Jump to content
IGNORED

What's wrong with hitting it straight?


Note: This thread is 4321 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Jack Nicklaus always played well at Augusta, which is notorious for favoring a draw, in spite of his normal fade.  He did ultimately learn to play a draw, mostly because there were shots at Augusta where he really needed it, but his stock shot was a fade, and he played most of the time.  Even in situations where a draw might have been the better choice, he would only try to turn the ball left when absolutely necessary.

If you consider that even someone with his talent would have difficulty playing a dependable draw, it really amazes me when I read comments from 15 handicappers who say that they draw and fade at will.  I don't know who they think they are kidding, but I'm not buying it.  I've played a fade my whole playing life, except when I'm playing a slice. Trying to learn how to play a draw only got me a duck hook, and made me have relearn how to play my fade.  I don't mess with it any more.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It is better because you can in many ways eliminate one side of the course. With a straight shot, you can miss left and right with small variances in clubface angle or clubhead path. If you aim straight at the flag, you can miss both left and right. If you got water to the left and a bunker to the right, you could end up in both. If you got a consistent curvature on the ball flight, you can more accurately predict where you possibly will miss. You can always miss both ways of course, but the margins of that is smaller if you got a predictable draw or fade. We want to hit the intended shot every time, but that's not possible. Once we accept this, we have to look at how to control the misses and limit the damage. By hitting a draw or fade, you make your missed shots "better".

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Jack Nicklaus always played well at Augusta, which is notorious for favoring a draw, in spite of his normal fade.  He did ultimately learn to play a draw, mostly because there were shots at Augusta where he really needed it, but his stock shot was a fade, and he played most of the time.  Even in situations where a draw might have been the better choice, he would only try to turn the ball left when absolutely necessary.

If you consider that even someone with his talent would have difficulty playing a dependable draw, it really amazes me when I read comments from 15 handicappers who say that they draw and fade at will.  I don't know who they think they are kidding, but I'm not buying it.  I've played a fade my whole playing life, except when I'm playing a slice.   Trying to learn how to play a draw only got me a duck hook, and made me have relearn how to play my fade.  I don't mess with it any more.

I used to hit big draws/hooks.  Then fades.  Now I'm only starting to hit draws and I've completely lost the ability to hit it a fade even if I try.  Its not a big loss, but its really frustrating.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

Jack Nicklaus always played well at Augusta, which is notorious for favoring a draw, in spite of his normal fade.  He did ultimately learn to play a draw, mostly because there were shots at Augusta where he really needed it, but his stock shot was a fade, and he played most of the time.  Even in situations where a draw might have been the better choice, he would only try to turn the ball left when absolutely necessary.

If you consider that even someone with his talent would have difficulty playing a dependable draw, it really amazes me when I read comments from 15 handicappers who say that they draw and fade at will.  I don't know who they think they are kidding, but I'm not buying it.  I've played a fade my whole playing life, except when I'm playing a slice.   Trying to learn how to play a draw only got me a duck hook, and made me have relearn how to play my fade.  I don't mess with it any more.


Amen to that.  I play a pretty reliable draw and have never really been able to fade the ball.  I wish that I could hit either at will but Im not there yet.

Whats in my :sunmountain: C-130 cart bag?

Woods: :mizuno: JPX 850 9.5*, :mizuno: JPX 850 15*, :mizuno: JPX-850 19*, :mizuno: JPX Fli-Hi #4, :mizuno: JPX 800 Pro 5-PW, :mizuno: MP T-4 50-06, 54-09 58-10, :cleveland: Smart Square Blade and :bridgestone: B330-S


I hit a small fade as my go to shot most of the time (5 yard fade).  I tried to learn to hit draws and can now somewhat, but it just doesn't fit my eye and it turns into a hook to easily for me.  For me a fade is the most consistent shot I have.  Also there is nothing wrong with straight, but most of the time a working shot is the best option.

Titleist 913D2 9.5 (UST VTS 65)

Titleist 913F 15 (Diamana S+)

Titleist 913H 19 (Diamana S+)

Titleist 714 AP2 (4-PW) (DG XP-95)

Titleist Vokey SM5 (52,56,58) (DG XP-95)

Ping Anser 2 Classic


Speaking of fading the ball, I have started fading the ball during my last 2 rounds.  It is a little more than I would like, you guys would call it a power fade. I wouldn't go that far but it is fading between 30-50 yards.  Learning this fade has helped me improve my scoring from 91 average the last 4 rounds to averaging 97.  It is awesome, I can't wait til I start slicing the ball and I am hitting 2 fairways over instead of just the one fairway over right now. LOL!


Originally Posted by Fourputt

it really amazes me when I read comments from 15 handicappers who say that they draw and fade at will.  I don't know who they think they are kidding, but I'm not buying it.

I'm sorry, but if you have somewhat of a repeatable swing a draw and fade can be controlled with setup.  I tend to draw, so if I want to play a fade I aim left and open the clubface so it's pointing at my target.  Then I just make a normal swing.  There's really nothing more to it than that regardless of what your handicap is.


Originally Posted by Tom Shanks

I'm sorry, but if you have somewhat of a repeatable swing a draw and fade can be controlled with setup.  I tend to draw, so if I want to play a fade I aim left and open the clubface so it's pointing at my target.  Then I just make a normal swing.  There's really nothing more to it than that regardless of what your handicap is.

Of course that might work for you but just for anyone out there reading this looking to do the same thing, the major factor in determining the direction the ball starts is the clubface. So doing exactly as you say will start the ball pretty much at the target and curve it further right.


Of course that might work for you but just for anyone out there reading this looking to do the same thing, the major factor in determining the direction the ball starts is the clubface. So doing exactly as you say will start the ball pretty much at the target and curve it further right.

This is incorrect. Clubface angle may be the major factor in determining direction, but it's not the only factor. If you bounce a basketball on a perfectly flat treadmill moving at 5 miles per hour, do you think it's going to bounce straight up and down? No. A golfball compresses when struck, so there's friction. If you swing 20 yards left of a target and at contact your clubface is perfectly aligned with your target, that ball is gonna move left.......not 20 yards left, but probably 5 or more depending on the club. This isn't my opinion. These are simple laws of physics. If you don't believe me, try it with a putter on a practice green or carpet, etc. Keep the face square to the target but make a stroke that cuts out to in across your target line. I assure you the putt will start left.


Originally Posted by Tom Shanks

I'm sorry, but if you have somewhat of a repeatable swing a draw and fade can be controlled with setup.  I tend to draw, so if I want to play a fade I aim left and open the clubface so it's pointing at my target.  Then I just make a normal swing.  There's really nothing more to it than that regardless of what your handicap is.

Originally Posted by Mordan

Of course that might work for you but just for anyone out there reading this looking to do the same thing, the major factor in determining the direction the ball starts is the clubface. So doing exactly as you say will start the ball pretty much at the target and curve it further right.

Not necessarily.  He didn't say anything about where his clubface points at impact, only at setup. ;)

Originally Posted by Tom Shanks

This is incorrect. Clubface angle may be the major factor in determining direction, but it's not the only factor. If you bounce a basketball on a perfectly flat treadmill moving at 5 miles per hour, do you think it's going to bounce straight up and down? No. A golfball compresses when struck, so there's friction. If you swing 20 yards left of a target and at contact your clubface is perfectly aligned with your target, that ball is gonna move left.......not 20 yards left, but probably 5 or more depending on the club.

This isn't my opinion. These are simple laws of physics. If you don't believe me, try it with a putter on a practice green or carpet, etc. Keep the face square to the target but make a stroke that cuts out to in across your target line. I assure you the putt will start left.

I believe that its 85%/15% clubface/path, so that would mean your example would have the ball starting something like 3 yards left.  Although, that's a weird way of measuring swing direction.  I think it would make more sense to measure it in degrees.

Mordan's point, though, is that if you actually were to return the clubface back at impact and it's still pointing at the target then there are no ifs, ands or butts about it ... you're missing right.  That 15% isn't enough to keep you hitting that target ... to do so that clubface needs to be some amount of degrees left of target but right of path.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by Tom Shanks

This is incorrect. Clubface angle may be the major factor in determining direction, but it's not the only factor. If you bounce a basketball on a perfectly flat treadmill moving at 5 miles per hour, do you think it's going to bounce straight up and down? No. A golfball compresses when struck, so there's friction. If you swing 20 yards left of a target and at contact your clubface is perfectly aligned with your target, that ball is gonna move left.......not 20 yards left, but probably 5 or more depending on the club.

This isn't my opinion. These are simple laws of physics. If you don't believe me, try it with a putter on a practice green or carpet, etc. Keep the face square to the target but make a stroke that cuts out to in across your target line. I assure you the putt will start left.

Why are you arguing? You're saying almost exactly the same thing:

Originally Posted by Mordan

Of course that might work for you but just for anyone out there reading this looking to do the same thing, the major factor in determining the direction the ball starts is the clubface. So doing exactly as you say will start the ball pretty much at the target and curve it further right.

He did not say the ONLY factor. He said it was the major factor (and it is, and you agree).

Originally Posted by Mordan

Of course that might work for you but just for anyone out there reading this looking to do the same thing, the major factor in determining the direction the ball starts is the clubface. So doing exactly as you say will start the ball pretty much at the target and curve it further right.

He did not say EXACTLY at the target. He said it'll start "pretty much" at the target (and it will, and you agree).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Tom Shanks

This is incorrect. Clubface angle may be the major factor in determining direction, but it's not the only factor. If you bounce a basketball on a perfectly flat treadmill moving at 5 miles per hour, do you think it's going to bounce straight up and down? No. A golfball compresses when struck, so there's friction. If you swing 20 yards left of a target and at contact your clubface is perfectly aligned with your target, that ball is gonna move left.......not 20 yards left, but probably 5 or more depending on the club.

This isn't my opinion. These are simple laws of physics. If you don't believe me, try it with a putter on a practice green or carpet, etc. Keep the face square to the target but make a stroke that cuts out to in across your target line. I assure you the putt will start left.

I said it was the major factor, not the only one. And I said it would pretty much start at the target, not that it would exactly start at the target.

If your swing path is 20 yards left of target, and your clubface is perfectly aligned (which appears to be what you were suggesting), then the ball will start a few yards left of target and curve considerably more than that to the right.

The putter as an example actually works against what you're saying. Because it has so little loft, the ball will start up to 95% in the direction of the club face, and only about 5% in the direction of your swing path.


Originally Posted by SCfanatic35

Speaking of fading the ball, I have started fading the ball during my last 2 rounds.  It is a little more than I would like, you guys would call it a power fade. I wouldn't go that far but it is fading between 30-50 yards.  Learning this fade has helped me improve my scoring from 91 average the last 4 rounds to averaging 97.  It is awesome, I can't wait til I start slicing the ball and I am hitting 2 fairways over instead of just the one fairway over right now. LOL!

LOL


My driver shot shape is usually straight with the occasional small draw.  I never fade that club, but when I hit my short irons correctly they are predictably straight and I usually fade my long irons and hybrids.  I'm just not very consistent right now, likely due to limited practice time.


Note: This thread is 4321 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 336 - Back to some full swing work. Focus was on a hips-towards-the-target finish, chest higher up. Partial swings working up to full swings. 
    • Day 79 - 2024-12-18 Got some work in before lessons while finishing the charging of the R50.
    • Matt, the equation is simple from my perspective. Stronger the grip, greater the potential of application for twist torque at impact. And if it it is combined with an extreme outward path as you say, god help you. Not too many skilled players with super strong grips, are there? Sure, it's all about match-ups but the connection to super strong grips and duck hooks is common from what I see and have dealt with myself.
    • Day 154: not feeling great, so just 5 minutes of mirror work. Working on backswing stuff still. 
    • I have been a big follower of this technology ever since I saw Positive Putters display at a golf show in the Revealer they invented and patented. That would have been around 2000. It made sense to me that staying target line balanced was a better way of balancing.  Early models of these putters were often too flat for me and I struggled to hole more putts. I was fascinated by all of them - Positive Putters, the Railgun, the SeeMore blades and the Backstryke. I have tried the DF1, which was great for long putts, and currently use the DF3. I am still really good at long putts with the DF3 3, having made a 90’ putt and a 34’ putt in my last two rounds. My first round with the DF3 I only had 24 putts making almost 200’ of putts. I don’t quite use the putter the way they suggest- I don’t swing harder, and only a little longer, on longer putts. All my putts are at the same tempo, or strive to be. Therefore, I am swinging harder on longer putts. I do love putting with the DF 3 and I have become much better at putting through 50-60 mm gates at home, rarely hitting the sides.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...