Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4049 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

  • Upvote 3

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Very informative! Thanks Erik.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

Erik, I have a question on video analysis and interpreting the ball flight laws. Now that I have started using video to analyse swings, I have noticed that sometimes what I see on film after a shot doesn't match with how the ball flew. Let me explain. Occasionally, I'll hit a ball that starts off right of target and draws back to the target. So far so good, that's what I'm looking for (a push-draw).

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible? If the camera is positioned correctly and I'm aimed correctly, even though it feels I have hit the ball in the middle of the clubface, must I conclude that I hit it off the toe and what I observed was the gear effect?

Or...occasionally, I'll notice that although I am clearly over the plane line with my arms and hands, the clubhead appears to strike the ball from under the plane line. Is this possible? Have I managed to come over the top and then manipulated the clubhead somehow to hit from the inside. Please clarify.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible? If the camera is positioned correctly and I'm aimed correctly, even though it feels I have hit the ball in the middle of the clubface, must I conclude that I hit it off the toe and what I observed was the gear effect?

That's unlikely. I'd like to see such a video. Most likely it's a case of this:


Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Or...occasionally, I'll notice that although I am clearly over the plane line with my arms and hands, the clubhead appears to strike the ball from under the plane line. Is this possible? Have I managed to come over the top and then manipulated the clubhead somehow to hit from the inside. Please clarify.

Good players all tend to do that if they get their arms out - they'll uncock the club and even bow their left wrists sometimes to keep the clubhead to the inside.

You can come "over the top" with your right shoulder, your left arm, your hands... or the clubhead. The latter is the only one that matters in terms of the ball flight.

Imagine in the pictures below Charlie's clubhead was in the same spot (both slightly under-plane) but his hands were a little above the plane. He'd be "over the top" with his arms/shoulders/hands but still be delivering the club from under the plane.

__1.jpg

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

Good players all tend to do that if they get their arms out - they'll uncock the club and even bow their left wrists sometimes to keep the clubhead to the inside.

You can come "over the top" with your right shoulder, your left arm, your hands... or the clubhead. The latter is the only one that matters in terms of the ball flight.


Ah OK, thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't sure if I was imagining things or had the camera in the wrong place! Still, it's a really bad way to hit the ball.

By the way, my feel isn't so off that I don't know the difference between hitting the ball in the middle of the face and off the toe. It's just I've heard so many stories about being just one dimple off and the differences it makes to the ball flight.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Moderator
Posted

Great explanation.  I can see what I have been doing wrong now.  Better videos to come....

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by TN94z

Great explanation.  I can see what I have been doing wrong now.  Better videos to come....

Thanks.

The easiest way is to put a stick on the ground and make it vertical in the camera. Then put your toes against the stick. If you don't want to hit balls with the stick there, put tees near where your toes go or something.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Thanks Erik.  I have been positioning it more in the middle (incorrectly).

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 years later...
Posted

bumping...

Very helpful thread. What is the recommended height that the camera should be set up at?

IN MY BAG
Driver: Taylormade SLDR Mini Driver
3 Wood: Calloway RAZR Hawk
Hybrid: Ping 19*
Irons: Mizuno JPX 825
Wedges: 52, 56 Cleveland
Putter: Odyssey White Ice

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
bumping...

Very helpful thread. What is the recommended height that the camera should be set up at?

Roughly hip or belly button height.  From "Filming Your Golf Swing"

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Erik, I have a question on video analysis and interpreting the ball flight laws. Now that I have started using video to analyse swings, I have noticed that sometimes what I see on film after a shot doesn't match with how the ball flew. Let me explain. Occasionally, I'll hit a ball that starts off right of target and draws back to the target. So far so good, that's what I'm looking for (a push-draw).

However, when I look at the video I can see my swingpath is clearly out-to-in. How is this possible?

1. First, consider that your video itself may not be accurate. Many cameras use a rolling shutter, which can cause some distortions with regard to high speed motion.

2. The "sweet spot" of the club as far as the ball coming off exactly straight may not be where you think the center is. And can depend on club design. And what happens on hits more towards the edges also varies depending on clubhead design. These effects shouldn't be large near the center, but just a few degrees might have you off by as much as 10 yards at target. So basically, you could even be slightly out in, with a draw, and still have the ball come off slightly right and draw back toward target, even with what you think is a center hit. So if you are talking about a shot being off a fairly small amount from your expectation, yes that is possible.


Posted

Roughly hip or belly button height.  From "Filming Your Golf Swing"

thx

IN MY BAG
Driver: Taylormade SLDR Mini Driver
3 Wood: Calloway RAZR Hawk
Hybrid: Ping 19*
Irons: Mizuno JPX 825
Wedges: 52, 56 Cleveland
Putter: Odyssey White Ice

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4049 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.