Jump to content
famousdavis

PING Eye 2s Are the Best Irons Ever Created

287 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

I can't believe I join a forum and post about some clubs I like and get accused of something like this.  I'm not trying to ruffle any feathers.  I believe that most people would benefit from playing Ping Eye 2s and I'm sorry if that offends you.  The Titleist AP2 irons are a joke.  They are heavy, bulky and feel like hitting a golf ball off of a tire iron.  The Ping Eye 2 irons are crisp and soft with an amazing trajectory.

I have tried just about every iron out there.  I consider myself somewhat of a golf equipment guru because I visit a golf store at least once a week.   I spend a lot of time going onto Craigslist, finding used irons and negotiating the price down.  I then sell them on Ebay for a nice profit.  I've probably made about $3,000 dollars this year from buying and selling clubs.  You have to be good at negotiating to do this so it's not for the faint of heart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

It isn't your posting of a set of irons that you really like, it's the incredibly subjective comments that your passing off as some sort of fact. You make statements to the effect of I'm a good ballstriker so my opinion means more and I flip (no pun intended) clubs so I am a better judge of quality. I mean, AP2's feel like hitting a tire iron? Really? This is your expert opinion? Come on man! And just to get you stoked even more I don't play the AP2's. I have the AP1's. Not even the 710 version.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by famousdavis

I spend a lot of time going onto Craigslist, finding used irons and negotiating the price down.  I then sell them on Ebay for a nice profit.  I've probably made about $3,000 dollars this year from buying and selling clubs.  You have to be good at negotiating to do this so it's not for the faint of heart.



Irrelevant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried the AP1 and AP1 710 irons both on the range as well as on the course.  The original AP1 irons had the Dynamic Gold High Launch shafts which, to their name, simply launched the ball too high.  The result were floaters that would balloon and then fall short of the mark.  I also noticed that they had sort of a mushy feel to them.  The Eye 2s have a crisp feel and you know if you've hit the center of the clubface.  The AP1 irons feel mushy and cold...kind of like a ham sandwhich with no mustard.  The newer AP1 irons are no better so I wouldn't waste your time or money.  You'd be better off with a set of Ping Eye 2 irons.  BeCu or Stainless, it's your choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think these irons are ugly, but due to the good rep, I bought a used set and although the look and setup took getting used to, the irons are very good. I still use mix of Titleist and Mizuno irons as my main set, but I go back to the Pings for a different look. I use a Ping bag and Anser as well, woods and wedges are other brands. The huge headed Callaway and Taylormade GI irons I think are even more ugly. Not saying anything about performance. Fugly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You're some kind of a weird PING shill, or you're insane.  Luckily this forum has tools that allow me avoid your rantings.

BTW-does anyone want me to start a new thread "PING Eye 2 Irons-Classic But Vastly Overrated?"

Originally Posted by famousdavis

I tried the AP1 and AP1 710 irons both on the range as well as on the course.  The original AP1 irons had the Dynamic Gold High Launch shafts which, to their name, simply launched the ball too high.  The result were floaters that would balloon and then fall short of the mark.  I also noticed that they had sort of a mushy feel to them.  The Eye 2s have a crisp feel and you know if you've hit the center of the clubface.  The AP1 irons feel mushy and cold...kind of like a ham sandwhich with no mustard.  The newer AP1 irons are no better so I wouldn't waste your time or money.  You'd be better off with a set of Ping Eye 2 irons.  BeCu or Stainless, it's your choice.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by max power

You're some kind of a weird PING shill, or you're insane.  Luckily this forum has tools that allow me avoid your rantings.

BTW-does anyone want me to start a new thread "PING Eye 2 Irons-Classic But Vastly Overrated?"


Or PING Eye 2 Irons - Ugliest Irons ever?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by max power

You're some kind of a weird PING shill, or you're insane.  Luckily this forum has tools that allow me avoid your rantings.

