Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dwade247

Small GI irons

39 posts in this topic

Are there any small (player sized) clubs that offer the advantages of GI clubs? I am thinking such as the AP2, JPX 825 Pro, JPX EZ forged.I am looking for forgiveness mostly but wouldn't mind some extra distance either.

Personally I think it is more/at least as difficult to hit the sweet spot with big shovels as it is with blade sized irons.

Basically I am looking for the largest sweet spot:club head ratio. Is there anyway to determine which clubs have the highest sweet spot:club head ratio?

Open to suggestions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried the MP-53s which were pretty good but I think manufacturers should be able to pack a little more into a small head. Is there anything major in the 54s that is different than the 53s?

As for the I series irons from ping...I'm not a big fan. I do not like that the sole of the club is quite large still. I do not like looking at the sole behind the club at address. But these have the right idea....just wish they could put some heavier metal in the sole rather than making it longer/deeper.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I think it is more/at least as difficult to hit the sweet spot with big shovels as it is with blade sized irons.

As a 28 HDCP, this possibly has to do with swing flaws. A SGI or GI iron has a larger sweet spot than a Player's (some of which are blades), and should be easier to hit. The "big shovels" work better for those who lack a Player's quality swing, or the time to develop one.

Check out Mike Stachura's item from 2013: It says that 3/4 of tour players now use GI irons:

http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-equipment/blogs/hotlist365/2013/03/game-improvement-irons-stix.html

Also, make sure you know the difference between a GI and an SGI club.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As a 28 HDCP, this possibly has to do with swing flaws. A SGI or GI iron has a larger sweet spot than a Player's (some of which are blades), and should be easier to hit. The "big shovels" work better for those who lack a Player's quality swing, or the time to develop one.

Check out Mike Stachura's item from 2013: It says that 3/4 of tour players now use GI irons:

http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-equipment/blogs/hotlist365/2013/03/game-improvement-irons-stix.html

Also, make sure you know the difference between a GI and an SGI club.

Yeah I am not necessarily good at this game and I hack with any iron I pick up on some days and other days I can hit any blade or SGI iron so this forum is only for my own interest. Although I am interested in this topic for myself I see this as a common thought on many forums and golf websites so I sort of just wanted to bring up the idea of blade sized clubs with the advantages of GI/SGI clubs such as hot faces, high launch, and good forgiveness on heel and toe strikes. It seems like a lot of people want the looks of a players club but definitely wouldn't complain if the club hit the ball straight every time and 10 yards farther than their current players clubs. (Although I know some would not want inconsistent distances that some say exist with hot faces.)

And what that article is saying is what I am thinking. But clubs still seem to be stopping at larger club head sizes. For instance...the rocketbladez irons are still larger than a players iron. Why can't they take that same design and just smash it into a bit smaller head. Just food for thought.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and some of my motivation for posting this thread is due to this little training club.

I hit this club at the golf show. And even though I was nervous about it I actually wound up striking it quite well. Granted it was just into a net. But it felt like I was hitting good shots. And the author of this article found it easier to hit than his game irons.

My point is...if the only part of the iron face is the sweet spot the it would be easier to find as long as you don't shank it or whiff completely. I think large iron heads make it harder to find the sweet spot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is...if the only part of the iron face is the sweet spot the it would be easier to find as long as you don't shank it or whiff completely. I think large iron heads make it harder to find the sweet spot.

Seriously..? I have the 735CM..CB/MB irons, which are pretty blade like. My Son plays the TM R7's, and I can hit his GI irons much more consistently than mine, being that his irons have a Larger sweet spot, which in my mind makes the GI irons easier to hit..Maybe I'm just weird..?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Seriously..? I have the 735CM..CB/MB irons, which are pretty blade like. My Son plays the TM R7's, and I can hit his GI irons much more consistently than mine, being that his irons have a Larger sweet spot, which in my mind makes the GI irons easier to hit..Maybe I'm just weird..?

Larger sweet spot is easier to hit. But why does the iron head have to be larger in order to get technology? The irons you have are your typically players CB. Very little technology in those compared to the R7s. The only thing your irons have is perimeter weighting on the CB irons. The R7s have a thin and hotter face which helps increase the perimeter weighting and therefore the sweet spot. If larger sweet spot was the only concern, then why don't we all just hit 460cc clubs with different lofts from tee to green? (Exaggeration obviously).

I want a club like the R7 packed into the head of a players CB. I don't simply want a larger sweet spot. I want the largest amount of the club head to be the sweet spot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a poorly depicted example of what I want. I want the smaller club head size because I feel I can control them better. I want smaller soles because i think they cut through the grass better in both the fairway and rough. And I want more forgiveness because I just want to hit the ball straight and long.

So does anyone know of any clubs that look like the middle picture here? Or at least think this would be a nice club?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welp, lemme know if and when you find such a club, cuz I'll be looking for new irons in a few months..

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Welp, lemme know if and when you find such a club, cuz I'll be looking for new irons in a few months.

Will do! I'll tell everyone about them!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a poorly depicted example of what I want. I want the smaller club head size because I feel I can control them better. I want smaller soles because i think they cut through the grass better in both the fairway and rough. And I want more forgiveness because I just want to hit the ball straight and long.

So does anyone know of any clubs that look like the middle picture here? Or at least think this would be a nice club?

