Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3139 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Hmmmm! Good point! That would make the clubface point left at address.

fitter told me that was an issue with hybrids. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
On 4/29/2017 at 10:23 PM, Buckeyebowman said:

That sounds about right. Offset helps lesser player square the clubface at impact. The clubface arrives at the ball just a fraction of a second later than the shaft does.

I don't think that's the reason at all. I think it's that offset makes people tend to line up left. The math doesn't really work for the "fraction of a second" idea.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, iacas said:

I don't think that's the reason at all. I think it's that offset makes people tend to line up left. The math doesn't really work for the "fraction of a second" idea.

Lets not do that math again ;-)

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
10 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Lets not do that math again ;-)

It's pretty simple:

A ton of offset gets you at most about an extra 1/3° of "closing."

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/21/2017 at 2:45 PM, onthehunt526 said:

It seems to me, in my travels, most hybrids have a draw bias. I'm not in the market for new ones but it just seems that way. I know most "Pro" or "Tour" models have less of a draw bias, but can anyone tell me why that is? My miss is left with the hybrid(s). Is there anyway to counteract this?

Assuming that hybrids do indeed have a draw bias, it would probably be because hybrids are aimed at the players who have a more difficult time getting the ball in the air with long irons. The golfers who have the most difficulty getting the ball into the air with long irons, and thus are most likely to use hybrids, tend to be higher handicap players (though there are still plenty of single digit and plus handicaps using hybrids). Higher handicap players, on the whole, tend to slice the golf ball. The draw bias is intended to help the majority of their market, which is the average golfer who goes out to the course every so often (either once a week or a couple times a year) and is battling a slice like the majority of golfers do. 

Offset on the majority of the irons that are widely marketed serves a similar purpose as a draw bias would. The offset creates an optical illusion that causes the golfer to line up with the clubface slightly closed, which is beneficial for golfers who slice the ball since it means they're getting a little bit of help right off the bat. These irons, such as the PING G irons or the Taylormade M2 irons, are the ones that are marketed the most heavily since they will generally be the best fit for the majority of golfers since they're forgiving and help with a very common problem.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3139 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.