Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The guy doesn't like the name of the driver, that's a risk marketing takes when they reach for the fringes of product names.  Rocketballs (RBZ) seems to work, Diablo not so much for some.  Trying to get back on topic here.

Originally Posted by Clambake

I guess you'd never use a Dirt Devil vacuum, patch up your walls with Red Devil caulk or spackel or tools, cut something with Morse Devil saw blades.     You must also limit your speech and never say that something is diabolical, or that you're having a devil of a time with your slice.    And you must really hate the Duke Blue Devils (OK, I do too) or the Arizona Sun Devils or the NJ Devils.

By the way, "diablo" is from the ancient Greek word "diabolos" which means a slanderer long before Church Latin eventually derived the word "diabolus" and created the concept of a devil.

Originally Posted by ApocG10

It isn't named after Satan. Its a spanish (or is it latin?) term for devil, in the oldest sense of the word. Diablo's were tiny, fiery devils who supposedly burned homes, farms, etc etc. Nothing to do with christianity AT ALL. (Like most of christianity, they stole pagan customs to create their work of fantasy/fiction, known as the bible)

On top of that, the driver was named after the car, with whose maker Callaway designed the metal used in the Diablo, as well as the Razr line.

So you are telling me you also wouldn't drive this? Or does your brand of crazy have limits?

The guy doesn't like the name or the driver, either way what does that have to do with Callaway cutting 12% of their work force?

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by ApocG10

. (Like most of christianity, they stole pagan customs to create their work of fantasy/fiction, known as the bible)

\Or does your brand of crazy have limits?

OK, so the bible is fantasy/fiction & I'm crazy.    Have a nice day.    I'll stick with my driver that doesn't sport devil horns just the same ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Callaway needs a new marketing approach to compete head on with TM. A few years ago, it seemed like a toss up between the 2 brands, but TM has taken an aggressive approach with their products and marketing. Seems to be working. Callaway, on the other hand, seems to be totally lost. To me, they sort of seem sort of like the Oldsmobile of golf - a great brand that has seen better days.

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5


Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

The guy doesn't like the name or the driver, either way what does that have to do with Callaway cutting 12% of their work force?

listen guys, this is getting out of hand ... it just seems to me that alot of Christian people aren't gonna buy a driver named diablo - thats all I'm saying.     If thats seems silly, whatever, I think that may be a reason why their sales are declining.     I could be way off base, who knows ... sheesh

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Many of my friends are current and previous religious professionals, my closest friend is an ex-Chistian Brother. I can't think of any that would be offended by something like that.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The original point, and it was a good one, is that they could have found a name that would have been a lot more acceptable to everyone. The risk of losing any portion of sales due to a name is just irresponsible in this economy,

How about the Callaway WhizBang?
Or
The Callaway Sledge Hammer?
Or
The Callaway Ka-Boom!

On my tombstone: "If this is the worst thing that ever happens to me, I'm doing just fine!"






 


Posted
Originally Posted by DirtCheap

The original point, and it was a good one, is that they could have found a name that would have been a lot more acceptable to everyone. The risk of losing any portion of sales due to a name is just irresponsible in this economy,

How about the Callaway WhizBang?

Or

The Callaway Sledge Hammer?

Or

The Callaway Ka-Boom!

They used to have great names ... the Titleist HOWITZER was an awesome name for a driver.      The Big Bertha was catchy (although my wife will tell you no woman alive would bag a club named that, so it was definitely a mans club).      Nike Sasquatch was funny.     Now the TM Rocketballs is the catchy name.    I just think Callaway blew it with the diablo ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by inthehole

the Titleist HOWITZER

Now THAT'S a cool name!

On my tombstone: "If this is the worst thing that ever happens to me, I'm doing just fine!"






 


Posted
Originally Posted by inthehole

I just think Callaway blew it with the diablo ...

I would say you are wrong. Plenty of things have been named after the 'devil' and have sold fantasticly.

