Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3186 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

I know people who wen to MIT for real, got engineering degrees and have trouble making Kraft Macaroni and Cheese. So regardless of whether his posts are the truth, he seems to not understand basic physics.

Please identify where the lack of physics knowledge is evident in my posts.  I would love to read your insight. 


Posted
Just now, JPitts said:

Please identify where the lack of physics knowledge is evident in my posts.  I would love to read your insight. 

There isn't any "lack of knowledge in physics" in your posts. I think most people were turned off by your overall tone, but I liked your review post. It's just that at 35 putts average which is closer to 38 right now, I'm not going to improve my putting no matter what I use.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Please identify where the lack of physics knowledge is evident in my posts.  I would love to read your insight. 

You are not telling us the truth about who you are or where you are from. No need to continue this conversation.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Please identify where the lack of physics knowledge is evident in my posts.  I would love to read your insight. 

I do not have a degree in anything related but it seems to me you have almost avoided talking about physics because you are probably afraid of being caught in a lie.-This is in spite of being invited to talk about them.

Seriously-You looked at Wikipedia and copied the information there?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque

I feel I can spot a bullshitter when I see one and I feel I have spotted one in you-Citing a formula from WIkipedia on torque?-Really?

3 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

You are not telling us the truth about who you are or where you are from. No need to continue this conversation.

Bullshitter.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Lihu said:

There isn't any "lack of knowledge in physics" in your posts. I think most people were turned off by your overall tone, but I liked your review post. It's just that at 35 putts average which is closer to 38 right now, I'm not going to improve my putting no matter what I use.

I'm Jason from Ft. Worth, Texas. I've stated at least 3  times now in this thread where I am from. Now you have a first name.  


Posted
15 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

I know people who wen to MIT for real, got engineering degrees and have trouble making Kraft Macaroni and Cheese. So regardless of whether his posts are the truth, he seems to not understand basic physics.

How much physics does it take to make Maccaroni 'n Cheese?

Anyway, no one wins here. It's an interesting putter. And JPitts is correct about the glowing reviews - they do exist. But I've also read a few negatives, mostly about its looks! lol. If it works to get the ball in the hole in less putts, it's fine. No putter is manna from Heaven. With mine, I had them reduce that T line so I could aim it straight. We'll see how it goes.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Phil McGleno said:

I do not have a degree in anything related but it seems to me you have almost avoided talking about physics because you are probably afraid of being caught in a lie.-This is in spite of being invited to talk about them.

Seriously-You looked at Wikipedia and copied the information there?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque

I feel I can spot a bullshitter when I see one and I feel I have spotted one in you-Citing a formula from WIkipedia on torque?-Really?

Bullshitter.

Actually the formula I posted is for angular velocity.  The image was posted from Google images though. A lot easier than trying to type it in this editor.  The fact you don't know the difference is ok,  most people don't. 

Edited by JPitts

Posted
Just now, JPitts said:

I'm Jason from Ft. Worth, Texas. I've stated at least 3  times now in this thread where I am from. Now you have a first name.  

Ah, yes, I see.

Anyway, I think this got off on a bad start.

Your original post was fine, then you dug into the site owner which was way overkill for what he noted in his posts to you. No doubt you are smart, and you don't have to prove it on this site. Just take everything at table value and go with it. No one is trying to put down the things you noted.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Lihu said:

Ah, yes, I see.

Anyway, I think this got off on a bad start.

Your original post was fine, then you dug into the site owner which was way overkill for what he noted in his posts to you. No doubt you are smart, and you don't have to prove it on this site. Just take everything at table value and go with it. No one is trying to put down the things you noted.

I wasn't trying to lay into anyone.  I know that tone doesn't always reflect properly through typed text. 

I do get a bit defensive about physics though as it is my passion. I've spent a lot of money and time studying it and applying it in my professional life.  There is a ton of mis information out there that is being presented and I am simply trying to correct some of the more common mistakes.  

 


Posted
12 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Actually the formula I posted is for angular velocity.  The image was posted from Google images though. A lot easier than trying to type it in this editor.  The fact you don't know the difference is ok,  most people don't. 

That is odd-On the Wikipedia page it says "power =" and then does some substitution to get power = torque x angular speed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque

But hey, you are a bullshitter-This is what you do.

3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

I wasn't trying to lay into anyone.

Bullshit.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I really don't care about the science, I just care if it works. Are these putters available at any retail golf stores? I'd love to see one in person.


Posted
3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

trying to correct some of the more common mistakes.

Well then do so. Just saying, "I'm from MIT and I'm passionate about physics" doesn't fly. Explain your reasoning with facts, diagrams, tests, whatever. If you've spent any time here you'd know that's exactly what @iacas does and his expecting no less is completely reasonable.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, caniac6 said:

I really don't care about the science, I just care if it works. Are these putters available at any retail golf stores? I'd love to see one in person.

Like @iacas said -It is a flat piece of metal on the end of a stick. Find one you can aim, find one with a good balance, and then learn to make a good stroke.

It is not like a putter actually twists in your hands.-There is a reason they have to go so low friction in the Revealer or like Edel has to in their no torque putters.

Good putters can putt with anything.-Look at how you putt almost as well with a wedge as your putter.-Your wedge is not using a formula for power or angular velocity to stay balanced and resist twisting.

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Phil McGleno said:

Good putters can putt with anything.-Look at how you putt almost as well with a wedge as your putter.-Your wedge is not using a formula for power or angular velocity to stay balanced and resist twisting.

Likewise, bad putters can't putt with everything. :-D

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well then do so. Just saying, "I'm from MIT and I'm passionate about physics" doesn't fly. Explain your reasoning with facts, diagrams, tests, whatever. If you've spent any time here you'd know that's exactly what @iacas does and his expecting no less is completely reasonable.

I'll post some info later today.


Posted
15 minutes ago, caniac6 said:

I really don't care about the science, I just care if it works. Are these putters available at any retail golf stores? I'd love to see one in person.

North Carolina? They have 2 fitters - locations. Call to see if they have demos on the floor. All of them are custom fitted, so picking one up at a store and taking it home is not a go. I was in CA on vacation and visited a fitter. They had about 3 demos and the infamous Revealer on the floor.

http://www.directedforce.com/Articles.asp?ID=255

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
23 minutes ago, caniac6 said:

I really don't care about the science, I just care if it works. Are these putters available at any retail golf stores? I'd love to see one in person.

It works,  at least for me and from what I've read,  several others.  The company website had a list of fitters and retailers. Im not going to post a link, so just Google the company name, Directed Force putters.


Posted
5 minutes ago, JPitts said:

It works,  at least for me and from what I've read,  several others.  The company website had a list of fitters and retailers. Im not going to post a link, so just Google the company name, Directed Force putters.

Yes-The company is good about sending out shills to vouch for how awesome these flat pieces of metal on the ends of sticks are. The guy who started the company even pretended to be someone else-Right here on this site-for a time.

  • Like 1

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3186 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
    • Yes, because you have lifted to like 120° without bending the left elbow. So when you turn and the left elbow bends… it bends in such a way that you then lower your left humerus and pull the club around you.
    • Bob Parsons can be a bit much. But… we fit PXG clubs at our academy. Every Tuesday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.