Jump to content
IGNORED

Edel Torque Balanced vs Classic


brg1875
Note: This thread is 2343 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

I'm sold on doing an Edel putter fitting soon but all the places that fit near me only do the E-Series torque balanced putters and not the classic line. My question is, am I missing out by not having the opportunity to fit for a classic style putter? Also what are you opinions between the torque balanced (toe up) design compared to the classic? The torque balanced seems a little unconventional since it's new but I have the preconceived notion to go with the classic line because I'm not sure how tried and true the torque balanced and toe up truly is.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

I think that if…

  • you can be fit really well into the Torque Balanced line and…
  • if you like how the Torque Balanced line looks and functions…

… then get a Torque Balanced putter.

There are really only about nine "major" combinations though: three heads and three hosels. Beyond that you can only change the lie and the number of lines on the face. The ability to change the weight of the putter is even more limited than with the Classic line.

You're near Washington, DC so just see my pal Mike Dickson at Congressional:

Mike Dickson

Congressional Country Club
8500 River Road
Bethesda, MD 20817

Phone: 240-372-5644
mdicksonpga@gmail.com

Fitting Systems
Putters, Wedges

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/23/2016 at 8:27 PM, iacas said:

I think that if…

  • you can be fit really well into the Torque Balanced line and…
  • if you like how the Torque Balanced line looks and functions…

… then get a Torque Balanced putter.

There are really only about nine "major" combinations though: three heads and three hosels. Beyond that you can only change the lie and the number of lines on the face. The ability to change the weight of the putter is even more limited than with the Classic line.

You're near Washington, DC so just see my pal Mike Dickson at Congressional:

Mike Dickson

Congressional Country Club
8500 River Road
Bethesda, MD 20817

Phone: 240-372-5644
mdicksonpga@gmail.com

Fitting Systems
Putters, Wedges

 

On 10/23/2016 at 8:53 PM, brg1875 said:

Thanks for the feedback, I was already planning on giving him a call tomorrow to schedule!

I did the fitting with Mike, he was great.  I got both the classic putter and wedges.

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I know this is very subjective and will depend on the person putting but I'm sure @iacas can shed some light on this since he seems to be the resident Edel expert :beer:. In your experience have you seen any data on a SAM puttlab to prove that the torque balanced keeps the putter face more square at impact as advertised? I know personally I just need to test the putters and go with which one feels and rolls the best and I'm hoping Mike will have both styles so I can decide in person! When it comes down to it I'm a numbers geek doing research on the front end but at the same time paralysis by analysis can be the death of a golfer, luckily when I'm on the course I get into the zone and just play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
25 minutes ago, brg1875 said:

I know this is very subjective and will depend on the person putting but I'm sure @iacas can shed some light on this since he seems to be the resident Edel expert :beer:. In your experience have you seen any data on a SAM puttlab to prove that the torque balanced keeps the putter face more square at impact as advertised? I know personally I just need to test the putters and go with which one feels and rolls the best and I'm hoping Mike will have both styles so I can decide in person! When it comes down to it I'm a numbers geek doing research on the front end but at the same time paralysis by analysis can be the death of a golfer, luckily when I'm on the course I get into the zone and just play.

No.

I don't think the forces involved in putting are at all in play, and don't buy into the entire concept of torque-balanced this or that. The forces involved in a putter rotating around the shaft (or whatever) are very small, and on top of that, we reverse the direction we swing the club (backswing, downswing) which has the effect of helping to cancel out whatever those forces did in the backswing.

I think the Torque-Balanced line is good:

  • because they're lower priced than the Classic series.
  • because some people like how they look.
  • because some people will buy into the "torque stuff," and if they're more confident with it, cool.
  • because they're easier to fit and less likely to result in a putter that just looks "weird." :-)

If you fit into a Torque-Balanced putter and like how they look, great. They're good putters.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd rely on Erik on this subject.

I have a torque balanced E-1 because I aim this mallet great, even with an unobtrusive sight dot. My problem is not aim.

As discussed, there are weight limitations with the head - I think the head is 345g with the 9g weight, and 357 with the 21g weight. - you can quiet your hands/add weight with counterweights and the Big Dog grip that weights 120g.

If I were to counsel someone, I'd say see which putter you aim best, and if the torque balance presents limitations as to weight or other custom features, and you aim another as well - go with the more customization classic line

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, Mr. Desmond said:

As discussed, there are weight limitations with the head - I think the head is 345g with the 9g weight, and 357 with the 21g weight. - you can quiet your hands/add weight with counterweights and the Big Dog grip that weights 120g.

That's the other thing (I mentioned it earlier I think…?): we routinely fit people into heavier putters than is possible with the Torque Balanced line. Green speeds are faster these days than when the 33"/350g and 35"/330g head weight combination was created.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am an example of the torque options not being enough. We tried every single combination and we were not able to get my aim inside the cup. The fitter apologized and said he wouldn't sell me a putter that I couldn't aim correctly. Went to another guy who has the full fitting set and that's what was needed for me.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As to the torque balance tech, I can't tell you whether it makes a difference. Since I bought one, I wanted it to make a difference, but my results were inconclusive. I tested both types - non torque and torque - and I think it depends on your stroke and tempo whether it makes a difference as to whether the tech benefits you. Yes, so color me as not completely bought into it, but it may depend on the individual golfer.

I will say that my putts roll on line better with the torque balance than my previous classic Edel. And the shape is a better fit -- I can see the line so much better with a mallet. At the same time, I did not completely like the fit. Felt like I had to chase long putts at times -- and that's a problem. I am experimenting with the heavier 21g weight and the Big Dog grip and I don't feel the need to accelerate or chase now.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Scheduled for my fitting on Tuesday and the fitter should have both the classic and torque to try out. I'm pumped! Now the extremely hard decision of what engravings and color scheme :mellow:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, brg1875 said:

Scheduled for my fitting on Tuesday and the fitter should have both the classic and torque to try out. I'm pumped! Now the extremely hard decision of what engravings and color scheme :mellow:.

Not too many choices on the Torque Balance other than initials on the sole or choice of black/satin. Good luck.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...

To resurrect a thread, I've used a Directed Force Putter for 3 months - you remember it - the one that looks like a garden hoe. After 6 rounds, did not feel as if I was holing enough putts - I burned the hole so many times and distance control on longer putts was inconsistent. I aimed it well. Even on the practice green, I was not holing as many as I did with the Edel. WIth the DF, I had a lot of 2 putts and a couple of 3 putts per round, not enough 1 putts or bombs or even 10-15 footers - now part of that is my short game is not presently up to my standards - changing back to my Edel wedges - and putts have been to far to hole. But too many burners and not enough plunks.

But the DF taught me that the Edel E-1 I have with the heaviest weight was possibly a bit too heavy - I traded out the 21g wt for the 9g weight - took it to the practice green and started holing putts more often and closer. Will play it for a couple of months and compare.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/28/2016 at 9:52 AM, brg1875 said:

Scheduled for my fitting on Tuesday and the fitter should have both the classic and torque to try out. I'm pumped! Now the extremely hard decision of what engravings and color scheme :mellow:.

Well...don't leave us hanging...How did the fitting go?  Did you buy a putter?   Details...

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2343 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • So the biggest issue right now is marrying the hands down with an athletic turn. I can get stuck not turning. Things get interesting from there. 
    • Wordle 1,040 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Hi everybody!  I am new to the golf game. I have taken some lessons and got fitted for clubs a couple of months ago. I usually score between 110-120 for 18 holes.  I bought a Stealth driver last year and have been hitting consistently with it 210-230 yds on the simulator. But when I take it out on the course, every drive is a severe slice!  I played 18 holes yesterday at the club where I belong. I removed the driver from my bag and used the 5 iron to drive with. I hit straight 16 out of 18 drives, 180 - 200 yds. I used the 5i - putter for the rest of my game.  I ended the day with a 92. Question: Does it make sense for me to continue playing with irons only until I get further along in my game before I reintroduce the Driver and woods again? Or should I continue to struggle with the Driver and woods and shoot in the 100’s again? To me it’s a no brainer, but for those more advanced I am interested to get feedback.
    • Thank you, currently I only had the 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 irons in the bag. I was never finding myself in a situation to use the 4 and 5 so I dropped those a while ago. The 60W is what I've been practicing with the most in the back yard, but that's only with short chipping. I don't think I've ever practiced hitting my wedges at 80% - 100% apart from yesterday. Maybe I should be doing that more. Generally I would be using a 9 iron if I was out about 75 yards or so. I am not really sure I understand your mention of the 60W and 3H. Aren't these going to be giving me completely different results? Unfortunately I am not able to adjust the loft on the hybrids I have. I looked into the Shot Scope H4 you suggested and this seems really neat and handy, however I am struggling to understand how it works. Am I correct in assuming it doesn't track the ball distance until you hit the ball a second time? Say I drive from the tee and walk up to my ball, tag the next club and hit the ball. Is it at this point when I tag my next club while standing next to my ball that is knows the distance? Thank you, I am going to give the local shop a call and check their prices and see what they can offer.
    • Do you know what their handicaps are? The handicap system isn't perfect and given the higher variance from higher handicaps, I think low handicap players would be expected to win maybe 60% of their matches? I'm not exactly sure what that number is and it will vary with the handicap difference, but if they're generally very low handicaps, then they might be at 60% likely to win a game. Given it's 16 vs 16, that's a lot of games to win. If it's 60%, then that's around an 80% chance that they'll win a given match. At 80% chance of winning, 21 wins in a row is about 1 in 108 times. Pretty unlikely, but not unheard of. It's pretty sensitive to what that individual win percentage is too. If it's 65%, then 21 wins is about 1 in 9. If it's 55%, then 21 wins is 1 in about 5,700. Clearly it's not as simple as this because that win likelihood is going to change match to match as they play lower handicap teams or higher handicap teams, but I don't think it's a "yes they're cheating" thing at all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...