Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3134 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Article in the NY Times today entitled "Want to Make More Baskets? Science Has the Answer" - read it here: https://nyti.ms/2qyjf6k

Seems obvious, and explains why many pros often say they swing only 80% or so.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah, 80%, but those pros are still hitting it 340. If you slow down to try and steer the ball straight? not gonna happen. I will take the same swing and choke down a couple of inches and tee it lower, or use a 3 wood off the tee.


Posted
11 minutes ago, RayG said:

Yeah, 80%, but those pros are still hitting it 340. If you slow down to try and steer the ball straight? not gonna happen. I will take the same swing and choke down a couple of inches and tee it lower, or use a 3 wood off the tee.

PGA Tour average is under 300 yards with the driver. 

They say 80%, but that is a feel. It could be they are swinging at 95%. Unless it is measured then I would be skeptical. That is more of an old golf adage than fact. 

  • Upvote 2

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Flawed swings don't slow down well. Which highlights why golf is harder than throwing. By a lot. 

Golf uses every sport as an analogy and no other sports use golf as an analogy. Wonder why that is. 


Posted
3 hours ago, chspeed said:

Seems obvious, and explains why many pros often say they swing only 80% or so.

Nothing more than a "feel".

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, saevel25 said:

PGA Tour average is under 300 yards with the driver. 

They say 80%, but that is a feel. It could be they are swinging at 95%. Unless it is measured then I would be skeptical. That is more of an old golf adage than fact. 

If you are referring to the PGA driving distance stat, not all of those tee shots are with driver.  I wouldn't be surprised if tour average with driver is over 300 yards.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, No Mulligans said:

If you are referring to the PGA driving distance stat, not all of those tee shots are with driver.  I wouldn't be surprised if tour average with driver is over 300 yards.

I would think they would select holes that people use their driver on.  


Posted
2 minutes ago, SunkTheBirdie said:

I would think they would select holes that people use their driver on.  

Hard to do.  Take Stenson, last year he seldom used his driver on long holes, he used his 3w the majority of the time.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

If you are referring to the PGA driving distance stat, not all of those tee shots are with driver.  I wouldn't be surprised if tour average with driver is over 300 yards.

Trackman has the average ball speed for the Driver at 167 mph. When hit optimally the carry distance is 295 yards.

Far away from your claim of 340. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
12 hours ago, chspeed said:

Seems obvious, and explains why many pros often say they swing only 80% or so.

As others said, 80% is a feel. They're swinging at 90-95%.

7 hours ago, No Mulligans said:

If you are referring to the PGA driving distance stat, not all of those tee shots are with driver.  I wouldn't be surprised if tour average with driver is over 300 yards.

It's not. They measure driving distance on holes where players are pretty much hitting driver.

@RayG, If you just gave them a 60-yard wide grid and told them it was a long drive contest, you might get the average to 340. Maybe even "probably." But that's not golf.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, SunkTheBirdie said:

Flawed swings don't slow down well. Which highlights why golf is harder than throwing. By a lot

The article is talking about professionals. Golf is hard, but so is throwing across the diamond to first base in time to beat a world-class sprinter going up the line. :)

14 minutes ago, iacas said:

If you just gave them a 60-yard wide grid and told them it was a long drive contest, you might get the average to 340. Maybe even "probably." But that's not golf.

I think this was what the point. When throwing, good athletes and professionals naturally tune their motions to find the right mix of speed and accuracy, with slower speeds usually leading to better accuracy. It's funny that one exception the researchers found was cricket. The study did not look at the golf swing, so it may not apply at all. I just thought it was interesting.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Trackman has the average ball speed for the Driver at 167 mph. When hit optimally the carry distance is 295 yards.

Far away from your claim of 340. 

My claim of 340, where is that?

And carry distance?  I said distance (as in total distance).

Edited by No Mulligans
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

My claim of 340, where is that?

And carry distance?  I said distance (as in total distance).

Sorry, my bad. I got you mixed up with another. :8)

Carry distance matters more. It's more consistent to track actual distance. Roll out is not consistent on the course. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A slower club head speed, made possible by gripping down on the shaft, might be a better discription for "....slower for more accuracy...." 

  • Upvote 1

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think that Ben Hogan always said "to save a little or hold something back" on your swing. I have always tried to keep that in mind. I figured he would know. It always felt like about 80% to me but after a club fitting (launch monitor etc.) it looks like I swing more towards 90% than 80%. Just my personal results. I would like to go back and try to swing at 80% and see what the results would be. It seems like a very slow motion swing based on my 90% swing. That feels pretty smooth and slow.

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Bucki1968 said:

I think that Ben Hogan always said "to save a little or hold something back" on your swing. I have always tried to keep that in mind. I figured he would know. It always felt like about 80% to me but after a club fitting (launch monitor etc.) it looks like I swing more towards 90% than 80%. Just my personal results. I would like to go back and try to swing at 80% and see what the results would be. It seems like a very slow motion swing based on my 90% swing. That feels pretty smooth and slow.

In Five Lessons Hogan said he hits better when he hits hard and full due to muscles being stretched the same every time.

Personally I like to swing comfortably on course.  No idea percentage compared to max.

 

Edited by Jack Watson

Posted

grasp of sarcasm seems to be a bit limited around here sometimes...


Posted

idk bout swinging slower but you can slow down ur back swing and then down swing u can attack it as hard as u want. slower ur back swing easier to get the club in ur back swing be more on plane. 

WITB:
Taylormade M2 - 10.5º 
Taylormade M2 - 3w 15º
Callaway - Apex CF16 9i-3i
Vokey - 46º F Grind
Taylormade MG - 54º, 60º   
Scotty Cameron - Newport M1  - 4.5º
Taylormade - TP5X #7
 


Note: This thread is 3134 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.