As I said, I bet there are less than 1000 golfers in NA who agree with you. Im not trying to attack you, im telling you that very few people care. Sports equipment, teams, and memorabilia with the name 'devil', 'diablo', have hundreds of millions of fans, christian or otherwise, who cheer for them and wear their gear.

Not to mention Diablo, the game, with 35 million sales across 3 iterations (the latest sold 6 million copies in its first week).

Like I said, iits a certain brand of crazy (and I blieve everyone is a little crazy in some ways), and very, very few people in general, let alone golfers, agree with you.

If it gave me longer, straighter drives, they could call it Satans Cock n' Balls, and i'd still game it.

In the Ogio Kingpin bag:

Titleist 913 D2 9.5* w/ UST Mamiya ATTAS 3 80 w/ Harrison Shotmaker & Billy Bobs afternarket Hosel Adaptor (get this if you don't have it for your 913)
Wilson Staff Ci-11 4-GW (4I is out of the bag for a hybrid, PW and up were replaced by Edel Wedges)
TaylorMade RBZ 5 & 3 Fairway Woods

Cobra Baffler T-Rail 3 & 4 Hybrids

Edel Forged 48, 52, 56, 60, and 64* wedges (different wedges for different courses)

Seemore Si-4 Black Nickel Putter


Posted

Originally Posted by ApocG10

I would say you are wrong.

wouldn't be the first time ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hmm. Duke University is an institution with religious connections, and nobody seems to protest that their nickname is the Blue Devils....


Posted

Ernie Els winning must be great for Callaway. In his interview just after Scott missed the putt, he did mention Callaway standing behind him though times were tough.

Makes me wonder though. Since he switched to Callaway he hasn't been the same great player he used to be than when he gamed TM and Titleist. Maybe now he's finally getting used to his Callaway equipment.

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

Callaway has failed where a lot of us predicted they'd fail. They instroduced too many product lines that were not appealing to the masses. Like an ugly car that everyone knows is ugly but can't explain why.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by RPMPIRE

Ernie Els winning must be great for Callaway. In his interview just after Scott missed the putt, he did mention Callaway standing behind him though times were tough.

Makes me wonder though. Since he switched to Callaway he hasn't been the same great player he used to be than when he gamed TM and Titleist. Maybe now he's finally getting used to his Callaway equipment.

Lynx?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by RPMPIRE

Ernie Els winning must be great for Callaway. In his interview just after Scott missed the putt, he did mention Callaway standing behind him though times were tough.

Makes me wonder though. Since he switched to Callaway he hasn't been the same great player he used to be than when he gamed TM and Titleist. Maybe now he's finally getting used to his Callaway equipment.

Yeah, that was a big win for Callaway.  They need all the press they can get... And as others have said in this thread... Their staple of pros is pretty bare - especially when you consider the younger generation of up and coming players.

Regarding the comment on Ernie getting used to his equipment.  These guys are so good - you could give them a set of Spalding golf irons and they could score.  To me, Ernie's struggles have been more to do with his putting than anything else.  In particular his confidence in his stroke.  Just yesterday, he kept missing birdie putts (like Tiger) by trying to have the perfect line and speed.  So mechanical it was sick (in a bad way).  And that type of stroke on those slow greens was short over and over and over again.

Then on the 18th green... You could tell Els just picked a line and in a sense gunned it into the hole.  That was one of the more brisk strokes he made all day!  And he canned it.  If he can roll the rock like he did on 18... He has a lot of golf left in him.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Was it Lynx?

I do remember him being with Titleist before Callaway.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Lynx?

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

I don't remember Ernie with Lynx.  But I remember Couples with the Lynx putter.  I actually used the Lynx putter in high school golf for my first first 2 seasons.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5033 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 254 5-4 Arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Short swing, pause and then hit.  Hit foam balls. Keeping arching of wrist a focus as well. 
    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.