Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3901 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Thanks to Callaway Golf, Sand Trap Forum Leaders and Supporters were able to test the new Chrome Soft balls .

This thread will serve for those members to post about their experiences with their Callaway balls.

Want to become a Supporter and get to test out new products? Go here

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Too bad, I missed out on the balls. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@mvmac

Thanks Mike and TST.

Just sent pm.

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nice ball, great value for price

Pros: Good feel, a step up from most balls in this price range

Cons: Close to a premium ball, but just misses

I was sent a box of the Callaway Chrome Soft Balls for the purpose of writing this review.

First impressions of this ball were great. My normal ball is the Bridgestone RX 330 and this one felt comparable for a few less dollars. Unfortunately during my test rounds, Florida weather was not what we consider normal. This ball did not see any play in temperatures above 60 degrees and was played mostly in temperatures of 35 to 50 degrees.

Callaway claims that this ball will allow me to compress (deform) the ball like a tour player and I am obviously a bit out of that skill level, even with the chrome.

Overall, this ball felt great in every step of the game - driver, hybrids, irons wedges and the putter. I tend to have a slight fade when hitting the driver correctly and a hook/draw with pretty much all of the rest of my clubs. This ball gave me the same flight I was accustomed to. I was really excited about my results with the ball until I compared the numbers with my usual ball.

These tests were conducted over 3 separate days, with best and worst shots pulled, in addition to shots that hit trees or anything else that would affect results.The Chrome Soft was compared against my usual Bridgestone RX 330.

First we will take into consideration that the Callway costs about 25% less than the RX 330.

Distances off of the driver were about 5% greater for the Bridgestone. Hybrid distances were close with Bridgestone having an edge well within any margin of error. Iron distances were very similiar.

Off of the putter both felt great and with the wedges, the Bridgetone had a little more spin than the Callaway in my tests.

None of this is any kind of knock on the Callaway ball - just tried using real numbers to see where it all really stood.

Overall, I really liked the Callaway Chrome Soft and look forward to testing it in a little warmer weather when I am dressed more like I am used to. This ball does have a chance at sneaking into my bag on a regular basis.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here's my review of the Callaway Chrome Soft golf balls. I'd like to thank TST, and Callaway for the opportunity to try these out.

Pros: Low spin with driver, good soft feel around the greens, and distance was a bit better than the golf balls I've used previously.

Cons: Can't think of any Cons.

Previously, I used the Srixon Z Star XV, and the Wilson Duo, granted the Z Star is much harder than the Chrome Soft, and the Duo to me felt not as soft as the Chrome Soft.

What I did notice during my round was, that the Callaway Chrome Soft was about 5 yards longer off the tee with driver, and with my irons, on a well struck shot, the Chrome Soft was about 3 yards longer, yet held the green very well. Also, having played Balata balls in the 90's, the Callaway balls brought back a feeling I had with them.

I did have to get use to the feel of the ball with my putter, the first 3 holes, I left my putts pretty short, but once I got use to the feel, my putts went as usual

One thing I noticed was the durability of the Chrome Soft, after 18, it barley looked used, so I feel these are a very good value for what I would consider, a better golf ball.

I want to thank Callaway for giving me the opportunity to review these balls, because I just found my new golf ball. I think you like  a softer feeling ball, the Chrome Soft should be a ball you should try.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My review:  (Happy to answer any specific questions anybody might have as well, as best as I can ;))

When I was offered the opportunity to test out the new Callaway Chrome Soft golf ball, I jumped at the chance.  Not because I was unhappy with my current ball(s), but because of their claims of being the Holy Trinity of golf ball performance – low spin for exceptional distance off the tee, low compression for incredibly soft feel , and excellent control .

The promotion material from their website boasts:

Low Spin Off The Tee For Exceptional Distance

Low spin off the driver for maximum ball speed and distance with the SoftFast Core. The core is the key to long, straight distance off the tee, and our optimized HEX Aerodynamics makes Chrome Soft even longer by reducing drag and increasing lift.

Low Compression For Incredibly Soft Feel

The low 65 compression lets you compress the ball on iron shots for incredibly soft feel, and it’s amazing around the greens. Now, all golfers can compress the ball like a Tour player.

Excellent Control

A high level of control for aggressive shots into the green comes from soft feel and the Tour Urethane Cover. It’s built for consistency that you can depend on with every shot.

The expectations are high, soooo … does the ball live up to the hype?  Let’s find out.

*First off, a disclaimer that will likely always accompany a golf ball review of mine;  I've always found it hard to really compare balls over short periods of time simply because I am not that good of a golfer.  I’ll never know for sure if many of the performance differences are due to the ball or how good or bad I happened to have been playing that day.*

Anyway, I have had the balls for a few weeks now and have had the chance to play 54 holes exclusively with them, as well as spend some time on the chipping and putting greens hitting them alongside some of the other balls I like using.  So, for comparison sake, let’s just review them based on the same categories they are advertised upon.

Low Spin Off The Tee For Exceptional Distance

As many of you may know, I use a GameGolf stat tracker to record all of my rounds so this is an easy test to perform.  Since I’ve been using the system, I’ve averaged 252 yards off the tee (over about 15 rounds or so), with a long drive in that time frame of 301 yards.  I hit the fairway 31% of the time and miss left and right virtually equally.  Over the course of the last five rounds, 4 of which were while using the Chrome Soft, my average has dropped to 242 yards, with a long of 295.  I also have only hit 15% of the fairways over that time frame.  Now, I would not consider the ball to be the cause of that (see previous disclaimer), but I am willing to go on record to say that the ball didn’t appear to provide me with any extra distance over the ProV1 or the KickX Tour Z that I have been playing.

That goes for my irons and wedges as well.  The ball appeared to play quite well to the distances I am used to with all clubs.

Low Compression For Incredibly Soft Feel

The easiest way to answer this one is …. Yup.  This claim is most definitely true.  The ball feels quite soft.  I took it out to the putting green late last night for one final spin.  I lined up a ProV1, a Tour Z and a Chrome Soft all side by side and hit 10-15’ putts back and forth for 10 minutes.  The ProV1 and Tour Z both felt and sounded very similar.  The Chrome Soft clearly felt(sounded) softer coming off the putter face.  I am confident I could replicate this test with a blindfold and pick out which was the Chrome Soft every time.

Putting stats from GameGolf are too reliant on GIRs and things unrelated to actual putting so those aren’t going to mean much here, but I can say that the putting performance was also quite comparable between the Chrome Soft and the other balls.  And I especially love how it felt off the putter face.

Excellent Control

Similar to the distance results, in this category, I found that the ball kept up nicely with the other balls, however, it did not stand out as far as having exceptional control above and beyond what I see from the Titleist and Kick X balls.  With wedges, it seemed to sit quite nicely near it’s pitchmark without kicking forward like a typical distance ball might or spinning back too much like tends to happen when I play a B330-S.  The reason I’m currently enjoying the Kick X is because it usually just sits right down, and the Chrome Soft was pretty good at doing that as well.

I also pitted the ball against the others in a pitching “contest” on the practice green, and as you might expect at this point in the review, it held its own, but didn’t stand out.

So, in conclusion, I believe that this is a pretty solid ball.  It doesn’t really stand out above and beyond the others on the course, but it does perform quite comparably.  If feel off the putter face is your primary concern, though, you should definitely give these a look.  Especially considering that it currently sells for about $8 less than ProV1’s per dozen.  I think you will like it.

Here are a couple of pics.  (Sorry, I forgot to take pics of the actual balls before I marked them up)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Pros: soft feeling low spinning ball reasonably priced

Cons: nothing really

I was given a dozen of these balls to play and test out.. I have played these for over 6-7 rounds now and have shot some good scores for me  (Mid-70-s).  As such, I kept the same ball for a few days.  I saw no degradation of the ball or performance.  And.. being a generous type, I passed out balls to my regular partners and asked them what they thought. I would not tell them what level ball they were (entry level, cheap, premium, etc etc).  Everyone really like them and thought they were getting more distance with less "deviation"  i.e slicing..  They noticed they did not get as much spin around the green and all commented at the soft feel off the putter.  Everyone had something different to say about the putting softness.. Some liked it, some thought they could never putt with something so soft, and most thought they could get used to it...

Me... I really liked the ball and thought it a good ball for the price and given the price point below the premium Titleist and Bridgestones..  I am not at a level where the difference between these and the next level are worth the difference.  The one nice thing is that these are available in yellow unlike Titleist ProVs.

Normally I find it easy to find something to write in reviews such as this but this has me a bit stumped.  This ball is basically virtually a premium ball that is softer than the norm, spins somewhat less and has a different feel off the putter face and irons.  It is cheaper than the premiums but still not a bargain ball.. I will definitely play this ball as it has no real downside for me.  Of the softer balls that are quite the thing these days, this is the one I would pick.  Pick up a dozen and give them a try.. You might just find a perfect fit..

Titleist 915 9.5 w/GD AD-DI shaft Callaway Big Bertha Alpha 14 degree FW wood Ping Anser hybrid 19 degree Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4-pw or Callaway Apex Titleist Vokey SM5 50, 54, 58, (62) Edel E3 Putter ES14 launch monitor ARCCOS

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Callaway chrome soft golf balls white. Just bought these golf balls will find out how they perform over the weekend. So far good reviews online.

Posted
I just wanted to say thanks for the reviews here. I am going through a "ball test" this year to replace the Penta that I have been playing since 2010 (and am finally starting to run out of). I was going to skip the Chrome Soft due to how unimpressed I have been with Callaway balls over the years. The comments here have changed my mind on that however and, unexpectedly, I will be including the Chrome Soft in my test this year. Thanks everybody!

Yonex Ezone Type 380 | Tour Edge Exotics CB Pro | Miura 1957 Irons | Yururi Wedges | Scotty Cameron Super Rat | TaylorMade Penta


Posted

Since my review, I have kept playing with these balls and decided that I like them enough that I'm going to stick with them.  I have a bunch of other good balls to get through before I need to buy more (3/4 dozen B330-S and a full dozen of Kick X) but once I'm ready to buy again, I think I'm leaning towards the Chrome Soft.  Especially if they can stay under $40. :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Since my review, I have kept playing with these balls and decided that I like them enough that I'm going to stick with them.  I have a bunch of other good balls to get through before I need to buy more (3/4 dozen B330-S and a full dozen of Kick X) but once I'm ready to buy again, I think I'm leaning towards the Chrome Soft.  Especially if they can stay under $40.:beer:

How would you compare the chrome soft to the kick X?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How would you compare the chrome soft to the kick X?

Very similar in every aspect, except the feel (read: sound) off the putterface.  The Kick X "clicks" a little more than the Chrome Soft, and I like that muted sound when putting.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Very similar in every aspect, except the feel (read: sound) off the putterface.  The Kick X "clicks" a little more than the Chrome Soft, and I like that muted sound when putting.

Cool I'm going to have to pick up a dozen. I like the kick X and the Bridgestone 330 rx. The Bridgestone 330 rx is what I played most of last year. I like the kick x a little more but they are a little expensive for how often I lose them.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 6 months later...
Posted
Did anyone notice sidespin reduction and higher launch vs ProV1x and Srixon Z Star XV? It seems like all I can do is hit it high and straight, which sounds nice, but I play a windy course with a fair amount of greenside bunkers, with greens that almost all slope back to front, so working the ball around danger and letting it run to the hole is important. I also felt on chips it had a higher launch than the ProV1x or Srixon. Off the putter face it felt soft and sometimes seemed to explode. Drives launched higher than the ProV1x or Srixon and seemed to roll less and sounded much mushier. Anyone else notice those things? For reference I'm a 7 handicap, play Putter - Odyssey Metal X / Superstroke Squared Wedges - Vokey SM 60 / SM4 54 Irons +1/2, 2 Up, Project X 6.0 - Taylor Made Forged TP 3,4 CB / 5,6,7 MC / 8,9,P MB 913D3 9.5 (neutral) - Tour AD Di 6s (tipped 1 inch) 913FD 15 (.75 upright) - Tour Ad Di 6x 910h 17 ( 1.5 up) - Ahina 90 Stiff Thanks, Ben

Posted

I'll be playing the Chrome Soft for the first time today.  Looking forward to it with all the positive accolades here.  I post my experience.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted (edited)

Well, I tried them out last night and they felt great off the driver and the irons.  I normally hit any tour ball about the same distance especially with the irons.  However, the Chrome Soft seemed to jump off the face.  I gained probably 10 yards with the same iron swing over any other ball.  Needless to say, I was hitting the ball too long on the greens.  I didn't hit it too much with the driver because I didn't want to lose any before my tourney.

During the scramble today, the Chrome Soft probably cost me the tournament.  I was hitting my irons too long.  When I chipped the ball, it jumped off the face and was past the hole too much.  I normally chip my ball stoney.  The ball jumped off the putter face and I hit my putts too long.  When I switched to another ball I was coming up short on the putts.  We tied for first , but came in third when cards were compared.  When I switched to another ball, I left 2 long putts about an inch short in the jaws which cost me $300.  Argh!!!!!

Since today was a scramble, I was hitting a rock off the tee, so I need to do a little more testing with the driver.

I will be switching to this ball.  I just can't switch back and forth between other balls.

The Chrome Soft almost feels illegal.

Edited by vangator

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Note: This thread is 3901 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.