• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
skywaterbanjo

Handicap trends and competition

33 posts in this topic

I worked really hard (lots of practice, lessons, etc.) to get my handicap below 10 this year.  I've been playing golf for 9 years and that was my goal.  So, now that I am (was until today) a 7.8, I felt really good.

However, I play in a couple of men's groups each week.  I turned into the lowest handicap in the group.  Most are in the 12-21 range.  I now find that to win a skin (net) or even to be on a winning team (2 low net out of 4) is nearly impossible, no matter how well I shoot.  One of the high hc'ers has a great day and I no longer feel competitive.  Even the pro at our shop says it is very hard for a low hc'er to effectively compete with the high ones.  I love playing with these guys because they are so nice but I'm frustrated losing every week.

Anyone else experience this and, if so, what did you do about it?  Switch groups?  Don't bet?

Thanks

Mark in Colorado

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I think even though the handicap system is theoretically designed to let people compete fairly against one another it does seem to break down when the gaps are too wide.  There are a couple of scratch guys at our club who get very frustrated that they can't win any of the club events except the one or two that are scored off of gross stroke play.  The people who mess it up are (sorry) people like me.  Newbies but who are on their way down from a handicap standpoint. I have been playing seriously for about a year and a half.  Last year's goal was to break 100 and this year's goal is to break 90.  I haven't gotten there but I'm hovering around 94/95 on a course with a slope of 134.  Any day I'm going to string together a few putts or avoid the blow up and shoot 88 or something and I'm getting 24 strokes as my course handicap!  The handful of sub 5 caps in every one of these events are playing against a bunch of guys like me who are getting better, can strike the ball and get a few breaks but still get a ton of strokes.  At any given event, one of the 20 cappers will shoot in the 80's and win.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is certainly true that higher handicap players are less consistent and therefore more likely to score further below their handicap (on a good day) than the single digit handicap player is.  So if an event has included a fair number of high handicap players it becomes likely there will be some net scores that are pretty well below par.   I know to avoid that issue most of the "organized" tournaments I play in have flights separated by handicaps.  The flights usually have a 7 stroke variation in handicap (e.g. no player in a flight will have a handicap will have more than a 7 stoke handicap difference from any other player in the flight). I don't know where the 7 stroke limits come from but seems to make each flight competitive.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I have noticed is that in the stableford comps at my club if you score 40+ points then you are in with a chance of a placing (and prize money). What Ive also noticed is that the vast majority of winners are below 20hcp, with the majority being around 10hcp or lower.

Secondly all of the 4BBB, bogey, greensomes comps are run on a 3/4 handicap system which I think is a bit unfair for higher handicappers because those guys who are already around 10hcp wont mind playing off 7hcp whereas a 28 playing off 21 does make a difference (speaking from personal experience of course:).

At the end of the day you cant win everything and if a high handicapper starts to win a lot of comps then his handicap is going to come down, thus negating the earlier advantage he/she had playing off 28.

Regards

Mailman

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Are you talking about competing in a Men's league with a bunch of groups or betting within your foursome?

Our Copper Mountain Men's league pays both low gross and low net (the same guy/team can't win prizes in both), so being the best player is an advantage.

If you are talking about betting within your foursome, I think consistency is usually rewarded except of you play a game like net skins.

PS- What CO mountains are you in?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't play for money unless were playing straight up! The handicap system is great for trying to match up players and it can level the playing field but when money is on the line your going to have to play me like a man or not play at all. That's probably why the majority of my money matches have been against local pro's and other scratch players.

I will say that my club's Match Play event uses only 80% handicaps and that seems to work out really well in making things fair and exposes the sandbaggers as well. A few years back I had a match against a 12 handicap and I had to give him 10 shots. When the match ended on #14 he was +2 over par for the day and blew me away. I would have had to shoot something near the course record that day to have beat him. The kicker was since the match was over we finished the round on our way back to the clubhouse and he double bogeyed every hole coming in. Then he had the audacity to walk in the clubhouse and claim to everyone he shot about 82. Dude are you kidding me, you were only +2 during the match through 14 holes, lol!

Funny that the guy has never competed in the Match Play since then and I have no problem telling anyone what a sandbagging Bi^%& the guy is!

But when it comes to cash I will play anyone but your going to have to put your big boy pants on and play like a man(with no strokes)!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't play for money unless were playing straight up!

But when it comes to cash I will play anyone but your going to have to put your big boy pants on and play like a man(with no strokes)!

I heard Phil doesn't mind putting on his big boy pants- I'm sure he would be happy to play you straight up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard Phil doesn't mind putting on his big boy pants- I'm sure he would be happy to play you straight up.

It would be fun!

I would rather lose like a man than win like a bitch!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be fun! I would rather lose like a man than win like a bitch!

I don't feel all that manly when I wipe up the course with my 12 hcp buddy straight up. I'd rather give him his 7 or 8 strokes and have to work for my win. But maybe that's just me...... ;-)

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't play for money unless were playing straight up! The handicap system is great for trying to match up players and it can level the playing field but when money is on the line your going to have to play me like a man or not play at all. That's probably why the majority of my money matches have been against local pro's and other scratch players.

I will say that my club's Match Play event uses only 80% handicaps and that seems to work out really well in making things fair and exposes the sandbaggers as well. A few years back I had a match against a 12 handicap and I had to give him 10 shots. When the match ended on #14 he was +2 over par for the day and blew me away. I would have had to shoot something near the course record that day to have beat him. The kicker was since the match was over we finished the round on our way back to the clubhouse and he double bogeyed every hole coming in. Then he had the audacity to walk in the clubhouse and claim to everyone he shot about 82. Dude are you kidding me, you were only +2 during the match through 14 holes, lol!

Funny that the guy has never competed in the Match Play since then and I have no problem telling anyone what a sandbagging Bi^%& the guy is!

But when it comes to cash I will play anyone but your going to have to put your big boy pants on and play like a man(with no strokes)!

Last I heard no one in this country is ever forced to play in handicapped events.  So if you don't want to, don't, but I'm pretty sure whether you do or don't has very little with "being a man".

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last I heard no one in this country is ever forced to play in handicapped events.  So if you don't want to, don't, but I'm pretty sure whether you do or don't has very little with "being a man".

Exactly, that's why I stated I don't play for money unless it's straight up. I was pretty clear about that! Playing in club matches and giving strokes is another thing and I don't have a problem with that!

It's not about being macho by any means. It's about putting yourself on the line. I was pretty clear in that I only play accomplished players for money. If a 10 handicap asked me to play  for money and give them strokes I would tell them to go put in the time and dedication that I have and come back when they are ready to play straight up!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you talking about competing in a Men's league with a bunch of groups or betting within your foursome?

Our Copper Mountain Men's league pays both low gross and low net (the same guy/team can't win prizes in both), so being the best player is an advantage.

If you are talking about betting within your foursome, I think consistency is usually rewarded except of you play a game like net skins.

PS- What CO mountains are you in?

We usually have a group of 3 or 4 foursomes, playing best net 2 balls.

I'm in Durango, playing Dalton Ranch.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We usually have a group of 3 or 4 foursomes, playing best net 2 balls.

I'm in Durango, playing Dalton Ranch.

In a 2 low net out of 4 format, you can afford to be a tad more aggressive, especially if only 1 of 3 or 4 foursome wins.

Haven't been down to Durango yet, but might look to get down there this winter.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be fun! I would rather lose like a man than win like a bitch!

This seems like a very ignorant way of thinking about the USGA Handicap system.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Speaking purely in generalities, when people enter their scores for their handicap, you should be sure that ESC is being applied. I know many people who don't know what this is and as a result their handicap is much higher than it should be. So if they are playing 14 or so holes around bogey and then have 4 or so triples or worse and then enter 101 or something like that then they will clean your clock in any net game except maybe a net stroke game when the totality of their strokes is counted together. But in a hole by hole game or a game in which they have a partner to erase their big mistake holes, they will clean up. Track their score one day, apply ESC and then check the handicap system later to see what got entered. You may even find a true sandbagger in there too, not that I am suggesting a witch hunt or anything.

As for your immediate situation, I suggest some side games. Gross skins maybe. Even net skins might get you back some cash. I know some guys who play the coin game (couple different variations) and that can tilt things in your favor a little. If its a good group like you said then let them know what you're thinking and see if they have any ideas.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking purely in generalities, when people enter their scores for their handicap, you should be sure that ESC is being applied. I know many people who don't know what this is and as a result their handicap is much higher than it should be. So if they are playing 14 or so holes around bogey and then have 4 or so triples or worse and then enter 101 or something like that then they will clean your clock in any net game except maybe a net stroke game when the totality of their strokes is counted together. But in a hole by hole game or a game in which they have a partner to erase their big mistake holes, they will clean up. Track their score one day, apply ESC and then check the handicap system later to see what got entered. You may even find a true sandbagger in there too, not that I am suggesting a witch hunt or anything.

As for your immediate situation, I suggest some side games. Gross skins maybe. Even net skins might get you back some cash. I know some guys who play the coin game (couple different variations) and that can tilt things in your favor a little. If its a good group like you said then let them know what you're thinking and see if they have any ideas.

Good ideas, thanks.  Our club implemented a hc oversight committee to address this.  First year in place, we'll see how it goes and how many hc's drop.

I like the gross skins idea but I think I'll be outvoted.  Oh well, it's a fun bunch to play with.  I'm sure one of these days will be my day...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In a 2 low net out of 4 format, you can afford to be a tad more aggressive, especially if only 1 of 3 or 4 foursome wins.

Haven't been down to Durango yet, but might look to get down there this winter.

Not quite the same caliber skiing as where you are but Purgatory isn't bad.  And, I can drive an hour and be playing golf at Pinon Hills, open all year (except when there's snow).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is certainly true that higher handicap players are less consistent and therefore more likely to score further below their handicap (on a good day) than the single digit handicap player is.  So if an event has included a fair number of high handicap players it becomes likely there will be some net scores that are pretty well below par.

