Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"Walking Preferred" Golf Courses


Note: This thread is 4051 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Take Florida for example, nearly every course forces a cart on you. Cart city. People love their carts they have their customized souped up carts. It is a cart culture.

I found exceptions, like USF, Mangrove Bay in Tampa. The Fox Hollow or Fox whatever franchise in FL, MA and CN. These courses don't force you to take a cart, allow walking and have greens next to tees. That's what I call walker friendly. The opposite is take a cart - my way or the highway. Pinehurst courses allow walking. Myrtle Beach, uh-uh, nope.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I would definitely gravitate towards a "walking" course. I love walking but when I'm playing at my home course or really any other course in the area, I just feel too out of place not to take a cart most of the time.

Career Bests:

9 Holes--37 @ The Fairways at Arrowhead-Front(+2)

18 Holes--80 @ Carroll Meadows Golf Course(+9)

 

Home Course:

1) The Fairways at Arrowhead

2) Mayfair Country Club


Posted

Ever notice how pretty much zero pros carry their own clubs?  I am  also guessing the king of scotland would have brought a horse along if he had to lug is own clubs around.

Originally Posted by SamW

If you want to stand with the cart argument, do you think they should be allowed on the PGA tour, I mean why should the pro's be forced to walk 5 miles each day for 4 days to play an event? Going back 150 years, why didn't they just make horse paths on golf courses and have all those old fellas in Scotland riding around the course on a horse? Carts aren't part of the sport, whether its 110 degrees in arizona or horizontal rain with 50mph winds in scotland, it's just something that was added to the game to facilitate golf courses extracting money from unfit people.




Posted


Originally Posted by x129

Ever notice how pretty much zero pros carry their own clubs?  I am  also guessing the king of scotland would have brought a horse along if he had to lug is own clubs around.


They love pull-carts in Scotland.....LOL.. To the others, there is a HUUUGE difference between courses encouraging walking, and courses with walker-friendly designs!!!  I mean c'mon, every course was designed with walking in mind years ago.  If you play a mature course, it's probably designed walker friendly.  To say that same course "encourages walking" today is an entirely different topic.........I know courses that allow walking on weekend mornings too,  but that isn't to say it's encouraged.

If you like to walk, older courses are definitely more walker friendly by design, but I don't think this is what this thread topic is asking.  What this thread is asking, IMO....are there any courses today that encourage walking?  My answer to that question is a resounding NO..................

There are definitely courses friendly to walking today........but is the course encouraging people to walk simply by not banning them?  Nope.....My 2 cents....no course "ENCOURAGES" walking......some just tolerate it.

Don't get me wrong....I've walked nearly 10,000 miles on the golf course....so I know where you are coming from.

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted



I guess we'll just have to go ahead and agree to disagree on this one.

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

They love pull-carts in Scotland.....LOL.. To the others, there is a HUUUGE difference between courses encouraging walking, and courses with walker-friendly designs!!!  I mean c'mon, every course was designed with walking in mind years ago.  If you play a mature course, it's probably designed walker friendly.  To say that same course "encourages walking" today is an entirely different topic.........I know courses that allow walking on weekend mornings too,  but that isn't to say it's encouraged.

If you like to walk, older courses are definitely more walker friendly by design, but I don't think this is what this thread topic is asking.  What this thread is asking, IMO....are there any courses today that encourage walking?  My answer to that question is a resounding NO..................

There are definitely courses friendly to walking today........but is the course encouraging people to walk simply by not banning them?  Nope.....My 2 cents....no course "ENCOURAGES" walking......some just tolerate it.

Don't get me wrong....I've walked nearly 10,000 miles on the golf course....so I know where you are coming from.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
I prefer walking - harder to get into the game when you're carting it IMO. Walking is more enjoyable and most courses I play are laid out to make walking pretty convenient. I do get though, that certain conditions make carting more practical & even necessary, like the blistering conditions you get in places like AZ, or resort complexes where there are often serious distances between holes. But yeah, if a course was designed to be walked and made that a feature, say by limiting carts, I'd definitely be interested.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted

No public course encourages walking....just because they let you walk isn't enough to say they "encourage"............that is my point.  Like I said, I've walked as many miles over the years as anybody........so it's not like I am some anti-walking guru...LOL

I will say this, there are definitely courses that are walker friendly....IE...if they were designed ++++ years ago is a good start...and if walkers aren't banned is a good start.  This is not to be confused with today's golf course management "preferring" players that walk.  That is completely false....they'd rather you pay $15 for a cart...for sure......if you play any course with carts in the barn, they'd prefer you rent them.

PS...there are definitely walker friendly courses!!!! They tend to be older mature courses........where green to tee walks tend to be shorter....and walkers aren't banned......

please don't confuse this with course management preference....this is my point.......

