Jump to content
IGNORED

Pros vs. Ams.....What's the difference?


Tiger90
Note: This thread is 4227 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Quote:

They hit shots a lot of players hit. They just do it way more often.

Everyone knows a few kids who were destined to make it as a professional in whatever sport is big in your neck of the woods. Some make it and others don't. It's not always about talent. You gotta have determination, luck, self confidence, nerves of steel, be clutch when the right people are watching, and more than anything you have to be somewhat coachable. Golf is like baseball in that there are a lot of statistics that seem to be a very good indicator of success.

All I'm saying is there are a lot of "scratch" players (and that's what were talking about, not 10 handicappers who can't break into the 70s let alone the 60s) who have pro skills in all but one or two areas. Sometimes it's important areas like putting or intelligence, but still, a ton of scratch and low index players "can" make the shots the pros make. It's all those "other shots" that add up. The consistency.

Maybe it's just semantics, but I'm not just talking about some sense of physical ability or some level of peak performance hand-eye coordination when I say "talent".  I'm including pretty much everything you list except for luck and maybe coachability.

Anyone who's a serious golfer and athletic enough to hit at least somewhat near tour distances with the irons has hit shots that any pro would be happy with from 200 in.  Certainly almost every scratch player is capable of hitting shots with every club in the bag that any pro would be happy with.

Being capable of hitting those shots is relatively little of what makes up the "talent" that's required to be a pro golfer.  The "talent" is being able to hit those shots (almost) every time, and change between different types of shots and hit them all right (almost) every time.  To me it seems like the consistency, and the mental skills required to maintain that consistency in crunch time, are the vast majority of what separates pro golfers from great amateurs.  That's where the physical talent is demonstrated too.  Cause it requires mental skills to maintain that consistency, but also physical skills.

I think the confusion about how good pro golfers are stems from the fact that, unlike in other sports, you can be a good amateur and be physically capable of all the skills required to succeed professionally.  Almost no one playing in a weekend adult baseball or basketball or football or hockey league is physically capabel of even really coming close to performing the required athletic feats with the speed, strength, etc required at the pro level.  But in golf, there are plenty of amateurs who can swing the club at 113 mph and go out and score 71 some days on a tough par 72 course.  And there are even more who can swing it 110 mph and go shoot 77 on a tough course and can trick themselves into thinking that if only they had the time and money they could train hard and play constantly and stop leaving those 9 strokes on the course and do that under tournament conditions and stress and have the skills to be successful as a pro.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


I would say the top nationwide players are about the same as the 100-150 pga pros if you go by the following years results. Just trying to remove the course differences and make it all about the golfers.

I am pretty confidant that crowds and nerves are a minor factor in the whole equation of why a scratch guy ins't on tour. Their game is still too weak.  Now if you are talking about a +4 making as pro then I would say nerves and the like matter a heck of  a lot.

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Hey, no changing the goalposts on me!  My 15-shot argument was the scratch golfer playing on the PGA Tour, not the other way around. The scratch golfer is not used to playing his normal game under such conditions and I'm not just talking about the course. You have to take into account the buzz (nerves, crowds, cameras etc.) surrounding a PGA Tour event, you cannot compare it to a little tournament at your local club.

Just so we are comparing oranges to oranges, I am talking about scratch golfers (proper 0.0 handicappers that average around 74-75 over their last 20 rounds, because there different kinds of 0.0 handicappers!) and PGA Tour pros capable of keeping their tour card.



Link to comment
Share on other sites



Quote:
Originally Posted by x129 View Post

Those scores would put the pro ~7-8 strokes better than the scratch guy (obviously a lot of assumptions including the one that a guy shooting a course record is doing some where around 1 in 1000 round) which is a about what I said. I am too lazy to do it but it might be more instructional to look at the nationwide tour instead of the PGA. My impression is that they are a bit closer to what the a normal club would be. The top nationwide guys are about the same as midlevel pro (based on results the following year). Most of the course are about a 75 and most tournaments are won around -15 or so (this varies quite a bit ) which again would suggest ~7=8 strokes. Obviously that is a boat load of strokes but it is a lot less than 15.

I think the prevailing thought in this thread is that even Nationwide is close to scratch. Not really, they are a hair from the PGA and miles from scratch. Maybe go down to Golden Bear, Hooters, and mini-mini tour level and you get closer.  Even the guys winning those events are shooting in the 60s on a daily basis from 7000 yards.

Quote:
Pros hit the same shots as a good amateur shot in my experience. I play with a guy that shoots int he low 80s (was low single back when he played a ton in HS but now gets out a couple times a month at best). If you took 100 swings of his and a 100 swings of a pro, the best 5 or so would be indistinguishable without going to slow motion. He is smooth and has enough clubhead speed to get that 7 iron out 180+ (I have seen 200 on the course but I sure as heck didn't notice the exact wind and slope) and you get the whole different sound than the rest of us hackers. The difference is the rest of the shots drop off much quicker where his worst 10 shots are probably are worse than the pros worst 10 shots of the year. It is tempting to say that if he practiced 24/7 he could gain that consistency but that isn't really true. People have limits and as you approach them improvement gets really hard.

You are over simplifying it. Your guy may take 100 shots to hit 5 that are pro quality, but they are not pro quality on demand.  Hitting a high fade to a front right pin with a 7 iron from 185 yards is different than hitting a 7 iron 185 yards.  Hitting that lower draw to skip back to that back left pin is what separates the two. See the pro only has about 32 full shots a round to make his case, anymore and he won't be making any cuts (assuming 2 on par 4s, 1 on par 3s, and 2 on par 5s with partials finishing). You are right about his worst 10 being worse than 10 a pro might hit all year. Pros can and do hit poor shots from time to time, but they rarely compound the errors like us ams do. I also give you credit for the last sentence as people do have limits and improvement becomes monumentally harder the better you get. That is why I maintain that a 10 is closer to scratch than a scratch is to Tour.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There pretty much zero difference between a top 25 nationwide pro and a 120-180 pga member. One just played better the previous year.Anyone who thinks differently is nuts. There is also the whole traveling scratch versus club one.  If you play the same course 2x a week for 10 years, you have build up an insane knowledge base for how to play that one course. Of course most amateurs don't have caddies out with them for second opinions (and if you believe the caddies they are worth 3-4 strokes a round ) so maybe it all evens out.

Yes what I said was  a gross simplification(I realize my post made it sound like I was focusing on distance which wasn't my intent. I have played with guys that over power the ball (ex DI football guys) and their shots look nothing like a pga pro of my friend.) that i but we are saying the same thing that it is consistency that matters. Heck it isn't even the 10 worst that kill you. It is those 80  in the middle that aren't up to snuff. A bladed chip is an obvious bad shot. Leaving the chip at 6 ft instead of 3 costs you 1/4 of a shot. In the long run that will catch up with you  From an improvement point of view (not necessary scoring) there is no doubt that 10 is closer to scratch than scratch to pro since improvement gets much harder as you get better.

I think the most controversial part that I have written is that the average guy can not develop the consistency of a pro no matter how much they practice. The reason I find it controversal is that our learning techniques for motor skills are pretty barbaric right now (pretty much just varying amounts of repetition of the action and drills to help that action). Maybe in 10 years we will learn enough about learning to figure out something that will really help. Or maybe not.  It might also turn out that we could all have been PGA pros but we needed to do certain training between the ages of 3-6 to develop those skills and it 12 it is too late (I am not saying you needed to have played golf. Maybe just swing bat 5000 times). No one really knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I admit to taking issue with the few guys suggesting the pros are playing a different game. They're playing the same game to a higher level. There's a difference. Yeah, I play a different style of golf than a 20 index and the 20's playing a different style than the 36, especially when it comes to their arsenal of shots and the consistency of the execution, but why now it's okay to suggest a scratch golfer is not playing golf?  The double standards are annoying. Beginners rock because they count all their terrible strokes, but a scratch golfer isn't really golfing because he has fewer stock shots on demand than a PGA Tour winner? What a joke.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by sean_miller

I admit to taking issue with the few guys suggesting the pros are playing a different game. They're playing the same game to a higher level. There's a difference. Yeah, I play a different style of golf than a 20 index and the 20's playing a different style than the 36, especially when it comes to their arsenal of shots and the consistency of the execution, but why now it's okay to suggest a scratch golfer is not playing golf?  The double standards are annoying. Beginners rock because they count all their terrible strokes, but a scratch golfer isn't really golfing because he has fewer stock shots on demand than a PGA Tour winner? What a joke.


Is that what they really meant by a different game?  I just took it as slang meaning they play a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Kobey

Is that what they really meant by a different game?  I just took it as slang meaning they play a lot better.


Exactly. Obviously it's the same game, I thought it was pretty clear it was a hyperbole.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kobey

Is that what they really meant by a different game?  I just took it as slang meaning they play a lot better.

Exactly. Obviously it's the same game, I thought it was pretty clear it was a hyperbole.



Call it a pet peeve. Yes obviously it's the same game yet people keep saying otherwise, and they're not always exaggerating to make a point. Some of them are dead serious. Of course a person playing a sport professionally will most certainly do almost everything better than someone playing that sport recreationally. Duh. Yet some people seem to be convinced that the actual sport the professional is playing is different because he or she is better at it. Perhaps I'm being too literal, but when the same thing is written over and over the same way, one eventually assumes the author actually means what they're saying.

It's not just this thread, or this site, it's golf forums in general.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


We all have our pet peeves, so I won't hold that against anyone, but I think it's a fair statement.

It is a different game in the following almost literal sense, which you hinted at. When I go out and play, the "game" is trying to hit enough quality shots to bogey most of the holes, make a few pars, and avoid the 8s. When a pro is out there, those quality shots are practically a given---the "game" involves picking the best targets, the best specific shots, etc. The rules that govern the ball rolling around are identical, but the focus is quite different.

But, mostly, it's hyperbole. A scratch golfer is so unlikely to hold up against a pro, it implies, that he's not even in the game.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I can sum up the difference between pros and AMs in 3 words plus 1 smiley:

"Night and Day"

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by TourSpoon

. That is why I maintain that a 10 is closer to scratch than a scratch is to Tour.


It's been said before, but a very famous player once said that 18 is closer to scratch than scratch is to a Tour player. And I agree.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by zeg

We all have our pet peeves, so I won't hold that against anyone, but I think it's a fair statement.

It is a different game in the following almost literal sense, which you hinted at. When I go out and play, the "game" is trying to hit enough quality shots to bogey most of the holes, make a few pars, and avoid the 8s. When a pro is out there, those quality shots are practically a given---the "game" involves picking the best targets, the best specific shots, etc. The rules that govern the ball rolling around are identical, but the focus is quite different.

But, mostly, it's hyperbole. A scratch golfer is so unlikely to hold up against a pro, it implies, that he's not even in the game.



As is the trend in this thread, I'll summarize this in 3 words using "golf" as a verb.

"Pros golf better."

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by sean_miller

"Pros golf better."



Yes, that much is obvious, but by how much? I said at least 15 shots, Shorty believes that it is more than 18, others have said between 7-9 and then we have a couple of people that think it is "a few shots".

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

"Pros golf better."

Yes, that much is obvious, but by how much? I said at least 15 shots, Shorty believes that it is more than 18, others have said between 7-9 and then we have a couple of people that think it is "a few shots".

This is all just guessing since it depend on what type of player the scratch player is. Why is he scratch? Is he scratch only at his home course? A good tour caddie helping with reads should be able to get a scratch player around pretty close to their average differential on a tour course assuming the player's index travels well (and it's not in a hurricane). I'm gonna go out on a limb and suggest that if a scratch player couldn't play well (relatively speaking - not exactly threatening to make the cut - and maybe even finishing dead last) on a PGA Tour course with a PGA Tour level caddie on the bag, then he's a fraud. That is my opinion.

If the caddie could help keep the player's ego in check they should certainly get around in 80 strokes. Not every time, but more often that not. That might be 15+ strokes more than some players and only a handfull more than others.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by sacm3bill

I can also do it in 3 words: "Hole. Nutha. Level."


OK...I have to admit that was pretty funny.  hahaha

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Yes, that much is obvious, but by how much? I said at least 15 shots, Shorty believes that it is more than 18, others have said between 7-9 and then we have a couple of people that think it is "a few shots".


Over a legit scratch, I'm going with 8.

PGA Tour scoring averages are still almost 71. Give a legit scratch guy more than, say, four rounds to get a true average and he's not going to average 86. Upper 70s, but not 85-86.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4227 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...