BTW-does anyone want me to start a new thread "PING Eye 2 Irons-Classic But Vastly Overrated?"


Man, are you a hater or what?  Also, aren't you a little old to be watching the Simpsons?  That show was good for one year and anyone with any taste knows that it's a complete waste of time.  I'm an adult.  I play golf.  I don't walk around with my little Simpson's avatar hoping that someone will find me mildly funny.

If you want to avoid what I have to say about the greatest irons ever invented then go right ahead.  Why are you wasting your precious time and energy telling me that you can avoid my rantings?  The truth is that you are very interested in what I have to say and deep inside you know you've wasted a lot of money on inferior clubs.  Time to step up the game sparky and get with the program.  Isn't it time you stopped being an outsider?  It's time for you to join the Ping Eye 2 army.  There are many of us spread across the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by famousdavis

Isn't it time you stopped being an outsider?  It's time for you to join the Ping Eye 2 army.  There are many of us spread across the world.

Thankfully only one of you is trolling this website.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst new to here i feel i must support the OP view, not just about Ping Eye 2 irons but Ping in general.

Like FamousDavies i am also a very good golfer and i honestly put this down to the superiority of my Ping Golf clubs. I own an original, mint condition set of Eye 2 BeCu irons which are so awesome i cannot bring myself to use them. I believe they are objects to be admired and lusted over as works of art and will never part with them.

My current set up includes G15 hybrids which are quite simply the finest players clubs ever devised and help me to shoot in the 70,s almost every round i play.

I salute you OP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is definitely a bizarre thread. The one point I'd make is there's a reason that Ping doesn't make the Eye 2's anymore and it's because they are old technology. The Ping concept of offset heads and thick toplines continues but metallurgy is better, shafts have improved and cast clubs now have more feel. I play Ping G2 irons and love them so I am not a Ping hater. I have always found that Ping and Callaway long irons the easiest to hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree, this is a bizarre thread.  Is one model of iron really much different than another?  Or is it what an individiual prefers to look at/ most comfortable with that really matters?  Is it possible to actually "love" or "hate" a set of golf clubs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by edgey

Whilst new to here i feel i must support the OP view, not just about Ping Eye 2 irons but Ping in general.

Like FamousDavies i am also a very good golfer and i honestly put this down to the superiority of my Ping Golf clubs. I own an original, mint condition set of Eye 2 BeCu irons which are so awesome i cannot bring myself to use them. I believe they are objects to be admired and lusted over as works of art and will never part with them.

My current set up includes G15 hybrids which are quite simply the finest players clubs ever devised and help me to shoot in the 70,s almost every round i play.

I salute you OP.



Ok, you guys win. But please be sure to wipe down your clubs after you have finished "lusting". I'll say this, I will never look upon another set of Ping Eye 2's the same way again because of you two guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by famousdavis

I'm sorry but I think you're wrong.  There is something different about Ping Eye 2s that set them apart from any other iron out there.  I don't care if you spent $1,000 on a set of Titleist AP2 irons and had them fit the lie, length, loft and everything else to fit you perfectly.  In the end, the proper color Ping Eye 2 would eventually cause you to score better.  There is something about the way they designed the head that matches up perfectly with the ZZ-Lite shaft.  It has a soft feeling tip yet it delivers a penetrating trajectory in the long irons.  Just the other day I played a long, uphill 185 yard Par 4 and I hit the most beautiful Ping Eye 2 4-iron to about 2 feet.  All the other guys with the modern irons were all over the place.  Now, I realize that's just a very small sample of the people who have been suckered into buying modern equipment but I do think it's a story representative of what is happening in the modern golf world.

I'm sure some of you are interested to hear about my set.  Here it is:

Ping Eye 2 Plus (no plus) 2-SW, ZZ Light Shaft, Red Dot, Ping K grips.

Ping Ally 2 Putter

Ping Rapture V2 Driver with Serrano Stiff

Ping Rapture 3 Wood

Ping G10 3 wood and Hybrid

Ping Latitude Golf Back.  Black and Grey.

