Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, David in FL said:

So you'd vote against someone who you agree with on the issues, because you don't care for them as an individual?

It never ceases to amaze me hoe people can fail to understand what is at stake here...

It's no different than people voting for someone because of their race/color/sex or just to vote against someone else. Which possibly happens much more than any of us would really like to know. I'll just not vote instead of voting against someone because I don't agree with either of them.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, David in FL said:

So you'd vote against someone who you agree with on the issues, because you don't care for them as an individual?

It never ceases to amaze me hoe people can fail to understand what is at stake here...

Well, what if you follow your line of logic to the extreme - would you vote for a neo-Nazi or someone like that just because you agreed with more of their policies than the other side? There's clearly a line somewhere. 

Edited by drmevo

Posted

 

8 minutes ago, drmevo said:

Well, what if you follow your line of logic to the extreme - would you vote for a neo-Nazi or someone like that just because you agreed with more of their policies than the other side? There's clearly a line somewhere. 

 
I've stayed out of the fray this time, and will back off now too, except to say again, too many people don't understand what's at stake here.
 
17 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

It's no different than people voting for someone because of their race/color/sex or just to vote against someone else. Which possibly happens much more than any of us would really like to know. I'll just not vote instead of voting against someone because I don't agree with either of them.

Yep.  Equally silly.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
37 minutes ago, David in FL said:

So you'd vote against someone who you agree with on the issues, because you don't care for them as an individual?

It never ceases to amaze me hoe people can fail to understand what is at stake here...

9 times out of 10 I would agree with you. However, I'm split. Also, at the risk of sounding a little ignorant... I feel like it's a little foolish to assume that both of front-runners (especially) are saying what they're actually going to do. We all know it's horse crap. Pool your voters and stay within a tolerance of your party lines.

The issue I have to DT is that he is a PRIME, PERSONAL, and BUSINESS example of just this. He'll tell you exactly what you want to hear and then stab you in the back. He'll tell you it's not about him... but it's ALL about him. If I genuinely feel that way, with a substantial degree of confidence... wouldn't it be foolish for me to vote for him despite my issues? It's not like I side with his issues 95%. I'm fairly split to begin with.

HC, in my mind, is the lesser of two evils here.

23 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Yep.  Equally silly.

I'm sorry, but I think this is brutally ignorant, and also assumptive. 

I'm not choosing a candidate because they're pro choice or pro life... or their race/religion or any other bogus parameters. 

The fact I've said what I'll do shows that I do care about what's at stake. What's at stake are issues, and an issue needs a resolution or at least a motivation for resolution. NOT just "what they say." That's absurd. 

Do you honestly believe DT is saying what he actually thinks and WOULD do... on a lot of the issues...?

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, jkelley9 said:

9 times out of 10 I would agree with you. However, I'm split. Also, at the risk of sounding a little ignorant... I feel like it's a little foolish to assume that both of front-runners (especially) are saying what they're actually going to do. We all know it's horse crap. Pool your voters and stay within a tolerance of your party lines.

The issue I have to DT is that he is a PRIME, PERSONAL, and BUSINESS example of just this. He'll tell you exactly what you want to hear and then stab you in the back. He'll tell you it's not about him... but it's ALL about him. If I genuinely feel that way, with a substantial degree of confidence... wouldn't it be foolish for me to vote for him despite my issues? It's not like I side with his issues 95%. I'm fairly split to begin with.

HC, in my mind, is the lesser of two evils here.

I'm sorry, but I think this is brutally ignorant, and also assumptive. 

I'm not choosing a candidate because they're pro choice or pro life... or their race/religion or any other bogus parameters. 

The fact I've said what I'll do shows that I do care about what's at stake. What's at stake are issues, and an issue needs a resolution or at least a motivation for resolution. NOT just "what they say." That's absurd. 

Do you honestly believe DT is saying what he actually thinks and WOULD do... on a lot of the issues...?

I believe that they will both do as they say, and they are polar opposites.  One is free-market conservative, the other is liberal socialist.

I can't understand how anyone could honestly understand either one and still be "split" between the 2.

But in case anyone still doesn't get it, this election is about one thing only.  The Supreme Court.  Vote how you want the Supreme Court to look like for the next 20 years.  That's all there really is to it. 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, David in FL said:

I believe that they will both do as they say, and they are polar opposites.  One is free-market conservative, the other is liberal socialist.

I can't understand how anyone could honestly understand either one and still be "split" between the 2.

But in case anyone still doesn't get it, this election is about one thing only.  The Supreme Court.  Vote how you want the Supreme Court to look like for the next 20 years.  That's all there really is to it. 

Agreed. Easily the biggest issue for me.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 minutes ago, David in FL said:

So you'd vote against someone who you agree with on the issues, because you don't care for them as an individual?

It never ceases to amaze me hoe people can fail to understand what is at stake here...

I don't care which issues Trump or Hillary claim to support, neither of them have enough character to tell the truth - much less be President. And it's not like that bar has been set very high.

Character matters to some of us.

I can't wait for one of my Trump-supporting friends to blame me for handing the White House to Hillary (by voting 3rd party). The deal was sealed months ago when that nut-job became the republican nominee.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

I don't care which issues Trump or Hillary claim to support, neither of them have enough character to tell the truth - much less be President. And it's not like that bar has been set very high.

Character matters to some of us.

I can't wait for one of my Trump-supporting friends to blame me for handing the White House to Hillary (by voting 3rd party). The deal was sealed months ago when that nut-job became the republican nominee.

1.  If character matters, then you won't vote for any of the 4.

2.  Your 3rd party vote is gonna hurt Hill more than Trump so go for it brother.

Edited by Gunther

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

I don't care which issues Trump or Hillary claim to support, neither of them have enough character to tell the truth - much less be President. And it's not like that bar has been set very high.

Character matters to some of us.

I can't wait for one of my Trump-supporting friends to blame me for handing the White House to Hillary (by voting 3rd party). The deal was sealed months ago when that nut-job became the republican nominee.

Whatever you think, or want, one or the other is going to be president.  Period.  One of them is going to be nominating 3 Justices to the Supreme Court.  Climb on any high horse you like, but the bottom line is, whichever candidate wins, whoever voted for anyone other than the other "real" candidate, will have contributed to their victory, and to the Supreme Court makeup that results.  It's that simple.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why do people give a shit if a candidate is more "honest"? Sure, you don't want someone who's a complete liar, but I don't think candidness is even in the top 10 traits required to be a successful and effective politician.

I think it's just a way for people to vote for who they like more, without admitting it.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, Gunther said:

1.  If character matters, then you won't vote for any of the 4.

2.  Your 3rd party vote is gonna hurt Hill more than Trump so go for it brother.

Agree to some extent with #1. But Trump and Hillary are on another level.

You're simply wrong about your second point... "brother." I'd have voted for any of the other Republican candidates. So would a lot of republicans, IMO.

2 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Whatever you think, or want, one or the other is going to be president.  Period.  One of them is going to be nominating 3 Justices to the Supreme Court.  Climb on any high horse you like, but the bottom line is, whichever candidate wins, whoever voted for anyone other than the other "real" candidate, will have contributed to their victory, and to the Supreme Court makeup that results.  It's that simple.

"high horse"... really? I'm glad you like your candidate, Dave. Good luck with him.

3 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

Why do people give a shit if a candidate is more "honest"? Sure, you don't want someone who's a complete liar, but I don't think candidness is even in the top 10 traits required to be a successful and effective politician.

I think it's just a way for people to vote for who they like more, without admitting it.

You're asking why people give a shit about honesty? You're right, we should care more about how they look.

Damn, that doesn't help.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, JonMA1 said:

You're asking why people give a shit about honesty?

I am asking why people give a shit about perceived relative honesty between two individuals, when assessing their actual honesty is basically impossible, and both are (by definition) engaged in a profession that does not reward nor require honesty.

2 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

You're right, we should care more about how they look.

If those are the only two choices, that's probably just as good! :-P

Anyway, I wasn't trying to attack anyone personally - the "honesty" thing is just a pet peeve of mine.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

Agree to some extent with #1. But Trump and Hillary are on another level.

You're simply wrong about your second point... "brother." I'd have voted for any of the other Republican candidates. So would a lot of republicans, IMO.

"high horse"... really? I'm glad you like your candidate, Dave. Good luck with him.

You're asking why people give a shit about honesty? You're right, we should care more about how they look.

Damn, that doesn't help.

I'll make this easy for you.  Do you want a Supreme Court that believes in fiscal conservative principles, or fiscal socialist principles.  For the former, vote for Trump.  For the latter, vote for anyone else.

I didn't vote for a Trump in the primaries.  I think there were better conservative candidates,  but in the general election, there are only two candidates who can possibly win.   As I said, and sadly, you're demonstrating the point.  There are too many who just don't understand simple pragmatism.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

Anyway, I wasn't trying to attack anyone personally - the "honesty" thing is just a pet peeve of mine.

I understand your point that all politicians are dishonest to some degree. They promise the world during campaign speeches and often fail to deliver. It stopped surprising me long ago. As I posted earlier, I just feel like these two are way worse than typical.

Just now, David in FL said:

I'll make this easy for you.  Do you want a Supreme Court that believes in fiscal conservative principles, or fiscal socialist principles.  For the former, vote for Trump.  For the latter, vote for anyone else.

I didn't vote for a Trump in the primaries.  I think there were better conservative candidates,  but in the general election, there are only two candidates who can possibly win.   As I said, and sadly, you're demonstrating the point.  There are too many who just don't understand simple pragmatism.

Thanks for making it easy for me 'cause I'm too st-st-st-stupid to think for myself.

You think I'm happy with the prospect of liberal justices, changes to the 2nd amendment, bigger government, higher taxes, and 4 more years of "Obama"? You're right, there's nothing pragmatic about my decision other than to send a message to those who were so desperate for change that they'd offer this asshole as a candidate. You want to blame me for what happens, that's your opinion. I have a different one.

I really, really, really dislike Hillary and cannot vote for her, but I just don't trust this guy. I don't know what he would do if he got in. He was a democrat a few years ago, now he's just #@%ing insane.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
34 minutes ago, David in FL said:

I'll make this easy for you.  Do you want a Supreme Court that believes in fiscal conservative principles, or fiscal socialist principles.  For the former, vote for Trump.  For the latter, vote for anyone else.

You cant guarantee Trump will nominate a fiscally conservative judge. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

As I posted earlier, I just feel like these two are way worse than typical.

Fair enough. I tend to think they're just worse at hiding it!

 

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Hardspoon said:

I tend to think they're just worse at hiding it!

 

I think you hit the proverbial nail on the head.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

You cant guarantee Trump will nominate a fiscally conservative judge. 

Certainly.  Even more, I can guarantee that Hillary will nominate activist socialist judges.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.