Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4713 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

My problem w/ phone GPS is that's just not a very good GPS.  A dedicated golf GPS will use WAAS which gives it good accuracy pretty much everywhere in North America. My understanding is that there are no common cell phones out there that support WAAS.  A phone is using a combination of a fairly poor GPS receiver combined with measurements from cell towers.  If you have a good cell tower geometry, the phone will actually be better than just GPS - but it could be much worse and the accuracy could vary widely over a course.  It's too bad because I think the cell phone apps are much, much better than the dedicated GPS software you get, especially with regard to stat keeping, ease of use, ease of data entry, etc.

Big clubs: :titleist: 915D3 @ 9.5°, :callaway: X-Hot Pro 3W
Med clubs: :callaway: X-Hot Pro 5W, :titleist: 910H 4H,
Small clubs: :callaway: X-Hot Pro 5-AW, :titleist: Vokey 55.10, 60.10


Posted
Originally Posted by hanalei

$499 for laser? $300 for GPS? Wow.. ill stick to being 3yards off, my swing will never be accurate to within <2inches

Remember you can't aim your GPS. With a laser you could shoot a tree, bunker, the flag itself, or other important landmarks. The GPS will give you a yardage to the front, back, and center of the green, but it doesn't help you off the tee, or if you want to know where the pin is. They often don't give you a pin sheet or use color coded flags, so you could be off by a lot more than 3 yards.

Besides, you can spend 500 on a good laser, but 300 is reasonable for a decent one, with 150 or a bit less getting you a useable model that might be harder to use or shorter ranged. GPS units are way cheaper than 300 though. The apps can be under 50 and cheap units are well under 100. Money well spent, in my opinion, to get a better club selection. It also helps on poorly marked courses and when practicing.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Who says $499.00 for a reliable laser? Bushnell pro v2's can be purchased for $299.00 at golfsmith and they are the same thing the big boys use.

Posted

Regardless of how accurate a GPS is, you're still going to be more or less guessing where the flag is.  And if you're hitting a layup, or at something other than a flag, you'll have to manipulate the cursor to get a precise yardage.  With a laser, you can simply point to whatever you're aiming at and get a distance.  It's just too easy, and it's always accurate.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I can't stress enough how easy a laser makes things.  Once you use one..you won't want anything else.  Look at my layup spot..shoot it, know exactly what club I need to hit to get there.  How far is it to those trees? 285...ok I can't reach them on my best drive.  How far is that bunker from here?  210..ok my hybrid will carry those easily.  It just takes ALL the guesswork out of making decisions.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

Remember you can't aim your GPS. With a laser you could shoot a tree, bunker, the flag itself, or other important landmarks. The GPS will give you a yardage to the front, back, and center of the green, but it doesn't help you off the tee, or if you want to know where the pin is. They often don't give you a pin sheet or use color coded flags, so you could be off by a lot more than 3 yards.

Huh? My GPS gives me yardage to bunkers, over bunkers and for the most part trees. I can drag to a point anywhere on the screen and get the yardage to that point and at the same time am given a yardage to close to where the pin is (You can drag the flag around the green to set it's relative position).


Posted
Originally Posted by Grumpter

Huh? My GPS gives me yardage to bunkers, over bunkers and for the most part trees. I can drag to a point anywhere on the screen and get the yardage to that point and at the same time am given a yardage to close to where the pin is (You can drag the flag around the green to set it's relative position).

When you are 150 yards away, you can move the little dot around on your screen to where YOU THINK the flag is, but you certainly don't know that for sure ... especially on holes where the green surface is hidden behind a mound or bunker.  Just like k-troop also said ... you are just guessing at that point.  Whereas, with the laser you are phsyically seeing what you are getting a measurement to so there is no question.

