Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2227 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, cutchemist42 said:

I have some old Ben Hogan Persimmons acting as nice looking wall items also from my grandpa's old set. They look nice but I was afraid of hitting them because of what was mentioned above about urethane covers.

If they have sentimental value it's best to leave them on the wall, but if your swing speed is under 100 mph and they are in good shape then there shouldn't be an issue. 

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

At what point does a club become vintage? One day those nice shiny Miura MB 101's will be vintage.

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, snapfade said:

At what point does a club become vintage? One day those nice shiny Miura MB 101's will be vintage.

To me there are 4 distinct equipment eras in golf. Pre 1900 gutta percha clubs (generally no face features). Pre 1935 hickory clubs (grooves are prominent and a defining feature on irons). Pre CB or what I'd call modern vintage (blade irons, steel shafts, persimmion heads on woods remain). And then the modern era (perimeter weighting, metal woods etc.). You could make a case for a pre large headed driver section to split the modern era, but I don't think that the changes being made are of the same magnitude of the other pivot points

As far as those miuras...who knows. I don't see any time soon where a tech shift would come that would be big enough to take the modern era and make it obsolete, therein turn making today's equipment the new modern vintage.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2020 at 1:17 AM, topoftheline89 said:

             The small headed metal  woods from the mid 80's was the key to your statement. I have 80's metal Macgregor clubs and I easily drive 15-20 yards longer then with my persimmons. I would argue that if you played with persimons you would see where the other 7 shots comes from.

 

I just watched a Mark Crossfield video, with him testing a modern driver and ball vs a persimmon driver and VERY old ball(Dunlop 65 one of the small ones) which was pretty worn and beat up. 
 

the difference between the drivers with a current ball was about 40 yards iirc, and the old ball was almost  60. So all in nearly a hundred yards. That’s a big difference. 
Jack Nicklaus drove the 18th at St Andrews with a persimmon driver but I think he was on the a better ball than the old 65’s. 
 

So you may be right

Edited by Beastie
Addition
  • Like 1

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Beastie said:

I just watched a Mark Crossfield video, with him testing a modern driver and ball vs a persimmon driver and VERY old ball(Dunlop 65 one of the small ones) which was pretty worn and beat up. 
 

the difference between the drivers with a current ball was about 40 yards iirc, and the old ball was almost  60. So all in nearly a hundred yards. That’s a big difference. 
Jack Nicklaus drove the 18th at St Andrews with a persimmon driver but I think he was on the a better ball than the old 65’s. 
 

So you may be right

 

Jack used the same 3 wood for 30 plus years. 

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
11 hours ago, Beastie said:

the difference between the drivers with a current ball was about 40 yards iirc, and the old ball was almost  60. So all in nearly a hundred yards. That’s a big difference. 
Jack Nicklaus drove the 18th at St Andrews with a persimmon driver but I think he was on the a better ball than the old 65’s.

Ummmmmm…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, Beastie said:

I just watched a Mark Crossfield video, with him testing a modern driver and ball vs a persimmon driver and VERY old ball(Dunlop 65 one of the small ones) which was pretty worn and beat up. 
 

Hey brother, I watched the same video. That ball was NOT worn OR beat up. As a matter of fact, Mark took the wrapper off of it. 

The ball WAS, however, very old. Roughly, 35 to 40 years old. It probably lost at least some of its elasticity in that time. I very much remember those Dunlop 65's back in the 80's. There is no way they could have been as "dead" as the one Mark was using, even if he did just unwrap it. 

There's also a theory, and I'm not sure I subscribe to this. That you had to swing "differently" to get the most out of that older style equipment. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

Ummmmmm…

That was what was claimed, I don’t remember the first metal woods adding more than 10 yards, but I was about 14 and about a 12hcp so I was hitting it better and further every month or so at that time. One thing I noticed in the video was the driver shaft in the persimmon was noticeably shorter than the modern driver ie about 2-3 inches, that’s a fair difference in swing speed. 

2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Hey brother, I watched the same video. That ball was NOT worn OR beat up. As a matter of fact, Mark took the wrapper off of it. 

The ball WAS, however, very old. Roughly, 35 to 40 years old. It probably lost at least some of its elasticity in that time. I very much remember those Dunlop 65's back in the 80's. There is no way they could have been as "dead" as the one Mark was using, even if he did just unwrap it. 

There's also a theory, and I'm not sure I subscribe to this. That you had to swing "differently" to get the most out of that older style equipment. 

The small balls stopped manufacture in the mid 70’s. So about 45-50 years old. 

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
18 minutes ago, Beastie said:

That was what was claimed

The ball and club didn't add anywhere close to 100 yards. Nowhere close.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, iacas said:

The ball and club didn't add anywhere close to 100 yards. Nowhere close.

I don’t believe it myself. I just checked back and there is no data on swing speed. With a modern ball Crossfields best persimmon was 244 carry, vs 277 with a modern driver. 

Do you have any numbers you feel are more representative?

This guy shows a ten yard drop off between an old titleist and a pro v1, which fits better with my experience. The driver was a similar percentage drop to Crossfields

modern-vs-classic-golf-clubs.jpg

A lot has changed in the golf equipment world over the past several decades. Recently we...

