Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
rehmwa

Drills to improve face angle consistency......?

Note: This thread is 2055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

15 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

asked in member swings, but thought as a general topic might be better in this forum here....(Did a couple searches also, good info there, but I'm after something more...)

I've had some recent Trackman time (i like it a lot) - numbers look really good and on a good day I can induce fade and draw, etc etc just with minor tweaks to my set up.

I've decided I'm happy with positive swing path (around +2 to 3), and slightly positive face angle (+1.0 or so) - that's a good ball flight.  The other metrics are in a good place and seem consistent enough for now.  So just focusing on these two for now...

I'm nailing the swing path pretty consistently.

When I'm missing, though, it's pretty much getting the face angle to dial in.....too much variation vs what I would find acceptable....

Can anyone recommend drills to tighten my face angle (at impact) control?

as far as full swing mechanics, this is my biggest bang for the buck. (the biggest absolute being short game stuff, but that's a different topic)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

There are only two videos at http://purestrike5sk.com/videos.php and one of them is just "theory." The drill that's there is a good one - it makes you aware of your start lines.

Your face angle can be a problem if you have a high rate of closure, which is often a Key #2/#3 issue. Are you certain it's JUST a face-angle issue? Can you post a video showing your full grip?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Check out this thread for any Key #5 drills http://thesandtrap.com/t/61376/5sk-video-thread

Other than that, you gain better club face control through practice, having a functional grip and understanding why those club face issues are occurring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

both are great replies.  I'll update vids soon, will include a closeup of my normal grip too - I can mitigate the occurence of shut downs by weakening my grip a bit......  (Since that bit is not general, I'll update my "My Swing thread" and poke you guys on it - rather than clutter this thread)

I have been very aware of my start lines.

--- On a good day, those are what I use to set up for a fade vs draw (and excited that it works!...).  I set up at address what I tend to hit on contact (i.e., if it looks slightly positive at address then trackman shows me a slight positive hit, etc).  So I'm lucky there - no wierd setup picture required just to make it work.  Just want to minimize the variations and the occasional too-negative club face strike....

---On a bad day, I tend to sporadically close the face too soon, typ - those are the outliers I want to fix.  (So a good idea for me to take a look at how my grip is interacting with the swing....)

will check into that advice and vids asap and get back

thanks for the info - Hope it also helps the others too

This weekend the courses are finally open...

(will research your 5 Keys info - I know this is a site that advocates actively for it, but I'm seeing more and more that you guys are the real thing and it's worth looking into more)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by rehmwa

(will research your 5 Keys info - I know this is a site that advocates actively for it, but I'm seeing more and more that you guys are the real thing and it's worth looking into more)

Thanks, we only deal with factual data, so that helps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by mvmac

Thanks, we only deal with factual data, so that helps

that's a great statement.  here's a funny story....

We were hitting the trackman Tuesday night and an old golf buddy showed up.  He's really good compared to me (4 HC) and he likes to 'give advice'.  Normally it's really good stuff, so I listen, (though lately I've been making a lot of my own progress and have started to just do my thing and my coach's advice only and no one else....)

Anyway - 'factual data theme' - he's watching me hit and I'm knocking about every third shot left.  My trackman numbers are +2 to +4 club path pretty consistently, and face angle is +2 on the good shots, and ~-6 to -8 on the 'pulls'.  So I'm mumbling about face angle control to myself.  He's trying to tell me I'm hitting outside in.....I point at the trackman display and he states "I don't need to look at that, I see what you are doing even before the display updates....." he then lays down an alignment rod for me to hit inside out.....instead of arguing, I just take the swing and hit a nice straight shot  (club path = +0.4, face angle = 0.4).  He then says "See?  it was your club path."

I'm a nerd, but I found it funny, so did the friend I was sharing the trackman with......

I'm ok with it, he means well and I have my own improvement plan regardless.

silly laws of physics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by rehmwa

that's a great statement.  here's a funny story....

We were hitting the trackman Tuesday night and an old golf buddy showed up.  He's really good compared to me (4 HC) and he likes to 'give advice'.  Normally it's really good stuff, so I listen, (though lately I've been making a lot of my own progress and have started to just do my thing and my coach's advice only and no one else....)

