Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. How well do you understand the golf swing?

    • 1 - Not a whit!
      4
    • 2 - Club hit ball. Right?
      27
    • 3 - I slice and pull a lot. I think that means I come over the top.
      85
    • 4 - I can work the ball if I want to.
      42
    • 5 - I still check in with the pro to see what I should work on.
      68
    • 6 - I know what I have to work on myself, and then I do it.
      114
    • 7 - I can fix just about any problem I see.
      24
    • 8 - Everyone asks me for advice.
      6
    • 9 - One step below Leadbetter
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, I picked #6 and I'm around a 12 right now. I actually have a pretty good understanding of the swing but still like to have a pro help me correct my problems (at least sometimes). I can also usually see faults in other swings but never say anything, and if I'm asked I might pick one main thing for them to be aware of. More often than not I don't even watch others swings for fear that it'll mess me up...don't even get me started on left handers .

Chris

What's in the bag?
Taylormade R7 Superquad
TaylorMade Burner 3W & 5W
Hogan Edge Hybrid 21*
Mizuno MX20 4-PWCleveland 588 GW & CG10 SWOdyssey 2-Ball Center ShaftTitleist NXT Tour

  • 5 months later...
  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Good question - there is a quite a gap between #6 and #7 in my case. I can usually figure out what I need to do/not do, but generally don't know where to start in offering suggestions to others.

Cleveland Ti460 10.5*  |  Cleveland 17* Steel  |  Mizuno MP60  |  Nicklaus JN nickel plated - 52.10, 56.12, 60.09  |  Ping Anser 4
Play it like you found it.
 


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Well I picked 5 but it could be somewhere between that and 7. I've only been playing for about 6 years. The first two years I didn't really try to improve just played. After that I started reading books. I've been through a ton of golf books and enjoy reading different ideas. I think I have a pretty good understanding of the swing and can usually pick out what I'm or others are doing wrong. Without video though its hard for me to see if I'm actually doing what my mind is saying I'm doing. Sometimes what you think you are doing may not be what is actually happening so I usually try to see a pro and get some feedback.

Yesterday I got through most of a new book. The 7 laws of the golf swing by Nick Bradley. Its actually an excellent book with great visual images. Can't wait to finish it and put some of it to work.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
It's hard for me make a decision in the pole because a lot of those choices apply to me. I would say I have a pretty good idea of whats going on in the golf swing, and work on a lot of things myself. However I do take lessons, and people ask me for advice. I wouldn't say I can fix any problem I see in my own swing, but for a higher handicapper I can generally point them in the right direction.
Also, many people feel differently about the golf swing. For example, if you showed my pro Tiger's swing, he would say that Tiger has some work to do. And my pro is a well known teacher in my area, has caddied on the PGA tour, and qualified for the U.S. Open. My point is, that no matter how well people think they know the golf swing, almost certainly other people will have different thoughts/approaches.
As for the pole I chose (7) and my handicap is 5.2
Northeastern University Golf Team


In Play:
Driver - Titleist 905R 9.5*/Aldila NV 75sFairway Wood - Titleist 904f 14.5*Dynamic Gold S300Hybrid - Cleveland Halo 2Iron(19*)Irons - Titleist 735cm(stainless)/Dynamic Gold S300 (Bent +0.5 degrees upright, +1.0 degrees strong) Wedges - Callaway...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
I'm not sure what they're failing to grasp here -

There not trying to get it, they want to swing as hard as they can and hit the ball a long way. the ball does go far but they have no idea where.
I play nine holes Sunday with two young guys and a wife ( in mid 20s) they hit the ball all over long, usually without a shot to the green. I shot a six over 42 and missed one fairway about 8 feet and that was because of the wind.
they were in the high 50s.

R7 9.5 S Shaft
560 R7 quad R shaft
RAC LT irons
Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum


  • 1 month later...
Posted
I would say that I know a lot about the golf swing simply because I have read way to many books. Heh. I can pretty much tell what people are doing wrong, but I feel unconfortable giving people advice, because, I'm only 14.

Posted
To me that is a tough question to answer b/c there is no real "Perfect" swing. Everyone's is different and obviously they work well...from Furyk's odd backswing to tigers hard swing to jacks all wrists putting method. I mean the swing can be a completely different thing for everyone so i dont know if you can really KNOW a ton about a swing other than you own.
What's In The Bag?

Driver - Rapture 10.5 Epic 68g X-Pure - Balance Certified
Fairway Metal - Titleist PT 18°
Irons - Mizuno MP-67 3-PW Project X 6.0 Wedges - Mizunos R Series Chrome 52°, 56°, 58° Project X 6.0 Putter - Yes! C-Groove Callie-f - Balance Certified Bag - Ping Freestyle...

Posted

I feel most experienced golfers can look at another golfer and identify faults. The problem is when you consider fixes there often unintended consequences. Especially when you consider individual differences, age, build, personality, the ability to find the right fix and communicate it so that another person can make us of it is very difficult. I need a feel, others need a visual cue, or a trigger. Thats why PGA teaching pros get paid.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
I feel most experienced golfers can look at another golfer and identify faults. The problem is when you consider fixes there often unintended consequences. Especially when you consider individual differences, age, build, personality, the ability to find the right fix and communicate it so that another person can make us of it is very difficult. I need a feel, others need a visual cue, or a trigger. Thats why PGA teaching pros get paid.

Very, very good point. What may be working for me won't necessarily work for you. Keep in mind that what I'm doing may be a ugly patch for a bigger problem I'm having.

There are some general principles that fit all of us though like proper swing plane and such.

Jeff

10.5° Callaway FT-iZ Tour

18°, 20°, 23° Adams Idea Pro Prototype Hybrid

4-9 Titleist 690.CB
48° Titleist Vokey Tour Nickel
54°, 58° Titleist Vokey Tour Oil Can

Scotty Cameron NP2, 33"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
I don't think options 5 and 6 are mutually exclusive. I can fix my swing, but I still like to have a pro look at it once in awhile to make sure I haven't picked up a new bad habit that I'm unaware of. I can also generally get my friends on track (but only if they ask).

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
i put 4...the only book i've read is tiger woods' how i play golf. i used that for my basics but havent looked at it since, i do suscribe to golf digest (for a couple months) but i have yet to find a tip thats worked. one thing i do know is that slowing down my swing does not work.

In My Bag:
9.5 degree Mizuno MX-500
15 degree Titliest 904F
Mizuno MP-32 3-PW
Cleveland CG10 Black Pearl 52 degree
Vokey Spin-Milled 56.14
Ping i5 Anser


Posted
I think when they say slow your swing they mean to slow the back swing and swing the club with speed on the down swing.

R7 9.5 S Shaft
560 R7 quad R shaft
RAC LT irons
Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum


  • Moderator
Posted
I think when they say slow your swing they mean to slow the back swing and swing the club with speed on the down swing.

I'd elaborate on that to say that slowing the backswing is a good general tip,

but in particular slow down the transition at the top. A lot of people try to yank it down from the top, which throws everything off. If I don't pause or at least smoothly transition from back to forward swing, I'm going to be off plane and lucky to find any mown area on the course. Don't be in a hurry to get to the ball. Then, you should feel like the club hits maximum speed just in front of the ball (as in after you've hit it), about 7 o'clock as seen from behind the golfer.

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I feel most experienced golfers can look at another golfer and identify faults. The problem is when you consider fixes there often unintended consequences. Especially when you consider individual differences, age, build, personality, the ability to find the right fix and communicate it so that another person can make us of it is very difficult. I need a feel, others need a visual cue, or a trigger. Thats why PGA teaching pros get paid.

Indeed. On a similar note, I'll share a little annecdote about how dangerous giving out swing advice can actually be. A friend of the family, a very very good golfer with a solid understanding of his swing was a constant victim of the "one-size fits all" mentality. The result was tragic for my father's game as he would aggressively give innaplicable advice (to a guy who was hitting the ball well too). You see, he had developed a convicted attitude that Hogan really did have all the keys to the game. If you've read The Five Fundamenals you know Hogan suffered a bit from the holy grail syndrom when it came to swing fundamentals. He studied Hogan's swing maticulously. Makes sense right--he figured, "hey, Hogan's built just like me, that the swing I should be making." You see he was all of 5'6" 140. On the other hand, my father is 6'4" 220! He also didn't realize, apparently, that other pros with small builds could have been studied e.g. Tom Watson (one plane v. two plane swings). The moral of the story is you have to be careful when giving out advice no matter how well you understand the golf swing. Should Chi Chi Rodgriguez or Lee Travino or Jim Furyk listen to you if numbly try to correct their apparently horrendous swing habits based on your concept of the correct swing? No. They'd probably just ignore you and continue smoking you from tee to green.

In the bag:

Orlimar HipSteel 8.5 Driver
Orlimar Tri Metal 3 Wood 15*
Titliest 775 CB Irons Ping Anser 2


  • 1 month later...
Posted
i voted 6 as i generally know when/why im doing something wrong as i know my swing pretty well. besides, most of my troubles come from trying to rip the ball on the backswing...DOH! :lol:

can spot minor faults on others swings too.

titleist 983E 8.5* Graffalloy Prolite stiff
Taylormade rescue mid tp 16* fuji vista pro stiff
hogan apex tour 2/3-E hogan '4' shafts
588 rtg wedges in 51, 56 and 60 degrees
yes c groove emma putterpro v1x


  • 10 months later...
Posted
Being honest with myself, I rated myself a 4. I've been playing about 3+ years now...how much can I really know? I like to think I'm constantly learning and constantly getting better though.

Nice thread.

Posted
I am at 22.3 right now and I would say my knowledge of the golf swing would be 5.5

What's in the Bag

Driver: HiBore 10.5* ProLaunch Blue 65s
Hybrid: No Fear 3i
Irons: Launcher LP 4-PW Harmonized 50* GWAmerican Standard 56* SWStriker by Golf Trends 60* LobPutter: Pro Response bladeBall: Tour Fire


Note: This thread is 6389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.