Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Probably had the most traumatizing hole in a long time today.  My approach shot landed in a greenside bunker, I then thinned it into the opposing greenside bunker..then thinned it again back into the first greenside bunker.  I started to laugh and was about to pick up but bit my tongue (and ego) and finished the hole..finally.

I used to carry a 56 deg./14 deg. bounce sand wedge..which I always got out of the bunker.  I changed over to a 54 deg. with 9 deg. of bounce (as I had yardage gaps in my current set of irons) and when the problems began.

I'm perfect with them on the green stuff..it's when I get inside a bunker I start to get nervous with thinning it.

The type of sand in my neck of the woods is more like compressed sand, granular.

I take my normal bunker stance, feet parallel, to my swing, pointing left of flag with the face of the wedge slightly opened and pointing at the flag.

I even tell my self to hit it fat on purpose, but just ain't working..

What do you guys recomend in trying to stop hitting my bunker shots thin?  Is the bounce on this wedge too low?


Posted

No amount of bounce is going to prevent you from hitting it thin.  More bounce actually helps keep you from hitting it fat.

Well, unless you are subconsciously trying to pick it clean because you think the bounce is low and its going to get stuck in the sand.

My answer would be either stick your 56 back in the bag and learn to deal with the yardage gap (or keep the 54 and 56 and dump another club if you can) or go find a 54 with 14 deg of bounce since that worked well for you in the past.

Otherwise, just practice a lot with your new sand wedge til you figure it out.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

By the way, the story you told reminds me of the one time I intentionally snapped a club in frustration.  (Not my proudest moment and it was about 20 years ago)  After the third time back across the green I lost it.

Clubs are expensive ... it was not worth it.  I learned my lesson and commend you for keeping your dignity.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

"Well, unless you are subconsciously trying to pick it clean because you think the bounce is low and its going to get stuck in the sand."

think this is the problem too..just need to start thinking fat.


Posted

Its your swing, especially if your opening the club, your adding more bounce to the club anyways. Try to feel like your hands and the clubhead pass the ball at the same time. Sounds like your flipping at the ball and then helping in the air by lifting up if your thinning it.

Also try to maintain the flex in your front leg longer in the swing, let the hands pass your body, feel like you slide the clubhead under the ball with a thump.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Could just got get your 56 bent by -2. Solves the yardage gap and gives you a club your comfortable with out of sand.

[b]My Bag[/b] 1 Burgeoning mental game


Posted
Originally Posted by Apotheosis

Could just got get your 56 bent by -2. Solves the yardage gap and gives you a club your comfortable with out of sand.

I had thought of suggesting that too, but then he would "mess" that club up by turning his 14 deg of bounce into 12.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Open the wedge more than you think.  Weight forward throughout the swing. Aim at a point in the sand about 3-4" BEHIND the ball. Practice. Should work every time.


Posted

I always just try to slide the club under the ball while accelerating. So many players I see decel at the bottom thinking they're gonna hit it too hard.

dak4n6


Posted

Thump it out.  If that makes sense.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

It does if you think of the sound a good sand shot makes..

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by dak4n6

I always just try to slide the club under the ball while accelerating. So many players I see decel at the bottom thinking they're gonna hit it too hard.

Yes.  I usually swing pretty hard out of the sand as well.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Harmonious

Open the wedge more than you think.  Weight forward throughout the swing. Aim at a point in the sand about 3-4" BEHIND the ball. Practice. Should work every time.

I agree with this, except, the distance you hit behind the ball depends on how far you want to hit it.  If you're greenside, with little green to work with 3-4 inches is about right.  But, if you need to carry the ball 20-30 feet or more, you might want to shorten that distance to 2-3 inches, or even 1-2 inches.

I was also going to say that if you "bounce the club" behind the ball, you almost can't go wrong.


Posted
Originally Posted by Limpinswinger

I agree with this, except, the distance you hit behind the ball depends on how far you want to hit it.  If you're greenside, with little green to work with 3-4 inches is about right.  But, if you need to carry the ball 20-30 feet or more, you might want to shorten that distance to 2-3 inches, or even 1-2 inches.

I used 3-4" because the OP has been hitting it then, and the added inch(es) should enable him to hit the sand first in all instances.

Personally, I try to look about 1-2" behind for all greenside bunkers, with the length of my backswing determining the carry distance.


Posted

I just feel the shot, i never concentrate on 1" or 3" behind the ball. I think what i usually do is, for shorter shots i will play the ball further up in my stance, for longer shots i will play it back farther, i just make the same swing and hit the same spot. But i usually go with what feels right at the time..

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I play a nice course with awful bunkers. Some are so hard packed that you need not rack when you exit. Other have sand like a "real" bunker. If there is little to no sand, you can not blast sand out of the bunker, get under the ball, hit three inches back... or anything like that. It plays more like a tight lie or even hard-pan. You don't need to hit it hard, but you need to hit very close to the ball. For some reason, it takes courage.

If you can hit your spot in the sand, you can learn to feel where you want to hit it depending on the amount of sand. I have a hard time consistently hitting my spot in green side bunkers. I move my head, lift up... all kinds of horrors. My drill is to draw a line in the sand and practice hitting that line. When I'm doing that well, taking less sand and hitting closer to the ball fixes my thin sand issues. Even so, I hate green side bunkers on my home course.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted

Think about knocking the sand on to the green.  About a medium soda cup full would be a good place to start.  And, like some else said, be sure to accelerate through the shot.  I like to feel like I am "striking a match" under the ball.


Note: This thread is 4986 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.