Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3057 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Played in district Senior championship (age 64-69) with a 2.7 HDCP player. He was about 5-foot-9, 150 lbs., and in pretty good shape physically.

Round 2 was veeeery slow, so those of us in our threesome game quick golf clinics to each other on the nature-goals of our swing.

Mr. 2.7 said he had shoulder surgery 10 years ago, and found that a shorter swing was easier to control, and easier to do. He had maybe a 3/4 swing at most, and hit solid trap draws with his irons and hybrids. His driver and woods flew in a high draw. His swing was smooth and effortless, with lots of acceleration through impact.

Another older buy I played with had a spinny flat swing, with the clubhead maybe coming up to ear level on backswing. It was an armsy followthrough, but he got a consistent low draw that ran out for decent yardage. Nothing you would want to teach a 10-year-old, but it worked for him.

Edited by WUTiger

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hope this doesn't come across as a snide remark, I really don't mean it that way. 

In answer to the question, "should I shorten my back swing as a senior?" I would say no.  Your back swing will shorten itself.   If you take as good a turn as you can and stay connected, that's all you need to do.   Your back swing will be whatever it can be. 

I'm not an instructor, I am just another hacker, but from my observation, almost everyone who talks about "shortening their back swing" really just needs to stay connected.   Their arms are coming loose at the top.

 

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
19 minutes ago, Marty2019 said:

I hope this doesn't come across as a snide remark, I really don't mean it that way. 

In answer to the question, "should I shorten my back swing as a senior?" I would say no.  Your back swing will shorten itself.   If you take as good a turn as you can and stay connected, that's all you need to do.   Your back swing will be whatever it can be. 

I'm not an instructor, I am just another hacker, but from my observation, almost everyone who talks about "shortening their back swing" really just needs to stay connected.   Their arms are coming loose at the top.

 

I would add to keep working on the flexibility too. They may not be able to increase range of motion much, but they can stop it from getting shorter.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/28/2017 at 7:07 AM, Marty2019 said:

I hope this doesn't come across as a snide remark, I really don't mean it that way. 

In answer to the question, "should I shorten my back swing as a senior?" I would say no.  Your back swing will shorten itself.   If you take as good a turn as you can and stay connected, that's all you need to do.   Your back swing will be whatever it can be. 

I'm not an instructor, I am just another hacker, but from my observation, almost everyone who talks about "shortening their back swing" really just needs to stay connected.   Their arms are coming loose at the top.

 

I can agree with this. A strike delivered solidly into the back of the ball will outperform any glancing blow from a loopy swing! 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3057 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.