Anyway - 'factual data theme' - he's watching me hit and I'm knocking about every third shot left.  My trackman numbers are +2 to +4 club path pretty consistently, and face angle is +2 on the good shots, and ~-6 to -8 on the 'pulls'.  So I'm mumbling about face angle control to myself.  He's trying to tell me I'm hitting outside in.....I point at the trackman display and he states "I don't need to look at that, I see what you are doing even before the display updates....."    he then lays down an alignment rod for me to hit inside out.....instead of arguing, I just take the swing and hit a nice straight shot  (club path = +0.4, face angle = 0.4).  He then says "See?  it was your club path."

I'm a nerd, but I found it funny, so did the friend I was sharing the trackman with......

I'm ok with it, he means well and I have my own improvement plan regardless.

silly laws of physics

lol major facepalm.  Yeah that kind of advice can get players in some big trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

If I were you I'd have hit a huge push-hook and then shown him THOSE numbers.

aww, that's great.....you assume I can actually do that on purpose........

and remember - there was a refusal to look at the numbers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by rehmwa

aww, that's great.....you assume I can actually do that on purpose........

and remember - there was a refusal to look at the numbers

Eh, I'd have made him look. Wager $100 on his "knowledge."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by iacas View Post

Eh, I'd have made him look. Wager $100 on his "knowledge."

I imagine a guy like that would probably then claim that the machine was broken. ;)

Quick question regarding terminology:

Quote:
Anyway - 'factual data theme' - he's watching me hit and I'm knocking about every third shot left.  My trackman numbers are +2 to +4 club path pretty consistently, and face angle is +2 on the good shots, and ~-6 to -8 on the 'pulls'.

Everytime I read this stuff I forget which way is which.  Based on this quote I'm assuming that + is to the right and - is to the left?  Also, I assume that + is up and - is down?  I know it's basic stuff, but I've never sat down and thought about it so I don't have it down 100%

Further, if you are talking numbers with lefties, do side to side numbers flip?  Or is it always +=right and -=left?

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I imagine a guy like that would probably then claim that the machine was broken. ;) Quick question regarding terminology:  Everytime I read this stuff I forget which way is which.  Based on this quote I'm assuming that + is to the right and - is to the left?  Also, I assume that + is up and - is down?  I know it's basic stuff, but I've never sat down and thought about it so I don't have it down 100% Further, if you are talking numbers with lefties, do side to side numbers flip?  Or is it always +=right and -=left? Thanks!

I am with you I have a vector pro and that means a push fade to me. Swing path to the right. Face open? What am I missing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

I imagine a guy like that would probably then claim that the machine was broken. ;)

Quick question regarding terminology:

Everytime I read this stuff I forget which way is which.  Based on this quote I'm assuming that + is to the right and - is to the left?  Also, I assume that + is up and - is down?  I know it's basic stuff, but I've never sat down and thought about it so I don't have it down 100%

Further, if you are talking numbers with lefties, do side to side numbers flip?  Or is it always +=right and -=left?

Thanks!

Outward swing direction (to the right for a RHG), hitting up, face angle aimed right of the target and a spin axis tilted right, would all produce positive numbers.  Negative would be inward swing direction (left for RHG), hitting down, face angle left of target and spin axis titled left.

Negative face to path, assuming center CoG hit, means a draw/hook, positive face to path, fade/slice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Thanks for the drills -

I just couldn't interpret the video with the line art at all.  Will take another try later, maybe after a couple drinks......or six.....

The other drill I did yesterday (hit around the target line) and it really does emphasize the function of the face angle at impact in terms of the start of ball flight.

I think playing around with controlling the left and right part of the launch like that on purpose is a great drill.  Exploring controllability over a range of motion is a great way to teach minimizing variation when you just want to keep it tight at a chosen point.  (Driving is another analogy - if you are very good at changing lanes, then you should be pretty darn good at staying in the center of a single lane.)

I teach a similar thing in skydiving.  When a competitor is trying to learn to be very still during freefall (two dimensionally in the horizontal plan - a much desired skill and harder than most people think), I first teach them how to move about briskly and in control - turning, start stop, sliding left right, moving forward and backward.  Magically, knowing how to move also teaches one how to not move strongly when desired.

So learning to manipulate face angle will also help me learn to control it a chosen point.....

that's the theory anyway and I'm sticking with it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2055 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • First you get the strike...then you get the speed !! Strike is boss...the first thing that you should ask yourself after every shot that you hit is how did I strike it.  If you struck it well...proceed to analyze the shot, and if you didn't strike it well, disregard the results and go back and fix the strike because the shot didn't end up where you wanted it to because poor strike should NEVER be apart of your plan.  In my opinion you aren't truly playing golf until a solid strike can be taken for granted and ignored.  Planning for a miss or taking one extra club is not the same thing either because the intention is to still strike it solidly.  Impact is boss.
    • And that is why I will never try to copy a Pros swing. Sure it looks effortless on the surface but his back has been ripped to shreds over the years and swinging as hard as you can from the top is never going to be the most efficient means to hit a golf ball.  Putting the speed on at the right time is how a swing can be perceived as effortless by a golfer. Even if the intent is to do nothing you will still do something but the goal should still be to let the club do most of the work. In my opinion trying to hit the ball as hard as I can and asking myself what is the minimal amount of effort needed to get the job done are too very different things.  
    • You’re some what making my point here? Hit the ball badly and get a 208 yard result or hit it well and get a great result (246 yards)? To improve your total distance by simply swinging harder is very difficult for most people.  If you are hitting the ball so badly that a 94 mph swingspeed delivers only 208 yards, to increase the total distance to 245 yards, without making swing changes, requires a swingspeed of around 110 mph.  I just can’t see that happening for most people? In addition, quality of strike generally deteriorates as swingspeed increases - it stands to reason that hitting the ball in the middle becomes more difficult if you’re trying to swing out of your shoes.
    • The evidence is all around you should you choose to accept it or not and golf isn't the only sport that is experiencing this. The gap between the best and the worst players, especially in Pro sports, is ever decreasing and this is fact.  It is more difficult to be a Pro or College athlete than it was 20 years ago and it is becoming more difficult everyday.  Technology, coaching, and training are without question better than 20 years ago. Bigger, faster, and stronger athletes are also choosing golf and a 6'2" 180 lb golfer simply has a better chance to make it to the pros in relation to a 5'8" 160 lb golfer if  they are both being introduced to the game at the same time and being exposed to the same training modalities. That is why the NFL combine exists because the foundation of sport is based on measurables. The bigger, faster, and stronger athletes have the best chance to succeed in sport. Not saying they will...but they have the best chance to succeed.      Even if the fields are marginally better...the fact is...it is harder to be dominant now than it was 20 years ago because golfers are better so those margins are harder to overcome. It all trickles down from the top and makes it tougher to succeed at all levels of the sport.  Corey Pavin doesn't even exist on tour in today's day and age because hitting it 250 doesn't cut it on tour today.  Not when there are videos of 13 year old on youtube shooting 63 from the tips at respected golf courses in sanctioned tournaments while hitting it 290 yards off the tee. That shift has happened within one generation of the sport and all sport right before out eyes.  
    • I don't understand why you would say that.  Tiger was not and is not the most influential golfer ever.  In fact when it comes to style, I'd say he has had a somewhat negative influence.  And, he was a coddled child literally bred to play golf; that's not something that golfers can aspire to.  So, I'm not sure what you mean by "influential."   Vardon was the early innovator and introduced the grip that most people still use.  Jones was a major celebrity and elevated the game worldwide, demonstrated utmost integrity, gave true meaning to "play for the love of the game", as well as being a pioneer in instructional video and an excellent writer, to boot. Hagen innovated wedge bounce.  Hogan's swing is more influential than Tigers, to this day.  Player introduced working out and nutrition.  Palmer was a celebrity-media pioneer.  ...  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. asimpson1211
      asimpson1211
      (44 years old)
    2. dfriend1
      dfriend1
      (54 years old)
    3. gmohr
      gmohr
      (64 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...