Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3813 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

The average person trying to hit a long shot tends to rip from the top and give away all their lag.  Swinging hard is not swinging fast.

Swinging slower does not create more lag. Ok, now back on topic

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Swinging slower does not create more lag.  Ok, now back on topic


Hang on a minute. Many players know what is meant here - I imagine. What I think he's saying is that often the longer irons are hit too hard from the top (because we all know they're meant to go a long way, right?), primarily via impetus from the hands/arms/shoulders instead of generating impetus from an initial weight shift/hip slide. Trying to hit long irons, by hitting from the top like this is, IMO, very difficult, very unreliable, likely to lead to OTT moves, casting and all sorts of other problems.

It's not a literal 'slow' that's being meant here. Anyone who's hit a perfect shot would, I suspect, comment that it feels effortless and that they had no feeling of swinging 'fast'. I guess it's about timing, rhythm and correct sequencing.

  • Upvote 1

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Swinging slower does not create more lag.  Ok, now back on topic

Adding to sarcastic and mocking you are going with dismissive, interesting.  You are quite the businessman.  So are you trying to intimidate people into not participating.  How does that further your cause.  If you say something the moderator doesn't agree with they insult you?

You know what I am talking about.  You are playing a game of semantics.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Adding to sarcastic and mocking you are going with dismissive, interesting.  You are quite the businessman.  So are you trying to intimidate people into not participating.  How does that further your cause.  If you say something the moderator doesn't agree with they insult you?

You know what I am talking about.  You are playing a game of semantics.

And now that you've had your say in public and in private, I encourage you to talk about the topic at hand, either by responding to Mike or ignoring him. Also, semantics are often important.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't think most amateurs think they need to swing hard with longer irons compared to other clubs. I think most amateurs swing hard for all their clubs because their swing isn't that good. I play with a ton of golfers who are 15-40+ handicaps. None of them swing easy for short irons, and suddenly decide they need to swing hard for longer irons. They all have basically the same bad tempo for all their swings. The problem is, longer irons are not forgiving at all. This is why Hybrids have helps so many amateurs, because of the high MOI, the clubhead design, the longer sole.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And now that you've had your say in public and in private, I encourage you to talk about the topic at hand, either by responding to Mike or ignoring him. Also, semantics are often important.

Thanks for your reply.  I'll just move on and take all that has been said with a positive spin.  I am certainly not always right nor do I always explain myself well so I am guilty but I am not the only one with fault in this case in my opinion.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Thanks for your reply.  I'll just move on and take all that has been said with a positive spin.  I am certainly not always right nor do I always explain myself well so I am guilty but I am not the only one with fault in this case in my opinion.

inthecup, sorry about all this, didn't realize at the time how my post might sound.

Ok getting back on topic, common mistake I see players make with a long iron is to play the ball too far back with a long iron which leads to them having to tip back to try and get it in the air.  Players would have a better chance if they played it just inside the left heel and had the weight go forward with the head steady.  Not the head moving back, just centered.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree 100% with MVMAC

I was at the range last night hitting 6 irons, I couldn't figure out what was my problem hitting the iron slightly heavy, almost like I was spanking the ground. I noticed the ball was in the middle of my stance. So I moved it forward, it caused me to move my hands forward more, tilt my right shoulder slightly more, and keep my head behind the ball. From there I was able to hit with a shallower angle, and hit the ball with a nice ball flight.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
Posted

I know that 2-iron is quickly become extinct. For mid-high handicappers, hybrid is a much better alternative indeed. However, I particularly interested in learning and mastering 2-iron. I believe that I can hit them purely, then hitting any other club shouldn't be a problem.

So, what are the fundamentals of hitting 2-iron? Grips, setup, stance, posture? Does it have to be very quick on the downswing? Comments and suggestions are appreciated.

Life is too short to learn how to hit a 3 or 4 iron, much less a 2.

.

A 4 hybrid is the highest "iron" I have.

.

I wouldn't waste my time trying to hit 2 iron. But, if you must, good luck.


Posted

Sorry if someone has already offered this, and allowing that the approach may be different for some of the better golfers..... But for an "average to below' hacker like me, here are the fundamentals of hitting a 2-iron:

- Grip the two iron with your dominant hand (Right for Righty, Left for Lefty).

- Position yourself, back to target.

- Begin counterclockwise spins (clockwise for Lefty) in the fashion of an Olympic hammer throw.

- Make sure you are positioned on the edge of a steep, high cliff.

- After approximately 2.5 rotations, release the club over the edge of the cliff.

- Assuming a floor of rocks, water, hard dirt, etc., the resulting hit of the 2-iron upon such surface will be most satisfactory.


  • Moderator
Posted
I dunno, shouldn't one not try and adjust to hit a 2 iron but improve one's swing so that hitting a 2 iron w/o adjustments is no problem?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sorry if someone has already offered this, and allowing that the approach may be different for some of the better golfers..... But for an "average to below' hacker like me, here are the fundamentals of hitting a 2-iron:

- Grip the two iron with your dominant hand (Right for Righty, Left for Lefty).

- Position yourself, back to target.

- Begin counterclockwise spins (clockwise for Lefty) in the fashion of an Olympic hammer throw.

- Make sure you are positioned on the edge of a steep, high cliff.

- After approximately 2.5 rotations, release the club over the edge of the cliff.