EDIT:  For most of us, 2 or 3 yards difference is no big deal cuz we ain't that precise anyway, but as you get better, you are going to want to know exactly how far things are.  Also, when I watch the "On The Range" show on golf channel I see caddies with lasers all the time, but haven't yet noticed one with a GPS.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

When you are 150 yards away, you can move the little dot around on your screen to where YOU THINK the flag is, but you certainly don't know that for sure ... especially on holes where the green surface is hidden behind a mound or bunker.  Just like k-troop also said ... you are just guessing at that point.  Whereas, with the laser you are phsyically seeing what you are getting a measurement to so there is no question.

Well, the flip-side to this is that if you have a blind shot where you can't see the target you want the distance to, you're out of luck with the laser. A GPS can be useful for setting layups around doglegs or for shooting for a part of the green other than where the flag is. It's not always (or perhaps even usually) the best strategy to choose your club to match the distance to the pin. In that case it comes down to measuring to the pin and guessing at how that relates to the part of the green you want to land on, or trying to choose that point on the GPS map.

With a quality GPS and decent reception conditions, the "inaccuracy" myth is indeed a fallacy. Sometimes the maps may be poor, that's true, but my experience suggests these are not nearly as common as the claims suggest. The laser is more accurate on paper, but whether that translates into a real benefit on the course is, to which this and other threads attest, a far more complicated question.

Which is better, a laser or a GPS? It depends on what you're trying to do with it.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
Originally Posted by zeg

Well, the flip-side to this is that if you have a blind shot where you can't see the target you want the distance to, you're out of luck with the laser. A GPS can be useful for setting layups around doglegs or for shooting for a part of the green other than where the flag is. It's not always (or perhaps even usually) the best strategy to choose your club to match the distance to the pin. In that case it comes down to measuring to the pin and guessing at how that relates to the part of the green you want to land on, or trying to choose that point on the GPS map.

With a quality GPS and decent reception conditions, the "inaccuracy" myth is indeed a fallacy. Sometimes the maps may be poor, that's true, but my experience suggests these are not nearly as common as the claims suggest. The laser is more accurate on paper, but whether that translates into a real benefit on the course is, to which this and other threads attest, a far more complicated question.

Which is better, a laser or a GPS? It depends on what you're trying to do with it.

Absolutely.  And I have a GPS that works just fine for me most of the time because I just don't have the precision required to care about a 3-4 yard difference in accuracy of the GPS.  When shooting at a green, assuming a course that has colored flags for front, middle and back of green pin positions, all I do is this:

If it's middle , I just take the distance to the center of the green and run with it.  If it's front , I take 1/4 of the distance from the front to the back and add it to the front.  If it's back , I take 1/4 of the distance from front to back and subtract it from the back.  Obviously, I can occasionally be off by 3 or 4 yards, but that is more than close enough for me right now.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

If it's middle, I just take the distance to the center of the green and run with it.  If it's front, I take 1/4 of the distance from the front to the back and add it to the front.  If it's back, I take 1/4 of the distance from front to back and subtract it from the back.  Obviously, I can occasionally be off by 3 or 4 yards, but that is more than close enough for me right now.

Yeah, if you're doing that, then I'd say GPS and laser are equal. Unless you have a dimensioned map showing the pin location, you're guessing either way. I suspect for the vast majority of golfers, 3-4 yards will never be significant on any shot where you can't just pace it off.

In that situation, it comes down to other factors. For me, the GPS form factor fits a lot better, plus I like to be able to use it to measure the occasional shot. I can imagine others preferring the process involved in aiming around with a laser, but it just doesn't appeal to me.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted
Originally Posted by LuciusWooding

Remember you can't aim your GPS. With a laser you could shoot a tree, bunker, the flag itself, or other important landmarks. The GPS will give you a yardage to the front, back, and center of the green, but it doesn't help you off the tee, or if you want to know where the pin is. They often don't give you a pin sheet or use color coded flags, so you could be off by a lot more than 3 yards.

My GPS app uses satellite aerial views which allows the user to touch points on the map which then gives you a distance to that point from your current location, and from that point to the center of the green.  I use this all the time for bunker/hazard carry distances and proper layup locations.

Examples (I'm currently pretty far away from the first tee of the course nearest my job )

As was mentioned already though, you can pinpoint a location on the green to get the distance to that point, but you're still only guessing as to whether the flag is really there or a few yards further forward or back.

As for the OPs question, yes it is somewhat of a fallacy: the GPS data is only as good as your phone's GPS signal/lock.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
Originally Posted by zeg

Well, the flip-side to this is that if you have a blind shot where you can't see the target you want the distance to, you're out of luck with the laser. A GPS can be useful for setting layups around doglegs or for shooting for a part of the green other than where the flag is. It's not always (or perhaps even usually) the best strategy to choose your club to match the distance to the pin. In that case it comes down to measuring to the pin and guessing at how that relates to the part of the green you want to land on, or trying to choose that point on the GPS map.

With a quality GPS and decent reception conditions, the "inaccuracy" myth is indeed a fallacy. Sometimes the maps may be poor, that's true, but my experience suggests these are not nearly as common as the claims suggest. The laser is more accurate on paper, but whether that translates into a real benefit on the course is, to which this and other threads attest, a far more complicated question.

Which is better, a laser or a GPS? It depends on what you're trying to do with it.

the blind shot thing isn't exactly a detraction for a laser.  All you have to do is go to the point where the shot wouldn't be blind...shoot your target..turn around..shoot the ground where your ball is.  Add them together...you got your distance.  If you're blind all the way to the green(an uphill hole on a shelf) then shoot the top of the hill at the front of the green.  Check flag color and get a decent yardage.  On most greens though...I can shoot the front..the flag, and the back in the area I wanna land the ball in a span of 10 seconds.  No moving cursors or playing with screens or anything else..just three button pushes.

As for just getting the number to the pin...it doesn't mean thats the number you swing for..it just gives you accurate info to base what shot you want to play off of.  There are many times when I'll shoot the flag and know that I'm going to be landing the ball well short of it..but it lets me know the club and the swing I need to try and accomplish that.  Doesn't mean I do it because I'm no pro..but it gives me confidence.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

My GPS app uses satellite aerial views which allows the user to touch points on the map which then gives you a distance to that point from your current location, and from that point to the center of the green.  I use this all the time for bunker/hazard carry distances and proper layup locations.

Examples (I'm currently pretty far away from the first tee of the course nearest my job )

As was mentioned already though, you can pinpoint a location on the green to get the distance to that point, but you're still only guessing as to whether the flag is really there or a few yards further forward or back.

As for the OPs question, yes it is somewhat of a fallacy: the GPS data is only as good as your phone's GPS signal/lock.

are these google earth images or some other proprietary service? The reason I ask is because what turned me off to any "aerial image' GPS units is that in Google earth...my area isn't all that sharp so I just didn't wanna take a chance on cruddy maps.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted
Originally Posted by Paradox

are these google earth images or some other proprietary service? The reason I ask is because what turned me off to any "aerial image' GPS units is that in Google earth...my area isn't all that sharp so I just didn't wanna take a chance on cruddy maps.

Yes, the particular app I use is powered by Google Maps/Earth.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted
Originally Posted by bplewis24

(I'm currently pretty far away from the first tee of the course nearest my job )

The newer GPSs have clearly come a long way since the black and white ones with only the three numbers on them, front, middle, back of green.

By the way, Brandon, just curious ... what is your 36,685 yd layup club?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

The newer GPSs have clearly come a long way since the black and white ones with only the three numbers on them, front, middle, back of green.

By the way, Brandon, just curious ... what is your 36,685 yd layup club?

Three wood, of course.  That way I can back it up, if necessary

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Posted

Was on the course the other day with a friend. He had a handheld Garmin. I had the Garmin Approach1 watch. There were times we were 10 yards off. Go figure.

R11s driver

R11 3 wood

Glide sole design 5 wood

Cleveland CG16 irons

Vokey SM4 48*, Vokey SM4 52*, Vokey SM4 56* wedges

Yes! Eleanor putter


Note: This thread is 4713 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.