• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
kennay92

Martin Hall sounded completely wrong!

Recommended Posts

I was watching the school of golf the came on yesterday and a few things sounded wrong and contradicted the new ball flight laws( or i believe so). First he said all slices are caused by an open club face. But with the new laws hasn't it been concluded the club face angle determines where the ball starts and swing path relative to target line determines spin? With that he said the way to correct a slice was to close the face earlier and just use a stronger grip, which really is just short-term "bandaid" cures rather than a solution. Lastly he said hitting more down on the ball does not cause higher ball flight rather getting rid of your lag earlier/ releasing the club earlier in the down swing will get you higher ball flight. That's pretty much saying flipping the club is good? Any one else see this or am I completely wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I didn't see the show, but I sure hate instructors that just say "open club face"! It means nothing if it isn't followed by relative to the target line or swing path. I agree with you re: his cure although it is not really a short-term cure as it will get people hitting lovely pulls and pull hooks.

You are being a bit harsh on him with the final point. He wouldn't have said flipping was good. I always think flipping is where the club head overtakes the hands at impact and that is bad. In what he seems to be describing, the more you reduce the amount of lag the higher your ball flight. That may be a good thing if you need to hit over a tree, but generally contact will not be as solid and you won't get such a penetrating ball flight. In calm conditions you'll also lose distance,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin's approach is too dumbed down with oversimplified 'tips', even for TV. I finally had enough when he said to hold onto the right wrist bend as long as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watch the show.  I'm not a teacher, pro, or really even a very good golfer.  Marty wasn't teaching a flip move so much as a cast move.  What a great swing technique.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by tm22721

Martin's approach is too dumbed down with oversimplified 'tips', even for TV. I finally had enough when he said to hold onto the right wrist bend as long as possible.



Isn't that what best golfers tend to do...? Keep the angle as long as possible? They in fact tend to work with their muscles against early release. Or am I getting something wrong here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Ignorant

Isn't that what best golfers tend to do...? Keep the angle as long as possible? They in fact tend to work with their muscles against early release. Or am I getting something wrong here?



That is right. I didn't see the show, so I don't know what he specifically was talking about. On a full swing you will want to hold the right arm flying wedge as long as possible, "hinge and hold", no rolling of the clubface or flipping of the wrists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

You are being a bit harsh on him with the final point. He wouldn't have said flipping was good. I always think flipping is where the club head overtakes the hands at impact and that is bad. In what he seems to be describing, the more you reduce the amount of lag the higher your ball flight. That may be a good thing if you need to hit over a tree, but generally contact will not be as solid and you won't get such a penetrating ball flight. In calm conditions you'll also lose distance,


I have the show recorded and haven't watched it yet, but I've heard about this part and intend to watch it and perhaps record it and put it on YouTube or something. People I trust said he had the club shaft inline with his left arm well before impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I figured he would get burned on here based on last nights episode, especially when demonstrating the opening and closing of the clubface with the black and white broom.  Not sure though whether he is advocating an active rotation of the clubface through impact (ala AJ Bonar) or simply demonstrating how to get a feel for a neutral clubface at impact. In his defense, he did have one drill to promote an inside to out swing path in addition with the drills to prevent an open clubface at impact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by kennay92

I was watching the school of golf the came on yesterday and a few things sounded wrong and contradicted the new ball flight laws( or i believe so). First he said all slices are caused by an open club face. But with the new laws hasn't it been concluded the club face angle determines where the ball starts and swing path relative to target line determines spin? With that he said the way to correct a slice was to close the face earlier and just use a stronger grip, which really is just short-term "bandaid" cures rather than a solution. Lastly he said hitting more down on the ball does not cause higher ball flight rather getting rid of your lag earlier/ releasing the club earlier in the down swing will get you higher ball flight. That's pretty much saying flipping the club is good? Any one else see this or am I completely wrong?


Did he use the words "open to the final target" or "open to the swing path"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by kennay92

I was watching the school of golf the came on yesterday and a few things sounded wrong and contradicted the new ball flight laws( or i believe so). First he said all slices are caused by an open club face. But with the new laws hasn't it been concluded the club face angle determines where the ball starts and swing path relative to target line determines spin? With that he said the way to correct a slice was to close the face earlier and just use a stronger grip, which really is just short-term "bandaid" cures rather than a solution. Lastly he said hitting more down on the ball does not cause higher ball flight rather getting rid of your lag earlier/ releasing the club earlier in the down swing will get you higher ball flight. That's pretty much saying flipping the club is good? Any one else see this or am I completely wrong?



Kennay, I am glad you posted on this.  I watched this segment as well, and I couldn't believe what I was hearing and seeing.  His comment about a slice being a larger issue of clubface than swing path got to me right away.  Does he even watch tour players hit draws?

Martin also used a broom which was painted white and black on opposite sides.  He advocated turning the hands so much that the back of the left hand feels as if it's facing down near impact, with the forearms colliding due to a "closing" of the clubhead.

His concept of ball flight laws, and particularly impact position were pretty contrary to what I personally believe.  A caller had asked if hitting down on the ball caused higher trajectory, and he answered this question as if the caller had too much shaft lean.  More than likely, the caller struggled with impact and likely wasn't close to generating enough lag and shaft lean.  Martin seemed to advocate flipping and taking minimal divots.

I don't think we need instruction on how to flip and smother the ball, and I feel bad that some players will take this to heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by delav

Kennay, I am glad you posted on this.  I watched this segment as well, and I couldn't believe what I was hearing and seeing.  His comment about a slice being a larger issue of clubface than swing path got to me right away.  Does he even watch tour players hit draws?

Martin also used a broom which was painted white and black on opposite sides.  He advocated turning the hands so much that the back of the left hand feels as if it's facing down near impact, with the forearms colliding due to a "closing" of the clubhead.

His concept of ball flight laws, and particularly impact position were pretty contrary to what I personally believe.  A caller had asked if hitting down on the ball caused higher trajectory, and he answered this question as if the caller had too much shaft lean.  More than likely, the caller struggled with impact and likely wasn't close to generating enough lag and shaft lean.  Martin seemed to advocate flipping and taking minimal divots.

I don't think we need instruction on how to flip and smother the ball, and I feel bad that some players will take this to heart.


I was watching a bit of this show and this was what I got out of the instruction as well. He wasn't advocating flipping but I can see how easily someone would start to flip the club if his advice were followed. I really don't see the appeal of golf tip shows. Unless you have a qualified instructor that knows something about you and your swing it's very difficult to understand the context of what is being taught. Reason #549 why I have stuck with my instructor for close to 10 years.

I think I am going to start my own show. I'll call it "Goin' Golfin" It will be filled with contradictory advice and quick band-aids and after a 1/2 hour of silly nonsense with lots of props I will close the show with, "Burn every magazine that contains golf tips and shut off the damn TV. Seek out a qualified instructor that you click with and my your card be full of birdies."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by 1par2win

I was watching a bit of this show and this was what I got out of the instruction as well. He wasn't advocating flipping but I can see how easily someone would start to flip the club if his advice were followed. I really don't see the appeal of golf tip shows. Unless you have a qualified instructor that knows something about you and your swing it's very difficult to understand the context of what is being taught. Reason #549 why I have stuck with my instructor for close to 10 years.

I think I am going to start my own show. I'll call it "Goin' Golfin" It will be filled with contradictory advice and quick band-aids and after a 1/2 hour of silly nonsense with lots of props I will close the show with, "Burn every magazine that contains golf tips and shut off the damn TV. Seek out a qualified instructor that you click with and my your card be full of birdies."


If someone was a bit judgmental, he or she would assume that after almost 10 years, you must getting a lot of bogeys along with those birdies, or your instructor is not qualified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by sean_miller

If someone was a bit judgmental, he or she would assume that after almost 10 years, you must getting a lot of bogeys along with those birdies, or your instructor is not qualified.


Not sure I am following you. My point was I believe tips and instruction found in magazines and TV are not all that effective unless you understand the whys and wherefores. This is usually the result of having a good instuctor. It has nothing to do with being judgmental. It has to to with the inherent limitation of golf instuction to a mass audience at one time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by 1par2win

Not sure I am following you. My point was I believe tips and instruction found in magazines and TV are not all that effective unless you understand the whys and wherefores. This is usually the result of having a good instuctor. It has nothing to do with being judgmental. It has to to with the inherent limitation of golf instuction to a mass audience at one time.


I believe it was a tounge-in-cheek reference to your handicap and therefore credibility.  I agree with you though, band-aids don't help without a solid understanding of the fundamentals beneath them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by delav

I believe it was a tounge-in-cheek reference to your handicap and therefore credibility.  I agree with you though, band-aids don't help without a solid understanding of the fundamentals beneath them.



