• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
boogielicious

Blackhawks v. Bruins

27 posts in this topic

"Old time hockey.  Eddy Shore." - Hanson Brothers.

Good to see two of the original teams in the finals.  Brings back memories of Bobby Orr and Bobby Hull.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Yea, and Phil Esposito, Stan Makita, Magnuson, etc. etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to be the first Stanley Cup Finals between two Original Six squads since 1979. Now that's old school.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Chilli Dipper

It's going to be the first Stanley Cup Finals between two Original Six squads since 1979. Now that's old school.

The Good Guys won that one!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Although I've lived in Texas for 34 years I grew up in Joliet IL and I'm still a Hawks fan.  Go Chicago!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Red Wings can't win it all, I'd like to see Chicago win.   Detroit had Chicago on the ropes and let them escape. but I believe Chicago is the best team playing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

I fully expect the series to go 6 or 7 games but if the Hawks show up and play their game, they should be able to get it done.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

I fully expect the series to go 6 or 7 games but if the Hawks show up and play their game, they should be able to get it done.

That is what the media said about Boston versus the Penguins.  Pitt averaged 4.2 goals per game before playing Boston.  Penguins were the odds on favorite to win the cup.  Their great offense was held to zero power play goals and two goals total in the series.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Its going to be a great series.  Both are great teams who like to hit and have great goaltending.  Im probably biased, being a Hawks fan but I see the Hawks taking this one.  IMO, the Bruins just dont have the talent to run with the Hawks.  The Bruins havent yet played a team that can score at will, plays great defense, hits you hard and has great goaltending.

The Pens were close but the Pens dont play defense and their stars didnt show up in that series.

The Pens were a team that could score at will. They play pretty darn good defense too - you know there was a stretch where they gave up 11 goals over 12 games? And "their stars didn't show up"… possibly because they were playing the Bruins? Crosby and Malkin were having a pretty good playoffs until Boston.

Now, the Pens also hit unlimited goal posts, and not once in the series could you say "the Pens got a lucky break there," but go ahead - overlook the Bruins all you want. It'll depend on which team shows up - the one that barely beat the Leafs or the one that beat the prohibitive favorite.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching. Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO. I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg. Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching. Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO. I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg. Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.

Oh, and one more thing... GO HAWKS!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This will be a great matchup but Bruins in six (no bias being from Boston I assure you (; ). Think the Pens had stretches of decent defensive play but that's clearly not their game and with average at best goaltending the series loss is no shock. Of course no one up here was talking sweep but we had a quiet confidence.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Ernest Jones

As much as I despise the bruins, they are for real. Anyone who thinks they don't have the talent to shut down teams is not watching.

Pittsburg's goaltending has been suspect IMHO.

I think the HABS would have given Boston a much harder time than Pittsburg.

Pittsburg should have played their game not the bruin's game, that was stupid.

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

That is why I like Hockey better than Basketball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

The Habs, ha. Give me a break. Yeah, they'd have given Boston a harder time than the second leading points getter in the entire NHL. Right. A team that was 3-0 against them in the regular season.

Pittsburgh played their game. Got away from it a little bit in game #2 but that's because they pressed hard after game #1 where nothing went their way. The game could have easily been 3-0 Pittsburgh five minutes in. Buddies for the Sabres texted and said the same thing.

Pittsburgh's goaltending was not suspect. In game 2 their defense was suspect, and towards the end of game 1 because they had to push to try to score, but that was it. Pittsburgh's goaltending (Vokoun) and defense gave up 3 goals in the last 5 periods of hockey.

Not a single break went the Pens way. If Game 1 was 1-0 or 2-0 inside the first five minutes, the series likely plays out very, very differently. Rask had a save percentage of something like 0.985. NO TEAM can beat that with ANY offensive output of their own.

The question is: which Boston shows up? Which Chicago? Boston almost lost to freaking Toronto, and Chicago almost lost to Detroit. The NHL isn't like the NBA where the team with the stars always seem to advance.