If only..... :beer:

As with everything in life, there are always compromises to be made.  The trick is to determine what's most important to your own game at the current time in it's development and buy that which best addresses that.  As a 28 hcp, I'd be surprised if a larger sweet spot and lower center of gravity didn't trump head size for you.  For what it's worth.....with a properly struck ball, you're not "cutting through" any grass in the fairway either because the club strikes the ball well before it ever touches the turf.

But, as @Hammer 4 said though, if you run into someone who has beaten the laws of physics, please let me know!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So does anyone know of any clubs that look like the middle picture here? Or at least think this would be a nice club?

Yes. These are the Game Improvement (GI) irons. And, as Stachura reported, 3/4 of all tour pros now use GI irons. You would be able to "feel" a GI club better than a SGI club, in part, because the GI has less metal in the head.

Also, your picture on the left overestimates the size of the Player's iron sweet spot, which is smaller than a dime.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes. These are the Game Improvement (GI) irons. And, as Stachura reported, 3/4 of all tour pros now use GI irons. You would be able to "feel" a GI club better than a SGI club, in part, because the GI has less metal in the head.

Also, your picture on the left overestimates the size of the Player's iron sweet spot, which is smaller than a dime.

So the AP2 is a GI iron? That's cool but I am not really concerned about whether a club is labeled GI/SGI/player. I want a blade sized club that has the goal of launching the ball straight and long, not with the goal of increasing workability for shaping shots. I think the jpx ez forged is the closest to what I'm thinking. However I do not really care if the club head is forged or cast.

http://www.mizunousa.com/golf/products/mizuno-jpx-ez-forged-irons#.UxXgMk2YaM8

And for cutting through turf in the fairway I may not phrased my words appropriately. I feel like the large soles encourage me and probably some other high handicappers to try and sweep the ball off the fairway.

And I don't see why my ideal club is against the laws of physics. Let's say 30% of an SGI clubs hitting area is the sweet spot. Why can't they make 30% of a blade sized club the sweet spot? I know the overall size of the sweet spot is smaller but they would both be the same in relationship to the club head. A bit thicker topline doesn't bother me, I just don't want to see the sole behind the club face at address.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enjoyed reading the post as I had a similar issue when getting new clubs recently.  I played golf at a competitive level and used to line everything up off the toe with my irons but I hit the sweet spot consistently...  I quit playing for a couple years and when I came back I ended up getting larger game improvement clubs... Out of an old swing habit at address, I hit everything off the toe lol...  I know why, but I haven't adjusted my setup.  See the pic below in regards to club face size.  I think this might be a decent description of what you are referencing.  As you see the distance from the toe is the same... but you are far different in relation to the center of the sweet spot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As you can see from my wear pattern...  I think I need to change my ball position at address!  I consistently miss on the toe -  just recently had started making corrections.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd honestly try the G25's.. my good friend is a scratch player and still loves the feel and forgiveness of these and is also still able to easily shape shots.. If you find them a bit too bulky I'd go with the i20 or i25's
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thank you! Got out for a few holes so it was a good day in spite of work!
    • 2/25: Played two rounds today with dad at a different course than usual. Shot 96 and 93. A few nice strings of pars and made several amazing putts (). Mostly bogeys other than that but managed a couple of absolute blow-up holes in each round that helped to guarantee 90+ scores from an otherwise very nice day of golf. I could complain about "sand-traps" sans-a-single-spec-of-sand with 10-foot wide puddles in them, or mushy fairways, or waiting 5-minutes for the 4-some in front of you on every shot, but there wasn't a notes field on the scorecard.  Practice is paying off, though. Hit my drives farther than ever, draws when I wanted them, and the fade didn't let me down when I needed it. 3/4 "flighted" shots are the new go-to approach of choice all the way out to 160+ with my 3-iron, and (n)GIRs have jumped up considerably. I've rambled on about my short-game improvements before, but it continues. Holed a pitch shot from about 10 yards and stopped 2 others 6 inches from the pin. Gotta play some more rounds from the front so I get used to stringing pars together. Realized today that I don't just get nervous about it, I also get cocky. Weird combination. 
    • I really like the travel of the sweetspot on the backswing. Kinda Nicklaus-esque.   They just stall a bit and it happens after impact. Can see how the belt loops are rotating all the way to impact.
    • At the top level the men may still be much better than the women at putting. Paige McKenzie once talked about how she played against some college guys who destroyed her on putting and she thought she was pretty good relative to her peers. I expect the best pro women ballstrikers have to work even less on putting to compete successfully than the guys where every edge is crucial just to get a card and make cuts. I love to watch Rory and DJ crank it out there. But I also get a kick out of Jim Furyk and Mo Martin's precision oriented play. It's all good. If they want to make accuracy more important for PGA players, all they have to do is grow the average event rough up a bit more so there's more of a penalty on every errant shot on the loss of spin and swing/ball speed reduction. Those are real issues for the sport...at least for facilities that don't cater to higher income golfers.
    • I have the Zepp 2 Golf (the round sensor).    Ive read the manual multiple times, and have approximately 500 ball strikes.    As I'm new to golf I can't seriously vouch for its accuracy, but I will say this: it's helping me improve my golf swing.    The 3D swing analysis is a great tool as is the swing comparison capability. In my opinion once you learn about what the tool measures and how it can be quite effective it    However, I do have a question: In the daily swings window, what does the red "P" next to the specific swing data mean?   Please and Thanks for any input.    V/R,  Chris
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon