• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
cipher

Promoting personal characteristics, political views, and products, among athletes in the public eye.

Recommended Posts

Thanks.

Unfortunately it is the subject of that thread when some choose to dislike an athlete for his/her religious or any other characteristics, but I will move my response here.

There is nothing wrong with someone saying that they dislike Bubba because of his religious beliefs and the way that he may choose to promote them. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and we have no right to tell someone they are wrong for not wanting to hear about religion. If someone does something that gets on your nerves or makes you dislike their actions, then that's how you feel about it.

Yeah I think there is something wrong with disliking a person for these reasons morally. I am going to disagree with you on this. Sure someone "can" feel this way, but should they? What about a person's personal beliefs and talking about them now and then is offensive to someone? Bubba is not cramming it down peoples throats the way that Tebow was. That was annoying, because it was seemingly all he talked about. Let me put it this way. Would you think it is right of me as a person of faith to say I don't like an athlete because he/she is gay and promotes that? One of my favorite female soccer players is a lesbian and promotes it on twitter and in other avenues. I have no problem with that. That is great that she can promote something that defines her. It would not be moral of me to dislike her for doing so and for her sexuality. Nobody can tell me that you cannot compare these two things either. Religion is every bit as intimate of a defining characteristic as sexuality is and I would say it is even more intimate. I don't want to call these things "choices" or "lifestyles" there are simply characteristics that no matter the origin define us.  The problem is that those who disagree with them see them as negative characteristics.  If you don't want to hear from them on it I would ask you why?  What is it going to do to you?  Why does it get on your nerves?

I guess the main question for this new thread though is does it bother you when someone in the public eye discusses or promotes religion, sexuality, politics or even if they take to social media for the promotion of a sponsor?  How much is too much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

It can be annoying.  Just as other things like swearing too much or arrogance can be annoying.  My wife didn't want Watson to win the Masters because of a tweet he made on gay marriage last year.  That is the nature of being a public figure.  What you say and do can and will be held against you by a percentage of the public no matter what that may be.

It goes both ways too.  If we support Watson's right to discuss his beliefs, we should also support someone's saying they don't like it.  We don't have to agree, but we need to defend their right to say it all the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It can be annoying.  Just as other things like swearing too much or arrogance can be annoying.  My wife didn't want Watson to win the Masters because of a tweet he made on gay marriage last year.  That is the nature of being a public figure.  What you say and do can and will be held against you by a percentage of the public no matter what that may be.

It goes both ways too.  If we support Watson's right to discuss his beliefs, we should also support someones saying they don't like it.  We don't have to agree, but we need to defend their right to say it all the same.

I can go with that.  I just hope that those that find these things annoying are truly finding it as such because it is truly overbearing. I don't find Watson or Rapinoe as such. At the same time I really like the way guys like Fowler and Aaron Rodgers carry themselves. They have a similar world view as Watson, but choose to speak through their actions more than they do with words.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When a athlete or person in the public eye starts sharing their personal views on religion, politics, etc with the public they have to expect that those views will endear part of the public even more while pushing others away.

I personally believe the 1st Amendment has been compromised by political correctness and the heavy liberal bias that exists in the media today.

If Bubba is religious and wants to share that part of his personal life with others why is it any different than John Daly sharing his passion for food, booze, cigarettes and women.  There seems to be little tolerance towards those who are committed to their religion.

I am agnostic and support gay marriage but I respect that others can have a differing opinion.  I don't want public figures to only give opinions that are politically correct or popular.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

In the realm of entertainment (including sports) it makes no difference to me what beliefs a person has. If I enjoy watching their performances I'll watch.

If I started boycotting everybody I disagree with I wouldn't be watching very many movies or TV shows or listening to very much music.

Doesn't even bother me in the least if other people do choose to dislike people for their beliefs.

As I said in the other thread it does surprise me when people obviously consider Christianity a negative. Being surprised doesn't mean I have a problem with their right to have that opinion and express it anyway they choose.

I am surprised because I don't know a single person personally that thinks that way, whether they are a Christian or not. The overwhelming majority of people I know would actually be more likely to support somebody because they are a Christian. The rest would consider it a complete non-factor.

Just shows the difference in culture between the places I have lived and other places. It would be extremely hard to find many (or any) people in the area where I live that would call themselves Atheists even if they don't actively follow any religion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When a athlete or person in the public eye starts sharing their personal views on religion, politics, etc with the public they have to expect that those views will endear part of the public even more while pushing others away.

I personally believe the 1st Amendment has been compromised by political correctness and the heavy liberal bias that exists in the media today.

If Bubba is religious and wants to share that part of his personal life with others why is it any different than John Daly sharing his passion for food, booze, cigarettes and women.  There seems to be little tolerance towards those who are committed to their religion.

I am agnostic and support gay marriage but I respect that others can have a differing opinion.  I don't want public figures to only give opinions that are politically correct or popular.

I agree the media plays a part, but disagree that it is liberal bias.  Fox News clearly contributes to the "attack everything they say and we disagree with" mentality of the media.  Conservative media plays a huge part in this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
If Bubba is religious and wants to share that part of his personal life with others why is it any different than John Daly sharing his passion for food, booze, cigarettes and women.  There seems to be little tolerance towards those who are committed to their religion.

There is a big difference here.

One promotes sexism, homophobia, slavery and prejudices

One of them promotes bad habits :-D

I think, to conclude - the person promoting does not bother me, the religion bothers me.

The same way I hate cancer, but not people with cancer

I feel bad for people with cancer, the same way I feel bad for people who believe in the bible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me put it this way. Would you think it is right of me as a person of faith to say I don't like an athlete because he/she is gay and promotes that?

There seems to be little tolerance towards those who are committed to their religion.

As I said in the other thread it does surprise me when people obviously consider Christianity a negative.

This pretty much sums up my feelings on this.  Seems to be a double standard many times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Kieran123

I think, to conclude - the person promoting does not bother me, the religion bothers me.

The same way I hate cancer, but not people with cancer

I feel bad for people with cancer, the same way I feel bad for people who believe in the bible.

Wow, at least you are honest about it.  That is very unfortunate though that you equate religious beliefs to cancer.  One could however sadly say that of anything they dislike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow, at least you are honest about it.  That is very unfortunate though that you equate religious beliefs to cancer.  One could however sadly say that of anything they dislike.

There are worse things said in the bible. But for many, the bible is considered the truth no matter how disgusting and shocking the subject or content, where my words are just an opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think, to conclude - the person promoting does not bother me, the religion bothers me.

I think I may actually be ok with this.  As long as others are fine with this:

"the person promoting does not bother me, the homosexual lifestyle bothers me."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I, generally speaking, don't really watch the post match interviews, they rarely contain any insight and are mostly cookie cutter sound bites and PR blather. I'll usually see the post round interviews as people come off the course as those are hard to avoid but once that final putt drops I turn off the TV and go make the wife happy.

Nobody's being forced to watch Bubba proselytize so whatever. Reminds me of the old George Carlin about free speech.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agree the media plays a part, but disagree that it is liberal bias.  Fox News clearly contributes to the "attack everything they say and we disagree with" mentality of the media.  Conservative media plays a huge part in this.

Agreed in the sense that both they represent extremes, liberal and conservative.  The liberal media has attacked religions and religious beliefs which is why I singled them out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just hope that those that find these things annoying are truly finding it as such because it is truly overbearing.

Why does it have to be overbearing to be "annoying"? Can't someone be annoyed at the mere mention of whatever topic it is they dislike?

You can't say "everyone gets an opinion" and then say "but you only get your opinion if it's truly overbearing."

I personally don't care about post-round religious comments. I think it's stupid to mention it (He or She or They don't care about your golf), but I can't get riled up over any and all stupid comments anyone makes or I'd never be at rest. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

But for many, the bible is considered the truth no matter how disgusting and shocking the subject or content

I don't think this is fair or true.  Well, if you're talking globally, then, yeah, maybe there are some extremists out there like this, but in general, I don't believe this to be even close to true.

How many people in the US would actually strongly believe that a woman who gets divorced must be stoned to death?  I'm going to say, at most, one.  (And that would be the guy she just divorced)

It's a good argument against people that use the "it's in the Bible" reason for believing something - like opposing gay marriage - but I don't think that any normal, sane people actually take 100% of the Bible as truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think this is fair or true.  Well, if you're talking globally, then, yeah, maybe there are some extremists out there like this, but in general, I don't believe this to be even close to true.

How many people in the US would actually strongly believe that a woman who gets divorced must be stoned to death?  I'm going to say, at most, one.  (And that would be the guy she just divorced)

It's a good argument against people that use the "it's in the Bible" reason for believing something - like opposing gay marriage - but I don't think that any normal, sane people actually take 100% of the Bible as truth.

So, to conclude, take what parts of the bible you want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does it have to be overbearing to be "annoying"? Can't someone be annoyed at the mere mention of whatever topic it is they dislike?

You can't say "everyone gets an opinion" and then say "but you only get your opinion if it's truly overbearing."

I personally don't care about post-round religious comments. I think it's stupid to mention it (He or She or They don't care about your golf), but I can't get riled up over any and all stupid comments anyone makes or I'd never be at rest. :)

I just don't think they are usually being honest then about what annoys them in this situation. I think they are then annoyed at the characteristic not necessarily the mention of it. They should at least be honest like @Kieran123 about it. Disliking a person and being annoyed by them are being muddled a bit(not saying you are).  I am just trying to say that I think disliking the person for the premise of  the characteristic is not a place I would go nor do I think others should.

I don't think this is fair or true.  Well, if you're talking globally, then, yeah, maybe there are some extremists out there like this, but in general, I don't believe this to be even close to true.

How many people in the US would actually strongly believe that a woman who gets divorced must be stoned to death?  I'm going to say, at most, one.  (And that would be the guy she just divorced)

It's a good argument against people that use the "it's in the Bible" reason for believing something - like opposing gay marriage - but I don't think that any normal, sane people actually take 100% of the Bible as truth.

The sad part is those of us that have faith are often thrown in with those rare types.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I may actually be ok with this.  As long as others are fine with this:

"the person promoting does not bother me, the homosexual lifestyle bothers me."

Homosexuality is not a religion. Homosexuality is not a choice. Homosexuality is not a multi billion dollar corrupt regime that still puts its hand out for more. Homosexuality is not fear mongering.

Homosexuality is two people of the same gender that are attracted to one another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • really hope his back holds out this time as, despite all the bad stuff he's been through (even if self inflicted), i think golf has missed him to a certain extent. Maybe he should make his return on one of the Web.com events or even an smaller one (Tiger Woods on the Hooters tour ). After the layoff he's had the less pressure he the better.
    • You put on quite a show the final two days.  Fun to watch man.  You found your long game and were putting to one of those oversized holes I think!    I just wish my long game would have been settled enough to give you a closer match.  I had a blast, learned a lot and enjoyed competitive golf for once.   It was great to play with you and learn from you @NCGolfer.  I truly enjoyed our pairings.  Hopefully I was not too much of a distraction out there with my long game struggles.    Thanks for being a good sport about it if anyway.   I really enjoyed playing with @bkuehn1952 as well.  I had a very tough first nine out there but Brian kept things positive and we battled through it.  We played much more competitively the second time out as shown in Drew's scorecard post.  We found a way to make our abilities work together, and it was a lot of fun!  I enjoyed meeting everyone else and a lot of the guys I have not had a chance to yet.  I want to mention @jsgolfer who was my roommate and our MVP.  I wish I was able to see Jerry play more.  What I did see was a treat to watch.  He is also one of the most kind and considerate people I have met in a long time.  A true class act.   Yellow ball or white ball I take responsibility for my shots out there no matter how much weight was on each individual one.  I had a 10' putt or so for a half point on the front Saturday that I lipped out after I thought I put a great stroke on it.  I should have put that one in.  I sure hit some bad ones off the tee and I am just thankful that I did not cost my team the cup.   Finally I just wanted to say one more time, thank you to @iacas and @mvmac.  I know that this was a lot of work for you organizing and making this a truly special experience for us all.  I hope everyone who was there could see how much work this must have been for them and how it was done to give an incredible experience to the participants.  Thank you guys so much!  
    • Finally again a (really) good tournament from Joost. Battling for victory until the final hole, coming up one shot short against Garcia to get a second place. Which raises him right back into the top 100 of the OWGR. Hopefully a good finish of the season in The Final Series, good points and money to earn there.
    • My answer depends on what you mean by "manage on the course."   I have a bag full of swing thoughts, because I have made the same mistakes so many times and corrected things so many times.  It's like a bag full of clubs.  I carry them around with me but I only use one at most when I'm addressing my shot.  But which one it is depends on what happened on the last shot or sometime in the recent past.  Then there are the times I have no swing thought at all, but hit a great shot.  But definitely I cannot have more than one swing thought in my head when I'm about to hit a shot. 
    • I voted 4 and 0, not based on the definitions you provided,  but based on your vote (9 and 1), and how I would compare my game to yours.   I think if you hit a solid shot 9 out of 10 times, then I should say I hit that kind of shot 4 out of 10 times.   I believe you would define "sweet spot" as much much smaller and more elusive than I would, but we have to agree on a definition, so taking your definition, which is really, "a spot you hit 1 out of 10 times," then I should say less than that.  So I said 0. 
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Covert
      Covert
      (74 years old)
    2. opie
      opie
      (40 years old)
    3. Robert Diddings
      Robert Diddings
      (33 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon