Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3666 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, craps said:

I admire Raymond Floyd  the most cos' his back swing is so wrong and yet he is so right at the top of the swing.

Which goes to show how relatively unimportant the first part of the backswing often is…

Let me put it this way, too: as a 24 handicap, I would imagine there are a lot of other more important priorities you could attack.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And as an 8hcp....I'm letting this go.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 11/21/2015, 4:18:15, craps said:

 

What I am preaching here is using a neutral grip and then as one moves the club to waist high, incorporate a slight inward rotation of hands towards left. 

This has worked for me WHEN an actual correction is not.  My miss is a push, but it's almost always caused by a lack of upper body rotation. I am good at disassociation so the lower body tends to turn through, but my miss is the upper body stalling. The rotating the arms left is a bandaid, for me, usually no more than a few swings. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 11/21/2015, 1:53:15, iacas said:

Which goes to show how relatively unimportant the first part of the backswing often is…

Let me put it this way, too: as a 24 handicap, I would imagine there are a lot of other more important priorities you could attack.

Did you ever play the word game where you say a word over and over until it sounds wrong? Something unconscious becomes hyper aware and now it seems weird.

That's what I fear about analyzing tiny fragments of the swing.

 

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Posted

Great topic here! I agree with the idea that the first few inches may not necessarily make or break the perfect swing. However, for myself... what starts in the firsy few inches sometime continues throughout my swing. I spent a few hours at the range today working on getting a good impact with my driver (using Dr. Scholls to spray the face). I was working on trying not to straighten the right elbow too soon (before impact). What really seems to help is, starting the takeaway with the LEFT side (arms/wrists/shoulder). This helps to relax the right side (I try to think of the right arm as a backseat passenger). As I reach the top, start the downswing with hips/weight forward) while almost keeping the right elbow stuck to my side as the swing progresses to impact.... engaging with hips and the LEFT side... everything else with arms/clubface is a naturally reaction to the above. Now, I am only a student here learning how to play and all this could be completely wrong. But the result was about 90% on or near the sweetspot at impact. Hope this helps.

Dave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, gregsandiego said:

Did you ever play the word game where you say a word over and over until it sounds wrong? Something unconscious becomes hyper aware and now it seems weird.

That's what I fear about analyzing tiny fragments of the swing.

 

Great thought here.  Very true as simple "feels" can change over time. 

Dave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3666 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.