Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 803 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by Pablo68

When over done, your rounded spine will cause as many if not more problems than a straight spine.

Ok so for you there are alignment issues.  What other problems would this posture cause?  What would these players be able to do better if their spines were straighter?

a1 posture.jpg

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Pablo68

1. What's your proof that the rounded spine is more atheletic? "I contend"..................that's your opinion. In a lot of sports, you assume a ready position that includes a relatively straight spine; hence the atheltic position.

See above. We've given reasons. It's my opinion, backed by, among others... these three reasons off the top of my head:

  1. More relaxed (less muscle tension)
  2. Shoulders more in their impact positions (not retracted)
  3. Able to view the ball out of the center of our eyes.

"Warming up" isn't relevant to the topic, so let's just ignore that you (or the other person) said anything about sore backs or "back issues." I don't feel I misread what you wrote - I will admit to misjudging the relevance (none) to the topic if it makes you feel better. :)

It's generally unwise to assume. I think I've established that I'm a credible instructor. You seem willing to take the word of anyone who puts themselves out there. Also, I don't know what in the hell I'm selling exactly, but I suppose that doesn't really matter. You've got your opinions and aren't budging. That's fine.

I'll let the rest of your post go without response, because it's late and I think we've been over it all already, but I will disagree with one part: given the choice between two players who are equidistant from "neutral," (the TW photos I've posted today are pretty close to neutral - slight rounding of the back), I'll take the one that's too round over the one that's too straight, for the three reasons listed above, and more.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by mvmac

Ok so for you there are alignment issues.  What other problems would this posture cause?  What would these players be able to do better if their spines were straighter?

There are different body types and the guy on the right is again, VERY TALL from the look of it. Unless he buys longer clubs of course he'll have to bend more somehow to get down to the ball.

I get it guys; you're instructors advocating a certain way of playing. You're offering information to the public which is great and I appreciate reading different philosophies. I choose to believe in the more traditional approach to the setup but not to the extreme.

Good luck in your ventures..............


Posted
There are different body types and the guy on the right is again, VERY TALL from the look of it.

Grant Waite? He's 6'1". So no, not "VERY TALL." [quote name="Pablo68" url="/t/56069/good-golf-posture/60_30#post_742475"]I choose to believe in the more traditional approach to the setup but not to the extreme. [/quote] Despite the fact that you've been given copious examples of "traditional" setups that contradict your own beliefs?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's just nice to see Waite in long pants for a change, which reminds me, why don't we see his actual students' swings more often and less of his swings? It would be like ignoring Hunter Mahan, Justin Rose, or even Tiger Woods, and raving about how Sean Foley hits the ball.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

You guys like to beat a guy to the ground...

Scary isn't it? Especially considering the fact they're Moderators/Administrators here.

Typically Mods/Admins are charged with keeping the peace and allowing discussions to occur without it getting personal. Guess that's only the case if you choose to drink the Kool Aid they're serving. Very telling indeed...........


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

It's just nice to see Waite in long pants for a change, which reminds me, why don't we see his actual students' swings more often and less of his swings? It would be like ignoring Hunter Mahan, Justin Rose, or even Tiger Woods, and raving about how Sean Foley hits the ball.

Because Foley never led the ball striking stat on tour lol  Grant still hits it better than anyone he teaches.  Believe me I try to get as much footage of his students as I can.  I recorded two of his students swings from the US Open Charles Howell and Bill Lunde http://www.youtube.com/user/TheSandTrapGolf/videos

Daniel Summerhays is the best of his students, I use his swing a decent amount.

Originally Posted by Pablo68

Scary isn't it? Especially considering the fact they're Moderators/Administrators here.

Typically Mods/Admins are charged with keeping the peace and allowing discussions to occur without it getting personal. Guess that's only the case if you choose to drink the Kool Aid they're serving. Very telling indeed...........

I don't know who's taking it personal.  We've given you reasons for what we think and you haven't given us any for why a straight back is more advantageous for playing better golf.  Other than it being "traditional" or "athletic".  I don't get what traditional is, look at Hogan, Nelson, Snead, Nicklaus, Palmer, Jones, Trevino, Player, Miller.  I guess they were all drinking kool aid lol

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Scary isn't it? Especially considering the fact they're Moderators/Administrators here. Typically Mods/Admins are charged with keeping the peace and allowing discussions to occur without it getting personal. Guess that's only the case if you choose to drink the Kool Aid they're serving. Very telling indeed...........

I can guarantee you that I have many better things to do that take a conversation about golf posture personally.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Despite some of the usual non-constructive sniping, I'm actually finding this thread interesting.     One thing I'm not seeing here, though, is that regardless of any "flat back" versus "rounded back" discussion is that the spine has 4 normal curvatures - there is no such thing as a naturally straight spine.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSKP6flmAK51K0ORmDZJZfzyU-rP_dVq7Mrhya0UFp1CUk660lRVQ

I'm certainly not a physiologist and have no more than a minimal layman's understanding of how the body works, but it seems to me that if you have a set up posture that basically conforms to your natural spine shape, you won't have to make unconscious corrections through the whole shoulder turn and swing.    If you have parts of the spine that naturally have slightly more curvature (let's say it's the thoracic curve) and you try to straighten them more at set up, this puts stress in that area and you're having to work muscles that would not otherwise be compensating.   To try and maintain that same alignment through the swing would mean you have to keep making muscular and skeletal corrections through the swing to maintain the straighter-than-natural alignment.     Although this is certainly physically possible, anytime you're fighting your natural body build through a series of motion opens the door for inconsistency.

Looking at pictures of the different players posted through this thread, it appears that many are simply using their natural spine curvature in their posture and swinging around that.   Trying to suggest someone with more natural curvature should straighten out (or vice versa) would seem to introduce more swing inconsistency and be more prone to injury.


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Clambake

Despite some of the usual non-constructive sniping, I'm actually finding this thread interesting.     One thing I'm not seeing here, though, is that regardless of any "flat back" versus "rounded back" discussion is that the spine has 4 normal curvatures - there is no such thing as a naturally straight spine.

I'm certainly not a physiologist and have no more than a minimal layman's understanding of how the body works, but it seems to me that if you have a set up posture that basically conforms to your natural spine shape, you won't have to make unconscious corrections through the whole shoulder turn and swing.    If you have parts of the spine that naturally have slightly more curvature (let's say it's the thoracic curve) and you try to straighten them more at set up, this puts stress in that area and you're having to work muscles that would not otherwise be compensating.   To try and maintain that same alignment through the swing would mean you have to keep making muscular and skeletal corrections through the swing to maintain the straighter-than-natural alignment.     Although this is certainly physically possible, anytime you're fighting your natural body build through a series of motion opens the door for inconsistency.

Looking at pictures of the different players posted through this thread, it appears that many are simply using their natural spine curvature in their posture and swinging around that.   Trying to suggest someone with more natural curvature should straighten out (or vice versa) would seem to introduce more swing inconsistency and be more prone to injury.

I would agree. I think that when you commonly tell people to have a "flat back" they overly straighten their spines. We don't really want people super slumpy or excessively (by the very nature of the word duh) rounding their backs, but a natural rounding of the spine is all we're after.

For decades the common advice has been to have your chin up and have a flat or straight back and sticking your butt out. There have been videos of people putting clubs against their backs and saying "just bend from the hips" when really there's a little more bend than that, largely from the thoracic spine. After all, our shoulders round in a little as our arms reach in front of us, and the spine curves roughly an added 10° or so forward (the same 10° or so that the spine "extends" as it tilts about 10° left during the backswing to retain our inclination to the ball).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some people play without spines..........take my manager for instance.

Seriously; take him.


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by Matt Filroy

Intresting.....how important is it to have a straight back? but really?

This post may be a joke but I'll respond anyway.

This pic demonstrates a straight back or good standing posture.  You don't see good golfers with these kind of alignments in the cervical, thoracic or lumbar vertebrates.

function_side.jpg

If you had this kind of posture above and just bent from the waist you would create an "S Posture".  Here's what TPI says on that.

Lower back pain is one of the most common complaints of all golfers. This is usually due to the high velocity rotary forces that are applied upon the lumbar spine during the golf swing.  Some golfers actually put themselves into this position on purpose because they heard it was good to stick their butt out at set up. Unfortunately, if you arch your back to stick your butt out at set up, you are also putting your lower back in jeopardy of being injured.

The Lower Crossed Syndrome / “S-Posture”:

One of the most clinically relevant patterns of muscle dysfunction is a lower crossed syndrome. Simply stated, the lower crossed syndrome is a grouping of weak muscles combined with overactive or tight muscles, that create a predictable movement pattern in the lower back that can lead to injury.

Erik does a great job of summing it up here

Originally Posted by iacas

I think that when you commonly tell people to have a "flat back" they overly straighten their spines. We don't really want people super slumpy or excessively (by the very nature of the word duh) rounding their backs, but a natural rounding of the spine is all we're after.

For decades the common advice has been to have your chin up and have a flat or straight back and sticking your butt out. There have been videos of people putting clubs against their backs and saying "just bend from the hips" when really there's a little more bend than that, largely from the thoracic spine. After all, our shoulders round in a little as our arms reach in front of us, and the spine curves roughly an added 10° or so forward (the same 10° or so that the spine "extends" as it tilts about 10° left during the backswing to retain our inclination to the ball).

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Pablo68

I choose to believe in the more traditional approach to the setup but not to the extreme.

This post made me laugh.  I wondered what this non-traditional guy would say to it:

14036.jpg

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

Great info.  thanks

  • Upvote 1

G10 9.0* fujikura stiff
Speedline 3 wood 13*
A4 OS 19* hybrid
S2 with Project X 5.5 steel shafts
CG 10 54* Studio Style 1.5


  • 1 month later...
Note: This thread is 803 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4).
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
    • Thanks, interesting to read. The swing is definitely very timing dependent. I hit it consistently I guess but consistently bad.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.