Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Pros vs. Ams.....What's the difference?


Note: This thread is 4994 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

Accepted by who?

When I was a 1.8 I was not a scratch golfer, and what's more, I knew how far away from it I was (quite a ways away - farther than even an 8.0 index was from me).



Honestly a scratch golfer with todays slope and ratings should be around a +2.  Scratch isn't shit I've been a +0.5 before and I still threw up the occassional 80s round.  I sucked...

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by poser

Honestly a scratch golfer with todays slope and ratings should be around a +2.


And as others have said, that's a +2, not a scratch golfer.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by poser

Honestly a scratch golfer with todays slope and ratings should be around a +2.  Scratch isn't shit I've been a +0.5 before and I still threw up the occassional 80s round.  I sucked...


Uff, I'm not sure I agree with that. There is big difference between a scratch golfer and a +2. A lot of people feel it is simply holing one more putt and getting U&D; one more time a round, but it is more complicated than that.

Shooting the occasional round in the 80s is normal for a scratch golfer. I disagree their bad rounds are 73s and 74s.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted


Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Uff, I'm not sure I agree with that. There is big difference between a scratch golfer and a +2. A lot of people feel it is simply holing one more putt and getting U&D; one more time a round, but it is more complicated than that.

Shooting the occasional round in the 80s is normal for a scratch golfer. I disagree their bad rounds are 73s and 74s.


Given that half of a player's rounds don't even count towards their handicap, I would tend to agree with this. If a player's "bad" rounds are a 73 or 74, they're better than scratch...if two over par isn't even counting towards their handicap that means they're posting a lot of rounds in the 60s.

  • Upvote 1

Posted


Originally Posted by The_Pharaoh

Uff, I'm not sure I agree with that. There is big difference between a scratch golfer and a +2. A lot of people feel it is simply holing one more putt and getting U&D; one more time a round, but it is more complicated than that.

Shooting the occasional round in the 80s is normal for a scratch golfer. I disagree their bad rounds are 73s and 74s.

I think you miss the point completely.  What i mean is the club scratch golfer you know isn't that good.  A true scratch in my eyes plays tournaments and different courses and shoots low rounds.  Which is why I say a guy that plays his local course every weekend should be a +2 to be a true scratch player in my eyes.  You can disagree all you want but, I promise if you take two scratch golfers one who plays his same 6500 yard course and another that plays different 7000+ courses.  I'll take the traveler over the home course guy any day of the week on a course neither have ever played.  It's a little different when you play the same course all the time and know every little break.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by poser

A true scratch in my eyes plays tournaments and different courses and shoots low rounds.  Which is why I say a guy that plays his local course every weekend should be a +2 to be a true scratch player in my eyes.


OK, I know what you mean and agree. This is why I said there are different types of scratch golfers. There is a guy at my club that is off +0.5 or something and only plays at our club because he admits he can't break 80 elsewhere. He's very wild with the driver and my local course is very forgiving off the tee.

I was actually agreeing to your second point re: the occasional 80. I was disagreeing with others saying they usually have a tighter scoring pattern. Scratch golfers often shoot under par one day, in the 80s the next.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

C'mon guys, it's right there in the definition I posted up-thread a bit. A scratch golfer plays to a zero course handicap on any course. If the performance doesn't travel from his home course, then he is, by definition, not a scratch golfer, he just has a zero index as a bit of a fluke.

Are there really that many zero-handicappers stuck to a single course? I would think the game would get really boring just playing the same 18 holes again and again. Of course, maybe that's just perspective from having been in southern California where there are a dozen or more golf courses within an hour's drive of any given point...

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by zeg

C'mon guys, it's right there in the definition I posted up-thread a bit. A scratch golfer plays to a zero course handicap on any course. If the performance doesn't travel from his home course, then he is, by definition, not a scratch golfer, he just has a zero index as a bit of a fluke.


Right. There's no point in discussing what a scratch golfer is. The number of "guys who are scratch on the same 6500 yard course and never play elsewhere" is incredibly small in my experience.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by zeg

Are there really that many zero-handicappers stuck to a single course?



Probably not, the example of the guy at my club is unlikely to be the norm for most scratch golfers. However, for the rest of the golfing population in Spain most people stick to their own club as playing elsewhere is very expensive.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted


Originally Posted by zeg

Are there really that many zero-handicappers stuck to a single course? I would think the game would get really boring just playing the same 18 holes again and again. Of course, maybe that's just perspective from having been in southern California where there are a dozen or more golf courses within an hour's drive of any given point...



You are underestimating the egos of some people.  There are plenty of people that will happily play the same course all the time just so that everyone will think they are a great golfer.


Posted


Originally Posted by Kobey

You are underestimating the egos of some people.  There are plenty of people that will happily play the same course all the time just so that everyone will think they are a great golfer.


I don't know too many in this boat, but I do know that there are some home courses that are so tough that a scratch there basically means you can play anywhere.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted




You are underestimating the egos of some people.  There are plenty of people that will happily play the same course all the time just so that everyone will think they are a great golfer.



That sounds incredibly boring.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted


Originally Posted by Kobey

You are underestimating the egos of some people.  There are plenty of people that will happily play the same course all the time just so that everyone will think they are a great golfer.


Really?

'Hey Joe - let's go play somewhere else this weekend.'

'Nah. I want to play the same course over and over so I can have a low handicap.'

I've heard of narcissistic, but that takes it to a whole new level.


Posted


Originally Posted by zipazoid

Really?

'Hey Joe - let's go play somewhere else this weekend.'

'Nah. I want to play the same course over and over so I can have a low handicap.'

I've heard of narcissistic, but that takes it to a whole new level.


Alot of people are members of golf courses and don't pay to play other spots.  Whats so weird about that?  People get married wife says you already have a membership why the hell would you play somewhere else..... Buddy of mine is only allowed to play his home course because its like 400 a month members fee.  His wife wouldn't allow him to play anywhere else

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by poser

Quote:

Originally Posted by zipazoid

Really?

'Hey Joe - let's go play somewhere else this weekend.'

'Nah. I want to play the same course over and over so I can have a low handicap.'

I've heard of narcissistic, but that takes it to a whole new level.

Alot of people are members of golf courses and don't pay to play other spots.  Whats so weird about that?  People get married wife says you already have a membership why the hell would you play somewhere else..... Buddy of mine is only allowed to play his home course because its like 400 a month members fee.  His wife wouldn't allow him to play anywhere else


It's guys like that I was thinking about when I read someone trash a guy for only playing 24 different courses. "Only" 24? What a douchey thing to say. If I get to play 24 different courses in the next decade it'll be because I won the lottery.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

We have agreements with other clubs where 4-8 members can play each other's course on one specific day during the week paying the same amount as the members. Fridays and weekends are completely out, unless you are willing to pay between $150-200. For this reason, the average golfer plays 95% of their rounds at the same club and the other 5% being when they are on their summer holidays.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


Posted

Sure, I'll completely buy that most people play most of their rounds at "home," but that's not my point. Very, very few of those guys play at scratch. How many guys are scratch at home, but significantly worse when they go somewhere else?

Course knowledge is no doubt useful, but unless you're playing in some seriously unconventional ways, the raw skill to take advantage of that knowledge consistently is going to travel pretty well. It'd seem to me that most home-scratch golfers would play very close to that when they go somewhere new, and certainly pick it up after a short period of visiting new courses.

And, to keep this on topic, consider that pros get practice time on a course prior to each tourney. Beyond that, most of them have played most courses several times prior. So, while the common wisdom (which I don't dispute) is that one considering going pro should be able to shoot sub-par at a previously unseen course, that's not at all what we see on TV. Heck, most of us only see Saturday and Sunday after the cut, so we never even get to see the guys having a bad week or who can't handle some characteristic of the course.

  • Upvote 1

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted


Originally Posted by zeg

Sure, I'll completely buy that most people play most of their rounds at "home," but that's not my point. Very, very few of those guys play at scratch. How many guys are scratch at home, but significantly worse when they go somewhere else?

Course knowledge is no doubt useful, but unless you're playing in some seriously unconventional ways, the raw skill to take advantage of that knowledge consistently is going to travel pretty well. It'd seem to me that most home-scratch golfers would play very close to that when they go somewhere new, and certainly pick it up after a short period of visiting new courses.

And, to keep this on topic, consider that pros get practice time on a course prior to each tourney. Beyond that, most of them have played most courses several times prior. So, while the common wisdom (which I don't dispute) is that one considering going pro should be able to shoot sub-par at a previously unseen course, that's not at all what we see on TV. Heck, most of us only see Saturday and Sunday after the cut, so we never even get to see the guys having a bad week or who can't handle some characteristic of the course.

I can name a few.  I don't know where you guys live but, golf around here isn't cheap.  You are looking at 80-400 bucks depending on where you want to play for a round.  Most are members and stick to that one course pretty much.  Even if the guy plays other courses doesn't mean anything real different from what I previously said.  Just means they could be putting up mid 80s at different courses which get thrown out for their handicap anyways.  Alot are members of the pinehurst courses there are 7 different courses you get to play for your membership.

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4994 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.