Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4667 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by kw purp

Generally my contact spot is on the hozzle for me playing my patented shank draw

as long as you're consistent

(is it 'hosel'?  though i like your version, like nozzle)

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Infamous 273

There's an old acronym in the direct sales world: BAD - Balls, Attitude, Desire.

Pretty much sums it up.

Not for professional golf, I'm afraid.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

Putting, short game, ball striking.  But I think the biggest thing that separates the pros from the rest of the good/great players is the mental ability to be able to hit the shot they want with 500 people down each side of the fairway, another 1000 people around the green, and a camera crew standing 30 ft behind them broadcasting their shot all over the world.  Not to mention the nerves it takes to stand over a putt that could move you up or down the leader board several places.


Posted

Well, this is what i've noticed

the pro's are hitting a good club length or two farther than you... 7 irons 200+ yards , pitching wedges 140 yards...  they know how to hit low fades, high fades, draws, punch shots, they can do it all with every club...

also, ever notice how they all seem to hit their irons off to the right?  yet come down right on the green?  or left ( for lefties )

plus on most courses, their fairways are very narrow, and the first cut is like the typical rough that you'd find at a public course...  the second cut is usually deep thick grass..

their bunkers are huge and deep...  the greens are quick and not flat...

also look at most of their courses they are 7000+ yards..

basically if you have a PGA type championship course in your surrounding area, and you've played it,,, imagine it playing tougher, and then you still need to shoot par or better on every hole to compete..

It is what it is

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
You forgot the galleries, film crews, sponsers checking out your every move...

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Lihu

You forgot the galleries, film crews, sponsers checking out your every move...

Originally Posted by ffemtp

Putting, short game, ball striking.  But I think the biggest thing that separates the pros from the rest of the good/great players is the mental ability to be able to hit the shot they want with 500 people down each side of the fairway, another 1000 people around the green, and a camera crew standing 30 ft behind them broadcasting their shot all over the world.  Not to mention the nerves it takes to stand over a putt that could move you up or down the leader board several places.

No they didn't :-p

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by phan52

Most golf competitions are a big putting contest. There a lot of great ball strikers in the world but the best make birdies and save pars with their flat stick.

Nope.

The top guys are the ones who give themselves the opportunity to putt the earliest.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Nope.

The top guys are the ones who give themselves the opportunity to putt the earliest.

I wonder what the correlation is of GIR to putts per round for the best players and where the the drop off is.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I wonder what the correlation is of GIR to putts per round for the best players and where the the drop off is.

Everything you ever wanted to know. http://www.pgatour.com/stats.html Like Erik said, it's not so much the putts in GIR, but the sheer number of GIR hit in the first place......

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by David in FL

Everything you ever wanted to know.

http://www.pgatour.com/stats.html

Like Erik said, it's not so much the putts in GIR, but the sheer number of GIR hit in the first place......

Strange that only 1 of the top 5 people in GIR are in the top 5 for scoring. Even the top 10 aren't comparable. Strange that. There are more people on both the strokes gained putting and scoring lists though in the top 10.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Jeremie Boop

Strange that only 1 of the top 5 people in GIR are in the top 5 for scoring. Even the top 10 aren't comparable. Strange that. There are more people on both the strokes gained putting and scoring lists though in the top 10.


At least for 2013, there seems to be a closer correlation between putting (I used strokes gained putting) and success (OWGR). Of the top 10 in GIR, only one is currently in the top 20 OWGR. Of the top 10 in strokes gained putting, there are 5 in the top 20 OWGR.

When you are a great putter and a pretty good ball striker, that leads to money. Here are the 5 who are in the top 10 putting and top 20 OWGR: Woods, Garcia, Snedeker, Donald, Mickelsen. The only top 10 GIR guy in the top 20 OWGR is Stenson.

This is a small sample to be sure. Maybe it just shows that some of the best ball strikers are lousy putters (Vijay Singh, for example) and that some of the best putters are not such good ball strikers (Greg Chalmers).

  • Upvote 1

Posted

But ALL the tour pros hit a heckuva lot more greens than us mere mortals.  On stupid long, hard courses.  That's the big difference.

Heck, in terms of putts per GIR, even I'm within a tenth of a point or so of some of the PGA tour pros.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's definitely a combination of GIR and putts per round. Two players could both shoot even par 72 with one individual hitting 18 greens and 36 putts, and the other hitting 0 greens and 18 putts. Both have great stats and terrible stats at the same time, and neither would be contending. It's the guys that hit a lot of greens and make a lot of putts.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think the main factor would be playing in front of crowds.  There are a ton of outstanding players on your locals courses, but put a few people watching them and their mental state goes to hell.  I've seen many pros play the game.  From tee to green, there is not much difference in a scratch golfer vs a tour pro.  But once you get to the green there is a dramatic difference in putting, scrambling, etc.  In my prime back in college i was hitting it solid pretty consistently from tee to green.  Worked at a pretty well known course in the DFW area.  Could usually hit the ball close to where i wanted, but when it came to scoring, that was the difference.  Couldn't sink the birdies or long par saves.  I also would get a little nervous in front of people watching our group.  Could never just let loose and play like I knew i could.  Most of the tour pros started at an early age, so they are used to the crowds.

So my answer would be:

1. Playing in front of crowds.

2. Scoring once you get to the green


Posted
I have a spot like that on my wedge. Took me about 6 hours with a Dremel tool, LOL. Seriously: 1. Quality and consistency of their strikes 2. Repetoire of shots. 3. Ability to score when not hitting as well 4. Better misses If you have never been to a PGA Tour tournament, you should go. The scales fell from my bogey golfer eyes and like Bobby Jones I said, "They play a game with which I am unfamiliar."

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Have any of you ever heard Tiger's stinger 2 iron off the tee box in person?  Holy crap it's heavenly.  Saw and heard it at the 2001 US Open in Tulsa while standing next to him on the tee box.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
No they didn't :-p

Ah, but the left out the sponsors. :-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4667 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.