Jump to content
IGNORED

MB's Centripetal Force Thread


Note: This thread is 1835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, iacas said:

Clue: spinning or "clearing" their hips is not an answer.

If you already know the answer and think it's different then explain yourself sir?

It's not a shift into a braced left leg.

It's a Little bit of clearing the hips and driving into a sublty bent left leg with knee flex well for me everyone is built different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I would actually say that he's going on the offensive against misinformation. He is not being defensive, and he argued his points quite well. You the proceeded to ignore his points and tell him he had

In no particular order… Behind with what? A good number of the best players in the world are awfully close to 50/50 weight distribution at the top of their backswing (change of club direct

Dude, it is just barely English. I mean the words are all English, but the way you string them together and then randomly sprinkle with odds and ends of punctuation makes it pretty hard to sift throug

Posted Images

  • Administrator

That doesn't answer the question.

How does a golfer specifically use centripetal force in the downswing?

You realize centripetal force is a force pulling inward, toward the center of rotation. So how does a golfer pull the handle inward in their downswing? At what stage? How does it help them?

And then, what do the hips have to do with it? They're not at the center of rotation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, iacas said:

That doesn't answer the question.

How does a golfer specifically use centripetal force in the downswing?

You realize centripetal force is a force pulling inward, toward the center of rotation. So how does a golfer pull the handle inward in their downswing? At what stage? How does it help them?

And then, what do the hips have to do with it? They're not at the center of rotation.

You know he won't answer :P

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, freshmanUTA said:

You know he won't answer :P

It's not that he won't, it's that he can't. He just acts as a conduit for all the BS he reads on the internet or in golf magazines with out any ability to actually understand what he's absorbing. 

He lacks all the base knowledge to understand any of what he's talking about. He tries to make up for it by making these bad analogies to baseball or divert attention by claiming people are attacking him. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, iacas said:

That doesn't answer the question.

How does a golfer specifically use centripetal force in the downswing?

You realize centripetal force is a force pulling inward, toward the center of rotation. So how does a golfer pull the handle inward in their downswing? At what stage? How does it help them?

And then, what do the hips have to do with it? They're not at the center of rotation.

You win I lose okay I'm done here you and few others are just making me look like an fool while at the same time making yourself look bad as well. I don't no I'm wrong here so.. You tell me the answer please because I don't know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I've already given the answer.

Golfers don't really "use" centripetal force in the downswing… It's a resultant force - the golfer has an arm that is attached to the club (via their hands) and their body.

Swing a rock tied to a string over your head. The string isn't really actively doing anything except holding onto the rock and, ideally, not breaking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

46 minutes ago, Mike Boatright said:

You win I lose okay I'm done here you and few others are just making me look like an fool while at the same time making yourself look bad as well. I don't no I'm wrong here so.. You tell me the answer please because I don't know.

What? You were just starting to convince me. Don't quit now champ! :beer:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Golfers don't really "use" centripetal force in the downswing… It's a resultant force - the golfer has an arm that is attached to the club (via their hands) and their body.

As an extension of this, the only thing that a centripetal force may do is increase or decrease the radius of the circle that the club swings on (by either decreasing or increasing in magnitude, respectively). This will not change the angular velocity of the golf swing in the slightest, though extension could very slightly increase the linear velocity of the clubhead - until the clubhead hit the ground because the radius was too long.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Mike Boatright said:

 I don't no I'm wrong here so.. You tell me the answer please because I don't know.

That wasn't so hard, was it Mike?  Nobody expects you to know what Erik knows. And nobody will hold it against you either.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, 14ledo81 said:

That wasn't so hard, was it Mike?  Nobody expects you to know what Erik knows. And nobody will hold it against you either.

He wasn't really asking.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, iacas said:

He wasn't really asking.

Yeah.  I assumed it was to good to be true...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Golfers don't really "use" centripetal force in the downswing… It's a resultant force - the golfer has an arm that is attached to the club (via their hands) and their body.

Swing a rock tied to a string over your head. The string isn't really actively doing anything except holding onto the rock and, ideally, not breaking.

Doesn't the 'trail elbow move' involve some pulling and maintaining force (resisting trail arm extension) towards the center of rotation during the mid downswing (before it starts extending around delivery)?

The rock & string metaphor is a good one for the action of the left arm in most swings, but can't some swing styles that feature a more bent lead elbow through impact involve some pulling of the arms / shaft toward the center of rotation through delivery / impact? Because the trail elbow is bend throughout most of the downswing, the rock & string is less applicable to both arms for the 'typical swing' isn't it?

Edited by natureboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

As an extension of this, the only thing that a centripetal force may do is increase or decrease the radius of the circle that the club swings on (by either decreasing or increasing in magnitude, respectively). This will not change the angular velocity of the golf swing in the slightest, though extension could very slightly increase the linear velocity of the clubhead - until the clubhead hit the ground because the radius was too long.

That's true for a simplified model, but the force generator is human muscle with changing leverage and ability to generate force at different times in the swing. If you decrease the moment arm by shortening the 'string' couldn't a little inward pulling make it easier to maintain some extra torque on the clubshaft at a point when leverage is decreasing due to increasing clubhead radial velocity? I'm thinking more limiting clubhead speed loss here rather than a gain.

Edited by natureboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, iacas said:

@natureboy, as this thread is largely a derailed train, your efforts are best saved for another time. And if you're not careful @Mike Boatright will think you're backing him up.

I haven't really been following the whole thread. Yes the OP is all over the place with his comments and thoughts, and his style of post is difficult to read, so I usually ignore them.

But my thinking is why not make the effort to be precise in the explanations so any other readers get more info / nuances even if the OP doesn't?

Edited by natureboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, natureboy said:

But my thinking is why not make the effort to be precise in the explanations so any other readers get more info / nuances even if the OP doesn't?

Because I'd never want to refer anyone to THIS thread for a few posts in the middle somewhere.

Start a new topic (and don't refer to this one) if you want. But consider too that I might not answer there either - this is likely something that's fine for an instructor with a scientific background to know, but not students, really.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasfeb21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Actually I do ( did ). I write right handed but throw, bat and golf left handed. I bowl left handed, played tennis right handed, Ping Ping..either hand is fine. When I try a new task or tool...I often have to consciously decide which hand feels better to use.   I think you mean anatomy? If the human body is capable of performing an action, there’s nothing opposite or foreign about it. It may be more difficult than another task, but not foreign or opposite.   The hands are the only part of the body directly connected to the club. We can manipulate the face of the club with our hands independently of the rest of the body. I can stand still and hit hooks or slices while keeping my torso practically still.
    • Juli was banned for being an imposter. He was a formerly banned troll who kept signing in with new usernames and from different IP addresses.
    • Juli,    Our dominant hands perform millions of everyday task for us that are in our subconscious mind. We never give them a thought. However, the golf swing is NOT in our subconscious mind . It is a learned conscious task that is totally foreign and opposite to human genetics. If it was NATURAL NBA and NFL and other great PRO athletes would be leading the PGA tour .    Our shoulders ( upper arms ) are the most flexible joints in our body . This enables our dominant HANDS to bring food to our mouths so we could survive as humans and they will ALWAYS roll over, turn down unless we force them / teach them to perform otherwise . The DS only takes 2/10 seconds . Whatever key you choose to use must be  preprogrammed / prepared before you ever pull the shaft back . The human brain can only sort out and perform ONE ( 1 ) task in that short amount of time . So - what is that one thought to be ? Well - their is a direct connection between the brain and it’s dominant hand . The right in your case . It is responsible for dropping the entire lever system down back around behind our torso and to stay right palm upward during the entire DS . If we don’t we definitely know what is going to happen and you can see it on any range in the world . It is the turning of the torso ( inner circle ) that squares the face, not the hands ! Yes - I know this sounds radical and some will say so , but check out * Cortical Homunculus * and see where I am coming from.  thanks for your reply . Good luck
    • I get where you are going with this.  The only thing I can think of that would really constitute a "Mental Mistake" is there have been times where I'm forced to used a cart and it's cart path only. I assume I have the correct club and then by time I walk across to my ball (Not sure why I never hit it near the cart-path.) I realize I don't have the "right" club. So, 9 times out of 10 I use the club I have rather then hike back for another one.  Sometimes it works out, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't I always think "Damned, I'm an idiot."  Pretty much the rest of the time my mistakes come from this list. Hit it off the hosel. Hit it off the toe. Hit it off the heel. Hit it off the bottom. Hit it off the top of the club, or roof of the driver. Shanked it. Thinned it. Or some other unexpected weirdo swing fault that happens.  I would bet "mental" mistakes, on average, probably make up about 1 shot a round for me... maybe less. I played yesterday. Shot an 84.... 12 over par. I don't think any of those 12 were due to "mental" mistakes. I would say that all 12 shots came from "didn't hit it good enough" mistakes.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 14ledo81
      14ledo81
      (40 years old)
    2. AussieDan
      AussieDan
      (35 years old)
    3. boggssharp
      boggssharp
      (67 years old)
    4. davisrod29
      davisrod29
      (33 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...