Habs won 3 out of 4 matchs vs Boston this season, and yes, I do believe the HABS would've been a better match-up for the Bruins. The HABS are a little more experienced at NOT playing the bruin's game, we've learned the HARD way, lol, you beat the Bruin's with speed, frustrate their D and let them start taking the bad penalties. The Laffs almost pulled it off but their D is a joke.

Regular season stats don't necessarily transfer over to playoff performance, Boston's a good example of that right now.

Agree that Pittsburg didn't have a single bounce go their way.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As someone is as fair-weather a fan of hockey and the Bruins as one can be and who doesn't claim to know anything about the sport, I'm just enjoying the entertaining games. Especially since I can't stand the Heat or Spurs.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by boogielicious

That is why I like Hockey better than Basketball.

I can't stand basketball. I don't even care to watch it in person let alone on TV.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

I can't stand basketball. I don't even care to watch it in person let alone on TV.

I used to like basketball but kinda grew out of it. After watching more baseball, football (and futbol), and hockey, I feel each score in basketball is so watered down. I now like watching sports where scoring is more difficult and one goal (or run) means a whole lot more than repeatedly shooting a ball through a hoop throughout the game.

I feel like it's the same story every season for the SJ Sharks. They get to the semis and then done. Very surprised to the the Blackhawks play really well against the Kings, especially with how goal stingy they are at home. Not a fan of either the team in the finals, but I'll put my money on the Blackhawks to win.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Ready golf except in match play. Match play is different. 
    • Yep! I have both a FJ jacket and pants in rainwear that I bought years ago. I don't use them very often so they've lasted a long time. But, they're heavy and hot! They were made before GoreTex and other waterproof, breathable fabrics. My advice? Get the absolute best you can afford! They will last you a long time, they will keep you comfortable, they will be light, and they won't impede your swing very much.
    • Thanks for all the responses. I think this boils down to the context of the situation. I had two of the foursome busting chops about hitting out of order on previous holes. Then the first time it was mildly inconvenient for them to wait, the holed out just as i hit the green. Mind you.  This wasnt an "adventure" hole.. I hit the green on stroke 5 because of a flub shot that went about 10 ft. And an errant approach that left me about 10 yards short of the green. In any other case I agree that its perfectly fine to hit when ready, but not if you complain about hitting out of order. I guess to paint the picture, one whipped a club on the 3rd hole due to sculling a shout out of the bunker.. on another hole had one of them walking towards green right in front of my approach.. he nicely moved about 3 yards to the right as i asked him to move. As karma would have it, i hit the shot straight at him and nearly hit him.. these were friends of mine.. so a lesson learned to play golf with different friends..
    • Picked one up and checked it out in a store the other day. First thing I noticed about it was how heavy it was. Reminded me of when I went out for the HS golf team, and the coach had a Driver with a solid steel head on it. He advised us that we were NOT to hit drives with it! It was for warm up only. Being as heavy as it is, I think the main benefit to it might be that it slows your transition from backswing to downswing. There's a whole lot of guys who could use that!
    • OK, this kind of clears things up for me. I thought you might have been trying to take close ups of clubheads impacting golf balls. In that case you'd need something numbering in the several thousands of fps! If all you need is to look at swings I'd say anything the budget allows should suffice. Consider the 960fps system mentioned. If a golf swing takes about I second, at a playback rate of 30fps, that gives you a swing video of 32 seconds in length. Plenty long enough to see the golfer's bodily motions. Considering how small the clubhead will appear when videoing the entire golfer, I don't know that fps is the main consideration. It could be pixel count and the quality of the lenses. This reminds me of my "audiophile" days when cassette tapes were all the rage. I had a BIC deck that could record at 7 1/2 ips (inches per second), and an Audiovox car player that could play back at that speed. The sound quality was amazing! You were putting the same amount of info into twice as much space! There was so much more room!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Just trying
      Just trying
      (33 years old)
    2. Peter_b
      Peter_b
      (45 years old)
    3. SACgolf
      SACgolf
      (51 years old)
    4. Weluvgolf
      Weluvgolf
      (53 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon