Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4965 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Right now I only have 1 wedge, a 56* and I definitely want more. I really want some Cobra Trusty Rusty's (51*, 55*, and 59*). I also really like mine now. Is it normal to have a mixed set of wedges? I don't really know anyone who does.


Posted
Originally Posted by ajst22

Right now I only have 1 wedge, a 56* and I definitely want more. I really want some Cobra Trusty Rusty's (51*, 55*, and 59*). I also really like mine now. Is it normal to have a mixed set of wedges? I don't really know anyone who does.

I used to play a 52, 56, 60 Vokey combo but for reasons unknown traded in the 52 and 60. Loved the 60 hated the 52. I now only play the 56 and really wish I had at least 2. ajst22 I really like the look of the Cobra TR, would do 53, 57 combo with some dg spinners on them. Might do it if the price comes down a bit.

  :sunmountain: eco lite stand Bag
:tmade: Sim 2 Max driver
 :callaway: Mavrick 20 * hybrid
:tmade: M2 3HL                               :mizuno: JPX 923 5-gw                           

 Lazrus 52, 56 wedges

:scotty_cameron:
:true_linkswear:-Lux Hybrid, Lux Sport, Original 1.2

:clicgear:


Posted

Two years ago, I carried the Callaway X20 PW, a Cleveland 50* GW, and a Callaway XForged 56* SW. This mix basically got the job done, and despite the mix had very good overlapping yardage coverage.

An instructor at a club repair school I attended carried two 56* SWs made about three years apart. He uses the high bounce SW for bunkers, and low-bounce for a lob wedge.

Let's say you have a PW from your iron set, and a separate model for GW-SW-LW. The higher wedges can work together better as a coordinated set if they match.

In your case, look for the the CG14 CC model that came out a couple of years ago. These wedges have a black gel inset, and new conforming grooves (for most of us, who cares?).  This reissue didn't sell that well in the wake of the newly arrived CG15 and CG16 models, so Sports Authority, Golf Galaxy and Golfsmith often have them available. I have seen the CG14s for under $80.

If you could pick up a 52* (and if you do LW) a 60*, you would pretty well have a matched set.

If you do this, consider trimming the shafts on the 56* and 60* to get some half-inch separation in length They come stock with a quarter-inch shaft increment (or less) between wedge lofts, so yardage distance difference would be bunched up more than you think. Run this idea by your local clubsmith if you want.

CG14

Wedge

Stock Shaft

Length

Trim

To

52* 35.5" No trim
56* 35.25" 35"
60* 35.25" 34.5"

Building on what jman said, the CG14s come with the TRAction wedge flex shaft, which functions pretty well the same as the Spinner (minus the nifty bend segment).

Edit: Improve sentence structure.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

MY 52 and 60 are Vokeys, but my 56 is a Hogan Sure-Out. Not only does that club get me out of sand, it can be used to pitch from the fairway, and the mass of metal the clubhead is made of lets it cut through the thickest rough.


Posted

I play 3 Scratch wedges. My 51* and 60* are cast 8620's but my 56* is an older JLM forged model.

I like having the JLM in the bag because the head is heavier, and the leading edge is a bit flatter. I find it a bit better out of heavier rough.

I originally bought 3 8620's as a set, but dropped the 56* in favor of my old JLM SND for the sake of versatility.


Posted

newbe here:

I carry:

Nickent 3dx PW                    46*

Heavy Wedge 5208              52*

Cleveland CG14 BlkPearl    56* std bounce

Sota ERA LOB Wedge        60*


Posted
My PW and AW came with my set - 712 AP1's - but my 56 & 60 are Vokey's.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted
Originally Posted by jmanbooyaa

I used to play a 52, 56, 60 Vokey combo but for reasons unknown traded in the 52 and 60. Loved the 60 hated the 52. I now only play the 56 and really wish I had at least 2. ajst22 I really like the look of the Cobra TR, would do 53, 57 combo with some dg spinners on them. Might do it if the price comes down a bit.

I demo'd the 59* today and I liked it a lot. Normal retail is $119 which is a lot, but my proshop has a discount on all products for members so it is $109...but it is still a lot. I will probably stick it out with my PW and the 56* until the end of the year and wait for the TR price to come down.


Posted
Normal? It's golf.....what the heck is normal?! I have 4 wedges and 3 different brands. Use whatever works for you.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I play a Mizuno MP R-12 52*, Tourstage MB-32 sand wedge and a Nike VR Pro 60* wedge and they get along just fine.  The clubs dont know that they arent all the same brand.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


Posted

I game a 56 Cleveland and a 52 Vokey.  Like both for different reasons.  Eventually I will have to part with the Cleveland it is showing some wear


Posted

I use a Cleavland VAS lob wedge and a Adam's Tight lies  sand wedge and I don't plan on changing that anytime soon. Its how the club works for you not the name on it. In my book


Posted
Originally Posted by haynesn12

I use a Cleavland VAS lob wedge and a Adam's Tight lies  sand wedge and I don't plan on changing that anytime soon. Its how the club works for you not the name on it. In my book

I like that. I was just concerned about the distances and stuff but that is a good way of thinking of it


Posted

We just aren't that good.  It really doesn't matter if they are different brands.  Right now I carry a 51 Mizuno MP, 56 x forged, 60 old vokey 200, and a x forged 64.  If the set up works for you and you feel confortable, that is all that matters.  99% of the time its the indian and not the arrow.

Brian


Posted

I play a VERY mixed set of 4 wedges that makes people's heads spin partially because they never heard of one of my clubs.

PW: Taylormade Burner 2.0 45*

AW: Taylormade Burner 2.0 50*

SW: Top Flite Tour 56*

LW: Mitsubisha Tour Classic 304 60*

I LOVE my LW, but never found it even on the internet.  Actually got it at a liquidator years ago.

I also used to play a Cleveland CG 14 50* wedge, but gave it to my father (who was looking for a 50* wedge recently) when I got my new Burners.

If you do find the Mitsubisha club somewhere, give it a shot.

Dirver:  Burner Superfast (Stiff Shaft) 9.5*----3 wood: Daiwa 3 Metal G-4 Brougham

2 Hybrid: T7 Attack 16*----3 Hybrid: Golden Bear GB Tech 460----4-AW  Burner 2.0 (R Flex)

SW:  56* LW: Mitsubisha 60*  Ball: Nike PD Soft -- Glove:  Weathersof


Posted
Originally Posted by Josh531

I play a VERY mixed set of 4 wedges that makes people's heads spin partially because they never heard of one of my clubs.

PW: Taylormade Burner 2.0 45*

AW: Taylormade Burner 2.0 50*

SW: Top Flite Tour 56*

LW: Mitsubisha Tour Classic 304 60*

I LOVE my LW, but never found it even on the internet.  Actually got it at a liquidator years ago.

I also used to play a Cleveland CG 14 50* wedge, but gave it to my father (who was looking for a 50* wedge recently) when I got my new Burners.

If you do find the Mitsubisha club somewhere, give it a shot.

Not sure how someone older than 20 wouldn't have heard of Top Flite and TaylorMade is still making clubs I think. Maybe your Google searches are finding info on Mitsubishi cars. Try Mitsushiba - the golf company.

http://www.mitsushiba.com/

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

Not sure how someone older than 20 wouldn't have heard of Top Flite and TaylorMade is still making clubs I think. Maybe your Google searches are finding info on Mitsubishi cars. Try Mitsushiba - the golf company.

http://www.mitsushiba.com/

Thanks for the link.  Never was able to find it, which is weird.  And the club that makes peoples heads turn is the mitsubisha.  No one has heard of it.  The Top Flite just gets the look of "Really?  Top Flite?"  But hey, whatever works.

Thanks again for the link!

Dirver:  Burner Superfast (Stiff Shaft) 9.5*----3 wood: Daiwa 3 Metal G-4 Brougham

2 Hybrid: T7 Attack 16*----3 Hybrid: Golden Bear GB Tech 460----4-AW  Burner 2.0 (R Flex)

SW:  56* LW: Mitsubisha 60*  Ball: Nike PD Soft -- Glove:  Weathersof


Note: This thread is 4965 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.