Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4198 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I play golf once a year, occasionally twice. I used to play a bit more when I first got into it, perhaps once every month, got my handicap down to around 10 and was shooting mid 80's regularly. However, recent times, other things have taken up the time in the weekends and the friends I used to play golf with now live in other cities and towns, I hit around a 25-30 handicap now. I played my annual round last weekend and I did not enjoy the round at all. The whole process of getting to the course, setting up, putting aside all of Sunday (the course was very slow with lots of people playing and trevel time to get there also) just did nothing for me at all. I did not enjoy myself and felt like the day was a chore rather than enjoyment. I have my original set of golf clubs that I've owned for around 8-9 years and I'm thinking about selling them and giving up golf. I've made a short list of pros and cons of selling the clubs below but want some outside perspective as I've been thinking about it all week and can't seem to make a black and white decision. Pros of keeping: - Can play with friends if they are in town. - Uncle and I may return to playing our annual game on 26th December Boxing Day (hasn't happened the past two years, I have no incentive to keep this happening either) - Have clubs if for any reason a work function is a round of golf (highly unlikely) - Have them to go to the range if I ever feel like it - May take up golf more seriously in the future (quite unlikely but never know) Cons of keeping: - Taking up valuable space in small apartment we have (I hate having excess stuff taking up space and clutter) - May need replacing in the next few years anyway. Gear such as bag, glove, tees, etc are looking old and need replacing - Can get money by selling them - Playing a round at a local course costs money $55 each round or so, money I'd get much more enjoyment spent elsewhere - Not getting any enjoyment out of golf. The only reason for me to keep them is if one of my friends were to come to town and we could socialise and play a round of golf, perhaps once every two years. I figure we could always socialise doing something else or I could borrow clubs off someone if I really needed to. Thoughts?

Posted

If they are paid for, then I'd keep them. If you ever need them, 8-9 year old clubs are not that old to use. But if you sell them, you won't get that much for them.


Posted

But if you sell them, you won't get that much for them.

Exactly what I was thinking. It's not even worth the effort to sell them, IMO.

-Rich

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Might well keep them -- you won't get anything for them.

And unless you devote effort to the game, the game will not reward you. And the weekends? Unless you like it slow and painful, do not play in season on the weekends unless it's very early or very late in the day, or very hot and no one is playing.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Op, going by your pro/con list it looks like you'd benefit more from trying to sell your clubs and freeing up space in your apartment. You'd eliminate clutter and possibly get a few $$ for your set up.

You've said that you no longer enjoy the game, that it's a hassle, that you don't have interest in playing with your uncle on Boxing day, and don't forsee a work related function that will require you to play.

It sounds to me like your cons outweigh your pros. I'd say sell the set up and if you are interested in playing in the future, you could pick up a newer set.

Just going by what you said... and any money you get for clubs is more than you have right now since they're already paid for.

Chris

I don't play golf, I play at golf. There's a difference.

TM RBZ driver, RBZ Stage 2 Tour 3 wood, RBZ 7 wood, TM Burner 2.0 4-AW, Cleveland CG16 Black Pearl 56* sand wedge, Yes! Golf Valerie putter, Snake Eyes golf balls, TM stand bag


Posted

I'd say if you only have the one set keep them. If you ever decide to play again it's a hassle to borrow or rent some and if you get back into playing more regularly you can worry about upgrading if necessary. If you never plan to golf again, sure you can get rid of them, but I don't think you'd get much for them.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Price your current clubs on the PGA value guide site:

http://valueguide.pga.com/

To see if they have any documented value.

Then check your local craigslist.org site to see what else is listed and what sort of values people are asking.

It might be better to just donate them to a thrift shop or one of the kid's development programs that some cities have, that way at least you get a tax donation receipt.  Then later on if you do decide to play again you can just pick up a used set for relatively cheap while deciding if you want to get fully back into the game.

For me, I'd keep at least one set of clubs "just in case" a reason to play pops up, at least if I were in your shoes.

Not knowing what clubs you have or what bag or other gear you have, nor knowing where you are located, I can't really give any other input. Ultimately though, your life, your situation, your decision, do what works best for you.

Taylormade M2 driver @ 9.5*+2

TM M6 D-type 3wood 16*, 
TM M2 Rescue 3H@19* and 4H@22* ,
TM RocketBladez irons 5-9,PW,AW, SW(23*,26.5*,30.5*,35*,40*,45*,50*,55*),
TM Hi-Toe 60* wedge,
Ping Karsten 1959 Craz-E, or a Scotty
Bushnell Tour V3 rangefinder


Posted

My inclination would be to keep them. One golf bag doesn't really take up that much space, and you anticipate playing occasionally. 8-9 year old clubs are not that much out of date, and at the same time, run of the mill 8-9 year old clubs won't bring you much money unless you have some special items.

I peruse the vintage ads a good bit, so if you want to list what you have, I will take a stab at guessing what it might bring.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

They maybe taking up space but they are costing you nothing sitting there. I started playing back in the 60s with my Dad's old Mcgregers until I went into the Military. Never gave golf a thought until 2006 when I was invited to play in a company charity benefit. Well the old wood heads went flying all over the golf course. The price of Taylor Made r7s and Burner woods really put a dent in the wallet. The point is you spend the few dollars you get for the clubs and will probably have nothing to show for it. Go to the range whack some balls.


Posted

I dragged mine around for quite a few years...maybe 20 and finally got back into the sport and used them for a year and decided to get serious and buy new ones. It would probably make it tough to get back into it again, the value of your clubs are probably low so I would keep them but if you have no room, ditch em.

Cheap tee times can be had online in most areas. I don't know about where you live.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would personally recommend keeping the clubs. If you decide to upgrade to new clubs eventually, you'll at least want to have something to use in the interim while you locate and get fitted for the set that works for you. It would also be nice to have the option to get away from life for a while and go play that long Sunday round, or hit the range when you feel like it. I think you limit yourself more by saying the hell with it and selling the clubs. Plus, you'll never, ever , get anywhere near what you paid. Say you make $100-150 by selling them. Is this situation-altering money that you can really use to pay a bill, or get caught up on something? If so, that may be a factor to look at it. However, if you're just going to have a $100 bill in your wallet from doing so and you spend it on odds and ends (DVDs, books, CDs, food, whatever..) it may be worth keeping them so that you have the option to play this game when you choose.

I'd rather keep a small piece of "clutter" and have options available, rather than vacate all flexibility and give up the game for good.


Posted

I played MacGregor MT irons (1972 model) from 1974-1994. The 1972 model was competitive, pro line quality. A few years later, I picked up matching MT 1, 3, 4 woods.

In 1994, I got custom fit for some component clubs, the irons which I played until 2008. The guy who fit me said he could give me $50 for lot of MTs, or I could find a period golf bag and keep it as a historic memento set. I did that, and I'm glad I did.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4198 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.