Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3763 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Despite using spins balls I rarely get spin on my clean shots from 70-to 140 yards? I pick them clean or take divots both have similar results being stop and drop but no real backspin why is this could it be i'm just not taking hitting the ball down enough or just to cleanly?


Posted

You have a lot of backspin, but not enough to back up the ball. The greens probably aren't soft enough. You probably don't have high enough swing speed. I can't back up the ball either with similar distances. You can open the face on your lob wedge a bit more and do it.

See if I used a sand wedge for a 115 yd shot I could probably back up the ball. But I use a pitching wedge for that shot, and I bet you do too. Still if the green is sufficiently sloped toward the tee, I can back up the ball, and it's not always a good thing.

I used to be able to get sufficient backspin to back up a ball in the early 1970s with the balata balls.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Soft public greens are hard to spin balls back on because the ball leaves a huge crater and loses energy. I spin the ball back but only at private clubs with fast greens and when our public courses bake to crispy dry in the dead of summer.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
To have the ball back on short iron shots, while already using a soft urethane ball, will require a HIGH trajectory. That way, your angle of decent will we steep and any spin on the ball will be used to spin her back not just used to get it to stop.

  • Moderator
Posted

In my opinion, backing a ball up is showy, but not all that useful.  If you can make the ball stop pretty close to where it lands, you're doing just fine.

  • Upvote 3

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Despite using spins balls I rarely get spin on my clean shots from 70-to 140 yards? I pick them clean or take divots both have similar results being stop and drop but no real backspin why is this could it be i'm just not taking hitting the ball down enough or just to cleanly?

Try getting on a launch monitor to measure your descent angle and your spin rate for wedges. You'll need somewhere around 10,000 RPMs to back the ball up and the steeper the descent angle the better. The quality of your strike, the sharpness of your grooves, and the spinny nature of the ball cover (urethane is spinniest) will all have a big impact on how much you spin the ball. Whether the ball backs up will further have to do with the receptiveness of the greens and your descent angle. I tend to have the ball back up about 6 inches with my SW, which I'm very happy with. I've had it spin off the front of the green when I've tried to go after it hard, and that's no fun either. Drop and stop is all you need unless you're a plus handicap and can consistently get the ball behind the pin to pull it back when called for. If I have to decided between a very hard SW or a softer GW from a clean lie, I'll go GW just to limit the spin.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Despite using spins balls I rarely get spin on my clean shots from 70-to 140 yards? I pick them clean or take divots both have similar results being stop and drop but no real backspin why is this could it be i'm just not taking hitting the ball down enough or just to cleanly?

Did you try opening the face up? That might give you more spin and loft, but shorter distances. 4 degrees is about 10 yards at this distance. Even though I'm not at the point where I can use this skill yet, but if I open the face I can get a lot more spin and loft on the flight.

In my opinion, backing a ball up is showy, but not all that useful.  If you can make the ball stop pretty close to where it lands, you're doing just fine.

Agree.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
In my opinion, backing a ball up is showy, but not all that useful.  If you can make the ball stop pretty close to where it lands, you're doing just fine.

feel the same way. More often than not I have seen the backspin pull ball way out of range. Reminds me of billiards, when someone learns to draw a ball backwards they become obsessed with it and do it more than they need too only because they can

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A more useful shot is the high lob shot I hit Sunday from the tall cabbage up onto the green that died and rolled slowly toward the hole and stopped about 3' past it.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In my opinion, backing a ball up is showy, but not all that useful.  If you can make the ball stop pretty close to where it lands, you're doing just fine.

+1  Drop and stop is exactly what you want on approach shots.  Not shooting and rolling off the back, not over-spinning and zipping back off the front.  Why choose to add another source of variation in distance control?  If you can hit the ball to carry the right yardage and your stock spin means the approach is going to end up almost exactly where it carries to, that seems perfect, not something you need to improve.

  • Upvote 1

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Soft public greens are hard to spin balls back on because the ball leaves a huge crater and loses energy. I spin the ball back but only at private clubs with fast greens and when our public courses bake to crispy dry in the dead of summer.

maybe thats it I hit my sw 95 yards.


Posted

+1  Drop and stop is exactly what you want on approach shots.  Not shooting and rolling off the back, not over-spinning and zipping back off the front.  Why choose to add another source of variation in distance control?  If you can hit the ball to carry the right yardage and your stock spin means the approach is going to end up almost exactly where it carries to, that seems perfect, not something you need to improve.

+1 (or is it +2?)


Note: This thread is 3763 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.