This. If your group is fairly large, and you are the lowest handicap, you are likely not going be low net on any given day. The probabilities just aren't on your side... As for net skins, you also limit yourself. If you are like me (our hdcp's are close - I'm a 6.5 right now), I average just under 2 birdies per round. If I don't birdie one of the 7 holes I get a stroke on, a skin is probably not gonna come my way. There are just too many 15 to 20 cappers who will par whatever hole I birdie and get their stroke to tie me. That's why I like the way my group creates teams based on handicaps. The best A player gets the worst B player, the best C player, and the worst D player. This isn't perfect, but overall team handicaps are close. I say, keep playing with your group. Keep trying to lower your handicap. Unless you are playing for big bucks, the bets are just for fun, anyway... If you guys do blind draws for teams, I'll bet you'll find that you'll go on streaks when you never win anything, and streaks where your blind draw partner tore it up and you won money. That's how it goes...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There are several statements that I disagree with which I feel are important to discuss: All golf balls do not go about the same distance.  A low compression, 2-piece Surlyn covered model will launch higher and with less spin than a 5-piece, high compression urethane covered model which will result in a noticeable difference in distance off the tee.  Dean even stated in another answer "The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance." Regarding balls for different swing speeds and compression:  3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing?  DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there…            I almost don't know where to start on this one.  The concept of designing golf balls based on swing speeds doesn't teach or force players to use a low compression ball...it's about using a ball that has the appropriate compression for your swing speed.  Some players will have better results with a higher compression ball, others will have better results with a lower compression.  Keep in mind, there is a difference between "lower compression" and "low compression".  Most of the urethane tour balls have a compression rating somewhere between the mid 70s to mid 90s.  Tour models like the Chrome Soft, B330-RX and B330-RXS are in the mid 60s, which is lower.  Balls like the Supersoft and e6 are in the upper 30s and 40s, which is considered low.  Dean's statement that "low compression balls have the lowest spin on all shots" is somewhere between a little misleading and flat-out wrong.  It's true that a lower compression ball will spin less (and launch higher) than a firmer ball on full shots.  But on short game shots around the green, the ball is not compressed.  On pitch shots, chip shots, and greenside bunker shots for example,    the only part of the ball that is being activated is the cover. Notice on this chart that the lowest compression ball is very close to the highest spinning, and the lowest spinning ball has almost the same compression rating!  The point is, compression has little to no affect on short game shots...the cover is the main factor.  All 4 of these models have a urethane cover, but the two that provide the most spin have softer covers.  To put this in context, the chart below was a test Golf Digest did in 2015 which shows the performance on a partial wedge shot (I think it was 40 yds) with most of the balls on the market at the time The different colors represented the price point.  These results don't match the first chart I posted exactly which can happen when player testing (this one shows the B330 has higher spin than the RXS). Is there a difference between the lower spinning "red dots" and the highest spinning?  Sure.  There should be though.  Golf balls are designed to have different types of performance for different types of players.  The B330-RX has the lowest spin among the red dot models, but that doesn't mean it's lacking in performance...it spins exactly how the ball designers intended it to, because not everyone wants/needs maximum spin.  Notice the e7...this is a high compression ball very comparable to the B330, but has very different spin characteristics. So again, higher compression doesn't mean higher spin around the green and lower compression doesn't necessarily mean low spin.  About the only thing that I could agree with Dean's comment on would be that all the ultra-low compression balls are Surlyn covered models designed for distance, so it's true that these balls have low spin on all shots and will not offer the same level of performance around the greens, but again, that has more to do with the cover than the compression.  The fact is, there are lower compression balls that perform at the highest level. The B330-RXS is the same type of ball as the Pro V1 in many respects, and performs just as well as, or even better for many players, so I'm surprised by his comments that fitting for swing speed is over-rated and lower compression balls have no performance.  That's like saying getting fit for the correct shaft flex is over-rated, and softer flex shafts don't perform as well as stiffer shafts!  Does anyone consider the Dynamic Gold S-300 to be a lower performing shaft than the Dynamic Gold X-100?  No, of course not. They are designed to do the same thing, but because some players don't swing as fast as others the softer flex will give them better results, just like the B330-RXS is the equal to the B330-S, but will fit players who don't swing as hard better. I'm also not on-board with the opinion that fitting with a driver is a "mistake" and when testing to choose a ball based on 100 yds and in.  I'm not saying that short game performance isn't important, but wow...to claim that testing with a driver is a mistake is ridiculous.  I'll make a simple point on this...anyone can hit good wedge shots with a Pro V1 or B330 or Z-Star.  Fast swingers, slower swingers, high handicappers, low handicappers...it doesn't matter, they can all get good results on wedge shots.  Does that mean that's the ball they should play, and it will work equally as well for the other aspects too?  No.  A wedge can mask any issues in performance because of the loft and backspin, but the driver exaggerates issues.  The same players who hit respectable wedge shots with various tour balls might struggle to keep shots in play or lose potential distance. And before anyone tries to use the old "the driver is used 14 times a round, but half of the shots are inside of 100 yds" argument...save it.  If you play a high spin ball and you're struggling to hit the fairway with your tee shots, that ball will not help you save shots around the green.  Too much spin for players who can't control it is worse than a lower spinning model. Sorry Dean...not trying to blast you or anything, just putting in my two cents.  Ok, maybe more like four cents!
    • So......Is this your point @Jack Watson?
    • https://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_716_ap1_review My review for the site is above. I've been using them since writing this review. Excellent clubs. One watch out is with short game shots with the PW and GW. They will go a bit farther than a corresponding chip or pitch with the equivalent wedge. The ball feels like it jumps off the face with good contact. So be careful with that.
    • Thanks for all the comments. I realize change is always hard but single length, lie and weight make so much sense to me. I am going to build a set of Value Golf clubs and see what happens. As improve I may go back to normal but who knows.  I think it will be better for learning the overall game. Which in my opinion and observance needs a lot of help. In my other hobbies that required learned skills it was easy to find groups to help you with the skills and drills to improve them. Businesses that the hobby supported held seminars and workshops covering all aspects. Trying to find help, other than paid lessons, is impossible, at least in my area. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon