Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3601 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
4 hours ago, dkolo said:

For the high handicappers these are putatively aimed at, the low lofts are visually imposing and I do think the low spin will be an issue when they do struggle to get the long irons in the air, even though these seek to specifically help that. But I feel the same as I would my 5i, which is that it's the limit of what I can handle in an iron. Even if the balancing of CG and loft works out on paper, in the hands of a higher handicapper, less loft isn't visually reassuring. And I can imagine it can create gapping issues as well.

I think we'll have to wait and see how they look before we can say that. Going from past irons in this category I would have to disagree that they are visually intimidating, it's the opposite in fact. Let's say I gave you two 5-irons, a TaylorMade TP MB 5 iron and a M2 5. Going by how much "confidence" they inspired at address, which one do you think would give you the best chance at getting the ball high in the air with solid contact? Good chance it would be the M2, even thought it's 5.5° stronger than the MB.

I use a GMAX 4-iron to replace my 3-iron and it looks super easy to hit. Like the MB vs the M2, the blade length is longer, top line is meaty and there's a decent amount of offset. 

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, SavvySwede said:

The pros actually have the same peak height throughout the entire bag.

I know. I was just saying that 145 feet for any club seems too high to me. I mean, this is the link to the apex height for the PGA Tour last year: http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.02407.2015.html . That stat is apparently on tee shots, so it might not be as accurate as possible. 145 feet is higher than the average apex height of the PGA Tour off the tee!

I get that this clubs are probably not aimed at people like you and me that don't have trouble hitting it high. But that seems extreme.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I know. I was just saying that 145 feet for any club seems too high to me. I mean, this is the link to the apex height for the PGA Tour last year: http://www.pgatour.com/stats/stat.02407.2015.html . That stat is apparently on tee shots, so it might not be as accurate as possible. 145 feet is higher than the average apex height of the PGA Tour off the tee!

I get that this clubs are probably not aimed at people like you and me that don't have trouble hitting it high. But that seems extreme.

I think it depends on your swing speed, some people gain distance with more height.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

I think it depends on your swing speed, some people gain distance with more height.

I'm sure I'd gain distance with these clubs, too. But the trade offs might not be worth it. I might be talking out of my ass here, but I think the biggest difference between a SGI or GI club and a players iron is that the GI clubs give you a lot more help getting in the air. Help you might not need if your peak height is 145 feet with the M2.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
23 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I'm sure I'd gain distance with these clubs, too. But the trade offs might not be worth it. I might be talking out of my ass here, but I think the biggest difference between a SGI or GI club and a players iron is that the GI clubs give you a lot more help getting in the air. Help you might not need if your peak height is 145 feet with the M2.

@SavvySwede is also carrying that 5i 215. The peak height itself isn't an issue since he's not ballooning it. Like I said earlier, the problem may be if it is hard to launch the M2s lower when you need to.

More height on long irons is a good thing. Easier to hold greens with them.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
34 minutes ago, billchao said:

@SavvySwede is also carrying that 5i 215. The peak height itself isn't an issue since he's not ballooning it. Like I said earlier, the problem may be if it is hard to launch the M2s lower when you need to.

More height on long irons is a good thing. Easier to hold greens with them.

Yeah, that's the point that I'm trying to make, less artfully than you did.

I'm also guessing that @SavvySwede doesn't have much trouble getting long irons to hold greens with his current iron set. I'm saying that it might not be the optimal ball fight for your peak height to be 145 feet. Not that the clubs are bad, just that they might not be aimed at people who already get a lot of height on their irons. At a certain point, consistency and control matter more than peak height. I'm wondering if 145 feet is past that point. That's all.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
16 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I'm also guessing that @SavvySwede doesn't have much trouble getting long irons to hold greens with his current iron set. I'm saying that it might not be the optimal ball fight for your peak height to be 145 feet.

Everyone can use a little help with the long irons, even pros. Plenty of them bag GI 3i and 4i, or hybrids, despite the rest of their set being MB.

But if it affects control and dispersion, I don't know. I asked @SavvySwede in the PGA Show thread.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
41 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

Yeah, that's the point that I'm trying to make, less artfully than you did.

I'm also guessing that @SavvySwede doesn't have much trouble getting long irons to hold greens with his current iron set. I'm saying that it might not be the optimal ball fight for your peak height to be 145 feet. Not that the clubs are bad, just that they might not be aimed at people who already get a lot of height on their irons. At a certain point, consistency and control matter more than peak height. I'm wondering if 145 feet is past that point. That's all.

Works for Jason Day;-) The range was facing into the wind but the high trajectory didn't hurt too much. I could see some issues hitting under trees and such though.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I got the M1 Driver in November. I was ready for an upgrade and wanted to go with latest/greatest. In terms of adjustablity the reality is that I don't mess with the levers (since deciding on initial settings). Makes me wonder if the M2 would have been a better (and cheaper) choice. Perhaps I will take advantage of the levers in the future though.

I am looking at upgrading my irons as well this Spring. Will have to look at the M2s..

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3601 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.