Jump to content
IGNORED

How Would You Play It? (5th Hole at Rancho Park)


mdl
Note: This thread is 3638 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

This might not be as good a hole for strategy discussion as some of the others guys have posted, but I think these posts are really fun and this is a hole I've considered and reconsidered strategy on, especially off the tee, so I thought it might be a fun one.  Consider this one like Erik's where we all assume the same clubs so we can talk strategy rather than a ton of different answers specific to a player's exact yardages.  Answers may differ of course depending on everyone's preferred shot shape and trajectory.  Assume the h, 3, and d correspond to about where a hybrid, 3 wood, and driver will stop.  Driver gets you to ~GW approach territory, 3w a ~9i approach, hybrid a ~6i approach.

I tried to lay out the needed info in the pic.  Dogleg right, tee shot into a steep uphill.  Trees hang more than you think from the right.  From where the h is, or if you fade a 3w and it stops along the red line, you don't have an open look at the right side of the green with a straight approach.  If you hit a draw pretty much only the left 1/4 of the green is available.  Fairway in the landing zone funnels slightly right, but it's flat or even helping the ball OB if you miss left off the fairway.  That red line indicates the absolute furthest right you can hit a tee shot straight, and even that might be generous.  If you go right the tall tree at the left downhill blue arrow will drop it, usually down the hill to the right where any shot that advances much is impossible.  No tee shot with any of these three clubs will clear the two tall trees with the big shadows.  Any recovery back out to the fairway that doesn't get almost all the way to the other side of the fairway that far back is blocked from the green by the trees.  The tree between the 3 and the OB in the pic hangs enough that a minor miss left with the 3w can force a very low knockdown even if you don't go all the way left and OB.

At the green, the left trap isn't very big, and anything left or long of it is down a steep, high hill covered in trees.  Totally screwed there.  Shots short of the bunker left of the green have some risk of bouncing and funneling down that hill, though if it stops before the blue line it's okay.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Gotta fade the driver and get far enough to open up the approach to the green.  Anything right either blocks you completely or forces you towards left of the green.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

@mdl,

How high is the tree at the left blue arrow?  If it is tall, then I can't go that route unless I try to fade a driver (easier said than done for me).  OB long left is bad, so depending on wind, I would opt for a 3H or 5W and aim for the edge of the trees on the right.  My 3H-5W typically draw 10 or more yards.  That would put me on the left side of the fairway with most of the green open to view.

If I try to fade a driver and it goes straight or draws, I am OB.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Gotta fade the driver and get far enough to open up the approach to the green.  Anything right either blocks you completely or forces you towards left of the green.

This used to be my play, but with my swing changes a fade with the driver isn't a reliable shot right now. @boogielicious, nothing clears the trees right.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

This used to be my play, but with my swing changes a fade with the driver isn't a reliable shot right now.

@boogielicious, nothing clears the trees right.

Well then that makes my decision easy then!! :-)

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Seems like the 3W is the best bet. The next shot is more open and there is less chance of being put into the "cyan OB" area. The chance of it running on the ground under the large tree in the middle is better than trying to go over it.

The second shot could be "half a 3W", or something like a PW or 52 degree wedge.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The second shot could be "half a 3W", or something like a PW or 52 degree wedge.

Is "half 3w" one of your typical approaches now from wedge range?!  So like choosing a long runner with a mid iron instead of more standard pitch with a wedge on a short game shot but from full wedge distance instead?  Interesting development!

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

How wide is the fairway?

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is "half 3w" one of your typical approaches now from wedge range?!  So like choosing a long runner with a mid iron instead of more standard pitch with a wedge on a short game shot but from full wedge distance instead?  Interesting development!


What I meant to say is the club that goes "half a 3W" which for me is either the PW or the 52 degree wedge. They provide the loft needed to hit and stick a green from 125 and 100 yards respectively.

You didn't give any distances, but to be more concrete (the hole is 375 from the blues and 401 from the tips), I would hit my 3W about 220 carry and it might roll to 230-240 or so. Then I would hit something around 100-130 to finish the hole. If I played from the tips (which I wouldn't) I would need a 3W and a 8i or 7i depending upon the roll on the 3W and if I expect roll from the approach shot.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

How wide is the fairway?

Wide.  35-40 yards through the landing zone including the areas where you don't have a look at the green.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Boy, honestly, I have no idea. I think the ideal play is to be able to fade a driver and hit your GW into the green. However, for me personally, I'm not sure I can control a fade enough to pull it off. I'm leery of an over fade into the trees on the right. That looks like double bogey city over there. Even though I'm not particularly enamored by this play, I think I would go with the 3H off the tee. I really hate having a 6 iron approach when I could have a GW, but that seems like the best option to me. 3W brings both sides of the trees into play, and driver brings the trees into the right into play. The 3H seems to have the best chance of avoiding the trees on both sides. Hit a 6 iron, take a bogey if I miss the green and walk off happy with the result. Honestly, this seems like a hole where bogey is a fine score. There's a lot of trouble with those trees lurking, and I think that's what you have to do on this hole. Avoid the trees, get close to the green, take a bogey. If you hit the green, take a par and run.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I'd want something between the 3 and the h, maybe leaving a 7i or preferrably 8i approach. The h is safe, to what looks like the widest part of the fairway, but I don't think I like the 6i approach from there. I want to go past that h, but not far enough to reach or get stuck behind that tree on the left. Maybe take a little off the 3w, towards that tree, with a slight fade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Boy, honestly, I have no idea. I think the ideal play is to be able to fade a driver and hit your GW into the green. However, for me personally, I'm not sure I can control a fade enough to pull it off. I'm leery of an over fade into the trees on the right. That looks like double bogey city over there.

Even though I'm not particularly enamored by this play, I think I would go with the 3H off the tee. I really hate having a 6 iron approach when I could have a GW, but that seems like the best option to me. 3W brings both sides of the trees into play, and driver brings the trees into the right into play. The 3H seems to have the best chance of avoiding the trees on both sides. Hit a 6 iron, take a bogey if I miss the green and walk off happy with the result.

Honestly, this seems like a hole where bogey is a fine score. There's a lot of trouble with those trees lurking, and I think that's what you have to do on this hole. Avoid the trees, get close to the green, take a bogey. If you hit the green, take a par and run.

Yeah the best leave is a nice fade with the driver.  My issue with that play is that either you have to aim pretty far left where with anything left or even just a shot that doesn't fade like you want there's a huge risk of OB, or you have to aim pretty tight against the tree on the right, where any push or over fade gets knocked down by the tree.  And you're right, without a somewhat lucky drop from the tree double bogey is in play big time.

If I had a reliable fade right now, I'd play this with a fade 3w.  As my swing is now, I just play for a straightish 3w aimed more or less where the 3 in the pic is.  It's always disappointing to hit what feels like a decent shot a bit left and end up having to hit a knockdown under the tree, but with that 3w distance only a pretty big pull or hook gets OB.

And I don't hit the hybrid.  I hate the approach with the longer club.  Trees right and hill left doesn't leave that big a margin for error with a relatively long club, and if you pull the hybrid off the tee at all you can easily be hitting 5i or even 4i into that tight window.  Plus, if you push the hybrid, you're probably still in the fairway but you're far enough behind the dogleg that you have much less opportunity to at least get it pretty close to the green and have a decent up and down shot.  A 3w too far right (but still past the tree on the right) might not leave you an open look, but you're far enough that you've got more high percentage options for getting it closer to the green.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Considering my form of play, I would probably take out my driver and swing right down the middle..maybe aim a fraction to the left of that right tree line. And then if I get lucky with that shot, I would probably have the opportunity to chip it up to the green with my 8 or 9 iron....I think that sounds about right.

We must harness the crystiles.

:tmade: Nubbins B7 Putter

:tmade: r7 460 Graphite Driver

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would like to take my driver up the fairway in the bottom of the pic to avoid OB and leave what appears to be LW over the trees. Not sure how tall the trees are by the green or closer to the tee box are though.

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Short par 4 with a tight fairway and dog to the right?

I'd try to fade a full driver down the fairway.

When my slice puts it in the wrong fairway, it's a pretty simple wedge over the trees to the green.....

Bill - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would like to take my driver up the fairway in the bottom of the pic to avoid OB and leave what appears to be LW over the trees. Not sure how tall the trees are by the green or closer to the tee box are though.

Originally Posted by rehmwa

I'd try to fade a full driver down the fairway.

When my slice puts it in the wrong fairway, it's a pretty simple wedge over the trees to the green.....

Unfortunately that's not a smart play. I've played from that other fairway more times than I'd like to admit.  You're well below the green from down there, and you're not in LW range, more like PW or 9i.  So then every time you think you've gotten over the trees (and have over the ones you can fully see from down there), it catches the last tree before the green and comes down short, often in a not great spot, pretty much every time.  Maybe you could make it if you go for the very back of the green, but usually that requires a longer club that might not get over the first trees, and even if you've got a little window and sneak it through, aiming that far back brings the big hill behind the green into play which is very penal.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unfortunately that's not a smart play.

Let me clarify..... :-P

"I'd try to fade a full driver down the fairway"------>  Smart Play

"When my slice puts it in the wrong fairway"------>  Poor Result

I'm glad to hear that a similar handicap has also had similar results......

(I'd like to also admit - "fade a driver"....for me, that's just my regular shot when it goes well......but I like to pretend it's on purpose)

Bill - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3638 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...