Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Provisional-2nd provisional and found ball question


Note: This thread is 3797 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Playing in a league match last night.

My opponent

Tee’s up the ball on a par 4 and hits it near 10 yards and  into the woods on the right.

Since it is a thick patch of trees there is no chance of playing it out there.

Tee’s up a Provisional  and hits it in the same spot into the woods on the right.

Tee’s up a 2 nd Provisional  and duffs the drive to the same spot. Except this stop short of the woods and is playable.

We walk 10 yards up and he plays his next shot  up the fairway.

As we begin walking up the fairway I look to my left and just past the ladies/senior tees is a ball.

I inform my opponent of a ball, he does not care continues walking. I inspect further it is his original ball.

He then comes back and plays it. Now he is lying 1 hitting 2 instead of lying 7 after 2 lost balls.

He ends up bogie on the hole and we push.

I think we played it correctly but could always be wrong.

What do the rules say about finding your original tee shot after putting a provisional into play, before you find out the golf G*ds have been kind to you?

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Playing in a league match last night.

My opponent

Tee’s up the ball on a par 4 and hits it near 10 yards and  into the woods on the right.

Since it is a thick patch of trees there is no chance of playing it out there.

Tee’s up a Provisional  and hits it in the same spot into the woods on the right.

Tee’s up a 2nd Provisional  and duffs the drive to the same spot. Except this stop short of the woods and is playable.

We walk 10 yards up and he plays his next shot  up the fairway.

As we begin walking up the fairway I look to my left and just past the ladies/senior tees is a ball.

I inform my opponent of a ball, he does not care continues walking. I inspect further it is his original ball.

He then comes back and plays it. Now he is lying 1 hitting 2 instead of lying 7 after 2 lost balls.

He ends up bogie on the hole and we push.

I think we played it correctly but could always be wrong.

What do the rules say about finding your original tee shot after putting a provisional into play, before you find out the golf G*ds have been kind to you?

I'm pretty sure If he played the provisional ball, the provisional is in play and he's now lying 8, you win the hole.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

By my understanding of the rules of golf, since he played is second shot with the provisional ball without looking where his original ball was, he is now stuck playing his provisional ball and is hitting 7.  Had he looked for his original ball first and found it, he could pick up the provisional ball and be hitting 2, but since he did not and hit his provisional ball down the fairway that is now his ball that is in play...you should have won the hole.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

By my understanding of the rules of golf, since he played is second shot with the provisional ball without looking where his original ball was, he is now stuck playing his provisional ball and is hitting 7.  Had he looked for his original ball first and found it, he could pick up the provisional ball and be hitting 2, but since he did not and hit his provisional ball down the fairway that is now his ball that is in play...you should have won the hole.

The only problem I have with this is that had he looked for his ball in the woods to the right he would not have found it, since it kicked out and ended up to our left.

Neither of us would have ever thought to look for the ball on the left.

So even if he had looked for the ball he would not have found it and until we began walking up the fairway.

So am I to understand that the rule is that even if you find your ball that you did not know kicked out of the woods after you played your provisional you are stuck with the provisional?

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes, unfortunately that is correct...once he made a stroke on the provisional he is stuck with it. That's why time is allotted to finding a lost ball, so it can be looked for somewhat extensively. Always with trees I will look 30-40 yards behind and 30-40 yards ahead, because if a ball ricochets off a tree it can go anywhere.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You're both incorrect, at least in what determines whether a provisional ball is in-play.

After hitting a provisional, you may make as many strokes at it as you wish until you reach spot at, or nearer the hole than where your original ball is likely to be.  If you make a stroke at a provisional from that spot or nearer the hole, then the provisional becomes the ball in-play.

It's not clear from the original post whether the provisionals were past the "10 yards" or not.  If he made a stroke at a provisional before reaching the spot where the original was likely to be, the strokes do not count and once the original is found, both provisionals are immediately abandoned and he's hitting his second shot with the original.  However, if he had made a stroke at a provisional from beyond where the original was likely to be, then the provisional immediately becomes the ball in play and the original is abandoned.


Posted

Yes, unfortunately that is correct...once he made a stroke on the provisional he is stuck with it. That's why time is allotted to finding a lost ball, so it can be looked for somewhat extensively. Always with trees I will look 30-40 yards behind and 30-40 yards ahead, because if a ball ricochets off a tree it can go anywhere.


No, that's NOT correct.  It is only correct if the stroke was made at the provisional from where the original was likely to be, or nearer the hole.


Posted
[COLOR=FF00AA][/COLOR]I need a little clarification... He hit his drive 10 yards ? I'm not understanding the distances here, and it's important, because you have the right to continue to play a provisional up to the point where the original ball is thought to be.... b. When Provisional Ball Becomes Ball in Play The player may play a provisional ball until he reaches the place where the original ball is likely to be. If he makes a stroke with the provisional ball from the place where the original ball is likely to be or from a point nearer the hole than that place, the original ball is lost and the provisional ball becomes the ball in playunder penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1). Edited to add that @wadesworld beat me to it....but the answer to the specific situation in the OP still lies in understanding the actual relationships between the balls.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some information on provisional shots,

b. When Provisional Ball Becomes Ball in Play

The player may play a provisional ball until he reaches the place where the original ball is likely to be. If he makes a stroke with the provisional ball from the place where the original ball is likely to be or from a point nearer the hole than that place, the original ball is lost and the provisional ball becomes the ball in play under penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1).

Also you can play any number of provisional shots and still play the first ball if you find it.

27-2a/4

Three Balls Played from Same Spot; Only Second Ball Was Provisional Ball

Q.A player, believing his tee shot might be lost or out of bounds, plays a provisional ball. His provisional ball is struck in the same direction as the original ball and, without any announcement, he plays another ball from the tee. This ball comes to rest on the fairway. What is the ruling?

A.If the original ball is not lost or out of bounds, the player must continue play with that ball without penalty.

If the original ball is lost or out of bounds, the player must continue play with the third ball played from the tee as, when this ball was played without any announcement, it rendered the provisional ball lost, regardless of the provisional ball's location. The player would lie 5 with the third ball played from the tee.

In both situations, the third ball bears a relationship only to the previous ball played, i.e., the provisional ball.

Also under 27-2 (a),

Note: If a provisional ball played under Rule 27-2a might be lost outside a water hazard or out of bounds, the player may play another provisional ball. If another provisional ball is played, it bears the same relationship to the previous provisional ball as the first provisional ball bears to the original ball.

I might need a 2nd opinion on this one. I believe if you hit a third provisional, and if you don't find the first ball, but find the 2nd provisional you can play that one. I am not sure if teeing up a third provisional abandons the second one.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, I was reading into it as all 3 balls went to the same spot, except this one was outside the woods...so I was seeing it as his 2nd provisional ball was where his first two were likely to be.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some information on provisional shots,

Also you can play any number of provisional shots and still play the first ball if you find it.

Also under 27-2 (a),

I might need a 2nd opinion on this one. I believe if you hit a third provisional, and if you don't find the first ball, but find the 2nd provisional you can play that one. I am not sure if teeing up a third provisional abandons the second one.


Teeing up the 3rd would only abandon the 2nd and 1st if both of those weren't found...the ball isn't abandoned unless it isn't found.  But all of the balls have to be distinctly marked or numbered differently to differentiate them from eachother.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You're both incorrect, at least in what determines whether a provisional ball is in-play.

After hitting a provisional, you may make as many strokes at it as you wish until you reach spot at, or nearer the hole than where your original ball is likely to be.  If you make a stroke at a provisional from that spot or nearer the hole, then the provisional becomes the ball in-play.

It's not clear from the original post whether the provisionals were past the "10 yards" or not.  If he made a stroke at a provisional before reaching the spot where the original was likely to be, the strokes do not count and once the original is found, both provisionals are immediately abandoned and he's hitting his second shot with the original.  However, if he had made a stroke at a provisional from beyond where the original was likely to be, then the provisional immediately becomes the ball in play and the original is abandoned.

The provisionals all were in the same spot either in the woods or playable on the fringe.

this was 10-15 yards forward and to the right.

none of these shots were further to the hole than where his original landed.

I need a little clarification...

He hit his drive 10 yards? I'm not understanding the distances here, and it's important, because you have the right to continue to play a provisional up to the point where the original ball is thought to be....

b. When Provisional Ball Becomes Ball in Play

The player may play a provisional ball until he reaches the place where the original ball is likely to be. If he makes a stroke with the provisional ball from the place where the original ball is likely to be or from a point nearer the hole than that place, the original ball is lost and the provisional ball becomes the ball in playunder penalty of stroke and distance (Rule 27-1).

Edited to add that @wadesworld beat me to it....but the answer to the specific situation in the OP still lies in understanding the actual relationships between the balls.

yes he hit his ball 10-15 yards forward and to the right.

He hit his 2nd provisional. We began walking forward and 10 yards ahead we found his original.

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, I was reading into it as all 3 balls went to the same spot, except this one was outside the woods...so I was seeing it as his 2nd provisional ball was where his first two were likely to be.

That's how I read it too, he said all the balls went 10 yards but the last one didn't roll into the woods.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The provisionals all were in the same spot either in the woods or playable on the fringe. this was 10-15 yards forward and to the right. none of these shots were further to the hole than where his original landed. yes he hit his ball 10-15 yards forward and to the right. He hit his 2nd provisional. We began walking forward and 10 yards ahead we found his original.

Given that, when he played his 2d shot with his 2d provisional, it became the ball in play, and he was lying 6 down the fairway. Gotta admit, I'm still trying to wrap my head around how you could lose site of a ball that went into the woods and bounced out again only 10 yards away.... :-\

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes, I was reading into it as all 3 balls went to the same spot, except this one was outside the woods...so I was seeing it as his 2nd provisional ball was where his first two were likely to be.

As Wadesworld posted, a provisional (including second or even third) may be played up to the point where the original is likely to be, not where it may subsequently discovered to be (D27-2b/4).The provisional only becomes the ball in play if a stroke is made at it from a place nearer the hole than that point.

One thing to note with multiple provisionals is that  " If another provisional ball is played, it bears the same relationship to the previous provisional ball as the first provisional ball bears to the original ball" . (Note to 27-2a)


Posted

As Wadesworld posted, a provisional (including second or even third) may be played up to the point where the original is likely to be, not where it may subsequently discovered to be (D27-2b/4).The provisional only becomes the ball in play if a stroke is made at it from a place nearer the hole than that point.

One thing to note with multiple provisionals is that  "If another provisional ball is played, it bears the same relationship to the previous provisional ball as the first provisional ball bears to the original ball" .(Note to 27-2a)


Yes, this is understood, as it was mentioned in previous posts...It was unclear whether or not the 2nd provisional went further than the other 2 since the poster said they all went 10 yards and to the right...that to me says that they are all in relatively the same place...if they all 3 went to the same place they are all 3 likely to be in the same spot and therefore when he played the 2nd provisional from the likely spot the other 2 balls were, his provisional was no in play...might be reading into it different than some others, but to me he was meaning all 3 balls were in relatively the same area.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Yes, this is understood, as it was mentioned in previous posts...It was unclear whether or not the 2nd provisional went further than the other 2 since the poster said they all went 10 yards and to the right...that to me says that they are all in relatively the same place...if they all 3 went to the same place they are all 3 likely to be in the same spot and therefore when he played the 2nd provisional from the likely spot the other 2 balls were, his provisional was no in play...might be reading into it different than some others, but to me he was meaning all 3 balls were in relatively the same area.

I'm reading this slightly differently, but I'm not sure which of us is correct.  As I read it, they were all on about the same line, but the 2nd provisional stopped short of the trees, so that the original ball and the 1st provisional went further (closer to the hole) than the 2nd.  In that case, he could play the 2nd as a provisional and then search for the other two balls.  When he found the original, the provisionals would be abandoned.  I don't think we disagree on the ruling, but the relative position of the three balls isn't entirely clear to me.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:

Originally Posted by Martyn W

As Wadesworld posted, a provisional (including second or even third) may be played up to the point where the original is likely to be, not where it may subsequently discovered to be (D27-2b/4).The provisional only becomes the ball in play if a stroke is made at it from a place nearer the hole than that point.

One thing to note with multiple provisionals is that  "If another provisional ball is played, it bears the same relationship to the previous provisional ball as the first provisional ball bears to the original ball" .(Note to 27-2a)

Yes, this is understood, as it was mentioned in previous posts...It was unclear whether or not the 2nd provisional went further than the other 2 since the poster said they all went 10 yards and to the right...that to me says that they are all in relatively the same place...if they all 3 went to the same place they are all 3 likely to be in the same spot and therefore when he played the 2nd provisional from the likely spot the other 2 balls were, his provisional was no in play...might be reading into it different than some others, but to me he was meaning all 3 balls were in relatively the same area.

The rule says if a stroke is made at a provisional ball at or near where the original ball (and/or previous provisional ball) is thought to be , any balls hit prior to that provisional ball are abandoned and the provisional ball becomes the ball in play.  The fact that all 3 balls were in the same area brings this into play, and when he made the stroke at the 2nd provisional ball, it was the ball in play.  When he then played the original ball, it was a wrong ball - additional two stroke penalty and he needed to correct that mistake by finishing with what was the 2nd provisional ball for a very high score.  He would have been lying 8 after returning to play out the hole with the 2nd provisional ball.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3797 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.