Jump to content
IGNORED

2014 U.S. Opens (Plural!) at Pinehurst #2 Discussion Thread


mvmac
Note: This thread is 3172 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

No, but we're almost all born with "the peer pressure gene," if you know what I mean…

In other sports peer pressure encourages you to skirt the rules, and in golf, very nearly the opposite.

Agreed.  And most of the on-field stuff in those sports (phantom tags, acting like you caught a ball you know you trapped, flopping for foul calls, trying to rip open a cut on your face to get those extra 2 penalty minutes, etc, etc) would fall under that category.  However, there are still a lot of bad apples that go the next step (corking bats, steroids**, trying to injure QBs, undercutting jump shooters [I'm talking to you Bruce Bowen ], etc) that I wouldn't put in the category of "peer pressure."

I'm simply saying that there is no reason to think that there aren't a few guys like that out there that also happen to be great golfers.

**I'd concede that you could make an argument for steroids in baseball to fall under the "peer pressure" category from 1998 through 2004 or whatever it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

People will invariably say this is a shining example of what sets golf apart, and they're right to a certain degree, but I can't help but wonder in these kinds of situations… what took the guy so long?

June 2 was Monday. He DQed himself on Saturday. He saw a small indentation and felt something.  It's not something that requires five days of thought.

This is actually the first thing I thought of too -- why does it take five days to come clean?   That said, I am going to give him the benefit of the doubt here and believe that he really doesn't know whether he violated a rule -- unless I am mistaken (and I very well could be), there is nothing in the Rules of Golf that requires a golfer to call a penalty on themselves simply due to the fact that they are not 100% sure they did not commit a violation -- is that correct?

Ultimately, the indent could have already been there and he just second-guessed himself once he saw it and then thought he caused the indent -- maybe that led him to believe he "felt" something when he really didn't.

The fact is -- and I believe this -- that more than 50% of people in the same situation would have never said anythign and would be teeing it up at the US Open.  Like it or not, I believe that to be true.

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Let's face it, Tiger would've won this if he was healthy... I'm hoping for tough but fair conditions, and someone who plays well overall, not just someone who putts out of their mind...

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Let's face it, Tiger would've won this if he was healthy...

He was healthy last year...and the year before that....and in 2009 and in 2010. How'd he do?

This is 2014, not 2006. Tiger doesn't just show up and win majors anymore. Actually, it's quite the opposite. No disrespect to him because he's one of the best...if not the best....ever, but he's not the same Tiger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

He was healthy last year...and the year before that....and in 2009 and in 2010. How'd he do?

I think that depends on your definition of "healthy."

But I agree with the sentiment. He'd be the favorite, but that doesn't guarantee anything.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

But I agree with the sentiment. He'd be the favorite, but that doesn't guarantee anything.

It does if I say it does, dammit!! :-D Sniff...I miss Tigs...It's just not the same without him...

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sniff...I miss Tigs...It's just not the same without him...

That goes without saying. Just look at the ratings for the tournaments this year. Been kinda snoozeville without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That goes without saying. Just look at the ratings for the tournaments this year. Been kinda snoozeville without him.

I've never understood this. To me, it was his dominance in his prime that was dull. I'm much more entertained by there being a large number of realistic contenders.

The more I practise, the luckier I hope to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've never understood this. To me, it was his dominance in his prime that was dull. I'm much more entertained by there being a large number of realistic contenders.

To each his own. I very much enjoy watching record setting dominance in any sport.

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've never understood this. To me, it was his dominance in his prime that was dull. I'm much more entertained by there being a large number of realistic contenders.

I disagree. Golf and tennis are two sports that I think really thrive on having a dominant figure in the game. I think you need one. I think there's much more excitement and a ton more interest. You can either root for that one player or root against them. How exciting was it in 2000 when you had a superstar in Tiger Woods going up against a cinderella story in Bob May? That was one of the best majors in our lifetime. Same when Tiger went up against Rocco or Tiger vs. Yang. Those were much more exciting than watching a showdown between Retief Goosen and Mark Brooks in 2001.

Phil and Tiger are great for the game. They've really helped the interest and excitement of the game over the last 17 years. Bob Harig, who I think is an excellent golf writer for ESPN, was on the radio the other echoing pretty much the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I disagree. Golf and tennis are two sports that I think really thrive on having a dominant figure in the game. I think you need one. I think there's much more excitement and a ton more interest. You can either root for that one player or root against them. How exciting was it in 2000 when you had a superstar in Tiger Woods going up against a cinderella story in Bob May? That was one of the best majors in our lifetime. Same when Tiger went up against Rocco or Tiger vs. Yang. Those were much more exciting than watching a showdown between Retief Goosen and Mark Brooks in 2001.

Phil and Tiger are great for the game. They've really helped the interest and excitement of the game over the last 17 years. Bob Harig, who I think is an excellent golf writer for ESPN, was on the radio the other echoing pretty much the same thing.

Kind of agree.  I would prefer a handful of dominant figures though.  Watching Federer win everything in sight was better than watching Joe club pro, but it's more exciting to me when it's Federer and Nadal and Djokovic and Murray and a couple on the next level like Del Potro and Ferrer and Roddick and Monfiels, etc.  (Trying to sound like I follow tennis a little more than I actually do. ;)  How'd I do?)

Same with golf.  Tiger winning everything is better than what we've been having, but not better than Tiger, A. Scott, Rory, Bubba, Phil, Rose all in contention. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Kind of agree.  I would prefer a handful of dominant figures though.  Watching Federer win everything in sight was better than watching Joe club pro, but it's more exciting to me when it's Federer and Nadal and Djokovic and Murray and a couple on the next level like Del Potro and Ferrer and Roddick and Monfiels, etc.  (Trying to sound like I follow tennis a little more than I actually do. ;)  How'd I do?)

Same with golf.  Tiger winning everything is better than what we've been having, but not better than Tiger, A. Scott, Rory, Bubba, Phil, Rose all in contention.

Agree. A handful of dominant figures is good. However, right now there are no dominant figures in golf without Tiger, which is why I disagree'd with the poster that what we have now is good for the game. It's not.

I'm not a big tennis fan, but I love watching Nadal vs. Djokovic battle it out every major, or back a few years ago Nadal vs. Federer. Women's tennis is unwatchable (unless Sharapova or Bouchard is playing), but was popular when you had Martina vs. Evert back in the day. That's dominance. That's what I wish golf had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Kind of agree.  I would prefer a handful of dominant figures though.  Watching Federer win everything in sight was better than watching Joe club pro, but it's more exciting to me when it's Federer and Nadal and Djokovic and Murray and a couple on the next level like Del Potro and Ferrer and Roddick and Monfiels, etc.  (Trying to sound like I follow tennis a little more than I actually do. ;)  How'd I do?)

Same with golf.  Tiger winning everything is better than what we've been having, but not better than Tiger, A. Scott, Rory, Bubba, Phil, Rose all in contention.

Ha! You did great. As a diehard Federer fan, I still have to agree with you that it's an exciting time in tennis when you have so many legit contenders (at least when it's not played on clay).

Alright back to golf. I rate the season so far a C+

Nike Covert 2.0 10.5* with Fujikura Motore F3 Stiff Flex
Nike Covert 2.0 3 Wood 15* Kuro Kage X-stiff 71g
Nike Covert 2.0 21* 3 hybrid Kuro Kage X-stiff 85g
Nike VR Pro Combo CB 4--PW
Nike VR Pro forged 50, 56, 58
Scotty Cameron Newport 2.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Agree. A handful of dominant figures is good. However, right now there are no dominant figures in golf without Tiger, which is why I disagree'd with the poster that what we have now is good for the game. It's not. I'm not a big tennis fan, but I love watching Nadal vs. Djokovic battle it out every major, or back a few years ago Nadal vs. Federer. Women's tennis is unwatchable (unless Sharapova or Bouchard is playing), but was popular when you had Martina vs. Evert back in the day. That's dominance. That's what I wish golf had.

Bjorn Borg vs MacEnroe's or in some instances Borg vs Conners, were great matches. in some respects I feel Tiger was very much like Borg! methodical, no emotion and when they needed a great shot! they just made it look routine. But I digress. I am looking forward to the Open, I was lucky enough to play it after a majority of the restoration was done. I am very light in the wallet as a result. I try to play an open course every year, its on my bucket list where its practical. Some of the greens I hit, I was reasonably certain the ball was either tight or inside of 18 feet.......but no, the ball would just roll right off the green and be 65 to 75 feet away. Even while trying to spin it. Crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


.......but no, the ball would just roll right off the green and be 65 to 75 feet away. Even while trying to spin it. Crazy!

Never played there but hope to someday, yet I think I can safely say that me and the "turtleback" style greens would not get along very well. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am looking forward to the Open, I was lucky enough to play it after a majority of the restoration was done. I am very light in the wallet as a result. I try to play an open course every year, its on my bucket list where its practical. Some of the greens I hit, I was reasonably certain the ball was either tight or inside of 18 feet.......but no, the ball would just roll right off the green and be 65 to 75 feet away. Even while trying to spin it. Crazy!

Wasn't it Pinehurst #2 that Johnny Miller said was like trying to putt on the roof of a VW Beetle?

The more I practise, the luckier I hope to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yeah, looking at it on TGC now and it looks a lot different. A lot of sand and waste areas around the course. Also very brown. This is the "brownest" US Open course I've ever seen. Has a little Whistling Straits look to it with all the sand with a little Muirfield to it from last year with all the brown.

Not sure I like the wider fairways, but we'll see how it pans out this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Anyone know what putter Brandt Snedeker switched to? Golf Channel video did not mention what he switched to and I can't find much online. Interested to see what it is given he has used his Odyssey White Hot XG Rossie for the past 8 years.

Matt Metzger - Newtown, PA

What's In My Bag

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha Alpha 815 - Aldila Tour Rogue Silver - 69g - Stiff

3-Wood: TaylorMade R11s - ProForce V2, Stiff, 76g

3 Hybrid: TaylorMade Burner - Stock shaft, Stiff

Irons: Callaway Apex 4-PW - True Temper XP-95, S300

Wedges: Cleveland Reg 588 Precision Forged, 52*, 56* & 60*

Putter: Kenny Giannini - G-4 No Neck, 34in

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3172 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
    • I agree with @klineka & @DaveP043 above.  When a new member first joins the club they cold be told that they are not eligible for tournaments until they have an established HCP.  As you said, it only takes a few rounds.  If they do not to post HCP that was their choice and choices have consequences.  If playing in the tournament is important to them then they should step up and establish an HCP.  Maybe they miss the 1st tournament, is that a real big deal?  And if it is a "Big Deal" to them then they had the opportunity to establish the HCP. As for not knowing how to report for HCP I assume your club has a pro and they should be able to assist in getting the scores reported and I suspect out of state courses may also have staff that can assist if asked.
    • Wordle 1,013 2/6 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Thought I was gonna be a big shot today...  🙂    Nice Job!
    • Cool here's my tweak, "If a player’s ball lies in the general area and there is interference from exposed tree roots or exposed rocks that are in the fairway or 1 club length from the fairway the tree roots and exposed rocks are treated as ground under repair. The player may take free relief under Rule 16.1b.[But relief is not allowed if the tree roots only interfere with the player’s stance.]
    • I would never do the extended warranty on the $50 slow cooker.  I also routinely reject the extended service plans on those toys we buy for the grand-kids.  I do consider them on higher cost items and will be more likely to get one if the product has a lot of "Electronic Tech" that is often the problem longer-term.  I also consider my intended length of ownership & usage.  If my thought is it would get replaced in 2-3 years then why bother but if I hope to use it for 10 years then more likely to get the extension. I did buy out a lease about a year ago.  Just prior to the lease end date the tablet locked up and would not function.  I got it repaired under the initial warranty and would not have bought it out if they had not been able to fix it since IMO once electronic issues start in a car they can be hard to track down & fix.  They did fix it but when I bought out the lease I paid up for the extended warranty the would cover electronic failures because my intent is to keep that car for another 8-10 years and I just do not trust the electronics to last.  Last week the touch screen went black and was unresponsive.  It reset on the 2nd time I restarted the car but that is exactly how the last malfunction started.  I fully expect to have a claim on that on repair under the extended warranty.  I do not recall the exact cost to fix last time since I did not pay it but I think it was @ $700-$800 and I suspect that will be higher next time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...