 

Edited by Beastie
Spelling and other uselessness

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

DJ hit Nicklaus’ persimmon 290. So nowhere near 100 yards.

 

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Beastie said:

I don’t believe it myself. I just checked back and there is no data on swing speed. With a modern ball Crossfields best persimmon was 244 carry, vs 277 with a modern driver. 

Do you have any numbers you feel are more representative?

This guy shows a ten yard drop off between an old titleist and a pro v1, which fits better with my experience. The driver was a similar percentage drop to Crossfields

modern-vs-classic-golf-clubs.jpg

A lot has changed in the golf equipment world over the past several decades. Recently we...

 

 

I have a big problem with this test. Why is the club speed so different between the clubs? It really doesn't seem fair. It is even significantly different between the balls.

Edit*

Didn't know this was on a monitor that doesn't actually measure club speed, just guesses.

Edited by Bonvivant
  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 hours ago, Beastie said:

The small balls stopped manufacture in the mid 70’s. So about 45-50 years old. 

I would swear they still made the Dunlop 65 small ball well into the 80's. But I can't find any information on-line to prove or disprove that. Just my memory which may not be all that reliable... what were we talking about?

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 hours ago, Bonvivant said:

I have a big problem with this test. Why is the club speed so different between the clubs? It really doesn't seem fair. It is even significantly different between the balls.

Edit*

Didn't know this was on a monitor that doesn't actually measure club speed, just guesses.

Well they are being a bit sneaky, the GC quad certainly measures club head speed, they just chose not to pass on the info. 

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2227 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 52 (30 Apr 26) - Had planned a solo round, got invited to be part of trio that included a fmr mini tour pro.  Was fun playing back a set of tees and having to stay in my game plan. Both were very engaging and encouraging in the round.  A good day in working through and making smarter shot choices. 
    • Day 576 - 2026-04-30 Put my playlist on and slowed down a little as things were meh. Mostly got to an exaggerated P6 and hit from there.
    • I mean, a golfer is trespassing and damaging property. So, golf rules don’t supersede state laws. 😉 Like, if it isn’t marked and is off golf property. The right thing to do is take an unplayable lie or take stroke and distance.  Also, this is a liability for the course. The homeowner could easily say the course is liable for damage done because they knowingly didn't mark their boundaries which allowed golfers to trespass and damage property. 
    • Interestingly enough, if the course (the Committee in Rules terms) doesn't mark the boundaries, there is nothing out of bounds.  I realize that neighboring homeowners would take a dim view of golfers whacking balls from their backyards, but that's what the Definition of Out of Bounds requires. "All areas outside the boundary edge of the course as defined by the Committee."
    • I had two events the past two days. Yesterday I was playing a course blind. Hit it solid. Hit 9/14 fairways, 12/18 greens, 34 putts. Many of those putts were the result of balls that were close-ish to the hole when they landed, but wound up a long way away once they'd finished rolling (backwards mainly). Then today, hit 11/13 fairways, 11/18 greens, 37 putts, and shot 80. 8 over par and it wasn't particularly pretty. My big problem today was my pitching. I was inside 100 yards of the hole and off the green on 9 occasions.  1st - drive to about 75 yards, fanned a 58 degree short and right. On the green, but a good 40 feet away and good two putt from there (so took 3) 2nd - laid up to a bunker and it's narrow past it, so had 165 in, missed it right with an 8 iron. Wet rough, chip from about 5 yards off the green and the club snagged. It got on the green, but only temporarily. Overcorrected a bit on the next one and hit it a bit firm and it rolled out to about 35 feet. Putt didn't break and it ran on a bit and I missed the one back (greens were fast and a little bumpy, which didn't help, but doesn't excuse either). (took 5 to get down from close to the green) 4th - had about 95 from the right rough, hit it on the green and two putts (3) 5th - 90 from the fairway, tugged it and it got a firm bounce, chipped on and hit what I thought was a decent chip, but it ran out down the hill and two putts from 20 feet (4) 7th - 65 from the fairway, significant upslope and hit it a bit hard, ran long left against the collar. Tried to blade a PW, but it got under a bit so didn't advance it anything like far enough. Made a good two putt from there (4) 11th - 63 from the fairway, hit a squirrelly pitch on the green and two putts (3) 12th - 75 from the semi-rough, caught it a bit clean and it wound up on the back edge. Putting down a tier and it ran 8 feet past (that was actually a really good putt and couldn't have done any better I don't think) and missed that (4) 13th - 55 from the fairway, overcorrected and hit the big ball before the small ball. Then made a stellar up and down from 25 yards short to an elevated green with a putter (3) 15th - down in three from a greenside bunker (3) That was it. The other 9 holes I hit it on the green from outside 100 yards. So on those 9 occasions, I took 32 shots to get in the hole. 3.56 average. Terrible. Reason I'm posting this in here is to see if anyone has any suggestions for how to work on my contact with pitch shots. I don't have access to a grass range. Only mats and it's easy off a mat. Partly I think my problem is I've hit it off mats so much this winter that I've lost my judgement on where the ball is versus the ground because of the leeway granted. Open to ideas. I also suspect that under pressure I stand a bit closer to it and then get steep and hit down on it and it puts me in a bad place, but I can't seem to get myself to not do that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.