- Assuming a floor of rocks, water, hard dirt, etc., the resulting hit of the 2-iron upon such surface will be most satisfactory.

I disagree.  If you position yourself facing the target you'd get an extra half turn in, so that would just add to the power, no? :-P:beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I dunno, shouldn't one not try and adjust to hit a 2 iron but improve one's swing so that hitting a 2 iron w/o adjustments is no problem?

That's one way to think about it. The reality is hybrids and high lofted fairway woods are just much easier to hit higher and farther. Most golfers don't have enough time to practice and get better, some don't even care about getting better. Even if your "average" golfer does improve their low point control enough to hit a 2 iron, they probably don't have the speed to launch it high enough.

A well struck 2 iron is going to launch lower, carry shorter, than a hybrid. One of the reasons it's kind of become extinct, even on tour. I'd much rather hit a hybrid 215 in the air, have it land and stop on the green rather than carry a 2 iron 210 yards and hope it doesn't run off the back of the green.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's one way to think about it. The reality is hybrids and high lofted fairway woods are just much easier to hit higher and farther. Most golfers don't have enough time to practice and get better, some don't even care about getting better. Even if your "average" golfer does improve their low point control enough to hit a 2 iron, they probably don't have the speed to launch it high enough.

A well struck 2 iron is going to launch lower, carry shorter, than a hybrid. One of the reasons it's kind of become extinct, even on tour. I'd much rather hit a hybrid 215 in the air, have it land and stop on the green rather than carry a 2 iron 210 yards and hope it doesn't run off the back of the green.

Question for you just out of interest: say you were playing a typical scottish links course where playing the ball low and out of the wind is crucial would you still take the hybrid over the 2-iron? i know a lot of the pro's switch out their hybrids for the Open as they like the lower flight of the iron. But would do the same or keep the easier to hit hybrid but just try to lower the flight?

Henry

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Question for you just out of interest: say you were playing a typical scottish links course where playing the ball low and out of the wind is crucial would you still take the hybrid over the 2-iron? i know a lot of the pro's switch out their hybrids for the Open as they like the lower flight of the iron. But would do the same or keep the easier to hit hybrid but just try to lower the flight?

Not sure what you mean, when I was in Scotland last summer it was warm with a light breeze ;-)

Regarding pros switching to long irons instead of hybrids for the Open

- I think the idea is but overdone. I remember watching Louis Oosthuizen hit plenty of 5 woods at St. Andrews.

- The guys that are making a change aren't going to a "true" 2 iron, more something like the Titleist 712U or Callaway X Utility.

- They are switching to these clubs because they'll be using them mostly off the tee. My last post was dealing more with shots from the fairway.

So I would say it depends. If you can hit a 2 iron solid and prefer the lower ball flight for a links style course, the great. Again 2 irons are hard to hit, 3 irons are now 20-21 degrees of loft, not much room for error with a 2 iron. So even though you're keeping it out of the wind, you're not really advancing the ball that far because contact sucks. To me, an average shot with a hybrid or a utility iron is going to advance the ball farther than a 2 iron which you maybe hit one good shot once every ten swings.

For a more skilled golfer, I would agree in windy conditions it would be best not to go with a standard hybrid and more of a "pro" hybrid or a utility iron because you have the ability to hit those lower when you need to.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Couldn't a less skilled player use a hybrid with less loft? Or put the ball back in the stance/stay in flexion and hit it lower?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Or put the ball back in the stance/stay in flexion and hit it lower?

They already do that ;-)

Couldn't a less skilled player use a hybrid with less loft?

Sure but then instead of going a 2 iron distance it's going a 1 iron/5 wood distance and could run into a gaping problem. Obviously you could ditch the 3 wood and go with 16* hybrid and then a 19 or 20. Or keep the 3-wood and go with an 18* hybrid and 21* or something like that. Tough to answer because I don't know the set makeup.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not sure what you mean, when I was in Scotland last summer it was warm with a light breeze

Regarding pros switching to long irons instead of hybrids for the Open

- I think the idea is but overdone. I remember watching Louis Oosthuizen hit plenty of 5 woods at St. Andrews.

- The guys that are making a change aren't going to a "true" 2 iron, more something like the Titleist 712U or Callaway X Utility.

- They are switching to these clubs because they'll be using them mostly off the tee. My last post was dealing more with shots from the fairway.

So I would say it depends. If you can hit a 2 iron solid and prefer the lower ball flight for a links style course, the great. Again 2 irons are hard to hit, 3 irons are now 20-21 degrees of loft, not much room for error with a 2 iron. So even though you're keeping it out of the wind, you're not really advancing the ball that far because contact sucks. To me, an average shot with a hybrid or a utility iron is going to advance the ball farther than a 2 iron which you maybe hit one good shot once every ten swings.

For a more skilled golfer, I would agree in windy conditions it would be best not to go with a standard hybrid and more of a "pro" hybrid or a utility iron because you have the ability to hit those lower when you need to.

Thanks, your answer was pretty much what i was thinking. I know i certainly would never swap my hybrid for a long iron, i saw ian poulter somewhere on youtube talking about swapping out his hybrid for a 2 iron bend to 16 o i seem to remember which to me seems ridiculous! I know many people have more loft on their 3 wood (or 4 wood etc) because a standard 15 o is too difficult to hit.

Henry

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3813 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.