder how much DirectTV stands to lose if they lose the channel.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Camo

" But Golf Channel’s viewership, particularly out of season, has been low. In November, the channel ranked 78th of 90 cable networks in total-day viewership, averaging 55,000 viewers on a 24-hour basis. Of sports channels, only Fox Soccer, MLB Network and NBA TV ranked lower. "


One thing that isn't reflected in these ratings is the demographics of the viewers.   The annual income for TGC viewers is much greater than many other cable channels, and these subscribers are also a very desirable demographic for DIRECTV as they spend more on programming in general and don't tend to churn (i.e. switch to competing providers) as frequently.


Posted


Originally Posted by Clambake

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camo

" But Golf Channel’s viewership, particularly out of season, has been low. In November, the channel ranked 78th of 90 cable networks in total-day viewership, averaging 55,000 viewers on a 24-hour basis. Of sports channels, only Fox Soccer, MLB Network and NBA TV ranked lower. "

One thing that isn't reflected in these ratings is the demographics of the viewers.   The annual income for TGC viewers is much greater than many other cable channels, and these subscribers are also a very desirable demographic for DIRECTV as they spend more on programming in general and don't tend to churn (i.e. switch to competing providers) as frequently.



also not reflected in that data is the rest of the year. I wonder  what the High end of the scale is or even the averages.  but 55,000 daily viewers. I don't see how they could possible survive on those numbers.

FYIY... TGC is pretty much always on in my house. Not that I sit down and watch it very often but it is on as background noise.  for some reason I enjoy the Hannny project the most and actually DVR it.

When a company makes a club in the USA I will proudly display their brand here. All of mine were made in china by somebody making $2 a day. Shame on you Mr club manufacture.


Posted

The TV show I work for airs on the Versus network, and a year ago Direct TV dropped Versus for about 6 months. Our numbers dropped, but it was eventually worked out. Seems Direct likes to play hardball with their networks .... it's a pattern with them.

Mark Boyd of the Clan Boyd
"Retired in my Dreams"

 


Posted


Originally Posted by Boyder

The TV show I work for airs on the Versus network, and a year ago Direct TV dropped Versus for about 6 months. Our numbers dropped, but it was eventually worked out. Seems Direct likes to play hardball with their networks .... it's a pattern with them.



In this business they pretty much have to play hardball fairly frequently.   If they acquiesced to the prices by the networks each time the contracts come up for renewal, we'd all be paying $300 a month for our basic programming package.    The other sides play hardball too, bundling programming together to try and force the service providers into carrying more of their content.   It's a major league game - no room for slowpitch softball in the TV business!


Posted

when cablevison dropped the golf channel here about 10 years ago, i dropped them and installed DTV in less than 24 hours. looks lik im going to have to do the same to DTV now. OH WELL....


Posted


Originally Posted by Camo

" But Golf Channel’s viewership, particularly out of season, has been low. In November, the channel ranked 78th of 90 cable networks in total-day viewership, averaging 55,000 viewers on a 24-hour basis. Of sports channels, only Fox Soccer, MLB Network and NBA TV ranked lower. "

WOW, that quote is pretty telling. TGC is out of their gord asking for more money when DTV is already in the process of eliminating channels that don't have the eyeballs.



What's really telling is Golf Channel gets more viewers then MLB Network and NBA TV, and I'm sure D* has no intention of dropping them.

Rob Tyska

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Boyder

The TV show I work for airs on the Versus network, and a year ago Direct TV dropped Versus for about 6 months. Our numbers dropped, but it was eventually worked out. Seems Direct likes to play hardball with their networks .... it's a pattern with them.


The problem is that Comcast is both a content producer and a content carrier, and it's likely illegal to use one to the advantage of another.

Originally Posted by RemyM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camo

" But Golf Channel’s viewership, particularly out of season, has been low. In November, the channel ranked 78th of 90 cable networks in total-day viewership, averaging 55,000 viewers on a 24-hour basis. Of sports channels, only Fox Soccer, MLB Network and NBA TV ranked lower. "

WOW, that quote is pretty telling. TGC is out of their gord asking for more money when DTV is already in the process of eliminating channels that don't have the eyeballs.

What's really telling is Golf Channel gets more viewers then MLB Network and NBA TV, and I'm sure D* has no intention of dropping them.


They probably don't ask for the incredibly high cost Comcast wants for Golf Channel.

Consider this, given that some basic cable channels provide 200 channels or so. At 25 cents per channel, that's $50 a month DirecTV would have to pay just to deliver content. No profit at all, just their costs. Never mind their costs for satellites, the techs, the hardware, billing, etc.

Now obviously DirecTV doesn't pay 25 cents per channel for every channel (ESPN charges more, and bundle several channels together in packages - I've heard that ESPN costs $3 to $4), but Comcast currently gets 25 cents and wants more than that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think a deal will get done plus when they lost versus I got the nhl package free when I called to complain. Pretty much as long as directv has the sunday ticket and I can watch Raiders games every sunday I will have directv.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted

When I lived in Philadelphia for a while I had a weird cable service that didn't include The Golf Channel. I think I paid less attention to golf in those two years than in my entire life. I'd say that TGC is my default channel, I always start there before flipping around, and if nothing else is on, I'll end up doing work, or messing around online with TGC as the background. It's also the one channel my wife and I can agree is good for going to sleep to (she says Fox News and CNN give her nightmares LOL).

I also have DirecTV for a year or two and didn't love it as much as everyone told me I would. I always had trouble with my dish, which I don't think was installed properly because if more than two TVs were on in the apartment it would start losing the signal and too often we'd lose the signal entirely. I found they were very difficult to deal with and they wanted to charge a lot for a service call despite my insistence it was done wrong to begin with. At this point, I have Comcast and while they're far from perfect, I think they're quite good, far better channel selection than Cablevision, and they include ESPN3.com online, which is awesome during college football season (some saturdays you'd get 10 games online that you couldn't see on TV, all in decent quality).

Funny that this story broke as the hubbub over Point Break. I wonder if that was a test to see what sort of response they get (even a negative response could show how many loyal viewers they have).

Driver: Nike Covert Tour | 3W: Callaway X Hot Pro | Irons: Mizuno JPX-800 Pro X100 SS | Wedges: Vokey SM 54-08, Vokey Raw 60-12 | Putter (of the week): Arnold Palmer "The Original" 33"


Posted

This is scary.  I live in a gated community and have no choice as to provider of cable or internet service (it's a Time Warner cable package).

What if TWC chose to drop TGC!!

hmmm, maybe I'd play more golf rather than watching so much on the boob tube and lower my scores ....

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball


Note: This thread is 5491 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.