Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was recently given a TM M1 460 driver. It had been hit a few times, but was as-new. I tried it for one round. I at first hit very poor shots - low slices. Eventually, I got the drives to go straight, but distance no better than my R9 driver. Then I found that the club had an S shaft!

From reviews it seemed that even if I changed shaft, the M1 may not be right for me (senior, 12-13 index) good drive about 220yds??

Should I return club so someone younger and stronger can make use of it, or would it likely work for me if it had an R shaft?   R-9 is a bit beat up, but still works for me.

By the way - is it easy to change the shaft?


Posted

What is the loft of the M1 head, and which model S-shaft do you have?

If you're making good contact but getting low distance, the shaft may be too stiff. I tried some stiff shafted drivers at Christmas - straight as an arrow, 190-200 yards:cry: every time.

Changing out the shaft would be easy, if it had the hosel adjustor tip for the M1.

M1 Promos  claim it will fit a wide range of golfers, but you would need the right shaft, and swing.

The M1 comes with three stock shaft options, and 12 loft-and-lie hosel combinations, and movable weights in the head. Lots of variations to dial in.

Best way to tell what to do? Get on a launch monitor with a fitter, and see what the numbers say. Another driver might be better. If not, a good fitter could help you get M1 adjusted right.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Shaft is an OZIK White Tie MFS 60X4 S High launch.

It is a 9.5. Set at present 1 div higher than normal on hosel adjuster.

At present, my old R-9 driver is the club in my bag that I hit best, so it might be best to just give this driver back (Even although it is tempting to keep it and maybe trade for an M2)

 


Posted

I had the ozik red tie mfs 60 stiff in my driver for a lil while until i got my motore f1 x-stiff 70 gram shaft back from my bro in law and it was a decent shaft but a lil too lite for my taste but if you do want to change it and dont want to buy a new adapter hit me up and ill walk you through it bud.. Its not that hard but it can be a lil nerve racking the first time you do it


Posted

How does it feel when you hit it? Might get better ball flight with swing changes.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Valleygolfer said:

How does it feel when you hit it? Might get better ball flight with swing changes.

To be honest, I didn't like the feel or sound of it compared with my other drivers. But it does "look" good :) 

M1  was given to me to try out and keep if I want it. So probably best to just return it. Someone else will get to enjoy it. 

Thanks for the input.

Edited by grahambm

Posted
On 11/10/2016 at 4:35 PM, grahambm said:

I was recently given a TM M1 460 driver. It had been hit a few times, but was as-new. I tried it for one round. I at first hit very poor shots - low slices. Eventually, I got the drives to go straight, but distance no better than my R9 driver. Then I found that the club had an S shaft!

From reviews it seemed that even if I changed shaft, the M1 may not be right for me (senior, 12-13 index) good drive about 220yds??

Should I return club so someone younger and stronger can make use of it, or would it likely work for me if it had an R shaft?   R-9 is a bit beat up, but still works for me.

By the way - is it easy to change the shaft?

I replaced my shaft in the R15 3 wood. It is a monster now. You just go and get your local fitting studio to fit you with a shaft that is perfect for you.

Taylormade M4 10.5* (turned down to 8.5*)
Ping G410 LST 3 Wood
Ping G410 5 wood
Titleist F2 7 woods
Ping G graphite irons 5 - PW  Black Dot
Ping Gorged Glide Wedges - 50, 54, 58
Directed Force Reno 2.0 Putter
What an amazing game this is.


Posted

If you haven't already made your decision why can't you match the shaft of your go to driver to this new one? Seems to me that would be the fairest comparison. If that still didn't match or exceed your current driver you could then explore loft. I don't believe you mentioned the loft of your current driver. 

  • Upvote 1

Posted

I didn't need a new driver, but having been given a very good one, I was quite excited to try it. But with stiff shaft that didn't work out for me. A replacement shaft for this driver costs more than I would have to pay for a top condition pre-owned like the Aeroburner. And I would be stuck with the new shaft it if I still didn't like the club. 

So have decided to stick with R9 and rather work on my swing (and flexibilty/fitness!)

Thanks again


Posted (edited)

SImple answer from another senior - give it back.

Get a lighter, more forgiving, higher lofted driver with an appropriate shaft.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Good decision to stick with what has been working.  Since you are not long, neither am I, the improvement the new equipment will give you will  probably be marginal at best.

Not worth the hassle to swap out the shaft for a few extra yards.  Especially if you end up not really liking it after all of that.

John

Edited by 70sSanO
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.