Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Would you rather be More or Less Consistent?


Note: This thread is 5176 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Assuming the same scoring average, would you rather be consistent or erratic?

    • I prefer consistency with most of my rounds close to my average.
      23
    • I'd rather have some really good and some really bad rounds.
      8


Recommended Posts

Posted

Overall I'd prefer to be consistent but it would be nice to have a few really good rounds to give me a sneak peek to indicate where my game is headed and give me some extra motivation to get there quicker.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I shoot 75 every time I play...now that is consistent!

HEH

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted

Last Saturday was the first round of our Club Championships.

Friend of mine, in my group, off 7, shot 87.

On Sunday, he had 1 under par. Same course.

Today, in the second round of the Club Championships he had 93.

'nuff said.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
I'd prefer to be more consistent than I am - somehow don't think that'll happen. Doesn't seem to be the nature of the game anyhow.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted


Originally Posted by poser

I've been over hauling my swing for the last year so I've had scores as low as 67 and as high as 87.  Thats 20 shots difference.  Like the above said unless you play the same course everytime you tee it up I don't see how you can be within 5 shots everytime.  Even tour players have rounds in the 80s



67....that's salty!!!!  Nice playing and I appreciate the input from a low HC player.  I don't doubt people tend to shoot the five shot range they claim.......but I think the high end of the scale on bad days is cut short.  IE...it's already a bad day , so why not take that free drop...etc, etc....

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted

Consistent.  It'd be great to know what the hell the ball is going to do every time I take a shot.  It is extremely frustrating to me to have rounds where I show a lot of promise in moving in the right direction only to have it completely reverse during later rounds.  I'm in a real slump lately compared to the significant improvements I had during August/early September.

Always changing:

 

Driver: Cobra S2/Nike VR Pro 10.5º

Irons: Callaway X-20 Tour 4-9i

Hybrid: Titleist 910H 19º & 21º

Wood: TaylorMade R11 3w

Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Wedges: Titleist Vokeys - 48º, 54º, 62º

 

First round: February 2011

 


Posted

Reading everyone's responses and seeing the poll results has been fun.  I voted for inconsistent, but it was a tough choice.


Originally Posted by ghalfaire

This is a difficult question.  But I think it depends upon your handicap and if you play for $$ or not.  If you're a 20 and you play for $$ (or Euros or whatever) it is better to be inconsistent unless you like losing.  I am inconsistent and just this year I have scored 83 (best) and 105 (worst).  I admit this has been a bad year for the handicap as I have not been able to play or practice very much for various reasons (life happens I guess).  But in terms of winning, the rounds in the 80s were money makers.  Given the way the handicaps are calculated I suspect it is better for double digit handicaps to be a little inconsistent (most are whether they want to be or not).

But I seem to be well now and other distractions have been resolved so I'll rededicate myself to becoming more consistent again and with a lower handicap (creek don't rise and Lord willing).


I think it depends on the type of money you are playing for- If you are playing regular nassaus against your friends, I think you will be better served by consistency.  Remember a guy who shoots 20 rounds between 81 and 83 will have a HIGHER handicap that a guy who shoots 80 ten times and 90 ten times.  However, if you play tournament golf, especially 1 round comps, the guy who can shoot well under his handicap has a chance to win on his good days while the guy who shoots near his handicap doesn't have much of a chance in a large field.

Here is an interesting article about consistency featuring two Nationwide players with similar scoring averages that shows the the more inconsistent player doing much better.  Danny Wax is struggling having played all 23 NW events so far this year with scoring range of 66 to 75 while Daniel Chopra has been over 75 six times, but has a chance to get his tour card for 2012.

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

Nobody shoots consistently within a 5 shot margin.............lets all be honest here.  Anyone who claims to shoot within a tight range of scores doesn't count all the strokes.



agreed it you mean 80 to 84, but not if you mean 5+/-  your average on the same course. (aka 80 to 90 with a 85 ave)



Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

My range of scores for 2011 is (-2) 70 and (+15) 87.  Everybody has bad days when our golf ball seeks out every bad spot on the course and scores will always spiral out of control pretty fast on those bad days.  Even the worlds best tour players do the same......even the best tour players toss in the occasional round in the 80's.


Occasionally they do under severe conditions, but there are some guys who can go years without shooting in the 80s under normal conditions.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Posted


Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

67....that's salty!!!!  Nice playing and I appreciate the input from a low HC player.  I don't doubt people tend to shoot the five shot range they claim.......but I think the high end of the scale on bad days is cut short.  IE...it's already a bad day , so why not take that free drop...etc, etc....



Very true.  I know alot of my high rounds come alot from the mental side though.  When I'm not hitting it well I usually just almost quit trying and start drinking lol.  There has been alot of drinking lately.  Some of those days I could probably scramble my butt off and come out with a a high 70s round but, for some reason if I know I can't shoot under for the day because of a bad front nine I just throw in the towel.  For sure something I really need to work on.  I also have friends if they have a bad day then they don't post their score and just call it a practice round.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For me just starting out consistency would be the most important. If i had a consistent swing and was able to shoot well I would be able to improve on that.


Posted

I feel that I would rather be consistent, which I pretty much am. Consistently horrible, really. To me, when I shoot a better score, and then repeat it the next outing (or at least come close), it says that whatever I learned that helped me improve my score stuck with me.

If I find that I shot a 110 and the next two weeks I shot 106, then for my skill level I'm not going backwards. As I improve, say I shoot a 95 and then the following week I shoot a 98, it tells me that the improvements stuck.

Driver: :adams: Speedline F11 9.5* loft 3 Wood: :adams: Speedline F12 15* Hybrid: :adams: Idea Super Hybrid 17* - Used in place of my 5 wood Hybrid: :adams: Idea A1 i-wood 21* Irons: :adams: Idea A1 5-PW Wedges: :adams: Watson 52*, 56*, 60* Wedges Putter: :tmade: Rossa Lambeau, Black


Posted

Is this a trick question?

Originally Posted by MEfree

Assuming your scoring average does not change, would you rather see your scores all bunched around your average, or spread all over the place with more really good and more really bad rounds?  If you play a bunch of different courses, it assumes they are all around the same difficulty.

i.e.  78, 85 and 93 OR 83, 85 and 87?



Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Posted


Originally Posted by Topper

Is this a trick question?


no just bad math on my part...should have been 92 not 93...would go back and fix it but do only see the edit button for this post, not the original

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Posted

Not sure. I read a lot of comments in previous years where guys called new playing partners posers and "vanity cappers" for not playing to approximately their handicap during a particular round. Several even questioned the validity of the entire USGA handicap index system (and I suppose the RCGA which is very similar) when a single digit player didn't break 90. Now apparently routinely shooting terrible rounds is in vogue for 2011. Now it's getting your overall game to a point where you're pretty close to your index every time out that's seen as fraudulent. If I had the kind of putting game where an under par round was commonplace, I can't see how a score of 93 would even be possible on that same course.

Originally Posted by Topper

Is this a trick question?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MEfree

Assuming your scoring average does not change, would you rather see your scores all bunched around your average, or spread all over the place with more really good and more really bad rounds?  If you play a bunch of different courses, it assumes they are all around the same difficulty.

i.e.  78, 85 and 93 OR 83, 85 and 87?



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I don't know if one would call this consistent or not, but I'll take these scores over mine any day!!!

Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

This is typical of what you should see as far as score ranges go for a 1HC..........

HC's will vary as do the scores............I'm not always a 1.

My index was in the 1's for most of the year, it was also in the 2's some......... I also jumped to a 3.2 early in the year recovering from winter rust.   Right now my index is 1.7.  On my home course from the tees I play, that translates to a 2HC.  Technically speaking....I'm not even a 1HC right now on my home course.  LOL

If I go somewhere easier....I am  It just depends where I play. You just have to keep in mind how handicaps are calculated because only the 10best scores out of 20 count.  My only point is that people who say for example....."I always shoot between 95-100" are kidding themselves because there is no way in hell that is possible if they are being truly honest with themselves.  I'm not saying they can't shoot those scores.  What I am saying is those ranges are much larger.....




Posted

I would like to wake up any day and shoot 77, until I made improvements and did the same at 76, 75, 74, etc.  The kind of body and game that could produce that would be nice to have.  Instead I get 72 sometimes and 82 other times.  Sometimes even 92...

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

I've just never seen a 1 handicap shoot a 87 before! I am a 3 and my high round of the year was an 83. So I guess I am more consistent than most. But to say someone who shoots all there scores between 5 strokes is not counting all there strokes is just plain ignorant.

Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated


Posted

Worst round this year for me was an 84(+12), best being 69(-3).  I feel like I go high 70's too often,but hey, whatever the math comes out to.

I see a lot of people here looking for consistency, but hey, I'd much rather shoot half my scores under 75 and the other half over 95, then shooting 80-85 with little chance of going under.  I'd rather have greatness and failures than live with mediocrity.

Then again, if my scores are that far apart, something is seriously wrong.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5176 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.