Did it occur to anyone that I might be a horse$%$# golfer even after 10 years? Just sayin'...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by 1par2win

Did it occur to anyone that I might be a horse$%$# golfer even after 10 years? Just sayin'...


No worries, there is nothing wrong with an honest 11.8 to begin with.  I could take dance lessons for the rest of my life and still humiliate my wife every time I chose to dance in public.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by 1par2win

I think I am going to start my own show. I'll call it "Goin' Golfin" It will be filled with contradictory advice and quick band-aids and after a 1/2 hour of silly nonsense with lots of props


I'd watch. Couldn't be worse than what's out there now. ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK, from what I've gathered from these posts is that somehow the braintrust of expertise on ball flight laws (which I see a lot of references to on TST) is somehow concentrated all on this site, which is pretty amazing.

In any case, please educamate me on what causes a slice, because as an engineer, I look at things pretty logically.  And logically, I don't see how you slice the ball if the club face is not open at impact.  The one exception I can envision is an extreme outside-in swing plane might impart enough side-spin to partially overcome a pull shot, but I have a hard time believing even that.  I am sure that there have been plenty of studies done on ball flight using mechanical swing machines, so please enlighten me.

I would also add that the Golf Channel held open auditions for the position that Martin Hall now holds, so if you really feel like he and the rest of the golf instructing universe is so far offbase on their teaching, I encourage you to apply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Venturing out to the Marine Base today. Have not played there in some time. Hope to get a tee time around 10:30 as a walk on. Short notice, but anybody that can make it.... (also have to stop by the exchange...it seems that S.W.M.B.O.  has run out of Chanel Nr 5...this constitutes an emergency).
    • @Vinsk The only thing I can really do is describe what I have felt/done. I played my best lead arm dominant golf with the intent of the lead arm being soft and swinging like a pendulum very vertically.  So,  what I mean is what worked for me was to let's say just stand normally no club in hand and then swing the lead arm at about a 45 degree angle to the chest.  Left shoulder swing center. Relative to golf posture I would imagine a straight line on the ground maybe 35-40 degrees from the inside and swing my lead arm on that line feeling like the hands never got outside that line.  The feel I used was left arm feeling like it was swinging vertically like a pendulum but right on the imagined line of approach.  So the line of approach let's say ball is 12 o'clock target is at 9 the line would be around 4 o'clock. The trail arm in this method just added support but never dictated the clubhead motion.  This method worked well for me but I moved on to other things and can't really even make it workable anymore.  The crucial aspect was that the location of that vertical left arm pendulum created the body motion.  It was similar to the Malaska type deal a bit. So,  now it's very different.  Now the basis of my swing is like if you stood there with a piece of wood horizontal at waist height with a nail in it and a hammer in the trail hand and hammered the nail. So,  kinda like a bicep curl.  The lead arm is basically inert or soft.  The motion is controlled by the trail hand arc.  Feels like the swings center is more the right elbow to me.  My feel is that I try to hammer back through address.  I just try to remain still and make that motion. My body moves only a bit.  I never felt with either method when playing well that I was aggressively pivoting but that my body moves turns in accommodation of the master intention.   The downward hammer arc basically kicks the clubhead out at the bottom.  For me I stay in pretty decent shape with steady head doing this and the clubhead carries me into the finish.  If you have watched Malaska it's kinda like a right arm Malaska deal.  It's not complicated.   I don't shift weight bump hips squat or post up or try to spin the shoulders.  The swing gets me to my lead side every time without thinking about it.    For me this style is very very easy on my body.   Thats my ramblings on that for now,  @Vinsk.  You have a unique situation.  I do know that I can't play well without having one side or the other be the master.  Trail or lead.      
    • Yes, it's surprising that you can get a ball to stop or slow down with a partial swing or even a putting stroke. The ball you use likely makes a big difference in these cases.
    • The challenges should be fascinating. Our hunch is that there will be many challenges on the difficult par three 17th, but each team will make decisions independently (and could vary based on conditions as they go).  6 points up for grabs with the challenges in today's matches. Reminder, the yellow ball will be played alternate shot and team that shoots par or better (net) gets the point.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. billymo2
      billymo2
      (25 years old)
    2. bostonboy9416
      bostonboy9416
      (17 years old)
    3. kpaulhus
      kpaulhus
      (30 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon