Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Taking good balls from range buckets


Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I just found this legal precedent that says otherwise:

https://www.ngcoa.ca/Userfiles/File/GBC/1997/Fall/Legal%20Fall-97.pdf

This is particularly interesting since it occurred during a clear case of trespassing...seems crazy to me.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 461
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
You mean the abandoned ball that has no owner?  Talk about a strawman, buddy.

I'll confess that I haven't read all your past posts in this thread, so it's entirely possible that I misunderstood your position. Just for clarity, is the "abandoned ball that has no owner" sitting in the bucket of range balls you just got from the machine/range dude?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The precedent he linked is from Canada and involves kids taking balls out of a course pond, not cherry picking them out of buckets that are rented on the range.  Apple to oranges, but a nice try.

Ha apples and oranges? not at all.

It says the judge said the abandoned balls are not the property of the course owner.  So why would they belong to the range owner now?

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
Ha, prove to me that the driving range isn't stealing the ball first. So when the range collects the ball and places it into their range bin, the property owner has to pay to get that ball back.  You know, a definition of theft by the State of Colorado.

1 - quote the entire statute, you missed a bit of it. 2 - you're trying to turn the argument around, because you can't win it otherwise. You still have not proven the range didn't own the ball. 3 - you're missing a few other statutes that would also be applicable. It's great that you know how to use Google, but that clearly isn't helping you establish that taking a range ball without permission, from it's owner, is not theft. You haven't proven anything yet


Posted

1 - quote the entire statute, you missed a bit of it.

2 - you're trying to turn the argument around, because you can't win it otherwise. You still have not proven the range didn't own the ball.

3 - you're missing a few other statutes the would also be applicable.

It's great that you know how to use Google, but that clearly isn't helping you establish that taking a range ball without permission, from it's owner, is not theft.

You haven't proven anything yet

Read the other legal precedent I posted.

You know, where the judge says the course owner is not the proper owner of the abandoned ball...

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
This is particularly interesting since it occurred during a clear case of trespassing...seems crazy to me.

Yeah, interesting that the kid wasn't charged with trespassing

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It says the judge said the abandoned balls are not the owner of the course owner.  So why would they belong to the range owner now?

I guess you could argue that the difference between a golf course and a range would be that the golf course NEVER purchases golf balls and scatters them on the course, so if there is a ball there, you know with 100% certainty that it was abandoned by someone else.

With the range, there is always the potential (however unlikely) that the owner did "sprinkle" some ProV1's in there...so when you take it, you can't know for sure it wasn't owned.

Here's a fun wrinkle: there is a (crappy) range I go to that uses ONLY abandoned balls.  Not a single one is marked in any way.  If I lived in Canada, apparently I could just walk out with them by the bucketload.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaAttack View Post

Ha apples and oranges? not at all.

It says the judge said the abandoned balls are not the property of the course owner.  So why would they belong to the range owner now?

Quote:
What Is Abandoned Property?
As a general matter, if a property owner intentionally abandons property, they lose ownership of it. When property is intentionally abandoned, it belongs to nobody until it is found. At that point, title (ownership) transfers to whoever finds it, and takes it with intent to take ownership. This is the general rule created by the common law. Property is abandoned when the owner deliberately leaves it somewhere with the intent to completely give up ownership. This means that, as a general rule, it belongs to nobody, and can be claimed by the first person to find and take possession of it. Many states have made some significant modifications to the rule. For example, in many states, under the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, previous owners may reclaim abandoned property within a certain period of time after abandonment. During this time period, the abandoned property essentially belongs to the state. While the person who finds the property may have the first right to it after the time period expires, and has a superior right of possession against everyone except the original owner, the original owner has a right to reclaim it any time before then. - See more at: http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/abandoned-personal-property.html#sthash.hQpjln5r.dpuf

When a range owner picks up and cleans the lost balls they have "found" the property.  Only the original owner has any rights to the property after it's abandoned and found.  Therefore if you find your golf ball in the bucket, you can claim ownership, otherwise it's theft.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If nothing else, please just don't take what two random people say on a forum.  They do not automatically know everything because they say so. It it is in your best interest to actual research a topic yourself.

In general I agree with that. But it's a question of degrees and prioritizing your life. I'm not going by get good value for my time if I choose to read the link, look for case law that counters it and prepare for the cycle of rebuttals and appeals. If you're right, you're right! It still wouldn't feel right to me, it's just not mine, regardless of its legal ambiguity. Still think you're likely wrong, but again, still haven't read the link.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
In general I agree with that. But it's a question of degrees and prioritizing your life. I'm not going by get good value for my time if I choose to read the link, look for case law that counters it and prepare for the cycle of rebuttals and appeals. If you're right, you're right! It still wouldn't feel right to me, it's just not mine, regardless of its legal ambiguity. Still think you're likely wrong, but again, still haven't read the link.

Twitter is right up your alley. ;)

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Read the other legal precedent I posted.   You know, where the judge says the course owner is not the proper owner of the abandoned ball...

The facts are not the same: 1 - that is in Canada. Holds no weight in the US 2 - the circumstances are different. We are taking about taking a ball out of a range basket... They were taking balls from a pond, which the course had not yet retrieved. Still... you have not proven anything


Posted

The facts are not the same:

1 - that is in Canada. Holds no weight in the US

2 - the circumstances are different. We are taking about taking a ball out of a range basket... They were taking balls from a pond, which the course had not retrieved the balls from.

Still, you have not proven anything

Who said it had to be in the US??  Only their laws apply to the rest of the world?

Not really any different at all.  The course owner never saw or touched either ball.  And has no claim to the ownership of said ball.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
I guess you could argue that the difference between a golf course and a range would be that the golf course NEVER purchases golf balls and scatters them on the course, so if there is a ball there, you know with 100% certainty that it was abandoned by someone else. With the range, there is always the potential (however unlikely) that the owner did "sprinkle" some ProV1's in there...so when you take it, you can't know [U]for sure[/U] it wasn't owned. Here's a fun wrinkle: there is a (crappy) range I go to that uses ONLY abandoned balls.  Not a single one is marked in any way.  If I lived in Canada, apparently I could just walk out with them by the bucketload.

Nah, that's all irrelevant, I believe. I think the difference is the range has gathered and processed the balls and redistributed them commercially. They are not just sitting at the bottom of a pond or deep in the woods waiting to be stumbled on. And even all that is probably irrelevant as you have yet to demonstrate that the balls are not in fact the property of the range in the first place.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Who said it had to be in the US??  Only their laws apply to the rest of the world? Not really any different at all.  The course owner never saw or touched either ball.  And has no claim to the ownership of said ball.

I said find the definition in any "state". Canada does not have any states... You do know that, right? And no, that facts are not the same. And, you're still missing some other key statutes which would be applicable (which REFREAK even pointed out for you). No matter how much you try to skirt the facts, change the argument, etc.... You are just wrong. And you can't prove it otherwise.


  • Administrator
Posted
@pumaAttack , multi quote AND read the posts before responding. Just like the other thread. Please stop this pattern of just repeating the same things over and over and ignoring the content of the responses. Lawyers have spoken, so if you haven't seen the posts it's because you're not reading them.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@pumaAttack, multi quote AND read the posts before responding. Just like the other thread. Please stop this pattern of just repeating the same things over and over and ignoring the content of the responses.

Lawyers have spoken, so if you haven't seen the posts it's because you're not reading them.

@iacas

Did you even read my posts?    I have posted legal precedents that proof my case and respond directly to questions asked to me.   What is the problem with that?

Lawyers have spoken?  Just because somebody claims to be a lawyer that does not mean I have to take everything they say as the 100% truth.

I am honestly confused as to how you think a message board works...  Do you just want people to agree with the first opinion and close a thread?

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted

I said find the definition in any "state". Canada does not have any states... You do know that, right?

And no, that facts are not the same. And, you're still missing some other key statutes which would be applicable (which REFREAK even pointed out for you).

No matter how much you try to skirt the facts, change the argument, etc.... You are just wrong. And you can't prove it otherwise.

Canada doesn't have states?  Wow, ground breaking revelation for me.

You are wrong and I have the legal precedent to back it up.  You still have shown me nothing at all.  You just keep saying the same thing over and over with no actual content to your posts.    If you had any proof you should have posted it by now, instead of your cryptic messages...

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


  • Administrator
Posted
Their word carries more weight than yours on legal topics. I've read everything you've said here. You cited one thing so far. You've ignored many things. I'm not getting into a debate on this with you. Same old stuff. Repeating the same thing over and over is not discussion. It has nothing to do with agreement. I asked you to multi quote after a moderator did and you still didn't. Edit: Looks like a mod restricted you while I was responding. Okay then.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.