Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

When Will the PGA tour start helping the LPGA tour


Note: This thread is 5369 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted



Contrast that with how anonymous and prone to cheating the players from ______ are.

I like to watch good golf, but just like the rotating top spot in women's tennis, if we don't know who the players are then we don't care who wins or loses. In other words, we don't care at all. At least in women's tennis there are some hotties worth watching just for the sake of watching.

Originally Posted by Shorty

Not quite sure about your logic.

The top female golfers in the worlds are Asian players.

How would an event combined with a PGA tournament help American female players?

The only exposure you'd get would emphasise how superb the Asian players are and how petulant and sulky the likes of Creamer and Pressel are.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I like a couple of points here.  The first is the LPGA needs a Tiger Woods to show up.  Sure helped the PGA and would help the LPGA, especially if it was an American Born Tiger Woods (that is not intended to be an anti Europe or Asia remark, just helps to see the home team excel).  I also like the idea of some shared events.  I used to watch the "Wendy's TriTour Annual" tournament.  The set the tee boxes such that the players were hitting approximately the same iron for the approach shots.  So the event was more about shot making than Power & Distance.  It was surprising how often the Champions Tour and LPGA Tour player won the event.  It was entertaining to watch and maybe one of the reasons I still watch the LPGA and Champions Tour events.

Butch


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by ghalfaire

I like a couple of points here.  The first is the LPGA needs a Tiger Woods to show up.  Sure helped the PGA and would help the LPGA, especially if it was an American Born Tiger Woods (that is not intended to be an anti Europe or Asia remark, just helps to see the home team excel).  I also like the idea of some shared events.  I used to watch the "Wendy's TriTour Annual" tournament.  The set the tee boxes such that the players were hitting approximately the same iron for the approach shots.  So the event was more about shot making than Power & Distance.  It was surprising how often the Champions Tour and LPGA Tour player won the event.  It was entertaining to watch and maybe one of the reasons I still watch the LPGA and Champions Tour events.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I've always wondered when the PGA tour will start helping the LPGA tour just like mens college sports has to help womens sport. Title V I think. I love to listen to the interviews with the LPGA players when the ask them why the LPGA can get more sponsored events. It seems like they only play every other week at best. I hate to sound harsh but its like watching the teenage Asia tour. Don't get me wrong those ladies are great golfers but most Americans want to see American women playing better. This is the only way this tour stands a chance. Maybe try to combine a couple of events with the PGA tour to get more people exposed to the LPGA tour.

I think Title IV is awful. Women's sports don't generate nearly the revenue that men's do, yet they're entitled to equal funding across the board? Men's golf is just more exciting to watch. With both sexes on at the same time, most people tune into the PGA tour.

My Equipment:
Driver: 9.5* R9, 73g Fubuki stiff | 3wood: 15* R9 3 Wood, x-stiff shaft | Hybrid: 19* Lynx Hybrid, reg. flex | Irons: MP-68s (4i-PW), 5.5x flighted |
Wedges: 52.08*, 56.11*, & 60.07 Vokey Spin-Milled | Putter: Pixl L1.8, 33.5" | Balls: Pro V1x |


Posted

This couldn't be further from the truth. LPGA players would wipe the floor with an average golf guy.  They will wipe the floor with scratch players, let alone an average guy.

Originally Posted by newtogolf

I agree that the LPGA is more like the golf average guys play versus the PGA which is what we all aspire to be able to do but very few of us ever will.


Posted

I actually really like watching the LPGA.  I agree that the talent isn't as deep.   The 50th best player on the LPGA is much worse than the top 10 players on the LPGA as compared with 50th versus top 10 on the PGA.  But the best two or three dozen players are SO good, and I actually like the fact that because they're smaller and female, I can hit it longer than almost all of them, so I get to see what shots look like hit by someone with pro level talent but a swing speed more like mine than the PGA pros are.

I'm also bored by the tiniest of the Asian women who hit their drivers 230 and play 7i for a 125 yard shot.  Yes it's highly effective for them but it's just not an entertaining athletic venture to watch someone with clubhead speed of 75-80 mph...

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Originally Posted by shades9323

This couldn't be further from the truth. LPGA players would wipe the floor with an average golf guy.  They will wipe the floor with scratch players, let alone an average guy.

Totally.  Lots of solid long hitting amateur guys could outdrive an LPGA player, then just get absolutely dominated from there to the hole.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by shades9323

This couldn't be further from the truth. LPGA players would wipe the floor with an average golf guy.  They will wipe the floor with scratch players, let alone an average guy.


Average guys for sure, but scratch players?  Really?

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted

Okay, before this thing gets out of hand, let be clear that it is Title IX not Title V or Title IV that helped women's high school/collegiate sports.