Ping Golf Towel

Ping i5 Divot Tool

I just want to say that I like your equipment very much.  The only suggestion I might make is you replace the 2 iron with another 3 wood so that you'd have 3 of them.  Or take out one of the 3 woods and get a second 2 iron.  The balance created by matching the club number with the number of them you have will hopefully compensate for your being imbalanced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Kieran123

It's safe to say that people are not going to see "eye 2 eye" in this thread



That's it! That's is the quote that should end this thread. IMO this conversation is at an end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ping G2 iron isn't even close when it comes to playability, shotmaking and penetrating ball flight.  The G2 is an abomination and shouldn't be spoken of when discussing Ping Eye 2s.  If you play Ping G2s then you are truly lost.

I have won 3 club championships with my Ping Eye 2s.  The one time I strayed and played with Titleist 990s I lost in the 2nd round.  I'm also known at my club as one of the best ballstrikers.  Sometimes people stop and watch me at the range just to see how I hit my Eye 2s.

I think some of the people on this forum that come across as angry are really upset because I got these irons for such a steal.  If you don't know how to negotiate then you can't get the kind of deals that I do.  I'm that good.  I'm not bragging, just telling it like it is.  That's called honesty...and I think we need a little more of it around here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by famousdavis

The Ping G2 iron isn't even close when it comes to playability, shotmaking and penetrating ball flight.  The G2 is an abomination and shouldn't be spoken of when discussing Ping Eye 2s.  If you play Ping G2s then you are truly lost.

I have won 3 club championships with my Ping Eye 2s.  The one time I strayed and played with Titleist 990s I lost in the 2nd round.  I'm also known at my club as one of the best ballstrikers.  Sometimes people stop and watch me at the range just to see how I hit my Eye 2s.

I think some of the people on this forum that come across as angry are really upset because I got these irons for such a steal.  If you don't know how to negotiate then you can't get the kind of deals that I do.  I'm that good.  I'm not bragging, just telling it like it is.  That's called honesty...and I think we need a little more of it around here.



LMAO you are bragging. A LOT. No two ways about it.

You are an amazing golfer and an amazing negotiator. Congratulations.

It doesn't make your opinion on the matter fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • Day 71, December 16 Range work today. Warmed up with priority piece drills, the gathered some MEVO data. Finished with partial wedge shots. 
    • Not really the topic for it, but group lessons can be good in that they lower the pressure, but the obvious "bad" parts are that the individuals don't get the same amount of attention as they would get individually. Adults often do them because they're cheaper, they can do them with friends, and they are less pressure. Kids often do them because they're good babysitting. That's not the point I was making at all. My point was that beginning golfers don't get to face a "beginner" opponent - the golf course and the equipment is pretty much pro-level right from the start. Beginners in cricket would not fare very well nor would they develop any good habits at all if they faced professional cricket bowlers right from the start, but unfortunately that's basically what happens in golf - they're given a golf ball, a driver, and a hole that's 4.25" away. About the only concession we make as "golf" is to sometimes tee them up 150 yards away instead of 450 yards away, but the actual act is still incredibly difficult, with virtually no margin for error. Cricket and virtually all other sports: Have a simpler motion with shorter implements at slower speeds. Have more margin for error. Are played against other human beings, who can make mistakes and who are, particularly when someone is starting out, often at about the same level. Golf: Has a complex motion with longer implements swung at higher speeds. Have virtually no margin for error. Is played right away to a 4.25" hole 150+ yards away. 🤦‍♂️ I think you've completely missed the context, not to mention the bit about meaning no offense. Being happy to shoot a 92 doesn't mean you're a bad person, your handicap is not a value judgment of any kind. Hell, half of my students probably started with me when they were at your level or worse. It's not a value judgment of any kind. But it does shed some light on your perspective here. It does lend weight to how strongly others might wish to weigh your opinions. Imagine if this was a court of law, and you were called to the stand as an expert witness. What insights could you offer into what it takes to play golf at a high level? Have you been a single digit golfer within the last 20 years? Ever? Have you been a 3, with a small but annoying miss, that required a few months to iron out? Something you couldn't see with the naked eye, that maybe required the use of a little technology to see or measure? I don't know the answer to these things. I guessed at your age based on the year in your email address. For all I know you're 88 and you were married in 1967, and so shooting 92 right now is pretty good, but back in the day you maintained a +1 handicap. I don't know. That would certainly give a bit more weight to your opinion, wouldn't you agree? Think about how this looks from my perspective. You're a 22 handicapper, and I'm a +1 and a pretty good instructor. You're posting here telling me (and others) a bunch of stuff about what makes for a good lesson and how people truly get "good" at golf. If I am right about the 51/22 stuff… (and tell me if I've gotten it wrong, please), imagine walking into an auto body shop having flipped through the pages of Car Mechanic magazine and telling the guys who worked there all about what's wrong with the auto body industry. Or talking to a bunch of Fortune 500 CEOs about how they should run their businesses because you took a few college business classes. Your opinions might be weighed a bit - outsider perspective is by its very nature often "fresh" and different - but most likely, what you don't know would limit the applicability and merits of your position/opinion. (And trust me, man, I hate bad instruction more than you probably do, and I would agree that there's a ton of it out there.) Because, like in my golf lessons, I like to tailor whatever I'm saying to the audience, to the person I'm talking to. Admittedly here I'm talking to a few people, anyone who might read this, but I'm also trying to understand where you're coming from, and I'm talking at least a little more to you than the others who might read it. You want to know how someone else put it? That's how someone else put it. And your reaction to my questions above, which again, man I trademarked the phrase "Golf is Hard®" - it is, I get it… anyway, your reaction to that doesn't dissuade me from agreeing with my friend here. What are your qualifications for telling us what a "good lesson" is? What are your qualifications for telling us what it takes to be "good" at golf? That's not to say you need a sparkling résumé for each of those. If you've taken lessons at all, from anyone, you will have opinions on what makes for a good lesson and a bad lesson. And that feedback and those opinions are welcome; I welcome feedback from all corners, from anyone who has something to say, new or old, rich or poor, +6 to 36 handicap… etc. But understanding where you're coming from helps us to understand the context of your opinion. If I'm right about the 51/22 stuff… maybe we're not that far off here. In other words: If I got the 51/22 stuff wrong, then please correct me. Please share some background info so that others know where you're coming from, and what your perspective might be. Being a bad golfer isn't a value judgment. I teach bad golfers. I don't think they're "bad people." The game is ridiculously hard. The first chapter in LSW says that an alien would probably imagine it would take 30 shots to get the ball in the hole, and we're ticked about doing it in 5 or 6. You skipped over all the actual content of my post because you chose to be offended by something that I took the time to write out a few times that was not written or intended to offend at all.
    • I’ve seen plenty of professionals in Cricket draw a “duck” (Bowled out on the first ball with no runs more or less).  It’s not an easy game. In fact it’s a very difficult game. Fast balls arrive at nearly 100 mph, often with an unpredictable bounce, deliberately delivered long and short of the wicket to vary the height on arrival at the batsman.  Spin bowlers can deliver the ball at 70-80 mph but deliver the ball so that it dramatically changes direction directly in front of the batsman after the bounce.  The change in direction happens in roughly 1/10th of a second after the bounce.  Add to that the impact of changing wicket conditions which makes a massive difference to how the ball performs.  Make no mistake cricketers are amazing athletes and the game requires very quick reflexes and excellent hand-eye coordination.  You could debate whether or not it’s easier or harder than golf I think.  Ok pal I won’t waste anymore of your time. Take it easy.
    • For me football is the most interesting sport to watch.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CT207
      CT207
      (66 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...