Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

And you clearly already know the only answer you want to hear.

Originally Posted by robrey85

I already take lessons. I'll pass on the cheapest balls I can find. I buy my balls on Ebay anyway to save the most money possible but with buying decent to mint condition balls. I'd rather find out what works best with how I play currently so I can continue to play my best and then if I need to switch later on when my HC gets lower, I can do that as well.


Posted
Originally Posted by max power

And you clearly already know the only answer you want to hear.

Quote:

Originally Posted by robrey85

I already take lessons. I'll pass on the cheapest balls I can find. I buy my balls on Ebay anyway to save the most money possible but with buying decent to mint condition balls. I'd rather find out what works best with how I play currently so I can continue to play my best and then if I need to switch later on when my HC gets lower, I can do that as well.

Not sure how choosing one ball, then buying a used version, is a great idea, but whatever floats your boat. I chose a ball that worked for my game and that I could afford to buy at a retail outlet. Then when my game got better (stopped losing so many balls - next round will be my third with the same B330) I upped the ante.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

Not sure how choosing one ball, then buying a used version, is a great idea, but whatever floats your boat. I chose a ball that worked for my game and that I could afford to buy at a retail outlet. Then when my game got better (stopped losing so many balls - next round will be my third with the same B330) I upped the ante.

Well, if you get the lost golf balls that have been hit a couple of holes, it's just like buying brand new. It really isn't that bad and they come in really good shape. Although, I did have an experience with buying AAA balls and those were garbage. Might as well have bashed them with a nice rock over and over. Give it a shot if you're ever short on funds. I really don't think you'll regret it assuming you pick the right quality.

Originally Posted by max power

And you clearly already know the only answer you want to hear.


Alright dick, considering you didn't even answer my question that I originally asked, thanks for your feedback.

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Performance Driver

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Perfomance 15° 3W

18° Burner 1.0 Superlaunch Rescue Hybrid

:mizuno: 4-PW MP-69 Irons

50°, 54° & 58° ATV wedges

Classic Collection #1 Black Putter

:bridgestone: Tour B330 Balls

2013 Tour v3 Laser Rangefinder w/ Jolt Technology

You don't know what pressure is until you play for five bucks with only two bucks in your pocket. -Lee Trevino


Posted
Originally Posted by robrey85

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

Not sure how choosing one ball, then buying a used version, is a great idea, but whatever floats your boat. I chose a ball that worked for my game and that I could afford to buy at a retail outlet. Then when my game got better (stopped losing so many balls - next round will be my third with the same B330) I upped the ante.

Well, if you get the lost golf balls that have been hit a couple of holes, it's just like buying brand new. It really isn't that bad and they come in really good shape. Although, I did have an experience with buying AAA balls and those were garbage. Might as well have bashed them with a nice rock over and over. Give it a shot if you're ever short on funds. I really don't think you'll regret it assuming you pick the right quality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by max power

And you clearly already know the only answer you want to hear.

Alright dick, considering you didn't even answer my question that I originally asked, thanks for your feedback.

If you're getting a mix-and-match box of AAAAA++++ balls that appear to be one hit wonders, you might get what you wanted and you might not. At our level it probably doesn't really matter, but I prefer knowing that every ball in the box was from the same year and likely the same batch.

It probably isn't really so important for most players though. I've seen guys post comparisons of two balls (after playing only 2 or 3 holes or even after hitting just a couple drives which is odd, but whatever) and they often see very little significant differences between brands, let alone different years of the same brand.

I http://www.golfballselector.com/pdf/GBS_CompressionHardness_Test_090811_v8.11a.pdf

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Originally Posted by sean_miller

If you're getting a mix-and-match box of AAAAA++++ balls that appear to be one hit wonders, you might get what you wanted and you might not. At our level it probably doesn't really matter, but I prefer knowing that every ball in the box was from the same year and likely the same batch.

It probably isn't really so important for most players though. I've seen guys post comparisons of two balls (after playing only 2 or 3 holes or even after hitting just a couple drives which is odd, but whatever) and they often see very little significant differences between brands, let alone different years of the same brand.

Ihttp://www.golfballselector.com/pdf/GBS_CompressionHardness_Test_090811_v8.11a.pdf


Yeah, that's probably my only gripe is that you can get a lot of all the same brand balls, for example E6, but they could be different years and I think different years have some changes and what not. I see what you're sayin' and I might just go that route eventually so I can support some local golf shops but for now I would rather go with what I can get on ebay or lostgolfballs.com

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Performance Driver

2013 Nike VR_S Covert Perfomance 15° 3W

18° Burner 1.0 Superlaunch Rescue Hybrid

:mizuno: 4-PW MP-69 Irons

50°, 54° & 58° ATV wedges

Classic Collection #1 Black Putter

:bridgestone: Tour B330 Balls

2013 Tour v3 Laser Rangefinder w/ Jolt Technology

You don't know what pressure is until you play for five bucks with only two bucks in your pocket. -Lee Trevino


Posted

It is a problem.  I have bought AAAA Titleist NXT Tours from lostgolfballs.com over the last few years.  While all the balls were NXT Tours, they ranged in years back to 2003 and 6 different versions.

I found out that the original NXT Tour was a 2 part ball, and had very different characteristics from the 2005, 2008, 2010, and 2012 versions.  I noticed some balls played differently than others, but never considered there were different versions of the ball and instead blamed it on my swing.  I have since gone through and sorted them all out, so I at least know what I'm hitting.

Originally Posted by robrey85

Yeah, that's probably my only gripe is that you can get a lot of all the same brand balls, for example E6, but they could be different years and I think different years have some changes and what not. I see what you're sayin' and I might just go that route eventually so I can support some local golf shops but for now I would rather go with what I can get on ebay or lostgolfballs.com

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

With my game and bank account I can't justify spending nearly $50 for a dozen balls, no matter what Titleist or anyone else says.  I bought 7 1/2 dozen Top Flite Gamer V2s online at less than $0.90 per ball )six 15-packs for $81 including shipping).  I wish they had a "Made in America" label like my New Balance shoes but some things just can't be helped.  On testing the Pro V1 had a spin rate of approximately 12,000 rpm and the Gamer V2 10,500 rpm, while the Gamer was a few yards longer off of the tee.  I can't make the Gamer back up unless I catch it perfectly with a sand wedge, but I can hit it the distance I need and have very little rollout on everything up to my 6 iron. Last time out I hit a 7 iron really crisply and the Gamer had less than four feet of roll after it hit the green. It's probably the lowest priced three-piece ball at $20/dozen (if you can still find them- I know that my local WalMart still has some) but I don't know what's going to happen with it since Dick's Sporting Goods bought Top Flite from Callaway in April.


Posted

Well played.  Using some of that Las Vegas charm.

Originally Posted by robrey85

Well, if you get the lost golf balls that have been hit a couple of holes, it's just like buying brand new. It really isn't that bad and they come in really good shape. Although, I did have an experience with buying AAA balls and those were garbage. Might as well have bashed them with a nice rock over and over. Give it a shot if you're ever short on funds. I really don't think you'll regret it assuming you pick the right quality.

Alright dick, considering you didn't even answer my question that I originally asked, thanks for your feedback.


Posted

This is an interesting question.  TaylorMade first started pressing the Penta as a multilayer ball--the different layers came into play with different clubs at different speeds.  Basically (and I'm guesstimating) 70MPH of CHS (wedges) will impact the first layer, 80MPH (short irons) the second layer, 90MPH (mid irons) the third layer, etc. So if your CHS with a driver is 95MPH, you won't be compressing the inner layer of the ball, but you can still benefit from its performance characteristics.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Seems like we all use range balls for practice, and if we use a higher compression ball for the course we might be pleasantly surprised by the distance gains off the tee. If not we need to use a bigger club the next shot. So, why not just expect range ball distances on the course? In my experience, the distances at the range are pretty similar to those on the course. For a satirical video, see "range balls with John o Hurley".

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by rustyredcab

I like the spin control of both Bridgestone RX and Callaway HEX Chrome. I find ProV's sometime ballon on me -- especially in the wind. The best overall ball for me now seems to be the Chrome. I also am hooked on yellow.


+1 on the new Chrome Hex Yellow....


  • 5 months later...
Posted

Well I have a swing speed around 97 to 100, if I drive a tour ball on monitor conditions all the same, say a prov1x which is high compression around 110, I carry it about 240. Now that said,  if I drive a ball with a compression of about 75 rocket, qstar, even mojo, I carry it 258 to 278. Now that is SIGNIFICANT, the numbers simply dont lie, therefore it seems to me ball compression does matter!


Posted
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

For years Titleist has been trying to tell people that the Pro V1 is the right ball for everyone.  This, "compression doesnt matter" campaign is just their latest attempt at trying to get hacks to play a more expensive ball.

I'm inclined to agree with you....and I'm no Titleist basher as my go-to ball is the DT So/Lo.  Great all around ball for reasonable price imo.


Note: This thread is 4696 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.