To the point of this thread, there are many sports that have more audience for women's competition than men's--gymnastics, tennis, to name just a few.  Problem with LPGA--IMHO--is that the attractive females don't get much TV time.  Before you stop crying that I am being sexist, just think of the average Joe Schmoe who watches golf.  And the fact that Natalie Gulbus (as someone has already mentioned) is one of the most popular LPGA player--who has won only once or twice shows that the general public wants to see more TV coverage for an attractive female.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


I'll agree average was a bit too far of a reach, but I think you went too far the other way to make your point saying they'd wipe the floor with male scratch golfers unless you are assuming they play from different tees

Originally Posted by shades9323

This couldn't be further from the truth. LPGA players would wipe the floor with an average golf guy.  They will wipe the floor with scratch players, let alone an average guy.



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There are lots (ok for some definition of lots) of long hitter amateurs that can outdrive PGA pros.

I would take the top 15-20 LPGA players over a scratch golfer (assuming we play the ladies tee in the mid 6k range).  Look what Annika or Wie did against the male golfers.  I doubt many scratch golfers would have been that competitive.  I don't track the LPGA enough to have a feel of how good the 100th ranked player is.

Originally Posted by mdl

Totally.  Lots of solid long hitting amateur guys could outdrive an LPGA player, then just get absolutely dominated from there to the hole.




Posted


Originally Posted by newtogolf

I'll agree average was a bit too far of a reach, but I think you went too far the other way to make your point saying they'd wipe the floor with male scratch golfers unless you are assuming they play from different tees



LPGA tournaments are mostly in the mid 6000 range for yardage I think. Some shorter, some longer.  From those tees(both playing the same tees), yes the LPGA player will wipe the floor with the male scratch golfer.



Originally Posted by x129

There are lots (ok for some definition of lots) of long hitter amateurs that can outdrive PGA pros.

I would take the top 15-20 LPGA players over a scratch golfer (assuming we play the ladies tee in the mid 6k range).  Look what Annika or Wie did against the male golfers.  I doubt many scratch golfers would have been that competitive.  I don't track the LPGA enough to have a feel of how good the 100th ranked player is.



The 100th ranked player has a scoring average of 74 in tournament conditions. Similar to the PGA add, these gals are good!


Posted


Originally Posted by The Recreational Golfer

I went to this week's Safeway Classic on Friday and had a great time. The golf is superb, but closer to the scale of the golf I play than the men's game is. The shots the ladies hit, I can hit too, two or three times a summer. I like LPGA golf and watch the tournaments whenever I can find the on TV.

I don't see a business need for the PGA to help, support, subsidize, etc., the LPGA, though. Nor do I see a moral(?) need to. While I sympathize with the LPGA's current situation, they will have to find their own success model. They will be better for it if they do. Hopefully, they can find a way to get to a 33 to 35-tournament schedule in the next few years, with 20-25 of them in the U.S.

As for womens' sports in general, let me offer two hypotheses for the general lack of public support for women's sports.

1. Pop Psychology: Men are wired to be competitors. Women are wired to be cooperators. In general. The idea of watching men compete seems natural and we look forward to the chance. Women competing seems odd, in a way, because our primeval wiring sees this as acting against type. So we'll watch, but our interest is lukewarm.

2. Standard setters: The best athletes, by far, are men. There is no questioning the truth of that. That is why men and women compete separately. When we watch athletes performing, we want to see the best performances that can be achieved in that sport. That's men's performances. Women doing the same thing is interesting, but not up to the standards the men set, so it's not that interesting (ML baseball vs. college softball). Exceptions that come to mind are figure skating and gymnastics, in which the men's version and the women's version are entirely different sports.

I think women's tennis got a free pass because the men's and women's tournaments are played simultaneously (at least the major tournaments are) in the same venues, and not because the quality of competition in the women's game equals that of the men's game.


What???!!!!!!!! I assume you're single and have never had a girlfriend. JK. Seriously though, I enjoy watching the LPGA however if I have to choose between that and the PGA, unless its a major I'll choose the PGA.


Posted

A scratch golfer most of the time wouldn't compete with a LPGA player from the same tees.

As for the LPGA tour I've said previously they need to come to the realization that they will have to move the bulk of their schedule to Asia. Yani Tseng is a heck of a player but she just doesn't get the attention that Annika or Lorena got when they dominated. If the majority of your top players are from other countries then you need to build your schedule around them. I like the LPGA tour but with the down economy and lack of sponsors in america why not shop some where else.

Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Whiskey84

I think Title IV is awful. Women's sports don't generate nearly the revenue that men's do, yet they're entitled to equal funding across the board?

How much money do you think men's golf generates in college?


Originally Posted by shades9323

They will wipe the floor with scratch players

I disagree, but, we have another thread for that discussion .

Originally Posted by mdl

I actually really like watching the LPGA.  I agree that the talent isn't as deep.   The 50th best player on the LPGA is much worse than the top 10 players on the LPGA as compared with 50th versus top 10 on the PGA.  But the best two or three dozen players are SO good, and I actually like the fact that because they're smaller and female, I can hit it longer than almost all of them, so I get to see what shots look like hit by someone with pro level talent but a swing speed more like mine than the PGA pros are.

I'm also bored by the tiniest of the Asian women who hit their drivers 230 and play 7i for a 125 yard shot.  Yes it's highly effective for them but it's just not an entertaining athletic venture to watch someone with clubhead speed of 75-80 mph...


Agree with all of that.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5369 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.