Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
grubby98

My Swing (grubby98)

19 posts in this topic

I've been Playing Golf for: 14 years seriously for 1

My current handicap index or average score is: 5

My typical ball flight is: high with a push draw

The shot I hate or the "miss" I'm trying to reduce/eliminate is: push and snap hook

I have been trying to copy my practice swing over the ball and just cant.  For the sake of me I can not figure out what I am doing when I am trying to hit the golf ball.  With my practice swing I stay on plane all the way to the top and back down.  But when I am over the ball, I get behind the ball on the way back and I come into the ball way to far from the inside.  I now this causes my blocks.  If my timing is on I play some awesome golf ( have had a few rounds under par) but when its bad its high 80s.  I cant seem to find any drills that can help me make the same swing as my practice swing.  Any help would be appreciated.  My pro is trying to qualify for the senior tour and isn't giving lessons at this time.


This is a practice swing...

This is my swing over the ball...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I am very new to this, so hopefully the more qualified/seasoned guys will add more (correct me), but here are my thoughts:

First, its very difficult to see much as the videos are short and fast, That said, I do not think the push is because you are coming from too inside, but rather with an open clubface. It was difficult to do, but if you can pause the video right at impact I see a couple of things - clubface open and impact off the toe. You can also see that your arms are disconnected from your body. Try keeping the upper arm pressure points and the elbows tighter together.

Again, I am new to this, but trying to offer some insight both to increase my own knowledge and so that I am not completely mooching off of this site and others advice.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

ive thought a lot about your concern with the practice swing.  Look at it this way.  The real swing is all instinct and the subconscious mind taking over, its human, and nobody out there is swinging at a real ball with their conscious mind.  The practice swing is a larger percentage of the conscious mind, you can make a practice swing look like Charles barkley or Freddie couples, it doesn't matter.  Practice swings can be used to help ingrain a certain feeling etc, but don't think you can carbon copy it over the ball lol.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple address things

- Get the eyes down more, feel like the head is hanging down more.  Your head goes down on the backswing, compensation for the eyes being too far up and then the head moves the opposite direction on the downswing.

- Turn the right foot out at address, will allow for a deeper hips turn and will help the sequencing.

- Do a few of these drills up against a wall, this needs to be your new practice swing.  Followthrough will feel much more like your head is tilted right, like you're trying to get water out of your right ear.  Will help the path issues.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow!! Thanks guys for the input.  I was so worried with my swing path and staying on plane I didn't look at anything else.  I clearly see that my head moves down and up and that my spine angle changes during the swing.  I'm starting the first of 4 straight 12 hours shifts at work so I cant wait until my next range session this weekend.  Goal is scratch by next summer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK have had 1 to 2 range session a week since my last video.  My swing to me looks more on plane.  I still seem to be a little flat going back and coming down.  Still swinging in to out but no way like I did before.  The ball is starting to start more were I want it than way right and hooking back.  So any more suggestions from this point to help me get even better? When I look at the swing in slow mow it looks like my hands come down towards the ground when I start my back-swing instead of going back towards the ball.

1/8th Speed Swing...

Full Speed...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my new swing.  Been working really hard getting on plane.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after a summer of playing.  Have my handicap sub 4.  Can shoot par or better, take lunch than have to grind to break 80.  I think its more from working hard on short game and putting.  Here is my swing.  To me I cant seem to figure out why I am on my toes when I make contact with the ball.  What do you all think?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason you're on your toes is because the left wrist is cupped at A6 and this can start to lengthen the "radius" of the swing arc. So you being on your toes is a reaction to trying to create more space for the club head, otherwise you would hit well behind the ball.

I would work on adding this feel, like you are "revving a motorcycle" with your left hand on the downswing, will get it looking flatter or slightly bowed (right pic). This will also make drawing the ball much easier, if you're into that sorta thing ;-) Overall the motion looks pretty good.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mvmac. Been working on what you said. Taped my swing today and it look identical to my last one I posted. Any other drills or ideas to try. when my timing is on I can play some awesome golf. Posted a 4 under on the front other day, but followed it up with a 3 over on back.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taped my swing today and it look identical to my last one I posted.

I recommend reading this thread, it's a great resource on how to "change the picture" as we like to say:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mvmac. Been working on what you said. Taped my swing today and it look identical to my last one I posted. Any other drills or ideas to try. when my timing is on I can play some awesome golf. Posted a 4 under on the front other day, but followed it up with a 3 over on back.

Another good one to check out

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Ok everyone, I have been working hard on making my swing way better and more consistent.  I have shot a career best 65 this summer, but followed it up the next day with a 78.  I am trying to get way more consistent and get that handicap down to scratch.

So tear my swing apart and tell me how to improve!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn no tips....can't figure why I stand up still since way more on plane...plus appears my spine angle changes
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to get some video where you're not so far away from the camera.

Review this post first.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/71014/my-swing-grubby98#post_982159

Would like to see you turn your left foot out more and turn your hips in place. Move that right hip up and around to increase how much you turn your torso. Create space with your right hip, not the left.


Then on the downswing you'll allow the left knee to flex forward (towards the target), left foot being turned out will help. Getting the left knee to work properly will help you transfer more weight forward and open up. The left leg straightening and knee not rotating is causing you to stand up. Leads to you staying closed for too long and standing up gives you room for your arms on the downswing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon