Jump to content
IGNORED

Is Golf Ball Fitting Beneficial For The Average Player?


Note: This thread is 2585 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, 1badbadger said:

If this is true, then club fitting would be purely entertainment also and make no difference.  We could all use different clubs every time we played with no measurable effect on our score.  I'm not so sure all the time, money and effort that has gone towards studying the benefits of club fitting and developing custom club programs and fitting carts and training techs how to conduct a club fitting session would have been spent if it's all just "entertainment".

Now, will there be a huge difference between the e6 and e7 for the average player?  No.  They are both 3 piece distance balls with the same type of cover, so the differences are not huge.  Noticeable, but not huge.  The difference between an e6 and a Pro V1 though will be dramatic.  And the number of players that played the Pro V that have been recommended the e6 are in the tens of thousands.  Not only is there a difference in the performance of those balls, but when you factor in the tendencies of the player the results can be substantial.  If a 10-15 yard gain won't have any affect on the average player's score, then you wouldn't mind if you had to give up 10-15 yards of distance off your drives and 5-7 off your irons, correct?  How would it affect your score if you had to tee off 25 yds  further back on every hole?  I'm guessing it would cost at least a couple of shots.

Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  

I never said clubs don't matter. Clubs can make a huge difference for both hackers and pros. You simply agreed with me but brought up clubs being unimportant which I never stated. 

Whst I'm saying (perhaps poorly) is that yes, even I see big differences between my floater range balls and a ProV1, BS e, Callaway Soft, etc. But with all the variables in a human golf swing, especially a poor golfer, thinking you can be fitted to one excellent ball over the other seems suspect to me at best. Iron Byron I'm sure can be set to where each swing is virtually identical, club head speed, smash factor, AoA, hardly the case with a human. If Iron Byron could show that 'X' ball consistently went farther than 'y' ball without using an extreme difference, then I would say yes...that ball will get me more distance. I'm just having some fun with this. I prefer to have a ball that can spin like crazy into the green, but still give me distance. So when I hit a SW onto the green and the ball rolls out....I don't immediately think I have the wrong ball, I assume I didn't hit the ball properly to generate spin. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
3 hours ago, Vinsk said:

First, you and Mike are not 'average golfers' by any means. You've seen ball fittings get 'someone' 15-20 yards? Who? A 20hcp or someone like yourself? Was it an extreme ball change?

No. Mid-level vs. premium ball. Not lower level (or super distance ball) vs. premium or anything more than one step away.

3 hours ago, Vinsk said:

Unlike golfers of your caliber, the average golfer has varying swings that can produce awful and fantastic results all in one round.

That doesn't mean you can't optimize for the average.

3 hours ago, Vinsk said:

You can't possibly believe a 20hcp would test 30 balls and consistently Choose one as better than the rest. Come on Erik....

The average… And if a ball spins more, then almost every shot will curve more.

2 hours ago, 1badbadger said:

Can @iacas shoot 75 with his wife's clubs?  Probably.  That doesn't mean that the equipment doesn't matter.  He would certainly need to make adjustments in his swing to hit them, which is hard to repeat precisely, so it would limit him from playing his best.  

Right. I'd have to change up my swing, etc. And I'd likely never shoot 70.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'd like to read more on the technology of ball making. What seems difficult to me is that a ball can have 'low spin with the driver but great spin around the greens'. I remember playing with the Balatas 100 and if I skulled it the cover would have a big smile in it. Did the Balata become undesirable because it wasn't great for distance? Does a ball fitting use equipment to tell how much spin a player is getting in regards to short game? Since I assume this is done inside...is there an rpm measurement that tells you the ball is going to work well for you in regards to spin/control on short game shots?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here is a ball fitting philosophy...

https://www.snellgolf.com/pages/dean-snell-golf-ball-fitting-philosophy

Dean states where he thinks a 15 handicap should spend alot of time fitting (although a 15 is better than the average golfer, IMO).

He also implies the driver is the least important area to focus on in a ball fitting.

Edited by Denny Bang Bang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

He also implies the driver is the least important area to focus on in a ball fitting.

I mostly play premium golf balls. With that being said, most premium golf balls perform very similar off wedges. I rather fit my golf ball to my driver and irons knowing that the short game and putting differences will be negligible. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I mostly play premium golf balls. With that being said, most premium golf balls perform very similar off wedges. I rather fit my golf ball to my driver and irons knowing that the short game and putting differences will be negligible. 

 

You're also far better than the average golfer, according to your handicap.  But I do understand your point.

 I find it interesting to read the different opinions, from both the experts (Bridgestone, Snell, Titleist), and non-experts such as ourselves.  There are certainly some different opinions, most having some validity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

With that being said, most premium golf balls perform very similar off wedges. I rather fit my golf ball to my driver and irons knowing that the short game and putting differences will be negligible. 

Yep, I feel the same way. All "tour performance" premium line of balls will work well enough around/on the greens, I want the ball that works best for me with the full shots.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
9 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I'd like to read more on the technology of ball making. What seems difficult to me is that a ball can have 'low spin with the driver but great spin around the greens'.

Because the shorter shots interact primarily with the cover, while the longer shots interact primarily with the core.

It's like in table tennis you can have a fast rubber that spins a lot, a fast rubber that doesn't spin much, a slow rubber that spins a lot, or a slow rubber that doesn't spin much.

Speed comes from the core (the layers and thickness and the padding, whether you've speed glued it, etc.) while spin comes from the tackiness and softness of the outer layer… because when you spin the ball you're giving it a glancing blow, and so you don't compress down into the lower layers (or core), just like a golf ball.

Slower shots with more loft or AoA relative to the face rely on the cover, while faster swings with more straight faces rely on the core or lower levels of the rubber/padding.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I never said clubs don't matter. Clubs can make a huge difference for both hackers and pros. You simply agreed with me but brought up clubs being unimportant which I never stated. 

Whst I'm saying (perhaps poorly) is that yes, even I see big differences between my floater range balls and a ProV1, BS e, Callaway Soft, etc. But with all the variables in a human golf swing, especially a poor golfer, thinking you can be fitted to one excellent ball over the other seems suspect to me at best. Iron Byron I'm sure can be set to where each swing is virtually identical, club head speed, smash factor, AoA, hardly the case with a human. If Iron Byron could show that 'X' ball consistently went farther than 'y' ball without using an extreme difference, then I would say yes...that ball will get me more distance. I'm just having some fun with this. I prefer to have a ball that can spin like crazy into the green, but still give me distance. So when I hit a SW onto the green and the ball rolls out....I don't immediately think I have the wrong ball, I assume I didn't hit the ball properly to generate spin. 

What I meant was. how can you claim ball fitting is purely entertainment and has no real effect for the average player but clubs and club fitting does?  

I agree this is a fun debate...I enjoy talking about it with others!  And I don't take it personally, but there is a lot of misinformation and confusion out there that I am in a position to dispel.  Most people form their opinions or beliefs off of what someone else said who may have never even attended a ball fitting event!  I have personally conducted in excess of 12,000 fittings so I have more insight than the average person and am glad to share my knowledge with others.

For example, robotic testing with an Iron Byron is done extensively during the development of a golf ball, and it is invaluable because it does repeat exactly the same every time, but there are still variables involved.  When a comparison between two golf balls is conducted, it's not as cut-and-dried as people think.  I would get asked every day "how much longer is this ball with the robot", and there isn't a good way to answer that question.  If the robot is set up with a 10.5* driver with a regular flex shaft and programmed to swing 85 mph, the results will be different than if an 8.5* driver with a stiff flex swung at 100 mph was used.  The launch angle, spin rates, and trajectory will be different, so the same ball might be longer in both tests, but by a different amount.  What surprises most people is a ball fitting makes the biggest difference for mid to high handicappers than it does for better players.  Their swings may not be as consistent but their tendencies are greater. 

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Assuming that everyone pretty much agrees that there are differences in the performance of different balls, and that there are wildly varying swings amongst golfers, how could it not be helpful to objectively evaluate how various balls perform for you individually?

  • Upvote 2

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I'd like to read more on the technology of ball making. What seems difficult to me is that a ball can have 'low spin with the driver but great spin around the greens'. I remember playing with the Balatas 100 and if I skulled it the cover would have a big smile in it. Did the Balata become undesirable because it wasn't great for distance? Does a ball fitting use equipment to tell how much spin a player is getting in regards to short game? Since I assume this is done inside...is there an rpm measurement that tells you the ball is going to work well for you in regards to spin/control on short game shots?

The phenomenon of a ball with low spin off the driver yet high spin off short irons and wedges is called "spin separation".  This is a benefit of the modern solid core, multi-layer ball (3, 4, 5-piece models).  With the driver and other long clubs the ball is deformed at impact, and more deformation means less spin.  With shorter clubs the ball isn't deformed as much, so the type of material used for the cover largely determines spin.  2-piece balls don't have this performance feature. 

Balata is a natural material found in Balata trees and was becoming harder to get,  About the same time better methods were developed for testing and a better understanding of ball flight was emerging.  Like you mentioned, if you looked at a balata ball the wrong way you could put a smile in it, so it was not very durable, it spun too much and often would go out of round. Urethane is better in every aspect as the replacement for balata.  It's more durable, and believe it or not it's actually softer than balata but more consistent.  

One of the challenges with ball fitting is developing a good method for testing irons and wedge data.  Bridgestone was going to start implementing irons into the fitting process, but it didn't happen.  The big issue at the time was because the launch monitors they used were the type that captures images of the ball at impact, so the ball had to be placed on a specific spot each shot.  This worked fine when hitting a driver off a tee, but when an iron shot is hit off of turf and a divot is created the ball can't be placed on that spot anymore.  Research was done on artificial mats and a very good design was found and an order was placed for 30 of them I believe, but before they were delivered the company went out of business. To answer your question, I don't know of any data on what the ideal amount of spin or rpms are for short game shots.  There are so many variables that it would be difficult to determine.  

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2585 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...