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted

The idea would never survive down here. Nevermind the summers, not only are the courses not built for walking, it is rare that you are allowed to.

I have friends that are *members* at public courses so they have that walking option. The once every 5 years that they actually walk 9, they are treated like 2nd class citizens by the course anyway. I've been playing for four years and have never walked and probably never will since I am so used to having more than I will ever need in my bag because I dont have to carry it.

The only place walking isnt discouraged is the munis - and those courses arent worth even $10 to walk.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

No public course encourages walking....just because they let you walk isn't enough to say they "encourage"............that is my point.  Like I said, I've walked as many miles over the years as anybody........so it's not like I am some anti-walking guru...LOL

I will say this, there are definitely courses that are walker friendly....IE...if they were designed ++++ years ago is a good start...and if walkers aren't banned is a good start.  This is not to be confused with today's golf course management "preferring" players that walk.  That is completely false....they'd rather you pay $15 for a cart...for sure......if you play any course with carts in the barn, they'd prefer you rent them.

PS...there are definitely walker friendly courses!!!! They tend to be older mature courses........where green to tee walks tend to be shorter....and walkers aren't banned......

please don't confuse this with course management preference....this is my point.......



Agreed.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted

Recently rode, to appease my wife, and didn't like it at all. It was the first, and last time this year. We have a fair number of walkers here in Tucson AZ, even in the summer. We just play earlier during the summer months...  :)

I guess it's just not me is all. I understand if you can't walk, as I will likely get there some day. Hope not though.

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Posted

All the courses around here that I've played (which is quite a lot) assume you're walking unless you specifically ask for a cart.  Carts add between $15-$20 to the cost of a round (per person).  I can only think of 2 courses off the top of my head that require carts, both are upscale and pretty expensive already.  With that said there are a couple courses I would never play without a cart, the hikes between holes or the incredibly hilly terrain just demands it.

I walk the vast majority of my rounds though, if for no other reason than 2 saved cart fees is practically another round 'for free'.

Brad


Posted

Wow, if carts were $15-20 per round, I'd be walking too.  I am lucky to have a lot of very nice (and very reasonable) public/mini courses in my area

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted

Sadly despite the popularity, golf is pretty expensive in Canada.  I imagine it has something to do with the fact the course is sitting empty 5-6 months of the year.

Brad


Posted


Originally Posted by bradsul

Sadly despite the popularity, golf is pretty expensive in Canada.  I imagine it has something to do with the fact the course is sitting empty 5-6 months of the year.



That is a little surprising.  Around here (Midwest USA), while our season is a little longer, many courses are seeing decreases in playing.  I see a ton of specials like free carts, reduced greens fees, all you can play on certain days, food included with greens fees, etc. to get more players.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted


My understanding is that Canada hasn't had the  same level of economic crisis as the US.  Golf is a luxury good. Look back at what the courses where doing in 2006.

Originally Posted by Gresh24

That is a little surprising.  Around here (Midwest USA), while our season is a little longer, many courses are seeing decreases in playing.  I see a ton of specials like free carts, reduced greens fees, all you can play on certain days, food included with greens fees, etc. to get more players.




  • Moderator
Posted

Bethpage Black is walking only. I'd call that encouraging walking.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm glad this hasn't turned into a carts versus walking debate, since the OP was likely targetting people who prefer to walk already. My opinion about carts and cart golf in general is just that - my opinion. Its good to know I'm not alone though. Golf to me is a bit more than shooting a score and getting done as quick as possible. It's a bit of an escape every time out and I enjoy a walk down the fairway almost as much as hitting the shots. As stated earlier, a walking preferred course would be great (for me), but for now walker friendly courses and not carting unless forced to is working out okay.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Originally Posted by nevets88

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

No public course encourages walking....

Bethpage Black is walking only. I'd call that encouraging walking.

Bill


Note: This thread is 4051 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
    • I think part of it is there hasn't been enough conclusive studies specific to golf regarding block studies. Maybe the full swing, you can't study it because it is too complicated and to some degree it will fall into variable or random.  
    • Going one step stiffer in the golf shaft, of the same make and model will have minor impact on the launch conditions. It can matter, it is a way to dial in some launch conditions if you are a few hundred RPM off or the angle isn't there. Same with moving weights around. A clubhead weights 200-220 grams. You are shifting a fraction of that to move the CG slightly. It can matter, again its more about fine tuning. As for grip size, this is more personal preference. Grip size doesn't have any impact on the swing out of personal preference.  You are going to spend hundreds of dollars for fine tuning. Which if you want, go for it. I am not sure what your level of play is, or what your goals in golf are.  In the end, the golf swing matters more than the equipment. If you want to go to that level of detail, go find a good golf club fitter. ChatGPT is going to surface scan reddit, golfwrx, and other popular websites for the answers. Basically, it is all opinionated gibberish at this point.   
    • Wordle 1,640 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.